Territorial cohesion: discussing the mismatch between conceptual definitions and the understanding of local and intra-regional public decision-makers

REFERENCES

• Abrahams, G. (2014). What ‘is’ territorial cohesion? What does it ‘do’?: Essentialist versus pragmatic approaches to using concepts. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2134–2155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.819838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdikos, V., & Chardas, A. (2016). European Union Cohesion Policy post 2014: More (place-based and conditional) growth – Less redistribution and cohesion. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2014.992460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banai, R., & Wakolbinger, T. (2011). A measure of regional influence with the analytic network process. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(4), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2011.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Berdegué, J. A., Hiller, T., Ramírez, J. M., Satizábal, S., Soloaga, I., Soto, J., Uribe, M., & Vargas, O. (2019). Delineating functional territories from outer space. Latin American Economic Review, 28(4), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40503-019-0066-4
   Google Scholar
• Chamusca, P. (2021). Urban planning and policy in Portugal: An overview on the role of EU funds and guidelines. Urban Research & Practice, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1980607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions (COR). (2003). Territorial cohesion in Europe. COR.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (1969). Welfare departments and territorial justice: Some implications for the reform of local government. Social Policy & Administration, 3(4), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.1969.tb00700.x
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2004). Territorial cohesion: An agenda hat is gaining momentum. Town and Country Planning, 73(7/8), 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450600767926
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2005, November). Understanding territorial cohesion. Planning, Practice & Research, 20(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450600767926
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2007). Territorial cohesion, the European social model, and spatial policy research. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. ISBN: 1558441662.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 3.2. (2006, January). Spatial scenarios and orientations in relation to the ESDP and Cohesion Policy (ESPON project 3.2, Third Interim Report).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON INTERCO. (2011). Indicators of territorial cohesion (Scientific Platform and Tools Project 2013/3/2, (Draft) Final Report, Part C, Scientific Report). ESPON & University of Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON TeDi. (2010). Territorial diversity (Final Report. The ESPON 2013 Programme. Targeted Analysis 8/2/2013, Version 12/05/2010).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (1987). Single European act. Treaties Establishing European Communities, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2004a). Third report on economic and social cohesion, convergence. Competitiveness and cooperation. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2004b). A new partnership for cohesion: Convergence, competitiveness, cooperation (Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2007). Treaty of Lisbon. EU. Official Journal of the European Union. C 306/1.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2008, October). Green paper on territorial cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2009, December 10–11). Territorial cohesion: Unleashing the territorial potential. European commission, background document to the conference on Cohesion Policy and territorial development: Make use of the territorial potential, Kiruna.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2010). EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2012). Consolidated version of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. EU. Official Journal of the European Union C 326/49.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2017). Integrated territorial and urban strategies: How are ESIF adding value in 2014–2020? (Final Report. Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy). Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2020, December 1). Territorial Agenda 2030. A future for all places. Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and territorial development and/or territorial cohesion. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON). (2004). Potentials for polycentric development in Europe (Project ESPON Report 1.1.1).
   Google Scholar
• European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON). (2005, March). The territorial effects of the Structural Funds (Project ESPON Report 2.2.1, Project Report).
   Google Scholar
• European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON). (2006). Territory matters for competitiveness and cohesion. Facets of regional diversity and potentials in Europe. ESPON Synthesis Report III, results by autumn 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2008). Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2004). Territorial cohesion: Old (French) wine in new bottles? Urban Studies, 41(7), 1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000214833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2005). Territorial cohesion: An unidentified political objective: Introduction to the special issue. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 1–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40112626 https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.76.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007). Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European model of society. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701232079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009). Territorial cohesion under the looking glass. Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/pdf/lookingglass.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: A critique of the ‘territorialism’ underlying. Regional Studies, 47(9), 1594–1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2014). Territorial cohesion beyond state territoriality. In CIST - Collège International des Sciences Territoriales (collective) (Ed.), II colloque International du Collège international des sciences du territoire, Frontiers and boundaries of territorial sciences (pp. 179–183). CIST.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2016). The territoriality of Cohesion Policy. In S. Piattoni & L. Polverani (Eds.), Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU (pp. 491–501). Edward Elgar. ISBN: 9781784715663.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Peyrony, J. (2011, September). Cohesion Policy contributing to territorial cohesion – Future scenarios, refereed article no. 43. European Journal of Spatial Development. http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereedarticles/refereed43.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farinós, J. (2009). Bases, métodos e instrumentos para el desarrollo y la cohesión territoriales. Diagnóstico y propuestas para el debate y la acción. In J. Farinós, J. Romero, & J. Salom (Coords.), Cohesión e inteligencia territorial. Dinámicas y procesos para una mejor planificación en la toma de decisiones (pp. 17–62). IIDL/PUV.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrão, J., & Mourato, J. M. (2010). The evaluation of public policies as a factor for learning, institutional innovation and citizenship: The case of the policy of territorial planning in Portugal. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, 12(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.2010v12n1p9
   Google Scholar
• Ferraz de Oliveira, A. (2020). Territory and theory in political geography, c.1970s–90s: Jean Gottmann’s the significance of territory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 9(4), 553–570, https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1733061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, A., Iha, K., Mancini, M. S., Moreno Pires, S., Alves, A., Zokai, G., Lin, D., Murthy, A., & Wackernagel, M. (2019). Assessing the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: Critical results for environmental awareness and local management. Cities, 96, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Hengstermann, A. (2014, June). Territorial cohesion through spatial policies: An analysis with cultural theory and clumsy solutions central European. Journal of Public Policy, 8(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.58516
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2009). Social justice and the city (Rev ed.). University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hübner, D. (2007, November 23). Territorial cohesion: Towards a clear and common understanding of the concept. Speech delivered at the informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion and regional policy, Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/07/743&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. (2017). Spatial development and territorial cohesion in Europe. In U. Altrock & S. Güntner (Org.), Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states. From adjustment to reinvention (pp. 16–27). Routledge. ISBN: 9781315242675.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2010). Territorial Cohesion Policy in the light of peripherality. Town Planning Review, 81(4), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2010.12
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2015). Planning in Europe for ‘Europe: Spatial planning as a political technology of territory. Planning Theory, 14(2), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213519355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., & Moilanen, H. (2012). Territoriality in the strategies and practices of the territorial Cohesion Policy of the European Union: Territorial challenges in implementing ‘soft planning’. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malý, J. (2018). Questioning territorial cohesion: (Un)equal access to services of general interest. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (1999). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 33(9), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950075506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, T., Saraiva, M., Santinha, G., & Guerra, P. (2018). Re-thinking territorial cohesion in the European planning context. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(4), 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2016). Territorial cohesion: An EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 60. Retrieved April 2016, from http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed articles/refereed60.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017). From smart growth to European spatial planning: A new paradigm for EU Cohesion Policy post-2020. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1856–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1337729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & Rauhut, D. (2020). Territorial cohesion cities: A policy recipe for achieving territorial cohesion? Regional Studies, 54(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1548764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & Van der Zwet, A. (2020). Evaluating integrated sustainable urban development strategies: A methodological framework applied in Portugal. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1606898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohl, P., & Hagen, T. (2010). Do EU Structural Funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., Bachmann, V., Bialasiewicz, L., dell’Agnese, E., Dittmer, J., & Mamadouh, V. (2013). Mapping the political geographies of Europeanization. Progress in Human Geography, 37(6), 737–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512472093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno Pires, S. (2017). Urban sustainability. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0553
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Dühr, S. (2005). The future of Cohesion Policy. Town and Country Planning, 74(3), 85. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/131312
   Google Scholar
• Park, B. (2017). New spatial readings of the state. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1275755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranci, C. (2011). Competitiveness and social cohesion in Western European cities. Urban Studies, 48(13), 2789–2804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010394688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2020). Urbanization. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. (2005). The search for community cohesion: Key themes and dominant concepts of the public policy agenda. Urban Studies, 42(8), 1411–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500150755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santinha, G. (2014). The principle of territorial cohesion as a new paradigm of development in the formulation of public policies: (Re)constructing dominant ideas. EURE (Santiago), 40(119), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612014000100004
   Google Scholar
• Santinha, G., & Marques, T. (2012). The integration of the principle of territorial cohesion in the political agenda: The Portuguese case. Revista de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território, 2, 215–244. https://doi.org/10.17127/got/2012.2.010
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2006). Cities in a world economy. Sage. ISBN: 9781506362618.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2013). When territory deborders territoriality. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2013.769895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout, J. A., & Jordan, A. J. (2007). From cohesion to territorial policy integration (TPI): Exploring the governance challenges in the European Union. European Planning Studies, 15(6), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701220280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teles, F. (2016). Local governance and inter-municipal cooperation. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• van der Zwet, A., & Ferry, M. (2019). Integrated sustainable urban development strategies in the European Union: Added value and challenges. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), Territorial cohesion. The urban book series. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_6
   Google Scholar
• Van Well, L. (2012). Conceptualizing the logics of territorial cohesion. European Planning Studies, 20(9), 1549–1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.708021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2009). Towards an integrated spatial planning? European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1571–1590. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903226499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2012). Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.707391
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2007). Territorial cohesion: The underlying discourses. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 37–59). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar