No obvious unintended effects was found in gene editing rice through transcriptional and proteomic analysis

References

• Huang S, Yan YL, Su F, Huang XL, Xia DD, XX J, YH D, Lv P, Chen FL, Lv YW. Research progress in gene editing technology. Front Biosci. 2021;26(10):916–27. doi:10.52586/4997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmon ZH, Reem NT, Dalrymple J, Soyk S, Swartwood KE, Rodriguez-Leal D, Eck JV, Lippman ZB. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nature Plants. 2018;4(10):766–70. doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0259-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu RF, Yang YC, Qin RY, Li H, Qiu CH, Li L, Wei PC, Yang JB. Rapid improvement of grain weight via highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in rice. J Genet Genomics. 2016;43(8):529–32. doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YP, Cheng X, Shan QW, Zhang Y, Liu JX, Gao CX, Qiu JL. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(9):947–51. doi:10.1038/nbt.2969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong Y, Wang YP, Li C, Zhang R, Chen KL, Ran YD, Qiu JL, Wang DW, Gao CX. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(5):438–40. doi:10.1038/nbt.3811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer KA, Wu WH, Colgan DF, Tsang SH, Bassuk AG, Mahajan VB. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Methods. 2017;14(6):547–48. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Gu F, Liu D, Yin C, Zhao S, Chen H, Zhang J, Yang C, Zhan X, Zhang M. Proteomic analysis of elite soybean Jidou17 and its parents using Itraq-based quantitative approaches. Proteome Sci. 2013;11(1):12. doi:10.1186/1477-5956-11-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang X, Yang J, Liu X, Song Y, Wang Z. Genetic variation assessment of stacked-trait transgenic maize via conventional breeding. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):346. doi:10.1186/s12870-019-1956-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Lv J, Wang H, Li L, Peng Y, Qu LJ. A comparative proteomics approach to detect unintended effects in transgenic Arabidopsis. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(10):629–39. doi:10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60155-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedair M, Glenn KC. Evaluation of the use of untargeted metabolomics in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops. Metabolomics. 2020;16(10). doi:10.1007/s11306-020-01733-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricroch AE, Berge JB, Kuntz M. Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(4):1752–61. doi:10.1104/pp.111.173609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullot G, Boutin J, Toutain J, Prat F, Pennamen P, Rooryck C, Teichmann M, Rousseau E, Lamrissi-Garcia I, Guyonnet-Duperat V, et al. 2019. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces megabase-scale chromosomal truncations. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1136. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09006-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuo E, Sun Y, Wei W, Yuan T, Ying W, Sun H, Yuan L, Steinmetz LM, Li Y, Yang H. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science. 2019 Apr 19;364(6437):289–92. doi:10.1126/science.aav9973. Epub 2019 Feb 28. PMID: 30819928; PMCID: PMC7301308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Zong Y, Gao Q, Zhu ZX, Wang YP, Qin P, Liang CZ, Wang DW, Qiu JL, Zhang F, et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science. 2019;364(6437):292–95. doi:10.1126/science.aaw7166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuladhar R, Yeu Y, Piazza JT, Tan Z, Clemenceau JR, Wu X, Barrett Q, Herbert J, Mathews DH, Kim J. CRISPR-Cas9-based mutagenesis frequently provokes on-target mRNA misregulation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4056. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12028-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li J, Manghwar H, Sun L, Wang P, Wang G, Sheng H, Zhang J, Liu H, Qin L, Rui H, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations and considerable inherent genetic or/and somaclonal variations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited cotton plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 May;17(5):858–68. Epub 2018 Oct 30. PMID: 30291759; PMCID: PMC6587709. doi:10.1111/pbi.13020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Peng XL, Yang ZJ, Zhao WW, Xu WT, Hao JR, Wu WH, Shen XL, Luo YB, Huang KL. iTRAQ mitoproteome analysis reveals mechanisms of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana induced by ochratoxin a. Toxins. 2017;9(5):167. doi:10.3390/toxins9050167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu HP. Expression of cytochrome P450 CYP81A6 in rice: tissue specificity, protein subcellular localization, and response to herbicide application. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2015;16(2):113–22. 2015. doi:10.1631/jzus.b1400168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan G, Zhang X, Liu K, Zhang J, Wu X, Zhu J, Tu J. Map-based cloning of a novel rice cytochrome P450 gene CYP81A6 that confers resistance to two different classes of herbicides. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;61(6):933–43. doi:10.1007/s11103-006-0058-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang T-C, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–95. doi:10.1038/nbt.3122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cingolani P, Platts A, L WL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: sNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012;6(2):80–92. doi:10.4161/fly.19695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng YY, Li JQ, Wu SF, Zhu YP. Integrated nr database in protein annotation system and its localization. Comput Eng. 2006;32(5):71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29. doi:10.1038/75556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA. The COG database: a tool for genome scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):33–36. doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;42(D1):D222–D30. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(90001):D277–D80. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Lin J, Minguez P, Bork P, von Mering C, et al. STRING v9. 1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1):D808–D15. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(90001):D115–D19. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504. doi:10.1101/gr.1239303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer V, Shen B, Zhang W, Hodgkins A, Skarnes WC, Huang X, Skarnes WC. Off-target mutations are rare in Cas9-modified mice. Nat Methods. 2015;12(6):479. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veres A, Gosis B, Ding Q, Collins R, Ragavendran A, Brand H, Erdin S, Cowan CA, Talkowski M, Musunuru K. Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(1):27–30. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson KR, Haeussler M, Watanabe C, Janakiraman V, Lund J, Modrusan Z, Stinson J, Bei Q, Buechler A, Yu C, et al. CRISPR off-target analysis in genetically engineered rats and mice. Nat Methods. 2018 Jul;15(7):512–14. Epub 2018 May 21. PMID: 29786090; PMCID: PMC6558654. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0011-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar