https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7887-9041
References
- Jaffe G. Regulating transgenic crops: a comparative analysis of different regulatory processes. Transgenic Res. 2004;13(1):5–19. doi:10.1023/B:TRAG.0000017198.80801.fb.
- Pinstrup-Andersen P. Biotech and the poor. The Washington Post. 1999 October 27. [Accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1999/10/27/biotech-and-the-poor/428df76b-5027-410f-a6ad-61f9ad4d8dc8/
- Caradus JR. Impacts of growing and utilising genetically modified crops and forages – a New Zealand perspective. New Zeal J Agr Res. 2022;65:1–30. doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2077380.
- Spök A, Sprink T, Allan AC, Yamaguchi T, Dayé C. Towards social acceptability of genome-edited plants in industrialised countries? Emerging evidence from Europe, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. Front Genome Ed. 2022;4:899331. Article. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.899331.
- Gatica-Arias A. The regulatory current status of plant breeding technologies in some Latin American and the Caribbean countries. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2020;141:229–42. doi:10.1007/s11240-020-01799-1.
- Bawa AS, Anilakumar KR. Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns-a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2013;50:1035–46. doi:10.1007/s13197-012-0899-1.
- Dederer HG. The challenge of regulating genetically modified organisms in the European Union: trends and issues. In: Nakanishi Y, editor. Contemporary Issues in Environmental Law. Environmental Protection in the European Union. Vol. 5. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2016. p. 139–68. doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55435-6_8.
- Jiang L. Commercialization of the gene-edited crop and morality: challenges from the liberal patent law and the strict GMO law in the EU. New Genet Soc. 2020;39:191–218. doi:10.1080/14636778.2019.1686968.
- Lucht J, Lucht. Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses. 2015;7:4254–81. doi:10.3390/v7082819.
- Ritchie H, Roser M. Forests and deforestation. Published online at OurWorldInData.Org. 2021 [Accessed 2023 Apr 20]. https://ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation
- Shahbandeh M. Import volume of soybeans worldwide in 2021/22, by country. 2022 [Accessed 20 Apr 2023]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/612422/soybeans-import-volumeworldwide-by-country/
- Van Eenennaam AL, Young AE. Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J Anim Sci. 2014;92(10):4255–78. doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8124.
- Blagoevska K, Ilievska G, Jankuloski D, Dimzoska BS, Crceva R, Angeleska A The controversies of genetically modified food. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 854; 2021. 12009 Article. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012009/meta
- Flachowsky G, Schafft H, Meyer U. Animal feeding studies for nutritional and safety assessments of feeds from genetically modified plants: a review. J Verbr Lebensm. 2012;7:179–94. doi:10.1007/s00003-012-0777-9.
- FSANZ. About FSANZ. 2020 [Accessed 2023 Jan 27]. https://www.foodstandards.govt.nz/about/pages/default.aspx
- Mfe. 2004. Genetic modification - the New Zealand approach. Ministry for the environment, wellington, NZ. ME Number 426. ISBN: 0-478-24055-4. [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/genetic-modification-nz-approach.pdf
- OGTR. Office of the gene regulator. Legislative documents. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Jan 27]. https://www.ogtr.gov.au/about-ogtr/legislative-documents
- Baulcombe SD, Dunwell J, Jones J, Pickett J, Puigdomenech P. GM science update: a report to the council for science and technology. 2014 [Accessed 2023 Apr 7]. http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/292174/cst-14-634a-gm-science-update.pdf
- Ellens KW, Levac D, Pearson C, Savoie A, Strand N, Louter J, Tibelius C. Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies. Transgenic Res. 2019;28(S2):165–68. doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00153-2.
- Marden E. Risk and regulation: US regulatory policy on genetically modified food and agriculture. Boston College Law Review. 2003;44:733.
- Office of Science and Technology Policy. Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology. 1986 [Accessed 2020 Jan 29].https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/coordinated_framework.pdf
- Baima S, De Giacomo M, Giovannelli V, Ilardi V, Pietrangeli B, Rastelli V. Cisgenesis: an European Union (EU) perspective. In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: safety, legal and social issues. concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 159–78. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_7.
- Becker G, Marcińska J, Artemel MN, Juszczyk A. Elucidation and acceptance—scientific, legal, and ethical aspects of cisgenesis in times of an alleged dwindling faith in science. In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: safety, legal and social issues. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 77–99. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_4.
- Caplanova A, Sirakovova E. Economic considerations of cisgenics as a sub-set of genetically modified organisms. In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic Crops: safety, Legal and Social Issues. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Springer, Cham; 2023. p. 135–58. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_6.
- Hefferon K. Cis genesis of crops. In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: potential and prospects. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 67–78. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06628-3_4.
- Koul B. Cisgenics and crop improvement. In: Cisgenics and transgenics. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2022. p. 107–29. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2119-3_3.
- Srinivas KR. Cisgenesis and cisgenic crops: need for a paradigm shift in harnessing and governance. In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: safety, legal and social issues. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 255–68. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_11.
- Dayé C, Spök A, Allan AC, Yamaguchi T, Sprink T. Social acceptability of cisgenic plants: public perception, consumer preferences, and legal regulation. In: Chaurasia C Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: safety, legal and social issues. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 43–75.doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10721-43.
- Aziz MA, Brini F, Rouached H, Masmoudi K. Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1027828. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1027828.
- Rinaldo AR, Ayliffe M 2015. Gene targeting and editing in crop plants: a new era of precision opportunities. Mol Breeding 35: 40 Article. 10.1007/s11032-015-0210-z
- Doudna JA, Charpentier E 2014. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Sci 346: 1258096 Article. 10.1126/science.1258096
- Menz J, Modrzejewski D, Hartung F, Wilhelm R, Sprink T 2020. Genome edited crops touch the market: a view on the global development and regulatory environment. Front Plant Sci. 11: 586027 Article. 10.3389/fpls.2020.586027
- FAO. Gene editing and agrifood systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; 2022. 86p. 10.4060/cc3579en
- Jones MGK, Fosu-Nyarko J, Iqbal S, Adeel M, Romero-Aldemita R, Arujanan M, Kasai M, Wei X, Prasetya B, Nugroho S, et al. Enabling trade in gene-edited produce in Asia and Australasia: the developing regulatory landscape and future perspectives. Plants. 2022;11(19):2538. Article. doi:10.3390/plants11192538.
- Cabrera-Ponce JL, Barraza A, Alvarez-Venegas R. Cisgenic crops: major strategies to create cisgenic plants based on genome editing. In: In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: potential and prospects. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 213–35. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06628-3_11.
- Ghose K, Yuan N, Dampanaboina L, Mendu V. Cisgenesis in the era of genome editing and modern plant biotechnology. In: Chaurasia A Kole C, editors. Cisgenic crops: potential and prospects. Concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 257–79. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06628-3_13.
- Gutmann A, Moreno JD. Keep CRISPR safe - regulating a genetic revolution. Foreign Affairs. 2018 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2018-04-16/keep-crispr-safe
- USDA. Agricultural biotechnology glossary. 2022 [Accessed 2022 Dec 22]. https://www.usda.gov/topics/biotechnology/biotechnology-glossary#:~:text=Genetic%20engineering%3A%20Manipulation%20of%20an,to%20as%20recombinant%20DNA%20techniques
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2000 [[Accessed 2023 May 11] https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf
- Novina CD, Sharp PA. The RNAi revolution. Nature. 2004;430(6996):161–64. doi:10.1038/430161a.
- Ossowski S, Schwab R, Weigel D. Gene silencing in plants using artificial microRnas and other small RNAs. Plant J. 2008;53(4):674–90. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03328.x.
- Parisi C, Rodríguez-Cerezo E. Current and future market applications of new genomic techniques. EUR 30589 EN. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg; 2021. p. 52. doi:10.2760/02472JRC123830.
- Whelan AI, Lema MA. Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina. GM Crops & Food. 2015;6(4):253–65. doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1114698.
- Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447(7143):396–98. doi:10.1038/nature05913.
- Faltus T. The applicability of the European GMO legislation to epigenetically modified organisms. Frontiers In Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1124131. Article. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1124131.
- Myskja BK, Myhr AI. Non-safety assessments of genome-edited organisms: Should they be included in regulation? Sci Eng Ethics. 2020;26(5):2601–27. doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00222-4.
- Misra MK, Harries A, Dadlani M. Role of seed certification in quality assurance. In: Dadlani M Yadava D, editors. Seed science and technology. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 267–98. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5888-512.
- Dadlani M, Yadava DK. Seed science and technology. Singapore: Springer; 2023. p. 440. ISBN 978-981-19-5888-5.
- Parsons FG. The early history of seed certification, 1900–1970. In: McDonald M Pardee W, editors. The role of seed certification in the seed industry. CSSA Special Publication Number 10; 1985. p. 3–8. doi:10.2135/cssaspecpub10.c2.
- Ajanahalli SR, Tikoo SK, Angadi SP, Kadaru SB, Ajanahalli SR, Vasudeva Rao MJ 2022. Regulatory aspects of the seed business in relation to plant breeding. In: Tiwari A, Tikoo K., Angadi SP, Kadaru SB, Ajanahalli S.R, Vasudeva Rao M.J. (Editors). Market-driven plant breeding for practicing breeders. Springer, Singapore. Pp. 323–87. 10.1007/978-981-19-5434-4_10
- OECD. Seed schemes. Promoting the use of certified agriculture seed. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/seeds/#:~:text=The%20OECD%20Schemes%20for%20the,in%20the%2061%20participating%20countries
- OECD. OECD schemes for the varietal certification or the control of seed moving in international trade. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Apr 20]. https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/seeds/documents/codes-and-schemes-list-of-varieties-eligible-for-seed-certification.pdf
- ESCAA. European Seed Certification Agencies Association. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 23]. http://www.escaa.org/index.php
- Akinbo O, Obukosia S, Ouedraogo J, Sinebo W, Savadogo M, Timpo S, Mbabazi R, Maredia K, Makinde D, Ambali A. Commercial release of genetically modified crops in Africa: Interface between biosafety regulatory systems and varietal release systems. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:1124131. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.605937.
- Komen J, Wafula DK. Authorizing GM crop varieties: policy implications for seed systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agronomy. 2021;11(9):1855. Article. doi:10.3390/agronomy11091855.
- Crump DK. Seed certification - an aspect of quality assurance with special reference to white clover seed. In: Hare MD Brock JL editors. Producing herbage seeds. New Zealand Grassland Association Grassland Research and Practice Series No. 2; 1985. p. 75–78.
- Jordens R. Progress of plant variety protection based on the international convention for the protection of new varieties of plants (UPOV convention). World Pat Inf. 2005;27(3):232–43. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2005.03.004.
- Srinivasan CS, Shankar B, Holloway GJ. An empirical analysis of the effects of plant variety protection legislation on innovation and transferability. In: Exploring diversity in the european agri -food system. Xth European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) International Congress: Zaragoza, Spain; 2002 August 28-31. p. 1–17. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.24788.
- Otto HJ. The current status of seed certification in the seed industry. In: McDonald MB Pardee WD, editors. The role of seed certification in the seed industry. CSSA Special Publication Number 10; 1985. p. 9–17. doi:10.2135/cssaspecpub10.c3.
- UPOV. UPOV. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 19]. https://www.upov.int/portal/index.html.en
- UPOV. Status in relation to UPOV. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Apr 2]. https://www.upov.int/members/en/status_in_relation_to_upov.html
- IPONZ. New Zealand intellectual property office. PVR Process. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 2]. https://www.iponz.govt.nz/about-ip/pvr/pvr-process/
- Foletto B. European rules for registration of varieties on a national catalogue (and a recommended variety list) for cereals. Proceedings of the COST ACTION 860 – SUSVAR and ECO-PB Workshop on Value for Cultivation and Use testing of organic cereal varieties What are the key issues?; 2008 February 28 and 29; Brussels, Belgium. p. 19–10. http://www.itab.asso.fr/downloads/actes%20suite/proceedings-brussel0208.pdf#page=9
- Escajedo San-Epifanio L, Filibi I, Lasa López A, Puigdomènech P, Uncetabarrenechea Larrabe J. Possible EU futures for CRISPR-edited plants: little margin for optimism? Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1124131. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1141455.
- Gov.UK. Add a new plant variety to the national lists. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Jan 30]. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-lists-of-agricultural-and-vegetable-crops
- Kiewiet B. Plant variety protection in the European community. World Pat Inf. 2005;27(4):319–27. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2005.07.006.
- Van Waes J The VCU variety testing for agricultural crops in an European context. Proceedings of the COST ACTION 860 – SUSVAR and ECO-PB Workshop on Value for Cultivation and Use testing of organic cereal varieties What are the key issues?; 2008 February 28 and 29; Brussels, Belgium. p. 11–15. http://www.itab.asso.fr/downloads/actes%20suite/proceedings-brussel02_08.pdf#page=9
- Norwegian Food Safety Authority. Application for listing a plant variety on the Norwegian official list of varieties. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 2]. https://www.mattilsynet.no/planter_og_dyrking/plantesorter/godkjenning/application_for_listing_a_plant_variety_on_the_norwegian_official_list_of_varieties.3298/binary/Application%20for%20listing%20a%20Plant%20Variety%20on%20the%20Norwegian%20Official%20List%20of%20Varieties
- Government of Canada. Variety registration. 2020 [Accessed 2023 Apr 3]. https://inspection.canada.ca/plant-varieties/variety-registration/eng/1299175847046/1299175906353
- MSP Corporate. State registration of plant varieties. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 2]. https://mspcorporate.com/plant-varieties-registration.htm
- Morsy MAM. Variety registration and protection in Egypt. 2009 [Accessed 2023 Apr 7]. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/agr/meetings/ge.06/2009/Egypt_PPTs/S2_MohamedMorsy.pdf
- Setimela PS, Badu-Apraku B, Mwangi W. Variety testing and release approaches in DTMA project countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Harare, Zimbabwe, CIMMYT. 2009 ISBN: 978-92-9059-252-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282604655
- Info Trade Kenya. Kenya Gazette supplement No 202. 2016 [Accessed 2023 Apr 2]. https://infotradekenya.go.ke/media/Seeds%20and%20Plant%20Varieties%20Act%20Cap%20326%20-%20Legal%20Notice.pdf
- Mwila G. Commentary on the Zambian plant variety and seeds act 1998. In: Halewood M, editor. Farmers’ crop varieties and farmers’ rights challenges in taxonomy and law. Chapter 22. Taylor and Francis, Routledge; 2016. p. 370–72. ISBN:9781136537486. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=1pWfAQAACAAJ.
- Santilli J. Commentary on Brazilian seed law. In: Halewood M, editor. Farmers’ crop varieties and farmers’ rights challenges in taxonomy and law. Chapter 20. Taylor and Francis, Routledge; 2016. p. 338–45. ISBN:9781136537486.https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=1pWfAQAACAAJ.
- Medaglia JC. Commentary on the draft proposal for the establishment of a native seed registry in Costa Rica. In: Halewood M, editor. Farmers’ crop varieties and farmers’ rights challenges in taxonomy and law. Chapter 25. Taylor and Francis, Routledge; 2016. p. 385–91. ISBN:9781136537486. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=1pWfAQAACAAJ.
- MOA. Ministry of agriculture, rural development and environment, republic of cyprus. Cultivar Registration Centre. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 30]. http://www.moa.gov.cy/moa/ari/ari.nsf/All/87657456739A0FD9C225786A0023CEA5
- Jabatan Pertanian. Varieties registered for national crop list. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 2]. http://pvpbkkt.doa.gov.my/
- Blaustein RJ. Commentary in plant variety regulation in the United States of America. In: Halewood M, editor. Farmers’ crop varieties and farmers’ rights challenges in taxonomy and law. Chapter 19. Taylor and Francis, Routledge; 2016. p. 333–37. ISBN:9781136537486. https://books.google.co.nz/books?id=1pWfAQAACAAJ.
- PBRA. The National Forage Variety Trials (NFVT) demonstrate how different ryegrass cultivars perform both regionally and nationally. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 30]. https://www.pbra.co.nz/trial-data/forage-grasses/
- MLA. Pasture trial network. Meat & Livestock Australia. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 7]. https://www.mla.com.au/extension-training-and-tools/tools-calculators/pasture-trial-network/
- GRDC. Groundcover. NVT harvest reports capture latest variety information for WA growers previous article. Grains Research And Development Corporation. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 7]. https://groundcover.grdc.com.au/agronomy/national-variety-trials/nvt-harvest-reports-capture-latest-variety-information-for-wa-growers
- Lusk JL, Jamal M, Kurlander L, Roucan M, Taulman L. A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J Agric Resour Econ. 2005;30:28–44.
- Ortega DL, Lin W, Ward PS. Consumer acceptance of gene-edited food products in China. Food Qual Prefer. 2022;95:104374. Article. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104374.
- Cui K, Shoemaker SP 2018. Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: a nationwide Chinese consumer study. NPJ Sci Food 2: 10 Article. 10.1038/s41538-018-0018-4
- Marette S, Disdier A-C, Beghin JC. A comparison of EU and US consumers’ willingness to pay for gene-edited food: evidence from apples. Appetite. 2021;159:105064. Article. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105064.
- Palmieri N, Simeone M, Russo C, Perito MA. Profiling young consumers’ perceptions of GMO products: a case study on Italian undergraduate students. Int J Gastro Food Sci. 2020;21:100224. Article. doi:10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100224.
- Research First. Public sentiment toward gene editing/advanced breeding solutions. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Jan 17]. https://researchfirst.co.nz/public-perceptions-of-gene-editing/
- Ankeny RA, Harms R. Focus groups on consumers’ responses to the use of New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) in food production. The University of Adelaide. 2022 [Accessed 28 Jan 2023]. https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/code/proposals/Documents/FSANZ%20NBT%20final%20report.pdf
- Research First. Genetically modified foods. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Mar 18]. https://researchfirst.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/31-Genetically-Modified-Foods-March-2023_v1.1.pdf/
- Spendrup S, Eriksson D, Fernqvist F. Swedish consumers´ attitudes and values to genetic modification and conventional plant breeding – the case of fruit and vegetables. GM Crops & Food. 2021;12(1):342–60. doi:10.1080/21645698.2021.1921544.
- Popek S, Halagarda M. Genetically modified foods: consumer awareness, opinions and attitudes in selected EU countries. Int J Consum Stud. 2017;41(3):325–32. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12345.
- Lusk JL, Daniel MS, Mark DR, Lusk CL. Alternative calibration and auction institutions for predicting consumer willingness to pay for nongenetically modified corn chips. J Agric Resour Econ. 2001;26:40–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40987094.
- Strobbe S, Wesana J, Van Der Straeten D, De Steur H. Public acceptance and stakeholder views of gene edited foods: a global overview. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41(6):736–40. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.011.
- Devos Y, Ortiz-García S, Hokanson KE, Raybould A. Teosinte and maize × teosinte hybrid plants in Europe−Environmental risk assessment and management implications for genetically modified maize. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2018;259:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.02.032.
- Macall DM, Williams C, Gleim S, Smyth SJ. Canadian consumer opinions regarding food purchase decisions. J Agric Food Res. 2021;3:100098. Article. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100098.
- Shew AM, Nalley LL, Snell HA, Nayga RM, Dixon BL. CRISPR versus GMOs: public acceptance and valuation. Global Food Secur. 2018;19:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.005.
- Pappalardo G, D’Amico M, Lusk JL. Comparing the views of the Italian general public and scientists on GMOs. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2021;56(7):3641–50. doi:10.1111/ijfs.14993.
- Wunderlich S, Gatto KA. Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Am Soc Nutr Adv Nutr. 2015;6(6):842–51. doi:10.3945/an.115.008870.
- Morris SH, Adley CC. Genetically modified food issues: attitudes of irish university scientists. Brit Food J. 2000;102(9):669–91. doi:10.1108/00070700010362040.
- Ichim MC. The more favorable attitude of the citizens toward GMOs supports a new regulatory framework in the European Union. GM Crops & Food. 2021;12(1):18–24. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1795525.
- Charlebois S, Somogyi S, Music J, Cunningham C. Biotechnology in food: Canadian attitudes towards genetic engineering in both plant-and animal-based foods. BFJ. 2019;121:3181–92. doi:10.1108/BFJ-07-2018-0471.
- Smyth SJ. Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops. GM Crops & Food. 2017;8(1):35–43. doi:10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468.
- Borrello M, Cembalo L, Vecchio R, Georgantzis N. Role of information in consumers’ preferences for eco-sustainable genetic improvements in plant breeding. Plos One. 2021;16(7):e0255130. Article. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255130.
- Knight JG, Mather DW, Holdsworth DK, Ermen DF. Acceptance of GM food—an experiment in six countries. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(5):507–08. doi:10.1038/nbt0507-507.
- Sendhil R, Yadav S, Prashat PR, Ragupathy R, Rama Prashat PG, Workie E, Ragupathy R, Ramasundaram P. Consumer perception and preference towards genetically modified (GM) foods: bibliometric evidence and policy imperatives. agriRxiv. Wallingford. 2021;2021:42. doi:10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00061.
- Smith MR, König A. Environmental risk assessment for food-related substances. Food Control. 2010;21(12):1588–600. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.12.032.
- Grant WJ, Bray H, Harms R, Ankeny RA, Leach J. Consumer responses to the use of NBTs in the production of food: a systematic literature review. Australian National University. 2021. [Accessed 2023 May 8]. https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/code/proposals/Pages/p1055-definitions-for-gene-technology-and-new-breeding-techniques.aspx
- FSANZ. Final report. Review of food derived using new breeding techniques. 2019 [Accessed 5 Jun 2023]. https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/gmfood/Documents/NBT%20Final%20report.pdf
- Reader’s Digest. Misinformation vs. Disinformation: how to tell the difference. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 10]. https://www.rd.com/article/misinformation-vs-disinformation/
- Lynas M, Adams J, Conrow J. Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019-2021. GM Crops & Food; 2022. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2140568.
- Lassoued R, Macall DM, Smyth SJ, Phillips PW, Hesseln H. How should we regulate products of new breeding techniques? Opinion of surveyed experts in plant biotechnology. Biotechnol Reports. 2020;e00460. doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00460.
- Ventura L. 5 influential activist NGOs spreading crop biotechnology misinformation in Latin America. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2023/05/19/top-5-activist-groups-spreading-anti-gmo-myths-in-latin-america/
- Roberts P. Kenyans subjected to world’s worst misinformation on GMOs, study finds. Alliance For Science. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://allianceforscience.org/blog/2023/02/kenyans-subjected-to-worlds-worst-misinformation-on-gmos-study-finds/#:~:text=An%20earlier%20Alliance%20for%20Science,makes%20it%20the%20world’s%20worst
- GE Free NZ 2023. [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://www.gefree.org.nz/
- Fernbach PM, Light N, Scott SE, Inbar Y, Rozin P. Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3:251–56. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3.
- OECD. Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology. Paris, France, OECD. 1993 [Accessed 2023 Apr 20]. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/18/41036698.pdf
- OECD. Test No. 408: repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents. In: OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section, 4, health effects. Paris, France: OECD; 1998 [Accessed 2023 Apr 20]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264070707-en.pdf?expires=1654508260&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=05CFAC4B1B5D0517CAF3B24EDFCCC20F.
- Pusztai A. Genetically modified foods: Are they a risk to human/animal health? Action Bioscience. 2001 [Accessed 2023 Apr 20] https://www.globalmagazine.info/sites/default/files/PDF/pusztai-gm-foods-risk-human-animal-health-2001.pdf
- Pusztai A. Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risk of GM? Nutr Health. 2002;16:73–84. doi:10.1177/026010600201600202.
- Smyth SJ, Phillips PWB. Risk, regulation and biotechnology: the case of GM crops. GM Crops & Food. 2014;5(3):170–77. doi:10.4161/21645698.2014.945880.
- Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrassi G, Ripandelli D. An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica. 2008;164(3):853–80. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9643-8.
- EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(Suppl 1):S2–70. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008.
- Gizaw Z. Public health risks related to food safety issues in the food market: a systematic literature review. Environ Health Prev Med. 2019;24(1):68. Article. doi:10.1186/s12199-019-0825-5.
- Hull RO, Bosse MA, Tzotzos GE. Training for implementing risk assessment regulations for the release of GM crops. Aspects Appl Biol. 2009;96:1–8.
- van den Belt H. Debating the precautionary principle: “guilty until proven innocent” or “Innocent until proven guilty”? Plant Physiol. 2003;132(3):1122–26. doi:10.1104/pp.103.023531.
- Burke D. GM food and crops: what went wrong in the UK? Many of the public’s concerns have little to do with science. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(5):432–36. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400160.
- Belderok A, de Vries AG, van der Spek L. Genetically modified organisms in food and beverages. Roland Berger Report, The Netherland. 2021 [Accessed 5 Jun 2023]. https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/Genetically-modified-organisms-in-food-and-beverages.html
- DeFrancesco L. How safe does transgenic food need to be? Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(9):794–802. doi:10.1038/nbt.2686.
- Dunn SE, Vicini JL, Glenn KC, Fleischer DM, Greenhawt MJ. The allergenicity of genetically modified foods from genetically engineered crops: a narrative and systematic review. Ann Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2017;119:214–22. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.010.
- Ladics GS. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops. J Immunotoxicol. 2019;16(1):43–53. doi:10.1080/1547691X.2018.1533904.
- Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;34(1):77–88. doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595.
- Panchin AY, Tuzhikov AI. Published GMO studies find no evidence of harm when corrected for multiple comparisons. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37(2):213–17. doi:10.3109/07388551.2015.1130684.
- Sasson A. Genetically modified crops (GM crops) and derived foods: brief review of their impact on health and environment, and of their social acceptance. Front In Sci Eng. 2018 [Accessed 20 Apr 2023];8:1–52. https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/fsejournal/article/download/27990/14625.
- The Royal Society. Is it safe to eat GM crops? 2016 [Accessed 2023 Jan 1]. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/gm-plants/is-it-safe-to-eat-gm-crops/
- Bernstein JA, Bernstein IL, Bucchini L, Goldman LR, Hamilton RG, Lehrer S, Rubin C, Sampson HA. Clinical and laboratory investigation of allergy to genetically modified foods. Environ Health Perspectives. 2003;111(8):1114–21. doi:10.1289/ehp.5811.
- McHughen A. The regulation of GM foods: who represents the public interest? Int J. 2000;55(4):624–32. doi:10.1177/002070200005500406.
- Caradus JR. Intended and unintended consequences of genetically modified crops – myth, fact and/or manageable outcomes? New Zeal J Agr Res. 2022;65:1–101. doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2141273.
- Ladics GS, Bartholomaeus A, Bregitzer P, Doerrer NG, Gray A, Holzhauser T, Jordan M, Keese P, Kok E, Macdonald P, et al. Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants. Transgenic Res. 2015;24(4):587–603. doi:10.1007/s11248-015-9867-7.
- Lack G. Clinical risk assessment of GM foods. Toxicol Lett. 2002;127:337–40. doi:10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00517-3.
- Nordlee JA, Taylor SL, Townsend JA, Thomas LA, Bush RK. Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):688–92. doi:10.1056/NEJM199603143341103.
- van Baalen S, Srinivas KR, He G. Challenges of global technology assessment in biotechnology—bringing clarity and better understanding in fragmented global governance. In: Hennen L, Hahn J, Ladikas M, Lindner R, Peissl W van Est R., editors. Technology assessment in a globalized world: facing the challenges of transnational technology governance. Cham:Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 149–73. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10617-0_8.
- FAO/WHO. Consultation on the assessment of biotechnology in food production and processing as related to food safety (1990: Geneva, Switzerland). Strategies for assessing the safety of foods produced by biotechnology: report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation [held in Geneva from 5 to 10 November 1990]. World Health Organization. 1991. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/41465
- United Nations Treaty Collection. Chapter XXVII Environment 8. A Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 29 January 2000. 2023 [Accessed 13 Jan 2023]. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-8-a&chapter=27&clang=_en#top
- ISAAA. Pocket K No. 8: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. 2004 [Accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/8/default.asp
- Convention on Biological Diversity. The cartagena protocol on biosafety. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 13]. https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/
- Smyth SJ. Genetically modified crops, regulatory delays, and international trade. Food Energy Secur. 2017;6:78–86. doi:10.1002/fes3.100.
- Araki M, Ishii T. Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(3):145–49. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010.
- Convention on Biological Diversity. Text of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. 2021 [Accessed 2023 May 11]. https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/
- Kerr WA. Worlds apart on GMOs—Can trade agreements bridge the gap? NABC report 27. stewardship for the sustainability of genetically engineered crops: the way forward in pest management, coexistence, and trade. 2015. p. 133–45. https://hdl.handle.net/1813/51463.
- Holtby KL, Kerr WA, Hobbs JE. International environmental liability and barriers to trade. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar; 2007. p. 192. ISBN: 978184720 0976. https://ideas.repec.org/b/elg/eebook/12610.html.
- Hobbs AL, Hobbs JE, Kerr WA. The biosafety protocol: Multilateral agreement on protecting the environment or protectionist club? J World Trade. 2005;39:281–300. doi:10.54648/TRAD2005024.
- FAO/WHO. Codex Alimentarius, international food standards. Biotechnology. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 31]. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/thematic-areas/biotechnology/en/
- FAO. Global community meeting of the FAO GM Foods Platform. Towards effective risk-based GM food safety assessment and regulatory management. Meeting Report. Rome; 2020. doi:10.4060/ca8945en
- Vega Rodríguez A, Rodríguez-Oramas C, Sanjuán Velázquez E, Hardisson de la Torre A, Rubio Armendáriz C, Carrascosa Iruzubieta C. Myths and realities about genetically modified food: a risk-benefit analysis. Appl Sci. 2022;12(6):2861. Article. doi:10.3390/app12062861.
- FAO. Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA plants. CAC/GL 45-2003. 2003 [Accessed 2023 Jan 17]. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/CAC.GL_45_2003.pdf
- Tsakok I, Mengoub FE 2021. Genetically modified organisms: promising or problematic for food security? A review of major developments in selected industrialized countries Part I. Policy Brief, Policy Centre For The New South. https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/PB_21-02_Tsakok-Mengoub.pdf
- Genetic Literacy Project. Human and Agriculture Gene Editing: Regulations and Index. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 28]. https://crispr-gene-editing-regs-tracker.geneticliteracyproject.org/
- Ishii T, Araki M. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome edited crops. GM Crops & Food; 2017. doi:10.1080/21645698.2016.1261787.
- Royal Society Te Apārangi. Gene editing scenarios in the primary industries. Wellington, New Zealand: Royal society Te Apārangi; 2019. p. 36. ISBN: 978-1-877264-41-2.
- OECD. Developments in delegations on the safety assessment of novel foods and feeds, June 2022 – April 2023. Series On The Safety Of Novel Foods And Feeds No. 36. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5].https://one.oecd.org/document/ENV/CBC/MONO(2023)29/en/pdf
- OECD. Biotechnology update - Internal Co-ordination Group for Biotechnology (ICGB) No. 41 – June 2022. Meeting of the Environment Policy Committee (EPOC) at ministerial level. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Jan 17]. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/biotrack/biotech-update-issue-41-june-2022.pdf
- Friedrichs S, Takasu Y, Kearns P, Dagallier B, Oshima R, Schofield J, Moreddu C. Policy considerations regarding genome editing. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(10):1029–32. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.005.
- WTO. Uruguay round agreement: trips part II — standards concerning the availability, scope and use of intellectual property rights, sections 5 and 6. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Apr 17]. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04c_e.htm
- McAfee K. Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in the biotechnology battles. Geoforum. 2003;34:203–19. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00089-1.
- USDA. WTO members support policy approaches to enable innovation in agriculture. 2018 [Accessed 2023 Jan 30]. https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2018/11/02/wto-members-support-policy-approaches-enable-innovation-agriculture
- WTO. International statement on agricultural applications of precision biotechnology. 2018 [Accessed 2023 Jan 30]. https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=250406,249838,249823,249748,249641,249507,249371,249321,249324,249267&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=7&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True
- Hobbs JE, Kerr WA, Smyth SJ. The perils of zero tolerance: Technology management, supply chains and thwarted globalization. IJTG. 2014;7:203–16. doi:10.1504/IJTG.2014.064742.
- Isaac GE. Sanitary and phytosanitary issues. In: In: Kerr WA Gaisford JD., editors. Handbook on international trade policy. Cheltenham UK:Edward Elgar Publishing; 2007. pp. 383–93. doi:10.4337/9781847205469.00047.
- Koop A. Top heavy: Countries by share of the global economy. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/countries-by-share-of-global-economy/
- World Population Review. GDP Ranked by Country 2023. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/by-gdp
- WorldData. Biggest economies in 2021 by gross domestic product. 2021. https://www.worlddata.info/largest-economies.php
- Worldometer. GDP by country. 2017 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/gdp-by-country/
- ISAAA. GM approval database. Ithaca: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications ISAAA. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 20]. https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/default.asp
- Nang’ayo F, Simiyu-Wafukho S, Oikeh SO. Regulatory challenges for GM crops in developing economies: the African experience. Transgenic Res. 2014;23(6):1049–55. doi:10.1007/s11248-014-9805-0.
- Schnurr MA, Gore C. Getting to ‘Yes’: governing genetically modified crops in Uganda. J Int Dev. 2015;27(1):55–72. doi:10.1002/jid.3027.
- Mousa H. Agricultural biotechnology annual - Saudi Arabia. Biotechnology and other new production technologies. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Riyadh_Saudi%20Arabia_SA2022-0015.pdf
- Entine J, Felipe MSS, Groenewald JH, Kershen DL, Lema M, McHughen A, Nepomuceno AL, Ohsawa R, Ordonio RL, Parrott WA, et al. Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world. Transgenic Res. 2021;30(4):551–84. doi:10.1007/s11248-021-00257-8.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Genetically engineered crops: experiences and prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016. p. 607. doi:10.17226/23395.
- Turnbull C, Lillemo M, Hvoslef-Eide TAK. Global regulation of genetically modified crops amid the gene edited crop boom – a review. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:630396. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.630396.
- Regulations. Pesticides: exemptions of certain plant-incorporated protectants derived from newer technologies. posted by the environmental protection agency on May 31, 2023. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 8]. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0508-0122
- Stokstad E. EPA decision to tighten oversight of gene-edited crops draws mixed response. Scienceinsider. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 8]. https://www.science.org/content/article/epa-decision-tighten-oversight-gene-edited-crops-draws-mixed-response
- EPA. Modernizing the regulatory system for biotechnology products: final version of the 2017 update to the coordinated framework for the regulation of biotechnology. Washington, DC: EPA. 2017 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://www.epa.gov/regulation-biotechnology-under-tsca-and-fifra/modernizing-regulatory-system-biotechnology-products
- The White House. Increasing the transparency, coordination, and predictability of the biotechnology regulatory system. 2017 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2017/01/04/increasing-transparency-coordination-and-predictability-biotechnology-regulatory
- Wolt JD, Wolf C. Policy and governance perspectives for regulation of genome edited crops in the United States. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1606. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01606.
- Xiao Z, Kerr WA. Biotechnology in China – regulation, investment, and delayed commercialization. GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):86–96. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2068336.
- Postings R. China approves first gene edited crop in food security push. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://impakter.com/china-approves-first-gene-edited-crop-in-food-security-push/#:~:text=China%20has%20approved%20the%20safety,owned%20Shandong%20Shunfeng%20Biotechnology%20Company.
- Patton D. China plans overhaul of seed rules to pave way for GMO approvals. Reuters. 2021 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://www.reuters.com/article/china-gmo-regulations-idINKBN2HZ0D3
- Patton D. China to allow gene-edited crops in push for food security. Reuters. 2022 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-drafts-new-rules-allow-gene-edited-crops-2022-01-25/
- FFTC. The Japanese policy for genetically modified food. 2017 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://ap.fftc.org.tw/article/1169
- Ministry of the Environment. Japan biosafety clearing house (J-BCH). Domestic law and regulations. 2017 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://www.biodic.go.jp/bch/english/e_index.html
- Ishii T. Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology: japan. In: Dederer, HG. Hamburger, D., editors. Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 239–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3_6.
- Tsuda M, Watanabe KN, Ohsawa R. Regulatory status of genome-edited organisms under the Japanese cartagena act. Frontiers In Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:387. Article. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00387.
- Lemke SL. Gene editing in plants. a nutrition professional’s guide to the science, regulatory, and social considerations. Nutr Commun. 2022;57:57–63. doi:10.1097/NT.0000000000000532.
- Sanatechseed 2021. Launch of genome edited tomato fruit for purchase. [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://sanatech-seed.com/en/20210915-2/
- WELL_NZ. Modern genetic technology – what it is and how it is regulated. A reference document from Te Puna Whakaaronui: New Zealand’s independent food and fibre sector think tank; 2023. ISBN: 978-1-99-106276-5.
- Brookes G. Twenty-one years of using insect resistant (GM) maize in Spain and Portugal: farm-level economic and environmental contributions. GM Crops & Food. 2019;10(2):90–101. doi:10.1080/21645698.2019.1614393.
- Isaac GE, Kerr WA. Whose vision of the future? The entrenched international conflict over genetic modification. Geneva Post Q. 2007;2:87–107.
- Viju C, Yeung MT. The trade implications of the post-moratorium European Union approval system for genetically modified organisms. J World Trade. 2012;46:1207–38. doi:10.54648/TRAD2012037.
- Tagliabue G. The meaningless pseudo‐category of “GMOs”. The trouble with the “new techniques” for genetically modifying crops demonstrates the illogical process‐based definition of GMOs in EU regulation. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:10–13. doi:10.15252/embr.201541385.
- Smyth SJ. Regulatory barriers to improving global food security. Global Food Secur. 2020;26:100440. Article. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100440.
- Sandin P, Munthe C, Björnberg KE. Technology neutrality in European regulation of GMOs. Ethics, Policy & Environ. 2022;25(1):52–68. doi:10.1080/21550085.2020.1865085.
- Eriksson D. The Swedish policy approach to directed mutagenesis in a European context. Physiol Plant. 2018;164(4):385–95. doi:10.1111/ppl.12740.
- Official Journal of the European Communities 2001. Directive 2001/18/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing council directive 90/220/EEC. L 106/1. Off J Euro Commun. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2001L0018:20080321:EN:PDF
- Eckerstorfer MF, Dolezel M, Engelhard M, Giovannelli V, Grabowski M, Heissenberger A, Lener M, Reichenbecher W, Simon S, Staiano G, et al. Recommendations for the assessment of potential environmental effects of genome editing applications in plants in the EU. Plants. 2023;12:1764. Article. doi:10.3390/plants12091764.
- Guehlstorf NP, Hallstrom LK. The role of culture in risk regulations: a comparative case study of genetically modified corn in the United States of America and European Union. Environ Science & Policy. 2005;8(4):327–42. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.04.007.
- Anyshchenko A, Yarnold J. From ‘mad cow’ crisis to synthetic biology: challenges to EU regulation of GMOs beyond the European context. Int Environ Agreements: Polit, Law Econ. 2021;21:391–404. doi:10.1007/s10784-020-09516-1.
- De Marchi B, Ravet JR. Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach. Sci Direct. 1999;31:743–57. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00030-0.
- Davison J. GM plants: science, politics and EC regulations. Plant Sci. 2010;178(2):94–98. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.12.005.
- Henseler M, Piot-Lepetit I, Ferrari E, Mellado AG, Banse M, Grethe H, Parisi C, Hélaine S. On the asynchronous approvals of GM crops: potential market impacts of a trade disruption of EU soy imports. Food Policy. 2013;41:166–76. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.05.005.
- Sieradzki Z, Mazur M, Król B, Kwiatek K. Prevalence of genetically modified soybean in animal feeding stuffs in poland. J Veterinary Res. 2021;65(1):93–99. doi:10.2478/jvetres-2021-0012.
- Turkec A, Lucas SJ, Karlik E. Monitoring the prevalence of genetically modified (GM) soybean in Turkish food and feed products. Food Control. 2016;59:766–72. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.06.052.
- ISAAA. GM approval database – commercial GM traits list. GM crop events approved in European Union. International Service For The Acquisition Of Agri-Biotech Applications. Ithaca, NY. 2022 [Accessed 2023 May 11]. https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/approvedeventsin/default.asp?CountryID=EU&Country=European%20Union
- European Commission. GMO authorisation. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/genetically-modified-organisms/gmo-authorisation_en
- EUR-Lex. Document 52023PC0411. Proposal for a REGULATION of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625. COM/2023/411 final. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2023:411:FIN
- Roger CR. NGT: the European Commission plays a” simultaneously” approach. European Scientist. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 6]. https://www.europeanscientist.com/en/features/ngt-the-european-commission-plays-a-simultaneously-approach/#
- European Commission. Proposal for a REGULATION of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT and of the COUNCIL on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:c88fe9ac-1c06-11ee-806b-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
- Verma V, Negi S, Kumar P, Srivastava DK. Global status of genetically modified crops. In: Kumar Srivastava, D., Kumar Thakur, A. Kumar, P., editors. Agricultural biotechnology: latest research and trends. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2021. p. 305–22. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2339-4_13.
- Chimata MK, Bharti G. Regulation of genome edited technologies in India. Transgenic Res. 2019;28(S2):175–81. doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00148-z.
- GEAC. Genetic engineering appraisal committee, ministry of environment, forest and climate change, government of India. 2017 [Accessed 2023 Jun 10]. http://geacindia.gov.in/
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India. Draft document on genome edited organisms: regulatory framework and guidelines for risk assessment. 2020 [Accessed 2023 Feb 20]. https://dbtindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/DraftRegulatoryFrameworkGenomeEditing9jan2020a.pdf
- Bhattacharya A, Parkhi V, Char B. Genome editing for crop improvement: a perspective from India. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol -Plant. 2021;57:565–73. doi:10.1007/s11627-021-10184-2.
- Barse B, Yazdani SS. India—GMOs/Synthetic biology rules/regulations and biodiversity – a legal perspective from India. In: Chaurasia, A., Hawksworth, D.L. Pessoa de Miranda, M., editors. Gmos. topics in biodiversity, conservation and ecological processes. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 559–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_32.
- Parallel Parliament. Genetic technology (precision breeding) act 2023. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://www.parallelparliament.co.uk/bills/2022-23/genetictechnologyprecisionbreeding#:~:text=make%20provision%20about%20the%20release,animals%3B%20and%20for%20connected%20purposes.
- Legislation.gov.uk. Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/6/contents/enacted
- Smyth S, McHughen A. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6(3):213–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00309.x.
- Gupta S, Kumar A, Patel R, Kumar V. Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(5):4851–63. doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06477-9.
- Buchholzer M, Frommer WB. An increasing number of countries regulate genome editing in crops. New Phytol. 2022;237:12–15. doi:10.1111/nph.18333.
- ASSAf. Academy of science of South Africa. Regulation of Agricultural GM Technology in Africa. 2012 [Accessed 2023 Jan 28].https://research.assaf.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.11911/81/2012_assaf_K9610ASSAFGMOReportDevV8LR.pdf?sequence=1
- Quemada H. Lessons learned from the introduction of genetically engineered crops: relevance to gene drive deployment in Africa. Transgenic Res. 2022;31(3):285–311. doi:10.1007/s11248-022-00300-2.
- Paarlberg R. Starved for science: how biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press; 2009. p. 93. ISBN-13:978-0-674-02973-6.
- Adenle AA, Morris EJ, Parayil G. Status of development, regulation and adoption of GM agriculture in Africa: views and positions of stakeholder groups. Food Policy. 2013;43:159–66. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.09.006.
- Zetterberg C, Björnberg EK. Time for a new EU regulatory framework for GM crops? J Agric Environ Ethics. 2017;30:325–47. doi:10.1007/s10806-017-9664-9.
- Morris S, Spillane C. EU GM crop regulation: a road to resolution or a regulatory roundabout? Eur J Risk Regul. 2010;1:359–69. doi:10.1017/S1867299X00000805.
- Sommer A, West KP JrEditors. Vitamin a deficiency: health, survival and vision. Oxford University Press: New York; 1996. pp. 1–438. ISBN 0-19-508824-7.
- Beyer P. Golden Rice and ‘Golden’ crops for human nutrition. N Biotechnol. 2010;27(5):478–81. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.010.
- Potrykus I. Lessons from the ‘humanitarian golden rice’ project: regulation prevents development of public good genetically engineered crop products. N Biotechnol. 2010;27(5):466–72. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.07.012.
- Wesseler J, Zilberman D. The economic power of the golden rice opposition. Environ Dev Econ. 2014;19:724–42. doi:10.1017/S1355770X1300065X.
- Wu F, Wesseler J, Zilberman D, Russell RM, Chen C, Dubock AC. Allow golden rice to save lives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2120901118. doi:10.1073/pnas.212090111.
- Ye X, Al-Bbili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P, Beyer P, Potrykus I. Engineering the provitamin a (β-Carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoid-free) rice endosperm. Sci. 2000;287:303–05. doi:10.1126/science.287.5451.303.
- Ensering M. Tough lessons from golden rice. Sci. 2008;320:468–71. doi:10.1126/science.320.5875.468.
- Tang G, Qin J, Dolnikowski GG, Russell RM, Grusak MA. Golden rice is an effective source of vitamin a. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(6):1776–83. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27119.
- Sumangil FR. 7 provinces to produce ‘golden rice’. The Manila Times. 2022, May 27 [Accessed 2022 June 22]. https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/05/27/news/regions/7-provinces-to-produce-golden-rice/1845154
- Rosell E. Stop opposing healthy food for poor children, Greenpeace. Warp News. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 6]. https://www.warpnews.org/column/stop-opposing-healthy-food-for-poor-children-greenpeace/
- Anderson K, Jackson LA, Nielsen CP. GM rice adoption: impact for welfare and poverty alleviation. J Eco Inte. 2005;20:125–34. doi:10.11130/jei.2005.20.4.771.
- Stein AJ, Sachdev HPS, Qaim M. Potential impact and cost effectiveness of golden rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1200–01. doi:10.1038/nbt1006-1200b.
- Staver C, Pemsl DE, Scheerer L, Perez Vicente L, Dita M. Ex ante assessment of returns on research investments to address the impact of Fusarium wilt tropical race 4 on global banana production. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:844. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00844.
- de Figueiredo Silva F, Kaplan S, Tobar FAM, Potts MD, Martinez RLE, Zilberman D. Estimating worldwide benefits from improved bananas resistant to fusarium wilt tropical race 4. J Of Agr App Econ Assoc. 2023;2:20–34. doi:10.1002/jaa2.41.
- Ainembabazi JH, Tripathi L, Rusike J, Abdoulaye T, Manyong V, Lee S-W. Ex-ante economic impact assessment of genetically modified banana resistant to Xanthomonas wilt in the Great Lakes Region of Africa. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138998. Article. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138998.
- Nawaz MA, Ali MA, Golokhvast KS, Tsatsakis AM, Chung G. Gmos: history, economic status, risks, and socio-economic regulatory frameworks. In: Nawaz MA, Chung G, Golokhvast KS Tsatsakis A., editors. Gmos and political stance. Academic Press; 2023. p. 1–13. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823903-2.00013-5
- Brookes G, Barfoot P. GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2018. 2020 [Accessed 2022 Jun 9]. https://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/globalimpactfinalreportJuly2020.pdf
- Brookes G. Farm income and production impacts from the use of genetically modified (GM) crop technology 1996-2020. GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):171–95. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2105626.
- Brookes G, Barfoot P. GM crop technology use 1996-2018: farm income and production impacts. GM Crops & Food. 2020;11(4):242–61. doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1779574.
- Scheitrum D, Schaefer KA, Nes K. Realized and potential global production effects from genetic engineering. Food Policy. 2020;93:101882. Article. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101882.
- Schiek B, Hareau G, Baguma Y, Medakker A, Douches D, Shotkoski F, Ghislain M. Demystification of GM crop costs: releasing late blight resistant potato varieties as public goods in developing countries. Int J Biotechnol. 2016;14:112–31. doi:10.1504/IJBT.2016.077942.
- McDougall P. The cost and time involved in the discovery, development, and authorization of a new plant biotechnology derived trait, a consultancy study for crop life international. Midlothian, UK. 2011 [Accessed 2023 Apr 8]. http://www.croplife.org/PhillipsMcDougallStudy
- Kalaitzandonakes N, Alston JM, Bradford KJ. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(5):509–11. doi:10.1038/nbt0507-509.
- Ehlers GAC, Caradus JR, Fowler SV. The regulatory process and costs to seek approval for the development and release of new biological control agents in New Zealand. BioControl. 2019;65:1–12. doi:10.1007/s10526-019-09975-9.
- Bullock DW, Wilson WW, Neadeau JF. Genetic editing (GE) versus genetic modification (GM) in the research and development of new crop varieties: An economic comparison. Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 793. Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics. Agricultural Experiment Station, North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA. 2020 [Accessed 5 Jun 2023]. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/293186
- Kleter GA, Kuiper HA, Kok EJ. Gene-edited crops: towards a harmonized safety assessment. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):443–47. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.014.
- Nap J-P, Metz PLJ, Escaler M, Conner AJ. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Plant J. 2003;33:1–18. doi:10.1046/j.0960-7412.2003.01602.x.
- Kumar K, Gambhir G, Dass A, Tripathi A, Singh A, Jha AK, Yadava P, Choudhary M, Rakshit S. Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects. Planta. 2020;251: 91. Article. doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8.
- Kuzma J, Kokotovich A. Renegotiating GM crop regulation. EMBO Rep. 2010;12:883–88. doi:10.1038/embor.2011.160.
- Jenkins D, Dobert R, Atanassova A, Pavely C. Impacts of the regulatory environment for gene editing on delivering beneficial products. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol -Plant. 2021;57:609–26. doi:10.1007/s11627-021-10201-4.
- Kang C-K, Nicholson S. A gene-edited crop coming to a market near you: when gene-edited crops meet the grain and oilseed supply chain. RaboResearch Food And Agribusiness. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/grains-oilseeds/a-gene-edited-crop-coming-to-a-market-near-you.html
- Sprink T, Eriksson D, Schiemann J, Hartung F. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts. Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35(7):1493–506. doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1990-2.
- Agapito-Tenfen SZ, Okoli AS, Bernstein MJ, Wikmark O-G, Myhr AI. Revisiting risk governance of GM plants: the need to consider new and emerging gene-editing techniques. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1874. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01874.
- Court of Justice of the European Union 2018. Organisms obtained by mutagenesis are GMOs and are, in principle, subject to the obligations laid down by the GMO directive., in PRESS RELEASE No 111/18, court of justice of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Accessed 2023 Jan 28]. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-07/cp180111en.pdf
- Callaway E. CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union. Nature. 2018;560(7716):16. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05814-6.
- Lappin J. EU Court extends GMO directive to new plant breeding Techniques Brussels. 2018 [Accessed 2023 Jan 28]. https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/EU%20Court%20Extends%20GMO%20Directive%20to%20New%20Plant%20Breeding%20Techniques_Brussels%20USEU_Belgium%20EU-28_7-27-2018.pdf
- Arpaia S, Christiaens O, Giddings K, Jones H, Mezzetti B, Moronta-Barrios F, Perry JN, Sweet JB, Taning CNT, Smagghe G, et al. Biosafety of GM crop plants expressing dsRNA: data requirements and EU regulatory considerations. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:940. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00940.
- Jorasch P. Potential, challenges, and threats for the application of new breeding techniques by the private plant breeding sector in the EU. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:582011. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.582011.
- Tyczewska A, Twardowski T, Woźniak-Gientka E. Agricultural biotechnology for sustainable food security. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41(3):331–41. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.12.013.
- Kershen DL. Sustainability council of New Zealand Trust v. The environmental protection authority: gene editing technologies and the law. GM Crops & Food. 2015;6(4):216–22. doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1122859.
- Fritsche S, Poovaiah C, MacRae E, Thorlby G. A New Zealand perspective on the application and regulation of gene editing. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9. Article 1323. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01323.
- OGTR. Department of health office of the gene technology regulator, technical review of the gene technology regulations 2001-2017-18 amendment proposals consultation, Department Of Health Office Of The Gene Technology Regulator, Australian Government. 2018 [Accessed 2023 Jan 28]. https://www.ogtr.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/2021-07/decision_ris.docx
- Redden R. Genetic modification for agriculture—Proposed revision of GMO regulation in Australia. Plants. 2021;10:747. Article. doi:10.3390/plants10040747.
- Department of Biotechnology. Draft document on genome edited organisms: regulatory framework and guidelines for risk assessment. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India. 2020 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://dbtindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/DraftRegulatoryFrameworkGenomeEditing9jan2020a.pdf
- Sato S. Japan gives green light to genome edited waxy corn product. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, Report Number: JA2023-0029. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/japan-japan-gives-green-light-genome-edited-waxy-corn-product
- Swedish Board of Agriculture. CRISPR/Cas9 Mutated Arabidopsis. 2015 [Accessed 2023 Jan 28]. https://www.upsc.se/documents/Information_on_interpretation_on_CRISPR_Cas9_mutated_plants_Final.pdf
- Anon. A CRISPR definition of genetic modification. Nature Plants. 2018;4:233. doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0158-1.
- Parrott W. Outlaws, old laws and no laws: the prospects of gene editing for agriculture in United States. Physiol Plant. 2018;164(4):406–11. doi:10.1111/ppl.12756.
- Park S-H, Joung Y-H, Kim K-M, Kim J-K, Koh H-J. Gene-edited crops: present status and their future. Korean J Breed Sci. 2019;51:175–83. doi:10.9787/KJBS.2019.51.3.175.
- Lukanda IN, Namusoga-Kaale S, Claassen G. Media as mediators in a science-based issue: politics, foreign influence and implications on adoption of genetically modified organisms in food production in Uganda. J Sci Communication. 2023;22:A03. Article. doi:10.22323/2.22010203.
- Segal DJ. The promise of gene editing: so close and yet so perilously far. Front Genome Ed. 2022;4:974798. Article. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.974798.
- Kuntz M. Technological risks (GMO, gene editing), what is the problem with Europe? A broader historical perspective. Frontiers In Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:1308. Article. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.557115.
- WELL_NZ. Reframing New Zealand’s food sector opportunities. A conversation starter from Te Puna Whakaaronui: the food and fibre sector think tank. 2022 ISBN: 978-1-99-102660-6 (online). ISBN: 978-1-99-102660-6 https://fitforabetterworld.org.nz/assets/Te-Puna-Whakaaronui-publications/Reframing-New-Zealands-Food-Sector-Opportunities.pdf
- Atanassova A, Keiper F. Plant breeding innovation: a global regulatory perspective. Cereal Chem. 2018;95(1):8–16. doi:10.1002/cche.10021.
- Ahmad A, Munawar N, Khan Z, Qusmani AT, Khan SH, Jamil A, Ashraf S, Ghouri MZ, Aslam S, Mubarik MS, et al. An outlook on global regulatory landscape for genome-edited crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:11753. Article. doi:10.3390/ijms222111753.
- Nawaz S, Kandlikar M. Drawing lines in the sand? Paths forward for triggering regulation of gene-edited crops. Sci Public Policy. 2021;48(2):246–56. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab014.
- Woźniak-Gientka E, Tyczewska A, Perisic M, Beniermann A, Eriksson D, Vangheluwe N, Gheysen G, Cetiner S, Abiri N, Twardowski T. Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security. GM Crops & Food. 2022;13:218–41. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946.
- Tachikawa M, Matsuo M 2023. Divergence and convergence in international regulatory policies regarding genome-edited food: how to find a middle ground. Front Plant Sci 14: 1105426 Article. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1105426
- Gordon DR, Jaffe G, Doane M, Glaser A, Gremillion TM, Ho MD. Responsible governance of gene editing in agriculture and the environment. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(9):1055–57. doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01023-1.
- Lema MA. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina. Transgenic Res. 2019;28(Suppl 2):147–50. doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2.
- ISAAA. (2017). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017: executive brief 53. Pp 153. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. https://www.agi.gov.vn/files/files/ISAAA/ISAAA%20Brief%20No_%2053%20-%202017_compressed.pdf
- Dima O, Heyvaert Y, Inzé D. Interactive database of genome editing applications in crops and future policy making in the European Union. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(8):746–48. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.05.002.
- Cerier S. Cracks appear in Europe’s opposition to CRISPR gene editing and other new breeding technologies. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2023/05/16/cracks-appear-in-europes-opposition-to-crispr-gene-editing-and-other-new-breeding-technologies/
- European Commission. Study on the status of new genomic techniques under Union law and in light of the court of justice ruling in case C-528/16. SWD(2021) 92. 2021 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-04/gmo_mod-bio_ngt_exec-sum_en.pdf
- European Commission. Delivering the European green deal. 2021 [Accessed 2023 Jun 6]. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/delivering-european-green-deal_en
- Kang C-K, van Rijswick C. Exploring EU regulations around gene editing – slowly but surely gee editing goes global. RaboResearch Food And Agribusiness. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 6]. https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/farm-inputs/exploring-eu-regulations-around-gene-editing.html
- Baum CM, Kamrath C, Bröring S, De Steur H. Show me the benefits! Determinants of behavioral intentions towards CRISPR in the United States. Food Qual Prefer. 2023;107:104842. Article. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104842.
- Heinemann JA, Clark K, Hiscox TC, McCabe AW, Agapito-Tenfen SZ. Are null segregants new combinations of heritable material and should they be regulated? Front Genome Ed. 2023;4. doi:10.3389/fgeed.2022.1064103.
- Kato-Nitta N, Inagaki Y, Maeda T, Tachikawa M. Effects of information on consumer attitudes towards gene-edited foods: a comparison between livestock and vegetables. CABI Agric Biosci. 2021;2:14. Article. doi:10.1186/s43170-021-00029-8.
- Yunes MC, Osório-Santos Z, von Keyserlingk MAG, Hötzel MJ. Gene editing for improved animal welfare and production traits in cattle: will this technology be embraced or rejected by the public? Sustainability. 2021;13:4966. Article. doi:10.3390/su13094966.
- Yamaguchi T. Performativity of expectations: the emergence of plant gene editing technologies in Japan. Elementa: Sci Anthropocene. 2020;8(1):1–12. doi:10.1525/elementa.036.
- Muhindi S. Court of Appeal upholds ban on GMOs importation. 2023 [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/2023-05-25-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-gmos-importation/
- Applegate JS. The prometheus principle: using the precautionary principle to harmonize the regulation of genetically modified organisms. Indiana J Global Legal Stud. 2001;9:207–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20643826.
- Prakash D, Verma S, Bhatia R, Tiwary BN. Risks and precautions of genetically modified organisms. Int Scholarly Res Not. 2011;2011:369573. Article. doi:10.5402/2011/369573.
- Smyth SJ, Phillips PW, Kerr WA. Food security and the evaluation of risk. Global Food Secur. 2015;4:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2014.08.001.
- Oxford Dictionaries 2016. Oxford dictionaries: British and World English. [Accessed 2023 May 15]. https://web.archive.org/web/20160620062539/http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/scientific-method
- Margolis H. Dealing with risk: why the public and the experts disagree on environmental issues. United Kingdom: University of Chicago Press; 1997. p. 227. ISBN:9780226505299.
- Wiener JB. Precaution in a multi-risk world. Duke law school public law and legal theory working paper series, Working Paper No. 23. Durham, North Carolina. 2001 [Accessed 2023 Feb 26]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=293859
- Wiener JB. The real pattern of precaution. In: Wiener JB, Rogers MD, Hammit JK Sand P., editors. The reality of precaution: comparing risk regulation in the United States and Europe. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press; 2011. pp. 519–65.
- WTO AB. European communities - measures concerning meat and meat products, January 16, 1998 (EC- Hormones ABR). Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organisation; 1998.
- Dinneen N. Precautionary discourse: Thinking through the distinction between the precautionary principle and the precautionary approach in theory and practice. Polit Life Sci. 2013;32:2–21. doi:10.2990/32_1_2.
- European Commission. Communication from the commission on the pre-cautionary principle: COM (2000) 1 final. 2000 [Accessed 2023 Jan 2]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52000DC0001
- Vanderzwaag DL, Fuller SD, Myers RA. Canada and the precautionary principle/approach in ocean and coastal management: wading and wandering in tricky currents. Ottawa Law Rev. 2002;34:117–58.
- Cartagena Protocol. Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity. 2000 [Accessed 2023 Jan 1]. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf
- Bourg D, Whiteside KH. Precaution and science-based environmental risk management: complementary not contradictory. In: Paleo UF, editor. Building safer communities: risk governance, spatial planning and responses to natural hazards. Lansdale, PA: IOS Press; 2009. p. 88–104.
- Conko G. Safety, risk and the precautionary principle: rethinking precautionary approaches to the regulation of transgenic plants. Transgenic Res. 2003;12(6):639–47. doi:10.1023/B:TRAG.0000005157.45046.8e.
- Aerni P Politicizing the precautionary principle: why disregarding facts should not pass for farsightedness. Front Plant Sci. 2019. 10: 1053 Article. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01053
- Smyth SJ, Lassoued R. Agriculture R&D implications of the CJEU’s gene-specific mutagenesis ruling. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37:337–40. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.004.
- European Commission. Directorate-general for research and innovation. ethics of genome editing. European group on ethics in science and new technologies. Opinion. 2021;(32):112. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/659034.
- Eichelbaum T, Allan J, Fleming J, Randerson R. Report of the royal commission on genetic modification. Report of the royal commission on genetic modification. Wellington, New Zealand. 2001 [Accessed 2023 Jan 1]. https://environment.govt.nz/assets/Publications/Files/Royal-Commission-on-GM-in-NZ-Final.pdf
- McGuinness Institute. An overview of genetic modification in New Zealand 1973–2013: the first forty years. Project 2058; Report 16. 2013 September [Accessed 2023 Jan 1] http://www.mcguinnessinstitute.org/project-2058-reports/
- Oh J, Ezezika OC 2014. To label or not to label: balancing the risks, benefits and costs of mandatory labelling of GM food in Africa. Agric & Food Secur 3: 8 Article. 10.1186/2048-7010-3-8
- Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature. 1999;399(6733):214. doi:10.1038/20338.
- Hellmich RL, Siegfried BD, Sears MK, StanleyHorn DE, Mattila HR, Spencer T, Bidne KG, Daniels MJ, Lewis LC. Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis-purified proteins and pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11925–30. doi:10.1073/pnas.211297698.
- Oberhauser KS, Prysby MD, Mattila HR, Stanley-Horn DE, Sears MK, Dively G, Olson E, Pleasants JM, Lam WK, Hellmich RL. Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11913–18. doi:10.1073/pnas.211234298.
- Ortman EE, Barry BD, Buschman LL, Calvin DW, Carpenter J, Dively GP, Foster JE, Fuller BW, Helmich RL, Higgins RA, et al. Transgenic insecticidal corn: the agronomic and ecological rationale for its use. BioScience. 2001;51:900–03. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0900:TICTAA]2.0.CO;2.
- Pleasants JM, Hellmich RL, Dively G, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Mattila HR, Foster JE, Clark PL, Jones GD. Corn pollen deposition on milkweeds in and near cornfields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11919–24. doi:10.1073/pnas.211287498.
- Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Siegfried BD, Pleasants JM, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Dively GP, Dively GP. Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11937–42. doi:10.1073/pnas.211329998.
- Shelton AM, Sears MK. The monarch butterfly controversy: scientific interpretations of a phenomenon. Plant J. 2001;27(6):483–88. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01118.x.
- Stanley-Horn DE, Dively GP, Hellmich RL, Mattila HR, Sears MK, Rose R, Jesse LCH, Losey JE, Obrycki JJ, Lewis LC. Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch butterfly larvae in field studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11931–36. https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.211277798.
- Hayes AW. The precautionary principle. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2005 [Accessed 26 Feb 2023];56:161–66. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/14375077.pdf.
- Jouanin A, Boyd L, Visser RG, Smulders MJ. Development of wheat with hypoimmunogenic gluten obstructed by the gene editing policy in Europe. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1523. Article. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01523.
- European Political Strategy Centre. Towards an innovation principle endorsed by better regulation (EPSC Strategic Notes No. Issue 14).2007 [Accessed 2023 Jan 2]. https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20191129102319/https://ec.europa.eu/epsc/publications/strategic-notes/towards-innovation-principle-endorsed-better-regulation_en
- FAO/WHO. 2006. Food safety risk analysis: A guide for national food safety authorities. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 87. Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations/World Health Organization, Rome. Pp. 50. [Accessed 2023 Jan 27]. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43718/9789251056042_eng.pdf
- FAO/WHO. 2010. FAO/WHO framework for developing national food safety emergency response plans. Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations/World Health Organization, Rome. Pp. 24. [Accessed 2023 Jan 27]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/338628
- Wiener JB. Precaution in a multi-risk world. In: Paustenbach DJ, editor. Human and ecological risk assessment. New York: John Wiley &c Sons; 2002. pp. 1509–31.
- Jonas H. The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984. p. 255. ISBN:9780226405971.
- Bradford KJ, Van Deynze A, Gutterson N, Parrott W, Strauss SH. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(4):439–44. doi:10.1038/nbt1084.
- Jenkins D, Juba N, Crawford B, Worthington M, Hummel A. Regulation of plants developed through new breeding techniques must ensure societal benefits. Nature Plants. 2023;9(5):679–84. doi:10.1038/s41477-023-01403-2.
- Camacho A, Van Deynze A, Chi-Ham C, Bennett AB. Genetically engineered crops that fly under the US regulatory radar. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(11):1087–91. doi:10.1038/nbt.3057.
- Marchant GE, Stevens YA. A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation. GM Crops & Food. 2015;6(4):233–42. doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406.
- Schenkelaars P, Wesseler J. Farm-level GM coexistence policies in the EU: Context, concepts and developments. EuroChoices. 2016;15(1):5–11. doi:10.1111/1746-692X.12112.
- Devos Y, Demont M, Dillen K, Reheul D, Kaiser M, Sanvido O. Coexistence of genetically modified and non-GM crops in the European Union: a review. In: In: Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Véronique S Alberola C., editors. Sustainable Agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. p. 203–28. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_14.
- Pearsall D. GM crop co-existence. GM Crops & Food. 2013;4(3):143–50. doi:10.4161/gmcr.26303.
- Ramessar K, Capell T, Twyman R, Christou P. Going to ridiculous lengths—European coexistence regulations for GM crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(2):133–36. doi:10.1038/nbt0210-133.
- Single Vision Grains Australia. Delivering market choice with GM canola. An industry report prepared under the Single Vision Grains Australia process. 2007 [Accessed 2023 Jun 12]. http://australianoilseeds.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/2935/Delivering_Market_Choice_with_GM_canola_-_FINAL_-_1MB.pdf
- Single Vision Grains Australia. Principles for process management of grain within the Australian supply chain: A guide for industry in an environment where GM and non-GM grain is marketed. Industry Report prepared under the Single Vision Grains Australia process. 2007 [Accessed 2023 June 12]. http://www.australianoilseeds.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/2981/Principles_for_Process_Management_Final.pdf
- EUR-Lex. Document 32003H0556. Commission Recommendation of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming (notified under document number C(2003) 2624). 2003 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32003H0556
- European Commission. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 23 July 2003 on guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming (notified under document number C(2003) 2624). 2003 [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eur39026.pdf
- Committees.parliament.uk 2014. Written evidence submitted by the Supply Chain Initiative on Modified Agricultural Crops (SCIMAC) (GMC0029). [Accessed 2023 Aug 5]. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/50286/pdf/
- Rizov I, Rühl G, Langhof M, Kathage J, Rodríguez-Cerezo E. Best practice document for the coexistence of genetically modified potato with conventional and organic farming, EUR 29047. EN, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg; 2018. p. 64. ISBN 978-92-79-77694-6 JRC109645. doi:10.2760/055172.
- Giraldo PA, Shinozuka H, Spangenberg GC, Cogan NOI, Smith KF 2019. Safety assessment of genetically modified feed: Is there any difference from food? Front Plant Sci 10: 1592 Article. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01592
- Rizov I, Cerezo ER. Best Practice Documents for coexistence of genetically modified soybean crops with conventional and organic farming. Joint Res Centre. European Coexistence Bureau – Technical Working Group for Cotton; 2016 EUR 26780 EN, ISBN 978-92-79-39542-0
- Loureiro I, Garcia-Ruiz E, Gutierrez E, Gomez P, Escorial MC, Chueca MC. Pollen-mediated gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic cotton under experimental field conditions in Spain. Ind Crop Prod. 2016;85:22–28. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.045.
- Van-Deynze AE, Sundstrom FJ, Bradford KJ. Pollen-mediated gene flow in California cotton depends on pollinator activity. Crop Sci. 2005;45(4):1565–70. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0463.
- Baltazar BM, Castro Espinoza L, Espinoza-Banda A, de la Fuente-Martínez JM, Garzón-Tiznado JA, González-García J, Antonio Gutiérrez M, Guzmán Rodríguez JL, Heredia Díaz O, Horak MJ, et al. Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize: implications for isolation requirements and coexistence in Mexico, the center of origin of maize. Plos One. 2015;10:e0131549. Article. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131549.
- Sanvido O, Widmer F, Winzeler M, Streit B, Szerencsits E, Bigler F. Definition and feasibility of isolation distances for transgenic maize cultivation. Transgenic Res. 2008;17(3):317–35. doi:10.1007/s11248-007-9103-1.
- Busi R, Qin Y, Barrett-Lennard R, Powles S. Long distance pollen-mediated flow of herbicide resistance genes in Lolium rigidum. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117:1281–90. doi:10.1007/s00122-008-0862-8.
- Wang ZY, Lawrence R, Hopkins A, Bell J, Scott M. Pollen mediated transgene flow in the wind-pollinated grass species tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Mol Breeding. 2004;14:47–60. doi:10.1023/B:MOLB.0000037994.26287.17.
- Cai L, Zhou B, Guo X, Dong C, Hu X, Hou M, Liu S. Pollen-mediated gene flow in Chinese commercial fields of glufosinate-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Sci Bull. 2008;53:2333–41. doi:10.1007/s11434-008-0305-6.
- Staniland BK, McVetty PB, Friesen LF, Yarrow S, Freyssinet G, Freyssinet M. Effectiveness of border areas in confining the spread of transgenic Brassica napus pollen. Can J Plant Sci. 2000;80:521–26. doi:10.4141/P99-117.
- Fitzpatrick S, Reisen P, McCaslin M Pollen-mediated gene flow in alfalfa: a three-year summary of field research. In: Proceedings of the 2003 central alfalfa improvement conference, virtual meeting, 2003 July 21–25; Pp. 2. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a019b1990f5d5066c4185c7fe7114cb9dc60c6e4
- Van De Wiel CC, Groeneveld RM, Dolstra O, Kok EJ, Scholtens IM, Thissen JT, Smulders MJ, Lotz LA. Pollen-mediated gene flow in maize tested for coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in the Netherlands: effect of isolation distances between fields. NJAS: Wagening J Life Sci. 2009;56:405–23. doi:10.1016/S1573-5214(09)80007-9.
- Devos Y, Thas O, Cougnon M, De Clercq EM, Cordemans K, Reheul D. Feasibility of isolation perimeters for genetically modified maize. Agron Sustain Dev. 2008;28(2):195–206. doi:10.1051/agro:2007039.
- Milanesi J. Current and future availability of non-genetically modified soybean seeds in the USA, Brazil and Argentina. Chapter 7. In: In: Bertheau Y., editor. Genetically modified and non‐genetically modified food supply chains: co‐existence and traceability. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012. pp. 89–112. 10.1002/9781118373781.ch7
- Ludvíková M, Griga M. Transgenic flax/linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) - Expectations and reality. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2015;51:123–41. doi:10.17221/104/2015-CJGPB.
- Ryan CD, Smyth SJ. Economic implications of low-level presence in a zero-tolerance European import market: The case of Canadian Triffid flax. AgBioforum. 2012;15:21–30.
- Miles S, Ueland O, Frewer LJ. Public attitudes towards genetically-modified food. Brit Food J. 2005;107:246–62. doi:10.1108/00070700510589521.
- Carter C, Gruere G, McLaughlin P, MacLachlan M. California’s proposition 37: effects of mandatory labelling of GM food. Giannini Found Agric Econ, Univ California. 2012; 15(6):3–8. [Accessed 11 May 2023]. https://s.giannini.ucop.edu/uploads/giannini_public/c8/1b/c81bc863-59f2-4a08-800d-abb2c14fcc72/v15n6_2.pdf.
- Story D 2023. Pros and cons of mandatory GMO labeling. [Accessed 2023 Jun 6]. https://tracegains.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-mandatory-gmo-labeling/
- Delgado-Zegarra J, Alvarez-Risco A, Cárdenas C, Donoso M, Moscoso S, Román BR, Del-Aguila-Arcentales S, Davies NM, Yáñez JA, Simonne A(. Labelling of Genetically Modified (GM) foods in Peru: Current dogma and insights of the regulatory and legal statutes. Int J Food Sci. 2022;2022:1–12. Article. doi:10.1155/2022/3489785.
- Chang HSC 2004. Labelling issues of organic and GM foods in Australia. Paper presented at the 48th AARES Annual Conference;[Accessed 6 Jun 2023]. Melbourne, Australia http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/58392/files/2004_chang.pdf
- Zheng Q, Wang HH. Do consumers view the genetically modified food labeling systems differently? “Contains GMO” versus “Non-GMO” labels. Chinese Econ. 2021;54(6):376–88. doi:10.1080/10971475.2021.1890356.
- Kim E-S. Technocratic precautionary principle: Korean risk governance of genetically modified organisms. New Genet Soc. 2014;33(2):204–24. doi:10.1080/14636778.2014.917916.
- Andrew J, Ismail NW, Djama M. An overview of genetically modified crop governance, issues and challenges in Malaysia. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;98:12–17. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8666.
- Sanmugam S, Sivakumar S, Gobalakrishnan T, Sarawanan T, Rashmi Abeweera P, Sandrasaigaran P. Perception and acceptance of genetically modified foods in Malaysia. Malaysian J Sci Adv Technol. 2021;1:144–50. doi:10.56532/mjsat.v1i4.29.
- Elbashir GO. Consumer protection in Islamic jurisprudence: The case of genetically modified food. J IAU Humanit Educ Sci. 2023;1:37–43. https://www.iau.edu.sa/sites/default/files/resources/consumer_protection_in_islamic_jurisprudence_the_case_of_genetically_modified_food_0.pdf.
- Mather D, Vikan R, Knight J. Marketplace response to GM animal products. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(3):236–38. doi:10.1038/nbt.3494.
- Vecchione M, Feldman C, Wunderlich S. Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(3):329–35. doi:10.3109/09637486.2014.986072.
- Codex Alimentarius. Report of the thirty fifth session of the codex committee on food labeling. 2007 [Accessed 2023 Jun 6]. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FShared%2BDocuments%252FArchive%252FMeetings%252FCCFL%252Fccfl35%252Ffl35_08e.pdf
- Pollack A. The impact of the national bioengineered food disclosure standard and its methods of disclosure on consumer preferences for gene edited and genetically modified foods. A thesis submitted to the faculty of the university of delaware in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of master of science in agricultural and resource economics. 2021. [Accessed 2023 Jun 5]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/71a47e7ba937aa70c37bc25e62b81d06/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- Anderson JA, Ellsworth PC, Faria JC, Head GP, Owen MDK, Pilcher CD, Shelton AM, Meissle M. Genetically engineered crops: importance of diversified integrated pest management for agricultural sustainability. Frontiers In Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:24. Article. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00024.
- Clark LF. Framing the uncertainty of risk: models of governance for genetically modified foods. Sci Public Policy. 2013;40(4):479–91. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct001.
- Ruder S-L, Kandlikar M. Governing gene-edited crops: risks, regulations, and responsibilities as perceived by agricultural genomics experts in Canada. J Responsible Innovation. 2023;10(1). doi:10.1080/23299460.2023.2167572.
- Eriksson D, Harwood W, Hofvander P, Jones H, Rogowsky P, Stöger E, Visser RG. A welcome proposal to amend the GMO legislation of the EU. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(11):1100–03. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.05.001.
- Neal T. The Regional Governance of Genetically Modified Crops: What Does the Future Hold for ECOWAS?. Africa Policy Journal – A Harvard Kennedy School Student Publication. 2019 [Accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://apj.hkspublications.org/the-regional-governance-of-gmos-ecowas/
- Rock JS, Schnurr MA, Kingiri A, Glover D, Stone GD, Ely A, Fischer K. Beyond the genome: genetically modified crops in africa and the implications for genome editing. Dev Change. 2023;54(1):117–42. doi:10.1111/dech.12750.
- Ishii T, Araki M. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35(7):1507–18. doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2.
- Parvaiz A, Munawa S, Nawaz MA, Mustafa G, Khan MS, Joyia FA. The need of regulations for GM crops and products thereof. In: In: Nawaz MA, Chung G, Golokhvast KS Tsatsakis AM., editors. Gmos and Political Stance. Academic Press; 2023. p. 15–30. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823903-2.00010-X
- Schmidt SM, Belisle M, Frommer WB. The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture: Many countries have exempted or move to exemt forms of genome editing from GMO regulation of crop plants. EMBO Reports. 2020;21(6): e50680. doi:10.15252/embr.202050680.