The legal aspect of the current use of genetically modified organisms in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda

References

• Gbashi S, Adebo O, Adebiyi JA, Targuma S, Tebele S, Areo OM, Olopade B, Odukoya JO, Njobeh P. Food safety, food security and genetically modified organisms in Africa: a current perspective. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2021;37:30–63. doi:10.1080/02648725.2021.1940735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebre Kedisso E, Barro N, Chimphepo L, Elagib T, Gidado R, Mbabazi R, Oloo B, Maredia K. Crop biotechnology and smallholder Farmers in Africa. Genet Modif Plants Beyond . 2022;107:27.
   Google Scholar
• Wu F, Wesseler J, Zilberman D, Russell RM, Chen C, Dubock AC. Allow golden rice to save lives. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118:e2120901118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2120901118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mmbando GS, Teranishi M, Hidema J. Transgenic rice Oryza glaberrima with higher CPD photolyase activity alleviates UVB-caused growth inhibition. GM Crop Food. 2021;12:435–48. doi:10.1080/21645698.2021.1977068.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adenle AA. Response to issues on GM agriculture in Africa: are transgenic crops safe? BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:2–7. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-4-388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang C, Wohlhueter R, Zhang H. Genetically modified foods: a critical review of their promise and problems. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2016;5:116–23. doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2016.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Mabaya E, Fulton J, Simiyu-Wafukho S, Nang’ayo F. Factors influencing adoption of genetically modified crops in Africa. Dev South Afr. 2015;32:577–91. doi:10.1080/0376835X.2015.1044078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidoye BO, Mabaya E. Adoption of genetically modified crops in South Africa: effects on wholesale maize prices. Agrekon. 2014;53:104–23. doi:10.1080/03031853.2014.887907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boluwade E, Uche N . Agricultural biotechnology annual. Report number: NI2020- 0005. United States Department of Agriculture - Foreign Agricultural Service; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lokuruka MN. Food and Nutrition Security in East Africa (Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania): Status, Challenges and Prospects. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Masaaka R. The regulation of GMO in Tanzania: Stakeholder analysis on awareness, understanding, accessibility and compliance of GMO regulation [ Dessertation]. Wageningen University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lukanda IN. Activists as strategic science communicators on the adoption of GMOs in Uganda. 2020. J Sci Commun. 2020;19(06):C06. doi:10.22323/2.19060306.
   Google Scholar
• Kikulwe EM, Wesseler J, Falck-Zepeda J. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda. Appetite. 2011;57:401–13. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.06.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikulwe EM, Birol E, Wesseler J, Falck‐zepeda J. A latent class approach to investigating demand for genetically modified banana in Uganda. Agric Econ. 2011;42:547–60. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00529.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISAAA. Brief 55: global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2019. 2020. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/default.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Winning A Kenya lifts ban on genetically modified crops in response to drought. 2022; https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/kenya-lifts-ban-genetically-modified-crops-response-drought-2022-10-04. [Accessed 4 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Kagoe R Why Kenya is turning to genetically modified crops to help with drought Published. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-63487149. [Accessed 9 Nov 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Masinjila S Tanzania cancels GMO trials again: urgent need to uphold ban, disrupt false solutions and neo-colonialism. 2021; https://acbio.org.za/gm-biosafety/tanzania-cancels-gmo-trials-again-uphold-ban-disrupt-false-solutions-neo-colonialism. [Accessed Jan 22 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Ng’hily D Tanzania to step up vigilance after Kenya nods to GMO tech. 2022; https://www.thecitizen.co.tz/tanzania/news/national/-tanzania-to-step-up-vigilance-after-kenya-nods-to-gmo-tech-3973966. [Accessed Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Agaba J GM crops: Kenya and Nigeria progress as Uganda falters [Internet]. 2021. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2021/08/gm-crops-kenya-and-nigeria-progress-as-uganda-falters. [Accessed Aug 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of the republic of Uganda. Uganda: bill prohibiting genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the Offing. 2022; https://www.africa-newsroom.com/press/uganda-bill-prohibiting-genetically-modified-organisms-gmos-in-the-offing?lang=en. [Accessed 17 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre S, Cook LA, Griffiths MA. Murray State ’ s digital commons consumer perceptions of genetically modified foods: a mixed- method approach. J Consum Mark. 2019;36:113–23. doi:10.1108/JCM-12-2016-2043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccia F, Punzo G. A choice experiment on consumer perceptions of three generations of genetically modified foods. Appetite. 2021;161:105158. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105158. Available from.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode L, Vraga EK, Tully M. Correcting misperceptions about genetically modified food on social media: examining the impact of experts, social media heuristics, and the gateway belief model. Sci Commun. 2021;43:225–51. doi:10.1177/1075547020981375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland HC. Gigantic new locust swarms hit East Africa. National Geographic; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Leisner CP. Climate change impacts on food security-focus on perennial cropping systems and nutritional value. Plant Sci. 2020;293:110412. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavhiza NJ, Zargar M, Prikhodko SI, Pakina EN, Murtazova K-S, Nakhaev MR. Improving crop productivity and ensuring food security through the adoption of genetically modified crops in sub-Saharan Africa. Agronomy. 2022;12:439. doi:10.3390/agronomy12020439.
   Google Scholar
• James C Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. 2016; http://biotechbenefits.croplife.org/impact_areas/developing-country-benefits/. [Accessed February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeve SL, Keijzer T, Kaitila R, Wickama J, Sterk G. Vegetation resilience under increasing drought conditions in northern Tanzania. Remote Sens. 2021;13(22):4592. doi:10.3390/rs13224592.
   Google Scholar
• Mukasa J, Olaka L, Yahya Said M. Drought and households’ adaptive capacity to water scarcity in Kasali, Uganda. J Water Clim Chang. 2020;11:217–32. doi:10.2166/wcc.2020.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komen J, Tripathi L, Mkoko B, Ofosu DO, Oloka H, Wangari D. Biosafety regulatory reviews and leeway to operate: case studies from Sub-Sahara Africa. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1–13. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Biosafety Agency. NBA Board Approves Environmental Release Application for GM Cassava. Press Release.
   Google Scholar
• Biosafety NewsBiosafety News. 2021. https://www.biosafetykenya.go.ke/images/newsletter2021/NBA-BIOSAFETY-NEWS-5TH-EDITION.pdf. ISO 9001:2015.
   Google Scholar
• Maina J. Bad press and wild claims have unfairly slowed GM crops on the continent. Afr Scientists Say. 10 Aug 2021. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2021/08/bad-press-and-wild-claims-have-unfairly-slowed-gm-crops-on-the-continent-african-scientists-say.
   Google Scholar
• Kedem S GM foods: the battle for Africa. https://african.business/2019/11/agribusiness-manufacturing/gm-foods-the-battle-for-africa. [Accessed 20 Nov 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Anami L, Bob Karashani GA East Africa divided on GM foods as Kenya lifts ban. 2022; https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/east-africa/east-africa-divided-on-gm-foods-3976652. [Accessed 9 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Nyinondi P, Dulle F, Nawe J. Perception of agricultural biotechnology among farmers, journalists and scientists in Tanzania -. Univ Dare S Salaam J. 2017;12:106–20. f.
   Google Scholar
• Ledermann ST, Novy A. GMOs and Bt cotton in Tanzania: The smallholder perspective. ANSAF; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis CP, Newell JN, Herron CM, Nawabu H. Tanzanian farmers’ knowledge and attitudes to GM biotechnology and the potential use of GM crops to provide improved levels of food security. A Qualitative Study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:1–10. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minja D Govt tasks biotech researchers on scientific advice [Internet]. 2022; Available from: https://dailynews.co.tz/govt-tasks-biotech-researchers-on-scientific-advice/. [Accessed 26 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Schnurr MA, Gore C. Getting to ‘yes’: governing genetically modified crops in Uganda. J Int Dev. 2015;27:55–72. doi:10.1002/jid.3027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ssekandi RS Why Uganda does not have a GMO law. 2022. https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/fight-against-hunger-genetically-modified-organisms-look-promising-there-are-serious-worries#:~:text=Agriculture%20in%20Uganda%3A%20For%20smallholders,negative%20impacts%20outweigh%20potential%20benefits. [Accessed 19 Oct 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Zawedde BM, Kwehangana M, Oloka HK. Readiness for environmental release of Genetically Engineered (GE) plants in Uganda. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:1–11. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikulwe EM, Falck-Zepeda JB, Oloka HK, Chambers JA, Komen J, Zambrano P,Hanson H. Benefits from the adoption of genetically engineered innovations in the Ugandan banana and cassava sectors: an ex ante analysis. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kikulwe EMOn the introduction of genetically modified bananas in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer preferences. Wageningen University and Research. 2010. http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wda/lang/1931947.
   Google Scholar
• Ecuru J, Naluyima H. Biotechnology developments in Uganda and associated challenges. African Crop Sci J. 2011;18:133–39. doi:10.4314/acsj.v18i4.68641.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of the republic of Uganda. Parliament passes bill to promote use of genetically modified materials. 2018. https://www.parliament.go.ug/news/2968/parliament-approves-gmo-bill. [Accessed 29 Nov 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Bendana C. Uganda removes key hurdle to GM crops. 2017. https://www.science.org/content/article/uganda-removes-key-hurdle-gm-crops. [Accessed Oct 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Masiga CW. Public submissions on the Uganda National Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill, 2012 reveal potential way forward for Uganda legislators to pass the bill. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:1–5. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprink T, Wilhelm R, Hartung F. Genome editing around the globe: an update on policies and perceptions. Plant Physiol. 2022;190:1579–87. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan D, Ramasamy K, Sellamuthu G, Jayabalan S, Venkataraman G. CRISPR for crop improvement: an update review. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra R, Zheng W, Joshi RK, Kaijun Z. Genome Editing Strategies Towards Enhancement of Rice Disease Resistance. Rice Sci. 2021;28:133–45. doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2021.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modrzejewski D, Hartung F, Sprink T, Krause D, Kohl C, Wilhelm R. What is the available evidence for the range of applications of genome-editing as a new tool for plant trait modification and the potential occurrence of associated off-target effects: a systematic map. Environ Evid. 2019;8:1–33. doi:10.1186/s13750-019-0171-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malzahn A, Lowder L, Qi Y. Plant genome editing with TALEN and CRISPR. Cell Biosci. 2017;7:21. doi:10.1186/s13578-017-0148-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEPAD. Technical support development of guidance document genome editing Burkina faso. [Internet]. 2021; Available from: https://www.nepad.org/news/technical-support-development-of-guidance-document-genome-editing-burkina-faso. [Accessed 06 Sept 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Meeme V Three African Nations take the lead in agricultural use of genome editing. 2021. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2021/01/three-african-nations-take-the-lead-in-agricultural-use-of-genome-editing/#:~:text=Kenya%2C%20Nigeria%20and%20Eswatini%20are,security%20and%20increasing%20farmers’%20incomes. [Accessed 26 Jan 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Hartley S, Smith RDJ, Kokotovich A, Opesen C, Habtewold T, Ledingham K, Raymond B, Rwabukwali CB. Ugandan stakeholder hopes and concerns about gene drive mosquitoes for malaria control: new directions for gene drive risk governance. Malar J. 2021;20:1–13. doi:10.1186/s12936-021-03682-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturme MHJ, Van Der Berg JP, Bouwman LMS, De Schrijver A, De Maagd RA, Kleter GA, Battaglia-De Wilde E. Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants. ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2022;2:192–201. doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen JP, Zhao D, Sasik R, Luebeck J, Birmingham A, Bojorquez-Gomez A, Licon K, Klepper K, Pekin D, Beckett AN, et al. Combinatorial CRISPR–Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions. Nat Methods. 2017;14:573–76. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck-Zepeda JB, Gruère GP, Sithole-Niang I, Eds. Genetically modified crops in Africa: economic and policy lessons from countries south of the Sahara. Intl Food Policy Res Inst. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rock J, Schurman R. The complex choreography of agricultural biotechnology in Africa. Afr Aff. 2020;119:499–525. doi:10.1093/afraf/adaa021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnurr MA. Africa’s gene revolution: genetically modified crops and the future of African agriculture. Canada: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Global hunger index. 2022; Available from: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/ranking.html.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull C, Lillemo M, Hvoslef-Eide TAK. Global regulation of genetically modified crops amid the gene edited crop boom–a review. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:630396. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.630396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISAAA . Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2018: biotech crops continue to help meet the challenges of increased population and climate change. ISAAA Br No 54 ISAAA. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops, 2011. Ithaca, NY: isaaa; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kargho A, Jawo E, Abubakar AS, Entonu ME, Yahaya J, Camara J. Development, adoption and commercialization of GM crops: a needed commodity in nigeria. Afr J Biol Sci. 2020;02(02):1. doi:10.33472/AFJBS.2.2.2020.1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Adenle AA Adoption of commercial biotech crops in Africa. International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Singapore. 2011;7:176–80.
   Google Scholar
• Zavale H, Mabaya E, Christy R Smallholders’ cost efficiency in Mozambique: implications for improved maize seed adoption. Staff Paper; 2005. No. SP 2005-04.
   Google Scholar
• Salami A, Kamara AB, Brixiova Z. Smallholder agriculture in East Africa: trends, constraints and opportunities. Tunisia: African Development Bank Tunis; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gbadegesin LA, Ayeni EA, Tettey CK, Uyanga VA, Aluko OO, Ahiakpa JK, Okoye CO, Mbadianya JI, Adekoya MA, Aminu RO, et al. GMOs in Africa: status, adoption and public acceptance. Food Control. 2022;109193:109193. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109193.
   Google Scholar
• Senyolo MP, Long TB, Omta O. Enhancing the adoption of climate-smart technologies using public-private partnerships: lessons from the WEMA case in South Africa. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev. 2021;24:755–76. doi:10.22434/IFAMR2019.0197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edge M, Oikeh SO, Kyetere D, Mugo S, Mashingaidze K. Water efficient maize for Africa: a public-private partnership in technology transfer to smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. From agriscience to agribusiness: Theories, policies and practices in technology transfer and commercialization. 2018; pp. 391–412.
   Google Scholar
• Wambugu F, Daniel K, Eds. Biotechnology in Africa. In: Emergence, Initiatives and Future. Nairobi, Kenya: Springer International Publisher Switzerland; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mukonyo R Will Kenya lift its GMO ban as its agriculture falters? 2019; Available from: https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2019/10/will-kenya-lift-gmo-ban-agriculture-falters/. [Accessed 10 Oct 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Afedraru L Uganda’s anti-GMO activists blamed for stonewalling nation’s new biosafety rules (Kampala, Uganda: Genetic Literacy Project). 2019; Available from: https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2019/05/06/ugandas-anti-gmo-activists-blamed-for-stonewalling-nations-new-biosafety-rules. [Accessed 6 May 2019].
   Google Scholar