Does validity matter for policymakers? Evidence from choice experiments on urban green

References

• Arrow, Kenneth, Robert Solow, Paul Portney, Edward Leamer, Roy Radner, and Howard Schuman. 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register.
   Google Scholar
• Beery, Thomas, Sanna Stålhammar, K. Ingemar Jönsson, Christine Wamsler, Torleif Bramryd, Ebba Brink, Nils Ekelund, Michael Johansson, Thomas Palo, and Per Schubert. 2016. “Perceptions of the Ecosystem Services Concept: Opportunities and Challenges in the Swedish Municipal Context.” Ecosystem Services 17 (February): 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, John C., and John B. Loomis. 2017. “Economic Valuation of River Restoration: An Analysis of the Valuation Literature and Its Uses in Decision-Making.” Water Resources and Economics 17 (January): 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.wre.2016.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Richard C. 2018. Warm glow, good feelings, and contingent valuation. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 43 (3): 307–320. doi:10.22004/AG.ECON.276497.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Richard C., and Kevin J. Boyle. 2019. “Reliability and Validity in Nonmarket Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 72 (2): 559–582. doi:10.1007/s10640-017-0215-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, Richard T. 2012. “‘Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative When Prices Aren’t Available’.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 27–42. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehnhardt, Alexandra. 2013. “‘Decision-Makers’ Attitudes Towards Economic Valuation – a Case Study of German Water Management Authorities’.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 2 (2): 201–221. doi:10.1080/21606544.2013.766483.
   Google Scholar
• Desvousges, William, Kristy Mathews, and Kenneth Train. 2012. “Adequate Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 84 (December): 121–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Desvousges, William H., F. Reed Johnson, Richard W. Dunford, Sara P. Hudson, K. Nicole Wilson, and Kevin J. Boyle. 1993. “Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability.” In Contributions to Economic Analysis, 220, 91–164. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-81469-2.50009-2.
   Google Scholar
• Forkink, Annet. 2017. “Benefits and Challenges of Using an Assessment of Ecosystem Services Approach in Land-Use Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (11): 2071–2084. doi:10.1080/09640568.2016.1273098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forkink, Annet. 2019. “Opportunities for Improving the Use of an Ecosystem Services Approach in Land-Use Planning: Experiences of Professionals in Florida.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (11): 1949–1971. doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1523786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, Harry, and James Burrows. 2017. “Hypothetical Bias: A New Meta-Analysis.” In Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods, edited by Daniel McFadden, and Kenneth Train, 270–291. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781786434692.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Gowan, Charles, Kurt Stephenson, and Leonard Shabman. 2006. “The Role of Ecosystem Valuation in Environmental Decision Making: Hydropower Relicensing and Dam Removal on the Elwha River.” Ecological Economics 56 (4): 508–523. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haab, Timothy C., Matthew G. Interis, Daniel R. Petrolia, and John C. Whitehead. 2013. “‘from Hopeless to Curious? Thoughts on Hausman’s “Dubious to Hopeless” Critique of Contingent Valuation’.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 35 (4): 593–612. doi:10.1093/aepp/ppt029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, Nick, and Mikołaj Czajkowski. 2019. “The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 13 (2): 248–266. doi:10.1093/reep/rez005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, Jerry A. 1996. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. 2. Impr. Contributions to Economic Analysis 220. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Jerry. 2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 43–56. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES. 2022. “Methodological Assessment of the Diverse Values and Valuation of Nature of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Zenodo. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.6522522.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Robert J., Kevin J. Boyle, Wiktor (Vic) Adamowicz, Jeff Bennett, Roy Brouwer, Trudy Ann Cameron, W. Michael Hanemann, et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405. doi:10.1086/691697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanninen, Barbara J. 2007. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. The Economics of Non-Market Goods and Resources, v. 8. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, Catherine L, Daniel J Phaneuf, and Jinhua Zhao. 2012. “From Exxon to BP: Has Some Number Become Better than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 3–26. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurans, Yann, Aleksandar Rankovic, Raphael Bille, Romain Pirard, and Laurent Mermet. 2013. “Use of Ecosystem Services Economic Valuation for Decision Making: Questioning a Literature Blindspot.” Journal of Environmental Management 119 (January): 208–219. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mariel, Petr. 2010. “Contingent Valuation: Past, Present and Future.” Prague Economic Papers 19 (4): 329–343. doi:10.18267/j.pep.380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariel, Petr, David Hoyos, Jürgen Meyerhoff, Mikolaj Czajkowski, Thijs Dekker, Klaus Glenk, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, et al. 2021. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3.
   Google Scholar
• Marre, Jean-Baptiste, Olivier Thebaud, Sean Pascoe, Sarah Jennings, Jean Boncoeur, and Louisa Coglan. 2015. “The Use of Ecosystem Services Valuation in Australian Coastal Zone Management.” Marine Policy 56 (June): 117–124. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.02.011.
   Google Scholar
• Marre, Jean-Baptiste, Olivier Thebaud, Sean Pascoe, Sarah Jennings, Jean Boncoeur, and Louisa Coglan. 2016. “Is Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Useful to Decision-Makers? Lessons Learned from Australian Coastal and Marine Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 178 (January): 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFadden, Daniel, and Kenneth Train. 2017. Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: A Comprehensive Critique. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Messonier, Mark, John Bergstrom, Christopher Cornwell, Jeff Teasley, and Ken Cordell. 2000. “Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (May): 438–450. doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Mouter, Niek. 2017. “‘Dutch Politicians’ Use of Cost–Benefit Analysis’.” Transportation 44 (5): 1127–1145. doi:10.1007/s11116-016-9697-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primmer, Eeva, Heli Saarikoski, and Arild Vatn. 2018. “An Empirical Analysis of Institutional Demand for Valuation Knowledge.” Ecological Economics 152 (October): 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.017.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Abbie A., Marit E. Kragt, Fiona L. Gibson, Michael P. Burton, Elizabeth H. Petersen, and David J. Pannell. 2013. “Non-Market Valuation: Usage and Impacts in Environmental Policy and Management in Australia.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 59 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, Kurt, and Leonard Shabman. 2019. “Does Ecosystem Valuation Contribute to Ecosystem Decision Making?: Evidence from Hydropower Licensing.” Ecological Economics 163 (January): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Tinch, Robert, Nicola Beaumont, Tim Sunderland, Ece Ozdemiroglu, David Barton, Colm Bowe, Tobias Börger, et al. 2019. “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Goods and Services: A Review for Decision Makers.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 92 (2): 1–20. doi:10.1080/21606544.2019.1623083.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, Andrés, Juan Pablo Sarmiento Erazo, and David Diaz. 2020. “Has Cost Benefit Analysis Improved Decisions in Colombia? Evidence from the Environmental Licensing Process.” Ecological Economics 178 (December): 106807. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106807.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatachalam, L. 2004. “The Contingent Valuation Method: A Review.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24 (1): 89–124. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00138-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, Richard, Benjamin Kushner, Megan Jungwiwattanaporn, Erin Gray, and Lauretta Burke. 2015. “Use of Coastal Economic Valuation in Decision Making in the Caribbean: Enabling Conditions and Lessons Learned.” Ecosystem Services 11 (February): 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.010.
   Google Scholar
• Welling, Malte, Zawojska Ewa. and Sagebiel Julian. 2022. “Information, consequentiality and credibility in stated preference surveys: A choice experiment on climate adaptation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 82 (1): 257–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, John, Peter Groothuis, Thomas Hoban, and William Cliffort. 1994. “Sample Bias in Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of the Correction Methods.” Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 16 (4): 249–258. doi:10.1080/01490409409513235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar