Landrace and GM maize cultivars’ selection choices among rural farming households in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

References

• Mutanyagwa AP, Isinika A, Kaliba AR. The factors influencing farmers’ choice of improved maize seed varieties in Tanzania. null. 2018;6(4):55–63. doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v6i4.ah01.
   Google Scholar
• Ngcinela S, Mushunje A, Taruvinga A, Ngarava S, Mutengwa CS. Determinants of genetically modified (GM) maize adoption and the intensity of adoption in or Tambo District Municipality, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. GM Crops And Food. 2019;10(1):1–11. doi:10.1080/21645698.2019.1580127. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman KB, Blekking JP, Attari SZ, Evans TP. Maize seed choice and perceptions of climate variability among smallholder farmers. Glob Environ Change. 2017;47:51–63. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambanje A, Taruvinga A, Mushunje A, Mutengwa C, Ngarava S. Determinants of food security status amongst smallholder farmers utilizing different maize varieties in or Tambo District, South Africa. J Soc Sci Res. 2020;6(2):133–39. doi:10.32861/jssr.62.133.139.
   Google Scholar
• Shiferaw B, Kassie M, Jaleta M, Yirga C. Adoption of improved wheat varieties and impacts on household food security in Ethiopia. Food Policy. 2014;44:272–84. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer K, van den Berg J, Mutengwa C. Is Bt maize effective in improving South African smallholder agriculture? S Afr J Sci. 2015 National Research Foundation;111(1–2):1–2. doi:10.17159/sajs.2015/a0092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lividini K, Fiedler JL. Assessing the promise of biofortification: a case study of high provitamin a maize in Zambia. Food Policy. 2015;54:65–77. doi:10.1016/J.FOODPOL.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimonyo VGP, Mutengwa CS, Chiduza C, Tandzi LN. Participatory variety selection of maize genotypes in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. null. 2019;47(1):103–17. doi:10.17159/2413-3221/2019/v47n1a493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassie M, Jaleta M, Mattei A. Evaluating the impact of improved maize varieties on food security in Rural Tanzania: evidence from a continuous treatment approach. Food Secur. 2014;6(2):217–30. doi:10.1007/S12571-014-0332-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Zhang Z, Li Y, Zhu L, Jiang L. Efficient production of d-tagatose via DNA scaffold mediated oxidoreductases assembly in vivo from whey powder. Food Res Int. 2023;166:112637. doi:10.1016/J.FOODRES.2023.112637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Ying H, Chen M, Bai J, Xue Y, Yin Y, Batchelor WD, Yang Y, Bai Z, Du M, et al. Optimization of China’s maize and soy production can ensure feed sufficiency at lower nitrogen and carbon footprints. Nature Food. 2021;2(6):426–33. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00300-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asfaw S, Kassie M, Simtowe F, Lipper L. Poverty reduction effects of agricultural technology adoption: a micro-evidence from rural Tanzania. 2012;48(9):1288–305. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.671475.
   Google Scholar
• Adenle AA, Wedig K, Azadi H. Sustainable agriculture and food security in Africa: the role of innovative technologies and international organizations. Technol Soc. 2019:58. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regier GK, Dalton TJ, Williams JR. Impact of genetically modified maize on smallholder risk in South Africa. AgBioforum. 2012;15:328–36.
   Google Scholar
• Smale M, Mason N. Hybrid seed and the economic well-being of smallholder maize farmers in Zambia. J Dev Stud. 2014;50(5):680–95. doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.887690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadi H, Samiee A, Mahmoudi H, Jouzi Z, Rafiaani Khachak P, de Maeyer P, Witlox F. Genetically modified crops and small-scale farmers: main opportunities and challenges. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015;36(3):434–46. doi:10.3109/07388551.2014.990413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GD, Glover D. Genetically modified crops and the ‘food crisis’: discourse and material impacts. Dev Pract. 2011;21(4–5):509–16. doi:10.1080/09614524.2011.562876.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Jia Q, Li Y, Zhang T, Chen J, Ren Y, Dong K, Xu S, Shi N-N, Fu S. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar on growth, nutrient absorption, and physiological properties of Maize (Zea mays L.). null. 2022;8(12):1275. doi:10.3390/jof8121275.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang S, Yang X, Wang W, Liu X, Wang H, Zhang H. Enhancing the fermentation performance of frozen dough by ultrasonication: effect of starch hierarchical structures. J Cereal Sci. 2022;106:103500. doi:10.1016/J.JCS.2022.103500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire R, Huang W-C. Household wealth and adoption of improved maize varieties in Nepal: a double-hurdle approach. Food Secur. 2015;7(6):1321–35. doi:10.1007/s12571-015-0518-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uduji JI, Okolo-Obasi EN. Adoption of improved crop varieties by involving farmers in the e-wallet program in Nigeria. J Crop Imp. 2018;32(5):717–37. doi:10.1080/15427528.2018.1496216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbeck A, Binimelis R, Defarge N, Steinbrecher R, Székács A, Wickson F, Antoniou M, Bereano PL, Clark EA, Hansen M, et al. No scientific consensus on GMO safety. null. 2015;27(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pellegrino E, Bedini S, Nuti M, Ercoli L. Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: a meta-analysis of 21 years of field data. null. 2018;8(1):1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21284-2.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2015: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. Genetic Modi Crops & Food. 2017;8(2):117–47. doi:10.1080/21645698.2017.1309490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISAAA. Impact of GM crops on soil health. Pocket K. No.57. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. 2020. [accessed 2023 Nov 23].https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/57/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Taheripour F, Tyner WE. The contribution of glyphosate to agriculture and potential impact of restrictions on use at the global level. Genetic Modi Crops And Food. 2017;8(4):216–28. doi:10.1080/21645698.2017.1390637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016. GM Crops & Food. 2018;9(2):59–89. doi:10.1080/21645698.2018.1464866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouse M, Sengupta D, Zambrano P, Zepeda JF. Genetically modified maize: less drudgery for her, more maize for him? Evidence from smallholder maize farmers in South Africa. World Dev. 2016;83:27–38. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuma M, Kolanisi U, Modi A. The potential of integrating provitamin a-biofortified maize in smallholder farming systems to reduce malnourishment in South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):805. doi:10.3390/ijerph15040805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazvimbakupa F, Thembinkosi Modi A, Mabhaudhi T. Seed quality and water use characteristics of maize landraces compared with selected commercial hybrids. Chil J Agr Res. 2015;75(1):13–20. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392015000100002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansiime MK, Mastenbroek A. Enhancing resilience of farmer seed system to climate-induced stresses: insights from a case study in West Nile region, Uganda. J Rural Stud. 2016;47:220–30. doi:10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi SL, Ceccarelli S, Blair MW, Upadhyaya HD, Are AK, Ortiz R. Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21(1):31–42. doi:10.1016/J.TPLANTS.2015.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Xu W, Hou P, Liu G, Liu W, Wang Y, Zhao R, Ming B, Xie R, Wang K, et al. Improving maize grain yield by matching maize growth and solar radiation. null. 2019;9(1):3635. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40081-z.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzon F, Arandia Rios LW, Caviedes Cepeda GM, Céspedes Polo M, Chavez Cabrera A, Muriel Figueroa J, Medina Hoyos AE, Jara Calvo TW, Molnar TL, Narro León LA, et al. Conservation and use of Latin American maize diversity: pillar of nutrition security and cultural heritage of humanity. Agronomy. 2021;11(1):172. doi:10.3390/agronomy11010172.
   Google Scholar
• Odjo S, Bongianino N, González Regalado J, Cabrera Soto ML, Palacios-Rojas N, Burgueño J, Verhulst N. Effect of storage technologies on postharvest insect pest control and seed germination in mexican maize landraces. Insects. 2022;13(10):878. doi:10.3390/insects13100878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios-Pola G, Perales Rivera H, de Dios Figueroa-Cárdenas J, Hernández Estrada ZJ. Changes in the physical, chemical, and sensory properties from three native corn landraces from Chiapas using two nixtamalization times. Int J Gastro And Food Sci. 2021;25:100373. doi:10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenzi M, Couix N. Growing maize landraces in industrialized countries: from the search for seeds to the emergence of new practices and values. Int J Agric Sustain. 2022;20(3):327–45. doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1933360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan BF, Fernandez-Tendero E, Fort A, Ryder P, Dupouy G, Deletre M, Curley E, Brychkova G, Schulz B, Spillane C. Hybridity has a greater effect than paternal genome dosage on heterosis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):120. doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1338-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abid M, Schneider UA, Scheffran J. Adaptation to climate change and its impacts on food productivity and crop income: perspectives of farmers in rural Pakistan. J Rural Stud. 2016;47:254–66. doi:10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2016.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibanda M, Mushunje A, Mutengwa CS. Factors influencing the demand for improved maize open pollinated varieties (OPVs) by smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. null. 2016;7(2):14–26. doi:10.5897/jco2015.0142.
   Google Scholar
• Manga VK, Bhatt RK. Adaptation and selection of crop varieties for hot arid climate of Rajasthan. Indian J Plant Sci. 2015;4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Danso-Abbeam G, Bosiako JA, Ehiakpor DS, Mabe FN. Adoption of improved maize variety among farm households in the northern region of Ghana. Cogent Eco And Finance. 2017;5(1):1416896. doi:10.1080/23322039.2017.1416896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martey E, Etwire PM, Kuwornu JKM. Economic impacts of smallholder farmers’ adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties. Land Use Policy. 2020:94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouma JO, de Groote H. Determinants of improved maize seed and fertilizer adoption in Kenya. J Dev Agric Econ. 2011;3(11):529–36. http://www.academicjournals.org/JDAE
   Google Scholar
• Gebre GG, Isoda H, Rahut DB, Amekawa Y, Nomura H. Gender differences in the adoption of agricultural technology: the case of improved maize varieties in southern Ethiopia. Womens Stud Int Forum. 2019;76:102264. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour G, Doss C, Marenya P, Meinzen-Dick R, Passarelli S (2016). Women’s empowerment and the adoption of improved maize varieties: evidence from Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania. Selected Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics AssociationAnnual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31-August 2, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Katengeza SP, Holden ST, Lunduka RW. Adoption of drought tolerant maize varieties under rainfall stress in Malawi. J Agr Econ. 2019;70(1):198–214. doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunduka R, Fisher M, Snapp S. Could farmer interest in a diversity of seed attributes explain adoption plateaus for modern maize varieties in Malawi? Food Policy. 2012;37(5):504–10. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marone D, Russo MA, Mores A, Ficco DBM, Laidò G, Mastrangelo AM, Borrelli GM. Importance of landraces in cereal breeding for stress tolerance. Plants. 2021;10(7):1267. doi:10.3390/plants10071267.
   Google Scholar
• Sibiya J, Tongoona P, Derera J, Makanda I. Farmers’ desired traits and selection criteria for maize varieties and their implications for maize breeding: a case study from KwaZulu-natal province, South Africa. null. 2013;114(1). www.jarts.info
   Google Scholar
• Das BF, van Deventer A, Wessels G, Mudenda J, Key DR. Role and challenges of the private seed sector in developing and disseminating climate-smart crop varieties in Eastern and Southern Africa. In: Rosenstock TS, Nowak A, and Girvetz E editors. The climate-smart agriculture papers: investigating the business of a productive, resilient and low emission future. London, United Kingdom: Springer Open Chambers; 2019. pp. 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mabaya E, Gouse M, Mugoya M, Quilligan E, van der Walt W. South Africa brief 2017-The African seed access index. 2017. [accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://www.tasai.org/reports
   Google Scholar
• DAFF. (2017). South African Grain Market Analysis Report.
   Google Scholar
• Chimonyo GVP. An evaluation of stress tolerant open pollinated maize varieties in selected environments of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Master’s Thesis, Department of Crop Science, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• OR Tambo District Municipality. (2020). OR Tambo District Municipality EC: Profile and analysis, District Development Model. https://www.cogta.gov.za/ddm/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ORTamnco-September-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eastern Cape Socio Economic Consultative Council (ECSECC). (2017). King Sabata Dalindyebo Local Municipality Social Economic Review and Outlook, 2017. https://www.ecsecc.org/documentrepository/informationcentre/king-sabata-dalindyebo-local-municipality_52786.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ekemini-Richard M, Ayanwale AB, Adelegan OJ. Factors influencing the choice of climate change adaptation methods among underutilized indigenous vegetable farmers. null. 2020;28(2):1–10. doi:10.1080/19315260.2020.1848960.
   Google Scholar
• Feleke FB, Berhe M, Gebru G, Hoag D. Determinants of adaptation choices to climate change by sheep and goat farmers in Northern Ethiopia: the case of Southern and Central Tigray, Ethiopia. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1). doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3042-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ojo TO, Baiyegunhi LJS. Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies and its impact on the net farm income of rice farmers in south-west Nigeria. Land Use Policy. 2020;95:103946. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CTJ, Jensen KL, Yen ST. Awareness of foodborne pathogens among US consumers. Food Qual Prefer. 2005;16(5):401–12. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukarumbwa P, Taruvinga A, Madikizela A. An analysis of factors that determines the choice of indigenous chicken (IC) owned by rural households in Alice Communal Area, South Africa. null. 2021;61(3):247–60. doi:10.17306/J.JARD.2021.01436.
   Google Scholar
• Taruvinga A, Kambanje A, Mushunje A, Mukarumbwa P. Determinants of livestock species ownership at household level: evidence from rural or Tambo District Municipality, South Africa. Pastoralism. 2022;12(1):8. doi:10.1186/s13570-021-00220-6.
   Google Scholar
• Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Res Policy. 2004;33(10):1477–92. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman R. The impact of Genetically Modified (GM) crops in modern agriculture: a review. GM Crops & Food. 2017;8(4):195–208. doi:10.1080/21645698.2017.1413522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinyemi BE, Mushunje A. Land ownership and usage for agriculture: empirical evidence from South African living conditions Survey. Cogent Soc Sci. 2019;5(1):1663691. doi:10.1080/23311886.2019.1663691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo BHZ (2010). The use and role of indigenous knowledge in small-scale agricultural systems in Africa: the case of farmers in northern Malawi [ PhD Thesis]. University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Ngigi M, Mueller U, Birner R. 2015. The role of livestock portfolios and group-based approaches for building resilience in the face of accelerating climate change: an asset-based panel data analysis from rural Kenya, ZEF- Discussion papers on development policy. (205) doi:10.2139/ssrn.2676574
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z-Y, Wang P-Y, Xiong X-B, Wang Y-B, Zhou R, Tao H-Y, Grace UA, Wang N, Xiong Y-C. Environmental risk of multi-year polythene film mulching and its green solution in arid irrigation region. J Hazard Mater. 2022;435:128981. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldosari F, Al Shunaifi MS, Ullah MA, Muddassir M, Noor MA. Farmers’ perceptions regarding the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Northern Pakistan. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2019;18(2):211–17. doi:10.1016/J.JSSAS.2017.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Bezu S, Kassie GT, Shiferaw B, Ricker-Gilbert J. Impact of improved maize adoption on welfare of farm households in Malawi: a panel data analysis. World Dev. 2014;59:120–31. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinyolo S. Technology adoption and household food security among rural households in South Africa: the role of improved maize varieties. Technol Soc. 2020;60:101214. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerop R, Dannenberg P, Owuor G, Mshenga P, Kimurto P, Willkomm M, Hartmann G. Factors affecting the adoption of agricultural innovations on underutilized cereals: the case of finger millet among smallholder farmers in Kenya. Afr J Agric Res. 2018;13(36):1888–900. doi:10.5897/AJAR2018.13357.
   Google Scholar
• Mwangi M, Kariuki S. Factors Determining Adoption of New Agricultural Technology by Smallholder Farmers in Developing Countries. J Eco And Sust Develop. 2015;5:2222–855.
   Google Scholar
• Kadafur IM, Idrisa YL, Shehu A. Adoption of improved maize varieties in northern Guinea Savannah of Borno State, Nigeria. J Agric Ex. 2020;24(1):34–41. doi:10.4314/jae.v24i1.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire R, Huang W, Poudel MP. Adoption intensity of agricultural technology: empirical evidence from smallholder maize famers in Nepal. null. 2015;4:139–46.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y-X, Erhunmwunsee F, Liu M, Yang K, Zheng W, Tian J. Antimicrobial mechanisms of spice essential oils and application in food industry. Food Chem. 2022;382:132312. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan C, Yang K, Erhunmwunsee F, Li Y-X, Liu M, Pan S, Yang D, Lu G, Ma D, Tian J. Inhibitory effect of cinnamaldehyde on Fusarium solani and its application in postharvest preservation of sweet potato. Food Chem. 2023;408:135213. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu S, Yang X, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Wang H. Effect of germination on nutritional properties and quality attributes of glutinous rice flour and dumplings. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;108:104440. doi:10.1016/J.JFCA.2022.104440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Geng Q, Luo Y, Xie R, Sun T, Wang Z, Qin L, Zhao W, Liu M, Li Y, et al. Dysfunction of FadA‐cAMP signalling decreases Aspergillus flavus resistance to antimicrobial natural preservative Perillaldehyde and AFB1 biosynthesis. Environ Microbiol. 2022;24(3):1590–607. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Vitale J, Park P, Adams B, Agesa B, Korir M. Socioeconomic determinants of hybrid maize adoption in Kenya. Afr J Agric Res. 2017;12(8):617–31. doi:10.5897/ajar2016.11958.
   Google Scholar
• Zamisa O, Taruvinga A. Drivers of genetically modified (GM) maize production among rural farming households in Ngqushwa Local Municipality, South Africa. A triple hurdle approach. null. 2022;65(3):229–41. doi:10.17306/J.JARD.2022.01544.
   Google Scholar
• Salasya B, Mwangi W, Mwabu D, Diallo A. Factors influencing adoption of stress-tolerant maize hybrid (WH 502) in western Kenya. Afr J Agric Res. 2007;2(10):544–51. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR
   Google Scholar
• Afolami CA, Obayelu AE, Vaughan II. Welfare impact of adoption of improved cassava varieties by rural households in South Western Nigeria. Agric Food Econ. 2015;3(1):1–17. doi:10.1186/s40100-015-0037-2.
   Google Scholar