Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits

References

• Achtnicht, M. 2012. “German Car Buyers’ Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions.” Climatic Change 113 (3–4): 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0362-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adaman, F., N. Karalı, G. Kumbaroğlu, İ. Or, B. Özkaynak, and Ü. Zenginobuz. 2011. “What Determines Urban Households’ Willingness to Pay for CO2 Emission Reductions in Turkey: A Contingent Valuation Survey.” Energy Policy 39 (2): 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, W. N., S. Dessai, M. Goulden, M. Hulme, I. Lorenzoni, D. R. Nelson, L. O. Naess, J. Wolf, and A. Wreford. 2009. “Are There Social Limits to Adaptation to Climate Change?” Climatic Change 93 (3–4): 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akter, S., and J. Bennett. 2011. “Household Perceptions of Climate Change and Preferences for Mitigation Action: The Case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia.” Climatic Change 109 (3–4): 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0034-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akter, S., J. Bennett, and M. B. Ward. 2012. “Climate Change Scepticism and Public Support for Mitigation: Evidence from an Australian Choice Experiment.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 22 (3): 736–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini, A., A. Bigano, M. Ščasný, and I. Zvěřinová. 2018. “Preferences for Energy Efficiency vs. Renewables: What Is the Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions?” Ecological Economics 144:171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E., M. J. Kotchen, and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2012. “Willingness to Pay and Political Support for a U.S. National Clean Energy Standard.” Nature Climate Change 2 (8): 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alló, M., and M. L. Loureiro. 2014. “The Role of Social Norms on Preferences Towards Climate Change Policies: A Meta-Analysis.” Energy Policy 73:563–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and T. Bernauer. 2016. “How Much Carbon Offsetting and Where ? Implications of Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Ethicality Considerations for Public Opinion.” Energy Policy 94:387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, F., J. B. Jacobsen, B. J. Thorsen, T. H. Lundhede, N. Strange, and M. Boman. 2018. “Disentangling Distance and Country Effects on the Value of Conservation Across National Borders.” Ecological Economics 147:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranzini, A., N. Borzykowski, and S. Carattini. 2018. “Carbon Offsets Out of the Woods? Acceptability of Domestic vs. International Reforestation Programmes in the Lab.” Journal of Forest Economics 32:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S. 2020. “Research on the Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: Past, Present and Future.” Energy Research and Social Science 68:101544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., and R. Gampfer. 2015. “How Robust is Public Support for Unilateral Climate Policy?” Environmental Science and Policy 54:316–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blennow, K., and J. Persson. 2009. “Climate Change: Motivation for Taking Measure to Adapt.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 19 (1): 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blennow, K., J. Persson, M. Tome, and M. Hanewinkel. 2012. “Climate Change: Believing and Seeing Implies Adapting.” PLoS One 7:e50182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, J. C., S. Jamet, and J. Corfee-Morlot. 2009. Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Literature Review and New Results. Economics Department Working Paper Series No. 693. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., L. Brander, and P. Van Beukering. 2008. “‘A Convenient Truth’: Air Travel Passengers’ Willingness to Pay to Offset Their CO2 Emissions.” Climatic Change 90 (3): 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9414-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntaine, M. T., and L. Prather. 2018. “Preferences for Domestic Action over International Transfers in Global Climate Policy.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 5 (2): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2017.34.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., M. Kataria, A. Krupnick, E. Lampi, A. Lofgren, P. Qin, S. Chung, and T. Sterner. 2012. “Paying for Mitigation: A Multiple Country Study.” Land Economics 88 (2): 326–340. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.88.2.326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., M. Kataria, A. Krupnick, E. Lampi, A. Lofgren, P. Qin, and T. Sterner. 2013. “A Fair Share: Burden-Sharing Preferences in the United States and China.” Resource and Energy Economics 35 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederich, J., and T. Goeschl. 2017. Does Mitigation Begin At Home? Discussion Paper Series 634. Heidelberg: Department of Economics, Heidelberg University. 26 p.
   Google Scholar
• Drews, S., and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh. 2015. “What Explains Public Support for Climate Policies? A Review of Empirical and Experimental Studies.” Climate Policy 16 (7): 855–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek, K. 2005. “Public and Private Attitudes Towards ‘Green’ Electricity: The Case of Swedish Wind Power.” Energy Policy 33 (13): 1677–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbakidze, L., and B. A. McCarl. 2007. “Sequestration Offsets Versus Direct Emission Reductions : Consideration of Environmental Co-Effects.” Ecological Economics 60 (3): 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure, C., M. C. Guetlein, J. Schleich, G. Tu, L. Whitmarsh, and C. Whittle. 2022. “Household Acceptability of Energy Efficiency Policies in the European Union: Policy Characteristics Trade-Offs and the Role of Trust in Government and Environmental Identity.” Ecological Economics 192:107267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. 2004. “Ethics and Global Climate Change.” Ethics 114 (3): 555–600. https://doi.org/10.1086/382247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, F., and P. Lionello. 2008. “Climate Change Projections for the Mediterranean Region.” Global and Planetary Change 63:90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenk, K., and S. Colombo. 2011. “Designing Policies to Mitigate the Agricultural Contribution to Climate Change : An Assessment of Soil Based Carbon Sequestration and its Ancillary Effects.” Climatic Change 105 (1–2): 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9885-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, M. 1995. “Seeking Fair Weather – Ethics and the International Debate on Climate-Change.” International Affairs 71 (3): 463–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2624836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M., X. Labandeira, and M. L. Loureiro. 2011. “Climate Change, Energy and Social Preferences on Policies: Exploratory Evidence for Spain.” Climate Research 48 (2): 343–348. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, C., and N. Stern. 2008. “A New Global Deal on Climate Change.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (2): 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2001. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., E. Lachapelle, J. Martinsson, and S. Matti. 2021. “Bridging the Ideological Gap? How Fairness Perceptions Mediate the Effect of Revenue Recycling on Public Support for Carbon Taxes in the United States, Canada and Germany.” Review of Policy Research 38 (5): 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kácha, O., J. Vintr, and C. Brick. 2022. “Four Europes: Climate Change Beliefs and Attitudes Predict Behavior and Policy Preferences Using a Latent Class Analysis on 23 Countries.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 81:101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J., K. J. Boyle, and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2013. “Willingness-to-Pay and Policy-Instrument Choice for Climate-Change Policy in the United States.” Energy Policy 55:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreibich, N., and L. Hermwille. 2021. “Caught in Between: Credibility and Feasibility of the Voluntary Carbon Market Post-2020.” Climate Policy 21 (7): 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegler, E., J. P. Weyant, G. J. Blanford, V. Krey, L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, A. Fawcett, et al. 2014. “The Role of Technology for Achieving Climate Policy Objectives : Overview of the EMF 27 Study on Global Technology and Climate Policy Strategies.” Climatic Change 123 (3–4): 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnick, A., D. Burtraw, and A. Markandya. 2000. “The Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Climate Change Mitigation: A Conceptual Framework.” In Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, edited by OECD, 53–93. OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. J. 1966. “New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiserowitz, A. 2006. “Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values.” Climatic Change 77 (1–2): 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, A., D. Hoyos, and A. Markandya. 2012. “Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation.” Environmental & Resource Economics 51 (1): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9491-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, A., A. Markandya, and M. Petrucci. 2008. “The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy.” Ecological Economics 67 (1): 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutter, R., and J. F. Shogren. 2002. “Tradable Permit Tariffs: How Local Air Pollution Affects Carbon Emissions Permit Trading.” Land Economics 78 (2): 159–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKerron, G. J., C. Egerton, C. Gaskell, A. Parpia, and S. Mourato. 2009. “Willingness to Pay for Carbon Offset Certification and Co-Benefits among (High-)Flying Young Adults in the UK.” Energy Policy 37 (4): 1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariel, P., D. Hoyos, J. Meyerhoff, M. Czajkowski, T. Dekker, K. Glenk, J. B. Jacobsen, et al. 2021. Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments, Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis. Springer Briefs in Economics. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 129 pp.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemet, G. F., T. Holloway, and P. Meier. 2010. “Implications of Incorporating Air-Quality Co-Benefits into Climate Change Policymaking.” Environmental Research Letters 5 (1): 014007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, L. 2014. “A Choice Experiment Survey Analysis of Public Preferences for Renewable Energy in the United States.” Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics at Colby 1 (1): 107. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/jerec/vol01/iss01/9.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, A., L. E. Conover, J. Videras, and S. Wu. 2012. “Heat Waves, Droughts, and Preferences for Environmental Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31 (3): 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. 2000. “Policy Frameworks for the Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change.” In Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, edited by OECD, 517–560. OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pittel, K., and D. T. G. Ruebbelke. 2008. “Climate Policy and Ancillary Benefits: A Survey and Integration Into the Modelling of International Negotiations on Climate Change.” Ecological Economics 68 (1–2): 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiner, D., T. Curry, M. De Figueiredo, H. Herzog, S. Ansolabehere, K. Itaoka, F. Johnsson, and M. Odenberger. 2006. “American Exceptionalism? Similarities and Differences in National Attitudes Toward Energy Policy and Global Warming.” Environmental Science & Technology 40 (7): 2093–2098. https://doi.org/10.1021/es052010b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Entrena, M., M. Espinosa-Goded, and J. Barreiro-Hurlé. 2014. “The Role of Ancillary Benefits on the Value of Agricultural Soils Carbon Sequestration Programmes: Evidence from a Latent Class Approach to Andalusian Olive Groves.” Ecological Economics 99:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., and K. G. Willis. 2010. “Willingness-to-Pay for Renewable Energy: Primary and Discretionary Choice of British Households’ for Micro-Generation Technologies.” Energy Economics 32 (1): 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ščasný, M., I. Zvěřinová, M. Czajkowski, E. Kyselá, and K. Zagórska. 2017. “Public Acceptability of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: A Discrete Choice Experiment.” Climate Policy 17:S11–S130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smead, R., R. L. Sandler, P. Forber, and J. Basl. 2014. “A Bargaining Game Analysis of International Climate Negotiations.” Nature Climate Change 4 (6): 442–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, B. D., and N. H. Johnson. 2009. “Valuing Climate Protection Through Willingness to Pay for Biomass Ethanol.” Ecological Economics 68 (7): 2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., M. Martiskainen, A. Hook, and L. Baker. 2020. “Beyond Cost and Carbon: The Multidimensional Co-Benefits of Low Carbon Transitions in Europe.” Ecological Economics 169:106529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. 2019. “Addressing Climate Change Through Price and Non-Price Interventions.” European Economic Review 119:594–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenningsen, L. S., and B. J. Thorsen. 2020. “Preferences for Distributional Impacts of Climate Policy.” Environmental and Resource Economics 75 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00386-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiene, M., and R. Scarpa. 2009. “Deriving and Testing Efficient Estimates of WTP Distributions in Destination Choice Models.” Environmental & Resource Economics 44 (3): 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9291-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, A. B., D. C. MacMillan, M. Skutsch, and J. C. Lovett. 2015. “‘Yes-in-My-Backyard’: Spatial Differences in the Valuation of Forest Services and Local Co-Benefits for Carbon Markets in México.” Ecological Economics 109:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 334 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K., and M. Weeks. 2005. “Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, N. J., H. L. van Soest, A. F. Hof, M. G. J. den Elzen, D. P. van Vuuren, W. Chen, L. Drouet, et al. 2020. “Implications of Various Effort-Sharing Approaches for National Carbon Budgets and Emission Pathways.” Climatic Change 162 (4): 1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02368-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, V. V., F. C. Santos, and J. M. Pacheco. 2013. “A Bottom-Up Institutional Approach to Cooperative Governance of Risky Commons.” Nature Climate Change 3 (9): 797–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, G., and R. J. Zeckhauser. 2012. “Climate Policy: Hard Problem, Soft Thinking.” Climatic Change 110 (3–4): 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0067-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, T., S. Yang, J. C. Moore, P. Shi, X. Cui, Q. Duan, B. Xu, et al. 2012. “Developed and Developing World Responsibilities for Historical Climate Change and CO2 Mitigation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (32): 12911–12915. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203282109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. J., S. J. Smith, R. A. Silva, V. Naik, Y. Zhang, Z. Adelman, M. M. Fry, S. Anenberg, L. W. Horowitz, and J.-F. Lamarque. 2014. “Co-Benefits of Global Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for Future Air Quality and Human Health.” Nature Climate Change 3 (10): 885–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar