Integrating genomics and genome editing for orphan crop improvement: a bridge between orphan crops and modern agriculture system

References

• Dawson IK, Jaenicke H. Underutilised plant species: the role of biotechnology. Position Paper No. 1. Crops for the Future; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Umesh MR, Angadi S, Gowda P, Ghimire R, Begna S. Climate-resilient minor crops for food security. In Agronomic crops. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hendre PS, Muthemba S, Kariba R, Muchugi A, Fu Y, Chang Y, Song B, Liu H, Liu M, Liao X, et al. African Orphan Crops Consortium (AOCC): status of developing genomic resources for African orphan crops. Planta. 2019;250(3):989–1003. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03156-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadele Z, Bartels D. Promoting orphan crops research and development. Germany: Springer-Verlag GmbH; 2019. p. 675–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory PJ, Mayes S, Hui CH, Jahanshiri E, Julkifle A, Kuppusamy G, Kuan HW, Lin TX, Massawe F, Suhairi TASTM, et al. Crops for the future (CFF): an overview of research efforts in the adoption of underutilised species. Planta. 2019;250(3):979–88. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03179-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson IK, Powell W, Hendre P, Bančič J, Hickey JM, Kindt R, Hoad S, Hale I, Jamnadass R. The role of genetics in mainstreaming the production of new and orphan crops to diversify food systems and support human nutrition. New Phytologist. 2019;224(1):37–54. doi:10.1111/nph.15895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oibiokpa FI, Adoga GI, Saidu AN, Kudirat OS. Nutritional composition of detarium microcarpum fruit. African Journal of Food Science. 2014;8(6):342–50. doi:10.5897/AJFS2014.1161.
   Google Scholar
• Cullis C, Kunert KJ. Unlocking the potential of orphan legumes. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(8):1895–903. doi:10.1093/jxb/erw437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiurugwi T, Kemp S, Powell W, Hickey LT. Speed breeding orphan crops. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(3):607–16. doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3202-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabhaudhi T, Chimonyo VGP, Hlahla S, Massawe F, Mayes S, Nhamo L, Modi AT. Prospects of orphan crops in climate change. Planta. 2019;250(3):695–708. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03129-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borelli T, Hunter D, Padulosi S, Amaya N, Meldrum G, de Oliveira Beltrame DM, Samarasinghe G, Wasike VW, Güner B, Tan A, et al. Local solutions for sustainable food systems: the contribution of orphan crops and wild edible species. Agronomy. 2020;10(2):231. doi:10.3390/agronomy10020231.
   Google Scholar
• King AJ, Montes LR, Clarke JG, Itzep J, Perez CAA, Jongschaap REE, Visser RGF, van Loo EN, Graham IA. Identification of QTL markers contributing to plant growth, oil yield and fatty acid composition in the oilseed crop Jatropha curcas L. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8(1):1–17. doi:10.1186/s13068-015-0326-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tlili N, Elfalleh W, Saadaoui E, Khaldi A, Triki S, Nasri N. The caper (Capparis L.): ethnopharmacology, phytochemical and pharmacological properties. Fitoterapia. 2011;82(2):93–101. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2010.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikia JP, Konwar BK. Physicochemical properties of starch from aroids of North East India. Int J Food Prop. 2012;15(6):1247–61. doi:10.1080/10942912.2010.491929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolera A, Sundstøl F. Supplementation of graded levels of Desmodium intortum hay to sheep feeding on maize stover harvested at three stages of maturity: 1. Feed intake, digestibility and body weight change. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2000;85(3–4):239–57. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00135-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Lin T, Meng X, Du H, Zhang J, Liu G, Chen M, Jing Y, Kou L, Li X, et al. A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice. Cell. 2021;184(5):1156–70. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karavolias NG, Horner W, Abugu MN, Evanega SN. Application of gene editing for climate change in agriculture. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5:685801. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.685801.
   Google Scholar
• Østerberg JT, Xiang W, Olsen LI, Edenbrandt AK, Vedel SE, Christiansen A, Landes X, Andersen MM, Pagh P, Sandøe P, et al. Accelerating the domestication of new crops: feasibility and approaches. Trends Plant Sci. 2017;22(5):373–84. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padulosi S, King EI, Hunter D, Swaminathan MS, editors. Orphan Crops for Sustainable Food and Nutrition Security: Promoting Neglected and Underutilized Species. London (UK): Routledge; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Talabi AO, Vikram P, Thushar S, Rahman H, Ahmadzai H, Nhamo N, Shahid M, Singh RK. Orphan crops: a best fit for dietary enrichment and diversification in highly deteriorated marginal environments. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.839704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin I, Ribnicky DM, Komarnytsky S, Ilic N, Poulev A, Borisjuk N, Brinker A, Moreno DA, Ripoll C, Yakoby N, et al. Plants and human health in the twenty-first century. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20(12):522–31. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(02)02080-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüdig M, Laibach N, Hein A-C. Genome editing in crop plant research—alignment of expectations and current developments. Plants. 2022;11(2):212. doi:10.3390/plants11020212.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Yang X, Yu Y, Si X, Zhai X, Zhang H, Dong W, Gao C, Xu C. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(12):1160–63. doi:10.1038/nbt.4273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsögön A, Čermák T, Naves ER, Notini MM, Edel KH, Weinl S, Freschi L, Voytas DF, Kudla J, Peres LEP, et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(12):1211–16. doi:10.1038/nbt.4272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewry PR, Tatham AS. Improving wheat to remove coeliac epitopes but retain functionality. J Cereal Sci. 2016;67:12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2015.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney RK, Chen W, Li Y, Bharti AK, Saxena RK, Schlueter JA, Donoghue MTA, Azam S, Fan G, Whaley AM, et al. Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(1):83. doi:10.1038/nbt.2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaut J-M, Ragot M. Modernising breeding for orphan crops: tools, methodologies, and beyond. Planta. 2019;250(3):971–77. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03200-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannarozzi G, Plaza-Wüthrich S, Esfeld K, Larti S, Wilson YS, Girma D, de Castro E, Chanyalew S, Blösch R, Farinelli L, et al. Genome and transcriptome sequencing identifies breeding targets in the orphan crop tef (Eragrostis tef). BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1–21. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doust A, Diao X. Genetics and genomics of Setaria. Switzerland (AG): Springer Nature; 2017. Vol. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hittalmani S, Mahesh HB, Shirke MD, Biradar H, Uday G, Aruna YR, Lohithaswa HC, Mohanrao A. Genome and transcriptome sequence of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) provides insights into drought tolerance and nutraceutical properties. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):1–16. doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3850-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C-Y Y, Fan L. Orphan crops and their wild relatives in the genomic era. Mol Plant. 2021;14(1):27–39. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linares OF. African rice (Oryza glaberrima): history and future potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99(25):16360–65. doi:10.1073/pnas.252604599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldra F. Encyclopedia of food and health. In: Jag AA, Accc C-M, RAM S, editors. Brazil: Universidade de Sao Paulo. Sao Paulo. Elsevier Ltd; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes S, Ho WK, Chai HH, Gao X, Kundy AC, Mateva KI, Zahrulakmal M, Hahiree MKIM, Kendabie P, Licea LCS, et al. Bambara groundnut: an exemplar underutilised legume for resilience under climate change. Planta. 2019;250(3):803–20. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03191-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Upadhyaya HD. Genetic and genomic resources for grain cereals improvement. USA: Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wijngaard H, Arendt EK. Buckwheat. Cereal Chemistry. 2006;83(4):391–401. doi:10.1094/CC-83-0391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceballos H, Iglesias CA, Pérez JC, Dixon AGO. Cassava breeding: opportunities and challenges. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;56(4):503–16. doi:10.1007/s11103-004-5010-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh AF, Bahramnejad B, Struik PC, Sohrabi Y. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian journal of crop science. 2010;4(8):580–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timko MP, Singh BB. Cowpea, a multifunctional legume. Genomics of tropical crop plants. New York (NY): Springer; 2008. p. 227–58.
   Google Scholar
• Olango TM, Tesfaye B, Catellani M, Pè ME. Indigenous knowledge, use and on-farm management of enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) diversity in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10(1):1–18. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-10-41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caballero B, Finglas P, Toldrá F. Encyclopedia of food and health. Waltham (MA): Academic Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Girma D, Korbu L. Genetic improvement of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) in Ethiopia: an unfulfilled promise. Plant Breeding. 2012;131(2):231–36. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01935.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Upadhyaya HD, Bisht IS. Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume improvement. Waltham (MA): Newnes; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• de la Vega MP, Torres AM, Cubero JI, Kole C, editors. Genetics, genomics and breeding of cool season grain legumes. UK: CRC Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zuk M, Richter D, Matuła J, Szopa J. Linseed, the multipurpose plant. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;75:165–77. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Kumar P, Nadendla R. A review on: abelmoschus esculentus (Okra). Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2013;3:129–32.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav HP, Gupta SK, Rajpurohit BS, Pareek, N. Pearl millet. In: Broadening the genetic base of grain cereals. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 205–24.
   Google Scholar
• Manickavasagan A, Thirunathan P. Pulses: processing and product development. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar B, Bhalothia P. Orphan crops for future food security. J Biosci. 2020;45(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s12038-020-00107-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherton J, Rees A. Tropical root and tuber crops: cassava, sweet potato, yams and aroids. 2008;2:1–9. doi:10.1079/9781789243369.0000.
   Google Scholar
• Spaenij-Dekking L, Kooy-Winkelaar Y, Koning F. The Ethiopian cereal tef in celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(16):1748–49. doi:10.1056/NEJMc051492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymundo R, Asseng S, Cammarano D, Quiroz R. Potato, sweet potato, and yam models for climate change: a review. Field Crops Res. 2014;166:173–85. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq MS, Uzaiir M, Raza A, Habib M, Xu Y, Yousuf M, Yang SH, Ramzan Khan M. Uncovering the research gaps to alleviate the negative impacts of climate change on food security: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:927535. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.927535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibaldi LA, Gemmill-Herren B, D’Annolfo R, Graeub BE, Cunningham SA, Breeze TD. Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32(1):68–80. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen C, Lagnaoui A, Esbjerg P. Advances in the knowledge of quinoa pests. Food Rev Int. 2003;19(1–2):61–75. doi:10.1081/FRI-120018868.
   Google Scholar
• Habiyaremye C, Matanguihan JB, D’Alpoim Guedes J, Ganjyal GM, Whiteman MR, Kidwell KK, Murphy KM. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and its potential for cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, US: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2017;7:1961. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohra A, Tiwari A, Kaur P, Ganie SA, Raza A, Roorkiwal M, Mir RR, Fernie AR, Smýkal P, Varshney RK, et al. The key to the future lies in the past: insights from grain legume domestication and improvement should inform future breeding strategies. Plant Cell Physiol. 2022. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcac086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza A, Tabassum J, Fakhar AZ, Sharif R, Chen H, Zhang C, Ju L, Fotopoulos V, Siddique KHM, Singh RK, et al. Smart reprograming of plants against salinity stress using modern biotechnological tools. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;1–28 . doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2093695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney RK, Ribaut J-M, Buckler ES, Tuberosa R, Rafalski JA, Langridge P. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops? Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(12):1172–76. doi:10.1038/nbt.2440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney RK, Bohra A, Yu J, Graner A, Zhang Q, Sorrells ME. Designing future crops: genomics-assisted breeding comes of age. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26(6):631–49. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney RK, Close TJ, Singh NK, Hoisington DA, Cook DR. Orphan legume crops enter the genomics era! Current opinion in plant biology. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2009;12(2):202–10. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tadele Z. Orphan crops: their importance and the urgency of improvement. Planta. 2019;250(3):677–94. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03210-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SA, Iwata A, Lee SH, Schmutz J, Shoemaker R. Sequencing crop genomes: approaches and applications. New Phytologist. 2011;191(4):915–25. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03804.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen KM, Wendel JF. A bountiful harvest: genomic insights into crop domestication phenotypes. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64(1):47–70. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Díaz A, Zikhali M, Turner AS, Isaac P, Laurie DA. Copy number variation affecting the Photoperiod-B1 and Vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum). PloS one. 2012;7(3):e33234. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox AK, Dhillon T, Cheng H, Tondelli A, Pecchioni N, Stockinger EJ. CBF gene copy number variation at frost resistance-2 is associated with levels of freezing tolerance in temperate-climate cereals. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121(1):21–35. doi:10.1007/s00122-010-1288-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(2):85–96. doi:10.1038/nrg3097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman-Minkov A, Sabath N, Mayrose I. Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication. Nature Plants. 2016;2(8):1–4. doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu S, Khan MA, Tao S, Korban SS, Wang H, et al. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res. 2013;23(2):396–408. doi:10.1101/gr.144311.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouse JW, Adhikary D, Page JT, Ramaraj T, Deyholos MK, Udall JA, Fairbanks DJ, Jellen EN, Maughan PJ. The amaranth genome: genome, transcriptome, and physical map assembly. Plant Genome. 2016;9(1):lantgenome2015–07. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2015.07.0062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regalado JJ, Tossi VE, Burrieza HP, Encina CL, Pitta-Alvarez SI. Micropropagation protocol for coastal quinoa. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2020;142(1):213–19. doi:10.1007/s11240-020-01840-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Feng B, Xiao J, Xia Z, Zhou X, Li P, Zhang W, Wang Y, Møller BL, Zhang P, et al. Cassava genome from a wild ancestor to cultivated varieties. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang MM, Wang J, Dong L, Kamizaki K, Wang Z, Tamada K, Takumi T, Hashimoto R, Otani H, Pazour GJ, et al. Lack of association of C3 gene with uveitis: additional insights into the genetic profile of uveitis regarding complement pathway genes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siadjeu C, Pucker B, Viehöver P, Albach DC, Weisshaar B. High contiguity de novo genome sequence assembly of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) using long read sequencing. Genes. 2020;11(3):274. doi:10.3390/genes11030274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed F, Chaudhry UK, Bakhsh A, Raza A, Saeed Y, Bohra A, Varshney RK. Moving beyond DNA sequence to improve plant stress responses. Front Genet. 2022;13:874648. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.874648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza A. Metabolomics: a systems biology approach for enhancing heat stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41(3):741–63. doi:10.1007/s00299-020-02635-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza A, Tabassum J, Zahid Z, Charagh S, Bashir S, Barmukh R, Khan RSA, Barbosa F, Zhang C, Chen H, et al. Advances in ‘omics’ approaches for improving toxic metals/metalloids tolerance in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;12:794373. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.794373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Hussain MA, Wei S, He H, Zaman QU, Xuekun Z, Yong C, Hasanuzzaman M, et al. Omics: the way forward to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Brassica napus L. GM Crops Food. 2021;12(1):251–81. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1859898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza A, Tabassum J, Kudapa H, Varshney RK. Can omics deliver temperature resilient ready-to-grow crops? Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021;41(8):1209–32. doi:10.1080/07388551.2021.1898332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza A, Mubarik, MS, Sharif, R, Habib, M, Jabeen, W, Zhang, C, Chen, H, Chen, ZH, Siddique, KHM, Zhuang, W, Varshney, RK , Developing drought‐smart, ready‐to‐grow future crops. Plant Genome 2022;():e20279. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L-m C, X-w L, T-j H, Li P-J, Liu Y, Zhou S-X, Wu Q-C, Chen -T-T, Lu Y-B, Hou Y-M, et al. Comparative biochemical and transcriptome analyses in tomato and eggplant reveal their differential responses to Tuta absoluta infestation. Genomics. 2021;113(4):2108–21. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj AR, Joshi G, Kukreja B, Malik V, Arora P, Pandey R, Shukla RN, Bankar KG, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Goel S, et al. Global insights into high temperature and drought stress regulated genes by RNA-Seq in economically important oilseed crop Brassica juncea. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15(1):1–15. doi:10.1186/s12870-014-0405-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozsolak F, Milos PM. RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(2):87–98. doi:10.1038/nrg2934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranasinghe R, Maduwanthi SDT, Marapana R. Nutritional and health benefits of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.): a review. Int J Food Sci. 2019;2019.
   Google Scholar
• Golisz A, Sugano M, Fujii Y. Microarray expression profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana L. in response to allelochemicals identified in buckwheat. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(11):3099–109. doi:10.1093/jxb/ern168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu YY, Zeng HQ, Dong CX, Yin XM, Shen QR, Yang ZM. microRNA expression profiles associated with phosphorus deficiency in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Sci. 2010;178(1):23–29. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt S, Blom JF, Pernthaler J, Berg G, Baldwin A, Mahenthiralingam E, Eberl L. Production of the antifungal compound pyrrolnitrin is quorum sensing-regulated in members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(6):1422–37. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01870.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Srivastava AK, Sablok G, Deshpande TU, Suprasanna P. Transcriptomics profiling of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under arsenate stress identifies key candidate genes and regulatory pathways. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:646. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning K, Tör M, Poole M, Hong Y, Thompson AJ, King GJ, Giovannoni JJ, Seymour GB. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):948–52. doi:10.1038/ng1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butelli E, Licciardello C, Zhang Y, Liu J, Mackay S, Bailey P, Reforgiato-Recupero G, Martin C. Retrotransposons control fruit-specific, cold-dependent accumulation of anthocyanins in blood oranges. Plant Cell. 2012;24(3):1242–55. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.095232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosokawa N, Hara T, Kaizuka T, Kishi C, Takamura A, Miura Y, Iemura S-I, Natsume T, Takehana K, Yamada N, et al. Nutrient-dependent mTORC1 association with the ULK1–Atg13–FIP200 complex required for autophagy. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(7):1981–91. doi:10.1091/mbc.e08-12-1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Liu H, Liu M, Liao X, Sahu SK, Fu Y, Song B, Cheng S, Kariba R, Muthemba S, et al. The draft genomes of five agriculturally important African orphan crops. GigaScience. 2019;8(3):giy152. doi:10.1093/gigascience/giy152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi S-E, Kok S-Y, Sarpan N, Azimi N, Hashim AT, Ishak Z, Rosli SK, et al. Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature. 2015;525(7570):533–37. doi:10.1038/nature15365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varshney RK, Saxena RK, Upadhyaya HD, Khan AW, Yu Y, Kim C, Rathore A, Kim D, Kim J, An S, et al. Whole-genome resequencing of 292 pigeonpea accessions identifies genomic regions associated with domestication and agronomic traits. Nat Genet. 2017;49(7):1082–88. doi:10.1038/ng.3872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tohge T, de Souza Lp, Fernie AR, de Souza LP. Current understanding of the pathways of flavonoid biosynthesis in model and crop plants. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(15):4013–28. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2019;32.
   Google Scholar
• Klee HJ, Tieman DM. The genetics of fruit flavour preferences. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(6):347–56. doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0002-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beleggia R, Rau D, Laidò G, Platani C, Nigro F, Fragasso M, De Vita P, Scossa F, Fernie AR, Nikoloski Z, et al. Evolutionary metabolomics reveals domestication-associated changes in tetraploid wheat kernels. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1740–53. doi:10.1093/molbev/msw050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gapare W, Liu S, Conaty W, Zhu Q-H, Gillespie V, Llewellyn D, Stiller W, Wilson I. Historical datasets support genomic selection models for the prediction of cotton fiber quality phenotypes across multiple environments. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2018;8(5):1721–32. doi:10.1534/g3.118.200140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner T, Kamoun S, Belhaj K. CRISPR crops: plant genome editing toward disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2018;56(1):479–512. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin K, Gao C, Qiu J-L. Progress and prospects in plant genome editing. Nature Plants. 2017;3(8):1–6. doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006;127(7):1309–21. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čermák T, Curtin SJ, Gil-Humanes J, Čegan R, Kono TJY, Konečná E, Belanto JJ, Starker CG, Mathre JW, Greenstein RL, et al. A multipurpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants. Plant Cell. 2017;29(6):1196–217. doi:10.1105/tpc.16.00922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature. 2002;418(6898):700–07. doi:10.1038/nature01019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle‐Echevarria AD, Fumia N, Gore MA, Kantar M. Accelerating crop domestication in the era of gene editing. Plant Breed Rev. 2021;45:185–211.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Leal D, Lemmon ZH, Man J, Bartlett ME, Lippman ZB. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell. 2017;171(2):470–80. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falke KC, Glander S, He F, Hu J, de Meaux J, Schmitz G. The spectrum of mutations controlling complex traits and the genetics of fitness in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013;23(6):665–71. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon ZH, Reem NT, Dalrymple J, Soyk S, Swartwood KE, Rodriguez-Leal D, Van Eck J, Lippman ZB. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nature Plants. 2018;4(10):766–70. doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsögön A, Peres LEP, Xiao Y, Yan J, Fernie AR. Enhancing crop diversity for food security in the face of climate uncertainty. Plant J. 2022;109(2):402–14. doi:10.1111/tpj.15626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Tang S, Zhang H, He M, Liu J, Zhi H, Sui Y, Liu X, Jia G, Zhao Z, et al. DROOPY LEAF1 controls leaf architecture by orchestrating early brassinosteroid signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(35):21766–74. doi:10.1073/pnas.2002278117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamidi S, Healey A, Huang P, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Barry K, Sreedasyam A, Shu S, Lovell JT, Feldman M, et al. A genome resource for green millet Setaria viridis enables discovery of agronomically valuable loci. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(10):1203–10. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0681-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull SE, Seung D, Chanez C, Mehta D, Kuon J-E, Truernit E, Hochmuth A, Zurkirchen I, Zeeman SC, Gruissem W, et al. Accelerated ex situ breeding of GBSS - and PTST1 -edited cassava for modified starch. Sci Adv. 2018;4(9):eaat6086. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat6086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochnik S, Marri PR, Desany B, Rabinowicz PD, Kodira C, Mohiuddin M, Rodriguez F, Fauquet C, Tohme J, Harkins T, et al. The cassava genome: current progress, future directions. Trop Plant Biol. 2012;5(1):88–94. doi:10.1007/s12042-011-9088-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassava NNMA. Manihot esculenta Crantz, genetic resources: origin of the crop, its evolution and relationships with wild relatives. Genet Mol Res. 2002;1:298–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik AI, Kongsil P, Nguyễn VA, Ou W, Srean P, López-Lavalle LA, Utsumi Y, Lu C, Kittipadakul P, Nguyễn HH, et al. Cassava breeding and agronomy in Asia: 50 years of history and future directions. Breed Sci. 2020;70:18180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez MA, Lin ZD, Moll T, Chauhan RD, Hayden L, Renninger K, Beyene G, Taylor NJ, Carrington JC, Staskawicz BJ, et al. Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of cassava eIF4E isoforms nCBP-1 and nCBP-2 reduces cassava brown streak disease symptom severity and incidence. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(2):421–34. doi:10.1111/pbi.12987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel AW, Chauhan RD, Cermak T, Mutka AM, Vijayaraghavan A, Boyher A, Starker CG, Bart R, Voytas DF, Taylor NJ, et al. Allele exchange at the EPSPS locus confers glyphosate tolerance in cassava. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(7):1275–82. doi:10.1111/pbi.12868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Li W, Gao T, Cui Y, Jin Y, Li P, Ma Q, Liu X, Cao C. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nucleocapsid inhibits type I interferon production by interfering with TRIM25-mediated RIG-I ubiquitination. J Virol. 2017;91(8):e02143–16. doi:10.1128/JVI.02143-16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veley KM, Okwuonu I, Jensen G, Yoder M, Taylor NJ, Meyers BC, Bart RS. Gene tagging via CRISPR-mediated homology-directed repair in cassava. G3. 2021;11(4):jkab028. doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi S, Kumar R, Kumar V, Won SY, Shukla P. Engineering disease resistant plants through CRISPR-Cas9 technology. GM Crops Food. 2021;12(1):125–44. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1831729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odipio J, Alicai T, Nusinow D, Bart R, Taylor N, editors. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of multiple TFL1-like floral repressors activates flowering in cassava 2018: SPRINGER 233 SPRING ST, New York, NY 10013 USA.
   Google Scholar
• Odipio J, Alicai T, Ingelbrecht I, Nusinow DA, Bart R, Taylor NJ. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of phytoene desaturase in cassava. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1780. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comai L. The taming of the shrub. Nat Plants. 2018;4(10):742–43. doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0275-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Blanco C, Aarts MGM, Bentsink L, Keurentjes JJB, Reymond M, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell. 2009;21(7):1877–96. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isik F, Kumar S, Martínez-García PJ, Iwata H, Yamamoto T. Acceleration of forest and fruit tree domestication by genomic selection. In: Christophe P, Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon, Editors. Advances in botanical research. USA: Elsevier; 2015, Vol. 74, p. 93–124.
   Google Scholar
• Migicovsky Z, Myles S. Exploiting wild relatives for genomics-assisted breeding of perennial crops. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:460. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichy KA, Wiesinger JA, Mendoza FA. Genetic diversity and genome-wide association analysis of cooking time in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128(8):1555–67. doi:10.1007/s00122-015-2531-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimati A, Kawuki R, Esuma W, Kayondo IS, Wolfe M, Lozano R, Rabbi I, Kulakow P, Jannink J-L. Training population optimization for prediction of cassava brown streak disease resistance in West African Clones. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2018;8(12):3903–13. doi:10.1534/g3.118.200710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Watson A, Gonzalez-Navarro OE, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Yanes L, Mendoza-Suárez M, Simmonds J, Wells R, Rayner T, Green P, et al. Speed breeding in growth chambers and glasshouses for crop breeding and model plant research. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(12):2944–63. doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0072-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson A, Ghosh S, Williams MJ, Cuddy WS, Simmonds J, Rey M-D, Asyraf Md Hatta M, Hinchliffe A, Steed A, Reynolds D, et al. Speed breeding is a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding. Nature Plants. 2018;4(1):23–29. doi:10.1038/s41477-017-0083-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetter MG, Zeitler L, Steinhaus A, Kroener K, Biljecki M, Schmid KJ. Crossing methods and cultivation conditions for rapid production of segregating populations in three grain amaranth species. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:816. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Birol I. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–100. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Würschum T, Leiser WL, Jähne F, Bachteler K, Miersch M, Hahn V. The soybean experiment ‘1000 Gardens’: a case study of citizen science for research, education, and beyond. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(3):617–26. doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3134-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargav DK, Meena HP, Ppb PPB. Participatory plant breeding: farmers as breeders. Popular Kheti. 2014;2:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg JG, Supple MA, Andrew RL, Borevitz JO. Genomic variation across landscapes: insights and applications. New Phytologist. 2015;207(4):953–67. doi:10.1111/nph.13410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coop G, Witonsky D, Di Rienzo A, Pritchard JK. Using environmental correlations to identify loci underlying local adaptation. Genetics. 2010;185(4):1411–23. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.114819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;37(12):4302–15. doi:10.1002/joc.5086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batjes NH, Ribeiro E, Van Oostrum A. Standardised soil profile data to support global mapping and modelling (WoSIS snapshot 2019). Earth Sys Sci Data. 2020;12(1):299–320. doi:10.5194/essd-12-299-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero J, Andrello M, Burgarella C, Manel S. Soil environment is a key driver of adaptation in Medicago truncatula: new insights from landscape genomics. New Phytologist. 2018;219(1):378–90. doi:10.1111/nph.15171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky JR, Forester BR, Reimherr M. Coherent synthesis of genomic associations with phenotypes and home environments. Mol Ecol Resour. 2018;18(1):91–106. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathinam M, Mishra P, Mahato AK, Singh NK, Rao U, Sreevathsa R. Comparative transcriptome analyses provide novel insights into the differential response of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) and its wild relative (Cajanus platycarpus (Benth.) Maesen) to herbivory by Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Plant Mol Biol. 2019;101(1):163–82. doi:10.1007/s11103-019-00899-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu F, Liang K, Fang T, Zhao H, Han X, Cai M, Qiu F. A group VII ethylene response factor gene, ZmEREB180, coordinates waterlogging tolerance in maize seedlings. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 Dec;17(12):2286–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott-Allen C, Prescott-Allen R. The first resource: wild species in the North-American economy. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Brar DS, Khush GS. Alien introgression in rice. Oryza: from molecule to plant. Plant Molecular Biology. 1997;35:35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rick CM, Chetelat RT. editors. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement. Leuven, Belgium; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Crute IR. From breeding to cloning (and back again?): a case study with lettuce downy mildew. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1992;30(1):485–506. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pink DAC, Walkey DGA. Resistance in marrow (Cucurbita pepo L.) to different strains of cucumber mosaic virus. J Agric Sci. 1984;103(3):519–21. doi:10.1017/S0021859600043616.
   Google Scholar
• Glaszmann J-C, Kilian B, Upadhyaya HD, Varshney RK. Accessing genetic diversity for crop improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13(2):167–73. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey MK, Upadhyaya HD, Rathore A, Vadez V, Sheshshayee MS, Sriswathi M, Govil M, Kumar A, Gowda MVC, Sharma S, et al. Genomewide association studies for 50 agronomic traits in peanut using the ‘reference set’comprising 300 genotypes from 48 countries of the semi-arid tropics of the world. PLoS one. 2014;9(8):e105228. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniato FF, Hamblin MT, Guimaraes CT, Zhang Z, Schaffert RE, Kochian LV, Magalhaes JV. Association mapping provides insights into the origin and the fine structure of the sorghum aluminum tolerance locus. AltSB PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87438. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho JG, Schaffert RE, Malosetti M, Viana JHM, Menezes CB, Silva LA, Guimaraes CT, Coelho AM, Kochian LV, van Eeuwijk FA, et al. Back to acid soil fields: the citrate transporter SbMATE is a major asset for sustainable grain yield for sorghum cultivated on acid soils. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2016;6(2):475–84. doi:10.1534/g3.115.025791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocnet C, Dupuis M, Congard A, Jopp D. Personality and its links to quality of life: mediating effects of emotion regulation and self-efficacy beliefs. Motiv Emot. 2017;41(2):196–208. doi:10.1007/s11031-017-9603-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonelli S, Davey RP, Arnaud E, Parry G, Bastow R. Data management and best practice for plant science. Nat Plants. 2017;3(6):1–4. doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar