Providing appropriate information to consumers boosts the acceptability of genome-edited foods in Japan

References

• Tsuda M, Watanabe KN, Ohsawa R. Regulatory status of genome-edited organisms under the Japanese Cartagena Act. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:387. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo M, Tachikawa M. Implications and lessons from the introduction of genome-edited food products in Japan. Front Genome Ed. 2022;4:899154. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.899154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kondo K, Taguchi C. Japanese regulatory framework and approach for genome-edited foods based on latest scientific findings. Food Safety. 2022;10(4):113–28. doi:10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-21-00016.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka S, Arai C, Takayama M, Matsukura C, Ezura H. Efficient increase of ɣ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in tomato fruits by targeted mutagenesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7057. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06400-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto K, Washio Y, Yoshiura Y, Toyoda A, Ueno T, Fukuyama H, Kato K, Kinoshita M. Production of a breed of red sea bream Pagrus major with an increase of skeletal muscle mass and reduced body length by genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Aquaculture. 2018;495:415–27. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto K, Washio Y, Murakami Y, Katayama T, Kuroyanagi M, Kato K, Yoshiura Y, Kinoshita M. An effective microinjection method for genome editing of marine aquaculture fish: tiger pufferfish Takifugu rubripes and red sea bream Pagrus major. Fish Sci. 2019;85(1):217–26. doi:10.1007/s12562-018-1277-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao H, Gadlage MJ, Lafitte HR, Lenderts B, Yang M, Schroder M, Farrell J, Snopek K, Peterson D, Feigenbutz L, et al. Superior field performance of waxy corn engineered using CRISPR–Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(5):579–81. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0444-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosotsubo M, Tsunoda H, Kano K, Okamura A, Hoshino T. Public Attitudes to Science and Technology: Social Acceptance of New Technologies. NISTEP RESEARCH MATERIAL; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Farid M, Cao J, Lim Y, Arato T, Kodama K. Exploring factors affecting the acceptance of genetically edited food among youth in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2935. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins M, Calabrese C, Featherstone JD, Barnett GA. Understanding knowledge and perceptions of genome editing technologies: a textual analysis of major agricultural stakeholder groups. J Sci Commun. 2021;20(5):A07. doi:10.22323/2.20050207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii T, Araki M. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35(7):1507–18. doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabei Y, Shimura S, Kwon Y, Itaka S, Fukino N. Analyzing twitter conversation on genome-edited foods and their labeling in Japan. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:11. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.535764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz L, Svanidze M, Tissier A, Brand Duran A. Consumers’ willingness to buy CRISPR gene-edited tomatoes: Evidence from a choice experiment case study in Germany. Sustainability. 2022;14:971. doi:10.3390/su14020971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marette S, Disdier A-C, Beghin JC. A comparison of EU and US consumers’ willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples. Appetite. 2021;159:105064. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muringai V, Fan X, Goddard E. Canadian consumer acceptance of gene-edited versus genetically modified potatoes: A choice experiment approach. Can J Agric Econom. 2020;68:47–63. doi:10.1111/cjag.12221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shew AM, Nalley LL, Snell HA, Nayga RM, Dixon BL. CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation. Global Food Secur. 2018;19:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Bearth A, Kaptan G, Kessler SH. Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes: an experiment on people’s perceptions and acceptance of food biotechnology in the UK and Switzerland. Agric Human Values. 2022;39(3):1117–31. doi:10.1007/s10460-022-10311-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunes MC, Teixeira DL, von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ, Olsson IAS. Is gene editing an acceptable alternative to castration in pigs? PLoS One. 2019;14:e0218176–e. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassoued R, Macall DM, Hesseln H, Phillips PWB, Smyth SJ. Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion. Transgenic Res. 2019;28(2):247–56. doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori I. Consumer perceptions of genome edited food. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Hartmann C. Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies. Nat Food. 2020;1(6):343–50. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka Y. Japanese attitudes toward genetically modified (GM) foods from JGSS-2005 Data [in Japanese]. JGSS Res Series No 3. 2007;6:95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Vecchione M, Feldman C, Wunderlich S. Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(3):329–35. doi:10.3109/09637486.2014.986072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich S, Gatto KA. Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Advances In Nutrition. 2015;6(6):842–51. doi:10.3945/an.115.008870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komoto K, Okamoto S, Hamada M, Obana N, Samori M, Imamura T. Japanese consumer perceptions of genetically modified food: Findings from an international comparative study. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5(3):e23–e. doi:10.2196/ijmr.5850.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McPhetres J, Rutjens BT, Weinstein N, Brisson JA. Modifying attitudes about modified foods: Increased knowledge leads to more positive attitudes. J Environ Psychol. 2019;64:21–29. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Nam SJ. The influence of consumers’ knowledge on their responses to genetically modified foods. GM Crops & Food. 2021;12(1):146–57. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1840911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hakim MP, Zanetta LDA, de Oliveira JM, da Cunha DT. The mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods in Brazil: Consumer’s knowledge, trust, and risk perception. Food Res Int. 2020;132:109053. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam SJ, Lee B. The moderating effect of information channel on the relationship between type of information search and knowledge of genetically modified organisms. GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):26–37. doi:10.1080/21645698.2021.2015272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato-Nitta N, Maeda T, Inagaki Y, Tachikawa M. Expert and public perceptions of gene-edited crops: attitude changes in relation to scientific knowledge. Palgrave Commun. 2019;5(1):137. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0328-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato-Nitta N, Inagaki Y, Maeda T, Tachikawa M. Effects of information on consumer attitudes towards gene-edited foods: a comparison between livestock and vegetables. CABI Agric Biosci. 2021;2(1):14. doi:10.1186/s43170-021-00029-8.
   Google Scholar
• Beghin JC, Gustafson CR. Consumer valuation of and attitudes towards novel foods produced with new plant engineering techniques: A review. Sustainability. 2021;13:11348. doi:10.3390/su132011348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Authority EFS. Special eurobarometer wave EB91.3: report. Food safety in the EU: April 2019. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez O, Hesseln H, Smyth SJ. Canadian consumer preferences regarding gene-edited food products. Front Genome Editing. 2022;4. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.854334.
   Google Scholar
• Vidigal MCTR, Minim VPR, Simiqueli AA, Souza PHP, Balbino DF, Minim LA. Food technology neophobia and consumer attitudes toward foods produced by new and conventional technologies: A case study in Brazil. Food Sci Technol. 2015;60(2):832–40. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2014.10.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucht JM. Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops. Viruses. 2015;7(8):4254–81. doi:10.3390/v7082819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberman D, Kaplan S, Kim E, Hochman G, Graff G. Continents divided: Understanding differences between Europe and North America in acceptance of GM crops. GM Crops & Food. 2013;4(3):202–08. doi:10.4161/gmcr.26981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Board NBA. Norwegian consumers’ attitudes toward gene editing in Norwegian agriculture and aquaculture. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fernbach PM, Light N, Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P. Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(3):251–56. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar