https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9059-4653
References
- Evanega S, Conrow J, Adams J, Lynas M. The state of the “GMO” debate - toward an increasingly favorable and less polarized media conversation on ag-biotech? GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):38–49. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2051243.
- Pew Research Center. Public and scientists’ views on science and society. 2015; https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/
- https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e17830/
- Walker B, Malson J. Science, god, and nature: a textual and frequency analysis of Facebook comments on news articles about agricultural and environmental gene editing. Environ Commun. 2020;14(7):1004–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1761853.
- Zhang X, Chen A, Zhang W. Before and after the Chinese gene-edited human babies: multiple discourses of gene editing on social media. Public Underst Sci. 2021;30(5):570–87. 096366252098775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520987754.
- Calabrese C, Ding J, Millam B, Barnett GA. The uproar over gene-edited babies: a semantic network analysis of CRISPR on Twitter. Environ Commun. 2019;14(7):954–70. doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1699135.
- Ewa W-G, Agata T, Milica P, Anna B, Dennis E, Nick V, Godelieve G, Selim C, Naghmeh A, Tomasz T. Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security. GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):218–41. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946.
- Yang Y, Hobbs JE. Supporters or opponents: will cultural values shape consumer acceptance of gene editing? J Food Prod Mark. 2020;26(1):17–37. doi:10.1080/10454446.2020.1715316.
- Wirz CD, Scheufele DA, Brossard D. Societal debates about emerging genetic technologies: toward a science of public engagement. Environ Commun. 2020;14(7):859–64. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1811478.
- Lynas M. Seeds of Science: why we got it so wrong on GMOs. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2018.