A struggle for control beyond the facts: examining constructs of GM technology in Philippine opinion columns

References

• Ponce de Leon IZ, Custodio PA, David C. Depicting science in a public debate: the Philippine legal challenge against GMO eggplant. Sci Commun. 2019;41(3):291–313. doi:10.1177/1075547019846130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltri GA, Suerdem AK. Worldviews and discursive construction of GMO-related risk perceptions in Turkey. Public Underst Sci. 2011;22(2):137–54. doi:10.1177/0963662511423334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk TA. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In: Bell A Garrett P, editors Approaches to media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998. pp. 21–63.
   Google Scholar
• Vafeiadis M, Han J, Shen F. News storytelling through images: examining the effects of narratives and visuals in news coverage of issues. Int J Commun. 2020;14:4364–4384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland K. Talking to the academy: forms of hedging in science research articles. Writ Commun. 1996;13(2):251–81. doi:10.1177/0741088396013002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Q, Tao Y, Grabar N. Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: a comparative corpus-based study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0247981. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland K. Constructing proximity: relating to readers in popular and professional science. J Engl Acad Purp. 2010;9(2):116–27. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro MJ, Malayang DB, Panopio JA. Media representation of science: how the Philippine press defines biotechnology. J Media Commun Stud. 2011;3:281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Lore TA (2011). An analysis of the coverage of genetically modified crops by mainstream Kenyan print media: the case of the Daily Nation, The Standard, And The Taifa Leo, 2007-2009. [ Master’s Thesis, the University of Nairobi].
   Google Scholar
• Lukanda NI (2018). From lab to fork? Press coverage and public (mis)perception of crop biotechnology in Uganda. [ Doctoral Dissertation, Stellenbosch University].
   Google Scholar
• Du L, Rachul C. Chinese newspaper coverage of genetically modified organisms. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):326. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evanega S, Conrow J, Adams J, Lynas M. The state of the ‘GMO’ debate - toward an increasingly favorable and less polarized media conversation on ag-biotech? GM Crops & Food. 2022;13(1):38–49. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2051243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lore TA, Imungi JK, Mubuu K. A framing analysis of newspaper coverage of genetically modified crops in Kenya. J Agric Food Inf. 2013;14(2):132–50. doi:10.1080/10496505.2013.774277.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez L, Lee S. What can be gleaned from news coverage to improve science reporting and enhance public literacy about agricultural biotechnology in Ghana? J Agric Food Inf. 2016;17(2–3):91–109. doi:10.1080/10496505.2015.1133309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRosier C, Sulemana I, James HS, Valdivia C, Folk W, Smith RD. A comparative analysis of media reporting of perceived risks and benefits of genetically modified crops and foods in Kenyan and international newspapers. Public Underst Sci. 2015;24(5):563–81. doi:10.1177/0963662514568061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock JC, Peitz K, Watson E, Esposito C, Nichilo P, Etheridge J, Morgan M, Hart-McGonigle T. Comparing cross-national coverage of genetically modified organisms: a community structure approach. Journal Mass Commun Q. 2017;94(2):571–96. doi:10.1177/1077699017696880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper K. Green carnivores, mad cows and gene tech: the politics of food in Hungarian environmentalism. Anthropol East Eur Rev. 2003;77. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_faculty_pubs/77.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan Y, Yang J, Jin J. One issue, different stories: the construction of GMO issues on Chinese, American and British mainstream media portals. Cultur Sci. 2019;2(4):255–75. doi:10.1177/209660831900200403.
   Google Scholar
• Lynas M, Adams J, Conrow J. Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019-2021. GM Crops & Food. 2022:1–10. doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2140568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latham J. Fakethrough! GMOs and the capitulation of science journalism. Independent Sci New. 2014. http://independentsciencenews.org/science-media/fakethrough-gmos-and-the-capitulation-of-science-journalism/.
   Google Scholar
• Omeje C (2019). Media coverage and framing of genetically modified crops: A case study of science journalism in Nigeria. [ Masters Thesis, Stellenbosch University].
   Google Scholar
• Crawley CE. Localized debates of agricultural biotechnology in community newspapers: a quantitative content analysis of media frames and sources. Sci Commun. 2007;28(3):314–46. doi:10.1177/1075547006298253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer K, Wennstrom P, Agren M (2019). The Swedish media debate on GMO 1994-2017. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/fu-food/publikationer/future-food-reports/slu-futurefood_rapport_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dorius SF, Lawrence-Dill CJ. Sowing the seeds of skepticism: Russian state news and anti-GMO sentiment. GM Crops & Food. 2018;9(2):53–58. doi:10.1080/21645698.2018.1454192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligami CM (2016). Print media coverage of the ban on importation of genetically modified foods in Kenya: a content analysis of Daily Nation and The East African. [ Master’s Thesis, the University of Nairobi].
   Google Scholar
• Olson EL. The rationalization and persistence of organic food beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. J Clean Prod. 2017;140:1007–13. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti GA, Harper J, Lemaux PG. Focus on genetically engineered crops and foods - a case study from Mendocino County’s public debate. The University of California; 2005. http://ucbiotech.org/resources/workshop_2005/handouts/giusti.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Firmstone J. Editorial journalism and newspapers’ editorial opinions. Oxford Res Encyclopedias Comm. 2019. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.803.
   Google Scholar
• Day AG, Golan G. Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: assessing editorial strategies in the New York Times and the Washington post. J Stud. 2005;6(1):61–71. doi:10.1080/1461670052000328212.
   Google Scholar
• Umukoro ES, Ogwezi JO. Newspaper framing of the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: a study of editorials of selected newspapers. Int J Health Sci. 2022;6(S5):5318–39. doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.9772.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisco CB (1994). Pre-war and war reactions to the Persian Gulf War: A study of editorials in the conflict zone. [ Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi].
   Google Scholar
• Noorian M, Biria R. Interpersonal metadiscourse in persuasive journalism: a study of texts by American and Iranian EFL columnists. J Mod Lang. 2010;20:64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet MC, Huge M. Where do science debates come from? Understanding attention cycles and framing. In: Brossard D, Shanahan J Nesbitt TC, editors The media, the public and agricultural biotechnology. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2007. pp. 193–230.
   Google Scholar
• Carver RB, Rodland EA, Breivik, J. Quantitative frame analysis of how the gene concept is presented in tabloid and elite newspapers. Sci Commun. 2012;35:449–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet M. Knowledge into action: framing the debates over climate change and poverty. In: Angelo PD Kuypers J, editors Doing frame analysis: empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010. pp. 43–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch JA. Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar