CRISPR/Cas9-gene editing approaches in plant breeding

References

• Chen H, Lin Y. Promise and issues of genetically modified crops. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(2):255–60. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldemita RR, Reaño IME, Solis RO, Hautea RA. Trends in global approvals of biotech crops (1992–2014). GM Crops & Food. 2015;6(3):150–66. doi:10.1080/21645698.2015.1056972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araki M, Ishii T. Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(3):145–49. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Patron NJ, Nekrasov V. Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;32:76–84. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83(1):409–39. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang S, Weigel D, Beachy RN, Li J. A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops. Nat Genet. 2016;48(2):109–11. doi:10.1038/ng.3484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiml S, Puchta H. Revolutionizing plant biology: multiple ways of genome engineering by CRISPR/Cas. Plant Methods. 2016;12(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s13007-016-0103-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puchta H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:1–14. doi:10.1093/jxb/eri025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu GTH, Cao HX, Watanabe K, Hensel G, Blattner FR, Kumlehn J, Schubert I. Repair of site-specific DNA double-strand breaks in barley occurs via diverse pathways primarily involving the sister chromatid. Plant Cell. 2014;26(5):2156–67. doi:10.1105/tpc.114.126607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science (80-). 2012;337(6096):816–21. doi:10.1126/science.1225829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2014;79(2):348–59. doi:10.1111/tpj.12554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Mao Y, Xu N, Zhang B, Wei P, Yang D-L, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Zheng R, Yang L, et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(12):4632–37. doi:10.1073/pnas.1400822111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B, Weeks DP. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(20):e188–e188. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SW, Kim S, Kim JM, Kim J-S. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(3):230–32. doi:10.1038/nbt.2507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, East A, Cheng A, Lin S, Ma E, Doudna J. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. Elife. 2013;2:e00471. doi:10.7554/eLife.00471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerkar G, Devarumath S, Purankar M, Kumar A, Valarmathi R, Devarumath R, Appunu C. Advances in crop breeding through precision genome editing. Front Genet. 2022;13:880195. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.880195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Xu Y, Li W, Chen Z, Wang J, Fan F, Tao Y, Jiang Y, Zhu Q-H, Yang J. Creating a novel herbicide-tolerance OsALS allele using CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene editing. Crop J. 2021;9(2):305–12. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2020.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidi SSEA, Mahas A, Vanderschuren H, Mahfouz MM. Engineering crops of the future: CRISPR approaches to develop climate-resilient and disease-resistant plants. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):1–19. doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02204-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouhen M, García-Caparrós P, Twyman RM, Abdelly C, Mahmoudi H, Schillberg S, Debez A. Improving environmental stress resilience in crops by genome editing: insights from extremophile plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;43(4):559–74. doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2042481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Yadav A, Ahmad R, Dwivedi UN, Yadav K. CRISPR-based genome editing for nutrient enrichment in crops: a promising approach toward global food security. Front Genet. 2022;13:1650. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.932859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Wang G, Ma S, Xie X, Wu X, Zhang X, Wu Y, Zhao P, Xia Q. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol Biol. 2015;87(1–2):99–110. doi:10.1007/s11103-014-0263-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönspies M, Schindele P, Wetzel R, Puchta H. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated chromosome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Protoc. 2022;17(5):1332–58. doi:10.1038/s41596-022-00686-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Z, Eid A, Ali S, Mahfouz MM. Pea early-browning virus-mediated genome editing via the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis. Virus Res. 2018;244:333–37. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2017.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selma S, Gianoglio S, Uranga M, Vázquez‐Vilar M, Espinosa‐Ruiz A, Drapal M, Fraser PD, Daròs J-A, Orzáez D. Potato virus X-delivered CRISPR activation programs lead to strong endogenous gene induction and transient metabolic reprogramming in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2022;111(6):1550–64. doi:10.1111/tpj.15906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu R, Lucke M, Jang Y, Zhu W, Symeonidi E, Wang C, Fitz J, Xi W, Schwab R, Weigel D, et al. An efficient CRISPR vector toolbox for engineering large deletions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Methods. 2018;14(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s13007-018-0330-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin K, Han T, Xie K, Zhao J, Song J, Liu Y. Engineer complete resistance to cotton leaf curl multan virus by the CRISPR/Cas9 system in Nicotiana benthamiana. Phytopathol Res. 2019;1(1):9. doi:10.1186/s42483-019-0017-7.
   Google Scholar
• Jang H-A, Bae E-K, Kim M-H, Park S-J, Choi N-Y, Pyo S-W, Lee C, Jeong H-Y, Lee H, Choi Y-I, et al. CRISPR-knockout of CSE gene improves saccharification efficiency by reducing lignin content in hybrid poplar. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18):9750. doi:10.3390/ijms22189750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai T, Chen Z, Guo Y, Ye J. Rapid detection of the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus using recombinase polymerase amplification combined with CRISPR/Cas12a. Crop Protection. 2023;170:106259. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Zhao J, Gao Y, Zhao R, Zhang J, Kong L. Efficient multi-sites genome editing and plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in Picea glauca. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:2198. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.751891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao HX, Vu GTH, Gailing O. From genome sequencing to CRISPR-based genome editing for climate-resilient forest trees. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):966. doi:10.3390/ijms23020966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapliyal G, Bhandari MS, Vemanna RS, Pandey S, Meena RK, Barthwal S. Engineering traits through CRISPR/cas genome editing in woody species to improve forest diversity and yield. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;43(6):884–903. doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2092714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzalone AV, Koblan LW, Liu DR. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(7):824–44. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aach J, Mali P, Church GM. CasFinder: flexible algorithm for identifying specific Cas9 targets in genomes. bioRxiv. 2014;5074.
   Google Scholar
• Heigwer F, Kerr G, Boutros M. E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat Methods. 2014;11(2):122–23. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labun K, Montague TG, Gagnon JA, Thyme SB, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W272–W76. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labun K, Montague TG, Krause M, Torres Cleuren YN, Tjeldnes H, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W171–W74. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague TG, Cruz JM, Gagnon JA, Church GM, Valen E. CHOPCHOP: a CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN web tool for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(W1):W401–W07. doi:10.1093/nar/gku410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeussler M, Schönig K, Eckert H, Eschstruth A, Mianné J, Renaud J-B, Schneider-Maunoury S, Shkumatava A, Teboul L, Kent J, et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1012-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hiranniramol K, Chen Y, Liu W, Wangb X, Luigi Martelli P. Generalizable sgRNA design for improved CRISPR/Cas9 editing efficiency. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(9):2684–89. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naito Y, Hino K, Bono H, Tei KU. Crisprdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(7):1120–23. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Kriz AJ, Sharp PA. Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Quant Biol. 2014;2(2):59–70. doi:10.1007/s40484-014-0030-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hajiahmadi Z, Movahedi A, Wei H, Li D, Orooji Y, Ruan H, Zhuge Q. Strategies to increase on-target and reduce off-target effects of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3719. doi:10.3390/ijms20153719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doench JG, Fusi N, Sullender M, Hegde M, Vaimberg EW, Donovan KF, Smith I, Tothova Z, Wilen C, Orchard R, et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(2):184–91. doi:10.1038/nbt.3437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Wei Z, Dominguez A, Li Y, Wang X, Qi LS. CRISPR-ERA: a comprehensive design tool for CRISPR-mediated gene editing, repression and activation: fig. 1. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3676–78. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratz SJ, Ukken FP, Rubinstein CD, Thiede G, Donohue LK, Cummings AM, O’Connor-Giles KM. Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila. Genetics. 2014;196(4):961–71. doi:10.1534/genetics.113.160713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, Zetsche B, Shalem O, Wu X, Makarova KS, et al. In vivo genome editing using staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature. 2015;520(7546):186–91. doi:10.1038/nature14299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker I, Makarova K, Essletzbichler P, Volz S, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163(3):759–71. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmamaw M, Zawdie B. Mechanism and applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-mediated genome editing. Biologics. 2021;15:353–61. doi:10.2147/BTT.S326422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Zong Y, Xue C, Wang S, Jin S, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Anzalone AV, Raguram A, Doman JL, et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(5):582–85. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0455-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Li W, Katin-Grazzini L, Ding J, Gu X, Li Y, Gu T, Wang R, Lin X, Deng Z, et al. A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants. Hortic Res. 2018;5(1):13. doi:10.1038/s41438-018-0023-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen K, Gao C. Targeted mutagenesis in zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. J Genet Genomics. 2014;41(2):63–68. doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang A, Liu Y, Wang F, Li T, Chen Z, Kong D, Bi J, Zhang F, Luo X, Wang J, et al. Enhanced rice salinity tolerance via CRISPR/Cas9 targeted mutagenesis of the OsRR22 gene. Mol Breeding. 2019;39(3). doi:10.1007/s11032-019-0954-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liang Z, Zong Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Chen K, Qiu J-L, Gao C. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12617. doi:10.1038/ncomms12617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain HI, Yi Z, Rookes JE, Kong LX, Cahill DM. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a biomolecule delivery vehicle in plants. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(6):1–15. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1676-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo Y, Wang J, Zhang Q, Zhu H, Chehab EW, Colvin VL, Alvarez PJJ, Braam J. Fluorescence reports intact quantum dot uptake into roots and translocation to leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana and subsequent ingestion by insect herbivores. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(1):626–32. doi:10.1021/es5050562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Chen B, Wang Q, Shi X, Xiao Z, Lin J, Fang X. Carbon nanotubes as molecular transporters for walled plant cells. Nano Lett. 2009;9(3):1007–10. doi:10.1021/nl803083u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frame BR, Drayton PR, Bagnall SV, Lewnau CJ, Bullock WP, Wilson HM, Dunwell JM, Thompson JA, Wang K. Production of fertile transgenic maize plants by silicon carbide whisker‐mediated transformation. Plant J. 1994;6(6):941–48. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.6060941.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurepa J, Paunesku T, Vogt S, Arora H, Rabatic BM, Lu J, Wanzer MB, Woloschak GE, Smalle JA. Uptake and distribution of ultrasmall anatase TiO2 alizarin red S nanoconjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nano Lett. 2010;10(7):2296–302. doi:10.1021/nl903518f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J, Kumar S, Alok A, Upadhyay SK, Rawat M, Tsang DCW, Bolan N, Kim K-H. The potential of green synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles as nutrient source for plant growth. J Clean Prod. 2019;214:1061–70. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushita J, Otani M, Wakita Y, Tanaka O, Shimada T. Transgenic plant regeneration through silicon carbide whisker-mediated transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci. 1999;49(1):21–26. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.49.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arshad M, Zafar Y, Asad S. Silicon carbide whisker-mediated transformation of cotton (gossypium hirsutum L.). In: Transgenic cotton: methods and protocols. Springer; 2012. pp. 79–92. doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-212-4_7.
   Google Scholar
• Ohta Y. High-efficiency genetic transformation of maize by a mixture of pollen and exogenous DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1986;83(3):715–19. doi:10.1073/pnas.83.3.715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhya D, Jogam P, Allini VR, Abbagani S, Alok A. The present and potential future methods for delivering CRISPR/Cas9 components in plants. J Gen Eng Biotech. 2020;18(1):25. doi:10.1186/s43141-020-00036-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Turesson H, Olsson N, Fält A-S, Ohlsson P, Gonzalez MN, Samuelsson M, Hofvander P. Genome editing in potato via CRISPR‐Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivery. Physiol Plant. 2018;164(4):378–84. doi:10.1111/ppl.12731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murovec J, Guček K, Bohanec B, Avbelj M, Jerala R. DNA-free genome editing of Brassica oleracea and B. rapa protoplasts using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1594. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svitashev S, Young JK, Schwartz C, Gao H, Falco SC, Cigan AM. Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(2):931–45. doi:10.1104/pp.15.00793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharat SS, Li S, Li J, Yan L, Xia L. Base editing in plants: Current status and challenges. Crop J. 2020;8(3):384–95. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2019.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Monsur MB, Shao G, Lv Y, Ahmad S, Wei X, Hu P, Tang S. Base editing: the ever expanding clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) tool kit for precise genome editing in plants. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(4):466. doi:10.3390/genes11040466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liang Z. CRISPR technology for abiotic stress resistant crop breeding. Plant Growth Regul. 2021;94(2):115–29. doi:10.1007/s10725-021-00704-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Sun Y, Du J, Zhao Y, Xia L. Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant. 2017;10(3):526–29. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickar-Oliver A, Gersbach CA. The next generation of CRISPR–Cas technologies and applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(8):490–507. doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimi K, Kaneko T, Voigt B, Mashimo T. Allele-specific genome editing and correction of disease-associated phenotypes in rats using the CRISPR–Cas platform. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):1–9. doi:10.1038/ncomms5240.
   Google Scholar
• Miki D, Zhang W, Zeng W, Feng Z, Zhu J-K. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–9. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04416-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vlk D, Řepková J. Application of next-generation sequencing in plant breeding. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2017;53(3):89–96. doi:10.17221/192/2016-CJGPB.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FZ, Chen MX, Yu LJ, Xie L-J, Yuan L-B, Qi H, Xiao M, Guo W, Chen Z, Yi K, et al. OsARM1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in regulation of the response to arsenic stress in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1868. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güell M, Yang L, Church GM. Genome editing assessment using CRISPR genome analyzer (CRISPR-GA). Bioinformatics. 2014;30(20):2968–70. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boel A, Steyaert W, De Rocker N, Menten B, Callewaert B, De Paepe A, Coucke P, Willaert A. BATCH-GE: batch analysis of next-generation sequencing data for genome editing assessment. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–10. doi:10.1038/srep30330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canver MC, Haeussler M, Bauer DE, Orkin SH, Sanjana NE, Shalem O, Yuan G-C, Zhang F, Concordet J-P, Pinello L, et al. Integrated design, execution, and analysis of arrayed and pooled CRISPR genome-editing experiments. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(5):946–86. doi:10.1038/nprot.2018.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Lim K, Kim J-S, Bae S, Valencia A. Cas-analyzer: an online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(2):286–88. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You Q, Zhong Z, Ren Q, Hassan F, Zhang Y, Zhang T. Crisprmatch: an automatic calculation and visualization tool for high-throughput CRISPR genome-editing data analysis. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(8):858. doi:10.7150/ijbs.24581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillito RD, Whitt S, Ross M, Ghavami F, De Vleesschauwer D, D’Halluin K, Van Hoecke A, Meulewaeter F. Detection of genome edits in plants—from editing to seed. Vitr Cell Dev Biol. 2021;57(4):595–608. doi:10.1007/s11627-021-10214-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C. Crispr/cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70(1):667–97. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connelly JP, Pruett-Miller SM. CRIS. py: a versatile and high-throughput analysis program for CRISPR-based genome editing. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40896-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen C-L, Rodiger J, Chung V, Viswanatha R, Mohr SE, Hu Y, Perrimon N. SNP-CRISPR: a web tool for SNP-specific genome editing. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2020a;10(2):489–94. doi:10.1534/g3.119.400904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song M, Kim HK, Lee S, Kim Y, Seo S-Y, Park J, Choi JW, Jang H, Shin JH, Min S, et al. Sequence-specific prediction of the efficiencies of adenine and cytosine base editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(9):1037–43. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0573-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab M, Shen MW, Mok B, Wilson C, Matuszek Ż, Cassa CA, Liu DR. Determinants of base editing outcomes from target library analysis and machine learning. Cell. 2020;182(2):463–80.e30. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang G-H, Bae S. Web-based base editing toolkits: bE-Designer and BE-Analyzer. In: Computational methods in synthetic biology. Springer US; 2021. pp. 81–88. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0822-7_7.
   Google Scholar
• Xie X, Li F, Tan X, Zeng D, Liu W, Zeng W, Zhu Q, Liu Y-G. Betarget: a versatile web-based tool to design guide RNAs for base editing in plants. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:4009–14. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domazetovska A, Jensen SO, Gray M, Radzieta M, Maley M. Culture-free Phylogenetic analysis of Legionella pneumophila using targeted CRISPR/Cas9 next-generation sequencing. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e00359–22. doi:10.1128/spectrum.00359-22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Ba Y, Song Y, Cui J, Zhang X, Zhang D, Yuan Z, Yang L. Rapid and sensitive screening and identification of CRISPR/Cas9 edited rice plants using quantitative real-time PCR coupled with high resolution melting analysis. Food Control. 2020;112:107088. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalendar R, Shustov AV, Akhmetollayev I, Kairov U. Designing allele-specific competitive-extension PCR-based assays for high-throughput genotyping and gene characterization. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:773956. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.773956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui L, Zhao M, He J, Hu Y, Huo Y, Hao H, Hao Y, Zhu W, Wang Y, Xu M, et al. A simple and reliable method for creating PCR-detectable mutants in Arabidopsis with the polycistronic tRNA–gRNA CRISPR/Cas9 system. Acta Physiol Plant. 2019;41(10):1–14. doi:10.1007/s11738-019-2961-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhang Y, Chen C, Zhang Y, Zhou W, Sang Y. Identification and quantification of cassava starch adulteration in different food starches by droplet digital PCR. PloS One. 2020b;15(2):e0228624. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeke T, Lee S-J, Eng M. Increasing the efficiency of Canola and soybean GMO detection and quantification using multiplex droplet digital PCR. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(2):201. doi:10.3390/biology11020201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li J, Gao H, Li Y, Xiao F, Zhai S, Wu G, Wu Y. Event-specific PCR methods to quantify the genetically modified DBN9936 maize. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;105:104236. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliaga-Franco N, Zhang C, Presa S, Srivastava AK, Granell A, Alabadí D, Sadanandom A, Blázquez MA, Minguet EG. Identification of transgene-free CRISPR-edited plants of rice, tomato, and arabidopsis by monitoring DsRED fluorescence in dry seeds. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1150. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang L, Ma M, Li L. An efficient transgene-free DNA-editing system for Arabidopsis using a fluorescent marker. Biotechnol Lett. 2020;42(2):313–18. doi:10.1007/s10529-019-02778-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen H. A novel CRISPR/Cas9 system for efficiently generating Cas9-free multiplex mutants in Arabidopsis. Abiotech. 2020;1(1):6–14. doi:10.1007/s42994-019-00011-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He Y, Zhu M, Wang L, Wu J, Wang Q, Wang R, Zhao Y. Programmed self-elimination of the CRISPR/Cas9 construct greatly accelerates the isolation of edited and transgene-free rice plants. Mol Plant. 2018;11(9):1210–13. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T-M, Huang J-Z, Oung H-M, Hsu Y-T, Tsai Y-C, Hong C-Y. H2O2-based method for rapid detection of transgene-free rice plants from segregating CRISPR/Cas9 genome-edited progenies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3885. doi:10.3390/ijms20163885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar SA, Zaidi SSEA, Gaba Y, Singla-Pareek SL, Dhankher OP, Li X, Mansoor S, Pareek A. Engineering abiotic stress tolerance via CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(2):470–79. doi:10.1093/jxb/erz476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Zhang N, Hussain S, Ahmed S, Yang W, Wang S. Integration of a FT expression cassette into CRISPR/Cas9 construct enables fast generation and easy identification of transgene-free mutants in Arabidopsis. PloS One. 2019;14(9):e0218583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son S, Park SR. Challenges facing CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:902413. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.902413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SH, Ahn WS, Jie EY, Cho H-S, Kim SW. Development of late-bolting plants by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing from mesophyll protoplasts of lettuce. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41(7):1627–30. doi:10.1007/s00299-022-02875-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong B, Dong H, Cui Y, Jiang P, Jin Z, Zhang D. The versatile type V CRISPR effectors and their application prospects. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;8:622103. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.622103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonin EV, Makarova KS, Zhang F. Diversity, classification and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;37:67–78. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillochet C, Peña Fernández A, Goossens V, D’Halluin K, Drozdzecki A, Shafie M, Van Duyse J, Van Isterdael G, Gonzalez C, Vermeersch M, et al. Systematic optimization of Cas12a base editors in wheat and maize using the ITER platform. Genome Biol. 2023;24(1):1–24. doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02836-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenson T, Hinchliffe A, Forner M, Harwood W. Highly efficient genome editing in barley using novel LbCas12a variants and impact of sgRNA architecture. bioRxiv. 2022;2022–04.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo K, Atsumi G. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the RDR6 gene in Nicotiana benthamiana for efficient transient expression of recombinant proteins. Planta. 2019;250(2):463–73. doi:10.1007/s00425-019-03180-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh J, Lee S-Y, Kang H-J, Lee S, Lee J-H, Kang B-C. Heat stress induced potato virus X-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Breed Biotechnol. 2022;10(3):186–96. doi:10.9787/PBB.2022.10.3.186.
   Google Scholar
• Nagalakshmi U, Meier N, Liu J-Y, Voytas, DF, Dinesh-Kumar, SP. High efficiency multiplex biallelic heritable editing in Arabidopsis using an RNA virus. Plant Physiol. 2022;189(3):1241–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberkofler V, Bäurle I. Inducible epigenome editing probes for the role of histone H3K4 methylation in Arabidopsis heat stress memory. Plant Physiol. 2022;189(2):703–14. doi:10.1093/plphys/kiac113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Xuan H, Yang C, Guo N, Wang H, Zhao J, Xing H. GmHsp90A2 is involved in soybean heat stress as a positive regulator. Plant Sci. 2019;285:26–33. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Blahut-Beatty L, Zheng S, Clough SJ, Simmonds D. The role of a soybean 14-3-3 gene (Glyma05g29080) on white mold resistance and nodulation investigations using CRISPR-Cas9 editing and RNA silencing. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2022;36(3):159–64. doi:10.1094/MPMI-07-22-0157-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt C, Fransz P, Rönspies M, Dreissig S, Fuchs J, Heckmann S, Houben A, Puchta H. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4418. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18277-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González MN, Massa GA, Andersson M, Turesson H, Olsson N, Fält A-S, Storani L, Décima Oneto CA, Hofvander P, Feingold SE, et al. Reduced enzymatic browning in potato tubers by specific editing of a polyphenol oxidase gene via ribonucleoprotein complexes delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci. 2020;10:1649. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu A, Ohtake M, Shimatani Z, Nishida K. Production of herbicide-sensitive strain to prevent volunteer rice infestation using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:925. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osakabe Y, Watanabe T, Sugano SS, Ueta R, Ishihara R, Shinozaki K, Osakabe K. Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):26685. doi:10.1038/srep26685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li B, Liang S, Alariqi M, Wang F, Wang G, Wang Q, Xu Z, Yu L, Naeem Zafar M, Sun L, et al. The application of temperature sensitivity CRISPR/LbCpf1 (LbCas12a) mediated genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (G. Hirsutum) and creation of nontransgenic, gossypol-free cotton. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(2):221–23. doi:10.1111/pbi.13470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeg GJ, Kim SH, Choi DM, Tripathi S, Han Y-J, Kim J-I. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation of 5-oxoprolinase gene confers resistance to sulfonamide compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2021;15(6):753–64. doi:10.1007/s11816-021-00718-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Gao C. Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants. Nat Plants. 2015;1(10):15144. doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Hu M, Wang Q, Cheng L, Zhang Z. Role of papain-like cysteine proteases in plant development. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:871. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A, Zhai Y, Ortiz J, Neff M, Mandal B, Mukherjee SK, Pappu HR. Multiplexed editing of a begomovirus genome restricts escape mutant formation and disease development. PloS One. 2019;14(10):e0223765. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Zheng Q, Yi X, An H, Zhao Y, Ma S, Zhou G. Establishing RNA virus resistance in plants by harnessing CRISPR immune system. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(8):1415–23. doi:10.1111/pbi.12881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin SJ, Xiong Y, Michno JM, Campbell BW, Stec AO, Čermák T, Starker C, Voytas DF, Eamens AL, Stupar RM. CRISPR/Cas9 and TALENs generate heritable mutations for genes involved in small RNA processing of glycine max and Medicago Truncatula. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(6):1125–37. doi:10.1111/pbi.12857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Mahmood MS, Rahman SU, Rizvi F, Ahmad A. Evaluation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system for the development of resistance against cotton leaf curl virus in model plants. Plant Protec Sci. 2020;56(3):154–62. doi:10.17221/105/2019-PPS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Li X, Jiang M. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of WRKY3 and WRKY4 function decreases salt and me-JA stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(8):5821–32. doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06541-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez MA, Berkoff KC, Gill BK, Iavarone AT, Lieberman SE, Ma JM, Schultink A, Karavolias NG, Wyman SK, Chauhan RD, et al. CRISPR-Cas9- mediated knockout of CYP79D1 and CYP79D2 in cassava attenuates toxic cyanogen production. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1079254. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1079254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel AW, Chauhan RD, Cermak T, Mutka AM, Vijayaraghavan A, Boyher A, Starker CG, Bart R, Voytas DF, Taylor NJ, et al. Allele exchange at the EPSPS locus confers glyphosate tolerance in cassava. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(7):1275–82. doi:10.1111/pbi.12868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolabu TW, Mahmood K, Jerez IT, Cong L, Yun J, Udvardi M, Tadege M, Wang Z, Wen J. Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of alfalfa FLOWERING LOCUS Ta1(MsFTa1) leads to delayed flowering time with improved forage biomass yield and quality. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023;21(7):1–10. doi:10.1111/pbi.14042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi JN, Ntui VO, Ron M, Muiruri SK, Britt A, Tripathi L. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of endogenous banana streak virus in the B genome of Musa spp. overcomes a major challenge in banana breeding. Commun Biol. 2019;2(1):46. doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0288-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santosh Kumar V, Verma RK, Yadav SK, Yadav P, Watts A, Rao MV, Chinnusamy V. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing of drought and salt tolerance (OsDST) gene in indica mega rice cultivar MTU1010. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2020;26(6):1099–110. doi:10.1007/s12298-020-00819-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan T, Zheng Y, Su Z, Yu S, Song H, Zheng X, Lin G, Wu W. OsSPL10, a SBP-Box gene, plays a dual role in salt tolerance and trichome formation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2019;9(12):4107–14. doi:10.1534/g3.119.400700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandy S, Pathak B, Zhao S, Srivastava V. Heat-shock-inducible CRISPR/Cas9 system generates heritable mutations in rice. Plant Direct. 2019;3(5):145. doi:10.1002/pld3.145.
   Google Scholar
• Butt H, Rao GS, Sedeek K, Aman R, Kamel R, Mahfouz M. Engineering herbicide resistance via prime editing in rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;18(12):2370–72. doi:10.1111/pbi.13399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Lowder LG, Zhang T, Malzahn AA, Zheng X, Voytas DF, Zhong Z, Chen Y, Ren Q, Li Q, et al. Correction: a CRISPR–Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nature Plants. 2017;3(7):18. doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu HP, Liu SM, Xu SL, Chen W-Y, Zhou X, Tan Y-Y, Huang J-Z, Shu Q-Y. CRISPR-S: an active interference element for a rapid and inexpensive selection of genome-edited, transgene-free rice plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(11):1371–73. doi:10.1111/pbi.12788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieves-Cordones M, Mohamed S, Tanoi K, Kobayashi NI, Takagi K, Vernet A, Guiderdoni E, Périn C, Sentenac H, Véry A-A, et al. Production of low-Cs+rice plants by inactivation of the K+transporter os HAK 1 with the CRISPR-Cas system. Plant J. 2017;92(1):43–56. doi:10.1111/tpj.13632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Botella JR, Liu Y, Zhu J-K. Gene editing in plants: progress and challenges. National Sci Rev. 2019;6(3):421–37. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwz005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Peng Z, Long J, Sosso D, Liu B, Eom J-S, Huang S, Liu S, Vera Cruz C, Frommer WB, et al. Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. Plant J. 2015;82(4):632–43. doi:10.1111/tpj.12838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Tian Y, Shen R, Yao Q, Wang M, Chen M, Dong J, Zhang T, Li F, Lei M, et al. Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;38(12):1402–07. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0581-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes NJ, Hummel AW, Konecna E, Cegan R, Bruns AN, Bisaro DM, Voytas DF. Conferring resistance to geminiviruses with the CRISPR–Cas prokaryotic immune system. Natural. 2015;1(10):15145. doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.145.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Z, Abulfaraj A, Idris A, Ali S, Tashkandi M, Mahfouz MM. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):238. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0799-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hong Y, Meng J, He X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zhang C, Qi H, Luan Y. Editing miR482b and miR482c simultaneously by CRISPR/Cas9 enhanced tomato resistance to phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology®. 2021;111(6):1008–16. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-08-20-0360-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva CJ, Abeele C, Ortega-Salazar I, Papin V, Adaskaveg JA, Wang D, Casteel CL, Seymour GB, Blanco-Ulate B. Host susceptibility factors render ripe tomato fruit vulnerable to fungal disease despite active immune responses. Journal Of Experimental Botany. 2021;72(7):2696–709. doi:10.1093/jxb/eraa601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhang L, Wang L, Chen L, Zhao R, Sheng J, Shen L. Reduction of tomato-Plant chilling tolerance by CRISPR–Cas9-Mediated SlCBF1 mutagenesis. J Agri Food Chem. 2018;66(34):9042–51. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortigosa A, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Leonhardt N, Solano R. Design of a bacterial speck resistant tomato by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of SlJAZ2. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(3):665–73. doi:10.1111/pbi.13006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashkandi M, Ali Z, Aljedaani F, Shami A, Mahfouz, MM. Engineering resistance against tomato yellow leaf curl virus via the CRISPR/Cas9 system in tomato. Plant Signal. 2018;13(10):e1525996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kis A, Hamar É, Tholt G, Bán R, Havelda Z. Creating highly efficient resistance against wheat dwarf virus in barley by employing CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(6):1004–06. doi:10.1111/pbi.13077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar