U.S. consumer support for genetically modified foods: Time trends and assessments of four GM attributes

References

• Lusk JL, McFadden BR, Wilson N. Do consumers care how a genetically engineered food was created or who created it? Food Policy. 2018;78:81–90. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton J, Rezai G, Baglione S. The effect of persuasive/possessing information regarding GMOs on consumer attitudes. Future Foods. 2021;4:100076. doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100076.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur N (2020, March 4). New ‘feed your mind’ initiative launches to increase consumer understanding of genetically engineered foods. Federal Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/new-feed-your-mind-initiative-launches-increase-consumer-understanding-genetically-engineered-foods
   Google Scholar
• McFadden BR, van Rijnsoever F. Examining the gap between science and public opinion about genetically modified food and Global warming. PloS One. 2016;11(11):e0166140. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mepham B. A framework for the Ethical analysis of novel foods: the Ethical matrix. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2000;12(2):165–76. doi:10.1023/A:1009542714497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ. A New approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132–57. doi:10.1086/259131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Ortega DL, Caputo V, Lusk JL. Personality traits and consumer acceptance of controversial food technology: A cross-country investigation of genetically modified animal products. Food Qual Prefer. 2019;76:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschel AO, Grebitus C, Alemu MH, Hughner RS. Personality traits and preferences for production method labeling – a latent class approach. Food Qual Prefer. 2019;74:163–71. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Hartmann C. Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies. Nat Food. 2020;1(6):343–50. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0094-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peter JP, Olson JC. Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Keller K. The New branding imperatives: insights for the New Marketing realities. Marketing Science Institute; 2010. https://www.msi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/MSI_FF_10-700.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke I. Global marketing research. J Int Consum. 2000;12(4):91–111. ProQuest Central. doi: 10.1300/J046v12n04_06.
   Google Scholar
• Bawa AS, Anilakumar KR. Genetically modified foods: Safety, risks and public concerns—a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2013;50(6):1035–46. doi:10.1007/s13197-012-0899-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font M, Gil JMT, Traill W. Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy. 2008;33(2):99–111. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer LJ, Shepherd R. Ethical concerns and risk perceptions associated with different applications of genetic engineering: Interrelationships with the perceived need for regulation of the technology. Agric Human Values. 1995;12(1):48–57. doi:10.1007/BF02218074.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, Coble KH. Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food. Am J Agric Econ. 2005;87(2):393–405. doi:10.1080/10920277.1998.10595667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohl JB. Consumers’ decision-making and risk perceptions regarding foods produced with biotechnology. J Consum Policy. 1998;21(4):387–404. doi:10.1023/A:1006904622571.
   Google Scholar
• Busch G, Ryan E, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose. Agric Human Values. 2022;39(1):151–64. doi:10.1007/s10460-021-10235-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamis WLM, van Dommelen A, de Snoo GR. Lack of transparency on environmental risks of genetically modified micro-organisms in industrial biotechnology. J Clean Prod. 2009;17(6):581–92. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruening GL, M J. The case of the FLVR SAVR tomato. Cal Ag. 2000;54(4):6–7. doi:10.3733/ca.v054n04p6.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Goodin, R. E., Tucker, A., & Reber, B. (2009). Promethean elites encounter precautionary publics: The case of GM foods. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(3), 263-288.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel E. The market for credible information in biotechnology. J Consum Policy. 1998;21(4):405–44. doi:10.1023/A:1006952505732.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer K, Ekener-Petersen E, Rydhmer L, Björnberg KE. Social Impacts of GM Crops in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2015;7(7):8598–620. doi:10.3390/su7078598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano S, Clodoveo ML, Gennaro BD, Corbo F. Factors determining neophobia and neophilia with regard to new technologies applied to the food sector: A systematic review. Int J Gastro Food Sci. 2018;11:1–19. doi:10.1016/j.ijgfs.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobe D, Douthitt R. Consumer acceptance of recombinant bovine growth hormone: interplay between beliefs and perceived risks. J Consum Aff. 1995;29(1):128–43. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.1995.tb00042.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepting DH, Jaffe JA, Maciag T. Operationalizing ethics in food choice decisions. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2014;27(3):453–69. doi:10.1007/s10806-013-9473-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky J. Ethical tensions from a “science alone” approach in communicating GE science to consumers. In: James H editor. Ethical tensions from new technology: the case of agricultural biotechnology. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2018. pp. 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lang JT, Hallman WK. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Computat Studies. 2005;25(5):1241–52. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00668.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, Riggeman BRCB. Food Values. Am J Agric Econ. 2009;91(1):184–96. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meghani Z. Risk assessment of genetically modified food and neoliberalism: An argument for democratizing the regulatory review protocol of the food and Drug. 2014. pp. 967–89. doi:10.1007/s10806-014-9511-1.
   Google Scholar
• Research Center P. Public opinion about genetically modified foods and trust in scientists connected with these foods. In The new food fights. U.S. Public Divides Over Food Science; 2016. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/12/01/public-opinion-about-genetically-modified-foods-and-trust-in-scientists-connected-with-these-foods/.
   Google Scholar
• Streiffer R, Rubel A, Carter CA, Gruère GP. Choice versus autonomy in the GM food labeling debate. AgBioforum. 2003;6:141–44.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PB. Food biotechnology’s challenge to cultural integrity and individual consent. Hastings Cent Rep. 1997;27(4):34–39. doi:10.2307/3528777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlers AE. Labeling of genetically modified food: closer to reality in the United States? Politics Life Sci. 2013;32(1):73–84. doi:10.2990/32_1_73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang Y, Hobbs JE. Supporters or Opponents: Will Cultural Values Shape Consumer Acceptance of Gene Editing? J Food Prod Mark. 2020;26(1):17–37. doi:10.1080/10454446.2020.1715316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucht JM. Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses. 2015;7(8):4254–81. doi:10.3390/v7082819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich S, Gatto KA. Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information. Adv Nutr (Bethesda, Md). 2015;6(6):842–51. PubMed. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenberg A. The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food — a meta-analysis. Ecol Econ. 2009;68(8–9):2182–92. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, Jamal M, Kurlander L, Roucan M, Taulman L. A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J Agric Resour Econ. 2005;30(1):28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer LJ, van der Lans IA, Fischer ARH, Reinders MJ, Menozzi D, Zhang X, van den Berg I, Zimmermann KL. Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Sci Technol. 2013;30(2):142–52. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2013.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Li W, Dawson IGJ, Clark B, Chen S, Frewer LJ. Consumer responses to genetically modified food in China: The influence of existing general attitudes, affect and perceptions of risks and benefits. Food Qual Prefer. 2022;99:104543. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno CC, Campbell BL. Students ’ willingness to pay for more local, organic, non-GMO and general food options. J Food Distrib. 2016;47:32–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bukenya J, Wright N. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes. Agribusiness. 2007;23(1):117–30. doi:10.1002/agr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colson G, Rousu MC. What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods? GM Crops & Food. 2013;4(3):158–65. doi:10.4161/gmcr.26322.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loureiro ML, Bugbee M. Enhanced GM foods: Are consumers ready to pay for the potential benefits of biotechnology? J Consum Aff. 2005;39(1):52–70. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro ML, Hine S. Discovering niche markets: A comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic, and GMO-Free products. J Agric Appl Econ. 2002;34(3):477–87. doi:10.1017/S1074070800009251.
   Google Scholar
• Rickertsen K, Gustavsen G, Nayga RM Jr. Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified vegetable oil and Salmon in the United States and Norway. AgBioforum. 2017;20:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vriens M, Ter Hofstede F. Linking Attribute, benefits, and consumer values. Mark. Res. Fall. 2000;12(3):4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Blancke S, Breusegem FV, Jaeger GD, Braeckman J, Montagu MV. Fatal attraction: The intuitive appeal of GMO opposition. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(7):414–18. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson L, Russell J, Cameron DD, Ton J, Horton P, Barker ME. Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate. Food Sec. 2018;10(5):1145–61. doi:10.1007/s12571-018-0832-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth T, Rumble J. What’s in a name? The influence of persuasive communication on Florida consumers’ attitude toward genetically modified food. J Appl. 2017;101(2):72–84. doi:10.4148/1051-0834.1006.
   Google Scholar
• Boccia F, Punzo G. A choice experiment on consumer perceptions of three generations of genetically modified foods. Appetite. 2021;161:105158. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii T, Araki M. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35(7):1507–18. doi:10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronberger N, Wagner W, Nagata M. How Natural is “more Natural”? The role of method, type of transfer, and familiarity for public perceptions of cisgenic and transgenic modification. Sci Commun. 2014;36(1):106–30. doi:10.1177/1075547013500773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyango BM, Nayga RM. Consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified food: relevance of gene transfer technology. J Agric Resour Econ. 2004;29(3):567–83. JSTOR.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Ping Y. Consumer perception of risk associated with eating genetically engineered soybeans is less in the presence of a perceived consumer benefit. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(2):208–14. doi:10.1053/jada.2003.50029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, McFadden BR, Rickard BJ. Which biotech foods are most acceptable to the public? Biotechnol J. 2015;10(1):13–16. doi:10.1002/biot.201400561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky J, Lusk J. Mandatory labels can improve attitudes toward genetically engineered food. Sci Adv [ 4(6]. 2018;4(6). http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/6/eaaq1413.abstract.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist M, Connor M, Keller C. Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Computat Studies. 2012;32(8):1394–403. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01739.x.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Food Safety. International Labeling Laws. Center for Food Safety; n.d. [accessed2021 Oct 5]. https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/976/ge-food-labeling/international-labeling-laws
   Google Scholar
• Genetic Literacy Project. How Are GMOs Labeled Around The World? Genetic Literacy Project; n.d. [accessed 2021 October 5]. https://geneticliteracyproject.org/gmo-faq/how-are-gmos-labeled-around-the-world/
   Google Scholar
• Macahilo MM. GMO labeling laws per country. Global Food Safety Resource; n.d. [accessed 2021 Oct 6]. https://globalfoodsafetyresource.com/gmo-labeling-laws/
   Google Scholar
• Agricultural Marketing Service. BE Rulemaking Documents | Agricultural Marketing Service. n.d. [accessed 2021 Oct 5]. https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/be/rulemaking-documents.
   Google Scholar
• Register F. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard. Federal Register; 2018, Dec 21. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/12/21/2018-27283/national-bioengineered-food-disclosure-standard
   Google Scholar
• FDA. Draft Guidance For Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Food Has Or Has Not Been Derived From Genetically Engineered Atlantic Salmon. n.d. https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ucm469802.htm
   Google Scholar
• Non-GMO Project. Non-GMO Verified Product List. n.d. [accessed October 6, 2021]. https://www.nongmoproject.org/find-non-gmo/verified-products/
   Google Scholar
• Bovay J, Alston JM. GMO food labels in the United States: Economic implications of the new law. Food Policy. 2018;78:14–25. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky J, Morris S, Pazuniak O. How consumers use mandatory genetic engineering (GE) labels: Evidence from Vermont. Agric Human Values. 2019;36(1):117–25. doi:10.1007/s10460-018-9896-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCluskey JJ, Wesseler J, Winfree JA. The economics and politics GM food labeling: An introduction to the special issue. Food Policy. 2018;78:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beales H, Mazis MB, Salop SC, Staelin R. Consumer search and public Policy. J Consum Res. 1981;8(1):11–22. JSTOR. doi: 10.1086/208836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler G, Shebo BJ. Knowing and liking. Motiv Emot. 1983;7(2):125–44. doi:10.1007/BF00992897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Perception of risk. Sci. 1987;236(4799):280–85. doi:10.1126/science.3563507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H, Slovic P. Science, Values, and Risk. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1996;545(1):116–25. doi:10.1177/0002716296545001012.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Font J, Mossialos E. Is dread of genetically modified food associated with the consumers’ demand for information? Appl Econ Lett. 2005;12(14):859–63. doi:10.1080/13504850500365830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences & Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2016. Genetically engineered crops: experiences and prospects (Vol. xlv). National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.17226/23395.
   Google Scholar
• Andreotti G, Koutros S, Hofmann JN, Sandler DP, Lubin JH, Lynch CF, Lerro CC, Roos AJD, Parks CG, Alavanja MC, et al. Glyphosate use and cancer incidence in the agricultural health study. JNCI J Nat Cancer Inst. 2018;110(5):509–16. doi:10.1093/jnci/djx233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Rana I, Shaffer RM, Taioli E, Sheppard L. Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis and supporting evidence. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019;781:186–206. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieterle JM. Autonomy, Values, and food choice. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2016;29(3):349–67. doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9610-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky J. Affect or information? Labeling policy and consumer valuation of rBST free and organic characteristics of milk. Food Policy. 2008;33(6):616–23. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siipi H, Uusitalo S. Consumer autonomy and availability of genetically modified food. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2011;24(2):147–63. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9250-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Kolodinsky J, Parsons R, Matiru G. Markets Really Exist for Organic and BST-Free milk. Hoard’s Dairyman. 2006;November:755.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham J. Cost Impact of Vermont’s GMO labeling law on consumers Nationwide. John Dunham And Associates. 2016:17. https://corn.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Cost-Impact-of-Vermont%E2%80%99s-GMO-Labeling-Law-on-Consumers-Nationwide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito V, Kolodinsky J. Consumer attitudes and Policy directions for GM labeling and pollen drift regulation: evidence from the 2006 Vermonter poll. AgBioforum. 2007;2:85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky J, DeSisto T, Narsana R. Influences of question wording on levels of support for genetically modified organisms. Int J Consum Stud. 2004;28(2):154–67. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2004.00348.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Conner D, Kolodinsky J. rBST labeling and notification: lessons from Vermont. Choices. 1998;13(3):38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh DA, Gómez MI, Kaiser HM, Gao Z. Signaling impacts of GMO labeling on fruit and vegetable demand. PloS One. 2019;14(10):e0223910. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farcomeni A. A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008;17(4):347–88. doi:10.1177/0962280206079046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DR, Creech JC. Consumer measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. Am Sociol Rev. 1983;48(3):398–407. JSTOR. doi:10.2307/2095231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin D. To debate or not debate? Examining the effects of scientists engaging in debates addressing contentious issues. JCOM. 2018;17(4):1–18. doi:10.22323/2.17040202.
   Google Scholar
• Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv In Health Sci Educ. 2010;15(5):625–32. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W, Kim G, Miao L, Behnke C, Almanza B. Consumer inferences of corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims on packaged foods. J Bus Res. 2018;83:186–201. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zumbo BD, Zimmerman DW. Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement? Can Psychol. 1993;34(4):390–400. doi:10.1037/h0078865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winship C, Mare RD. Regression models with ordinal variables. Am Sociol Rev. 1984;49(4):512–25. JSTOR. doi: 10.2307/2095465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertler CA, Vannatta RA. Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. 3rd ed. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hayo B. Simplicity in econometric modelling: Some methodological considerations. Journal Of Economic Methodology. 1998;5(2):247–61. doi:10.1080/13501789800000015.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner A, Keuzenkamp H, McAleer M. Simplicity, inference and modeling: keeping it sophisticatedly simple. Cambridge, UK: Campbridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kato-Nitta N, Inagaki Y, Maeda T, Tachikawa M. Effects of information on consumer attitudes towards gene-edited foods: A comparison between livestock and vegetables. CABI Agric Biosci. 2021;2(1):14. doi:10.1186/s43170-021-00029-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter C, Shriver A, McConnachie E, Robbins J, Keyserlingk MAGV, Weary DM, Gao Z. Public attitudes toward genetic modification in dairy cattle. PloS One. 2019;14(12):e0225372. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghin JC, Gustafson CR. Consumer valuation of and attitudes towards novel foods produced with New plant engineering techniques: A review. Sustainability. 2021;13(20):11348. Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection; ProQuest Central. doi: 10.3390/su132011348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. GMO crops, animal food, and beyond. FDA; no date. https://www.fda.gov/food/agricultural-biotechnology/gmo-crops-animal-food-and-beyond.
   Google Scholar
• Beyond The Cart: A Year Of Essential Insights. 2021. https://www.instacart.com/company/updates/beyond-the-cart-a-year-of-essential-insights/
   Google Scholar
• McFadden BR, Anderton BN, Davidson KA, Bernard JC. The effect of scientific information and narrative on preferences for possible gene-edited solutions for citrus greening. Appl Eco Perspectives Pol. 2021;43(4):1595–620. doi:10.1002/aepp.13154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muringai V, Fan X, Goddard E. Canadian consumer acceptance of gene-edited versus genetically modified potatoes: A choice experiment approach. Canadian J Agri Economics. 2020;68(1):47–63. doi:10.1111/cjag.12221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shew AM, Nalley LL, Snell HA, Nayga RM, Dixon BL. CRISPR versus GMOs: Public acceptance and valuation. Global Food Secur. 2018;19:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2018.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Helliwell R, Hartley S, Pearce W. NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing. Agric Human Values. 2019;36(4):779–91. doi:10.1007/s10460-019-09956-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleboda P, Lagerkvist C-J. Tailored communication changes consumers’ attitudes and product preferences for genetically modified food. Food Qual Prefer. 2022;96:104419. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby J. Perspectives on information overload. J Consum Res. 1984;10(4):432–35. JSTOR. doi: 10.1086/208981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchler F, Greene C, Bowman M, Marshall KK, Bovay J, Lynch L. Beyond nutrition and organic labels—30 years of experience with intervening in food labels. 1477-2019–2808. 2017. p. 97. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.291967.
   Google Scholar
• Costanigro M, Lusk JL. The signaling effect of mandatory labels on genetically engineered food. Journal Of Food Policy. 2014;49:259–67. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones Michael S, Delborne Jason A, Elsensohn J, Mitchell Paul D, Brown Zachary S. Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know? Sci Adv. 2019;5(9):eaau8462. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau8462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar