Twenty-eight years of GM Food and feed without harm: why not accept them?

References

• CODEX. Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Rome: The World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• CODEX Alimentarius Commission. Foods derived from modern biotechnology. second ed. Rome, Italy: World Health Organization, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman RE, Ebisawa M, Ferreira F, Sampson HA, van Ree R, Vieths S, Baumert JL, Bohle B, Lalithambika S, Wise J. et al. Allergen online: a peer-reviewed, curated allergen database to assess novel food proteins for potential cross-reactivity. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(5):1183–1198. doi:10.1002/mnfr.201500769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelmoteleb M, Zhang C, Furey B, Kozubal M, Griffiths H, Champeaud M, Goodman RE. Evaluating potential risks of food allergy of novel food sources based on comparison of proteins predicted from genomes and compared. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021;147:111888. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111.888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg P, Baltimore D, Brenner S, Roblin RO, Singer MF. Summary statement of the asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72(6):1981–84. doi:10.1073/pnas.72.6.1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg P, Singer MF. The recombinant DNA controversy: twenty years later. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(20):9011–9013. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.20.9011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Government Coordinated Framework for Biotechnology Regulation. The White House office of science and technology policy (OSTP); 1986. www.usbiotechnologyregulation.mrp.usda.gov/biotechnology.gov/about/about.
   Google Scholar
• CBD. Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal Quebec, Canada; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wuhan. Published papers from Wuhan, China, at the Huangzhou University of Agriculture. Collaboration of the American Academy of Science and the Chinese Academy of Science. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cartagena. Caragena protocol on biosafety and biological diversity. Montreal; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Delmer D. GM crops and food security. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q-F. Demands for green technologies in future plant breeding. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes G, Barfoot P. Key global environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2012. GM Crops & Food. 2014;5(2):149–60. doi:10.4161/gmcr.28449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raven PH. Global perspective: GM crops and biodiversity. 2014;24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Newell-McGloughlin M. Future directions, development and applications of GM crops in the USA. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:31=39.
   Google Scholar
• Nepomuceno AL, Lopez MA, Filho FF, Coelho MVS, Pagliarini RF. Biosafety legislation and the use of GM crops in Brazil. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wesseler J, Drabik D. The situation for genetically modified crops in Europe. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:112–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr UB. GM crops in India. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Obokoh NH, Keetch D. The status of GM crops in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dubock A. The present status of golden rice. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman RE. Biosafety: evaluation and regulation of genetically modified (GM) crops in the United States. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:83–109.
   Google Scholar
• Wu K-M. Environmental safety evaluation and risk management of GM crops in China. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:112–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lynas M. Why GMOs are green-biotech crops to benefit the environment and reduce poverty. J Hauzhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:121–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chrispeels MJ. Global production and consumption of genetically engineered crops. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014;33:123-16.–23.
   Google Scholar
• Magkos F, Arvaniti F, Zampelas A. Putting the safety of organic food into perspective. Nutr Res Rev. 2003;16(2):211–22. doi:10.1079/NRR200361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieser H, Segura V, Ruiz Carnicer A, Sousa Comino I, Comino I. Food safety and cross-contamination of gluten-free products: a narrative review. Nutr. 2021;13(7):2244. doi:10.3390/nu13072244.
   Google Scholar
• Turner PJ, Patel N, Ballmer-Weber BK, Baumert JL, others, Taylor SL, Remington BC, Brough H, Campbell DE, Chen H. Peanut can be used as a reference allergen for hazard characterization in food allergen risk management: a rapid evidence assessment and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022;10(1):59–70. Appendix IV: 2003. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgrave ML, Byrne K, Caine J, Kowalcyzk L, Vihakaran P, Dong B, Ovrecz G, Macintosh S, Scoble JA, Petre JR. et al. Proteomics reveals the in vitro protein digestibility of seven transmembrane enzymes from the docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis pathway. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019;130:89–98. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh SC, Shaw M, Connelly M, Yao ZJ. Food and feed safety of NS-B5ØØ27-4 omega-3 canola (Brassica napus): a new source of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids. Front Nutr. 2021;8:716659. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.716659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Misra A, Verma AK, Roy R, Tripathi A, Ansari KM, Das M, Dwivedi PD. Bt brinjal in India: a long way to go. GM Crops. 2011;2(2):92–98. doi:10.4161/gmcr.2.2.16335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hautea DM, Taylo LD, Masanga APL, Sison ML, Narciso JO, Quilloy RB, Hutea RA, Shotkoscki FA, Shelton AM, Jurat-Fuentes JL. Field performance of Bt eggplants (Solanum melongena L.) in the Philippines: Cry1Ac expression and control of the eggplant fruit and shoot borer (leucinodes orbonalis guenée). PloS One. 2016;11(6):e0157498. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton AM, Hoosain M, Paranhape V, Prodhan ZH, Azad AK, Mujumder R, Sarwer SH, Hossain A. Bt brinjal in Bangladesh: the first genetically engineered food crop in a developing country. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(10):a344678. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a034678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mero HR, Lyantagaye SL, Bongcam-Rudloff EB. Why has permanent control of cassava brown streak disease in Sub-Saharan Africa remained a dream since the 1930s? Infect Genet Evol. 2021;94:105001. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Goodman RE, Tetteh AO, Lu M, Tripathi L. Bioinformatics analysis to assess potential risks of allergenicity and toxicity of HRAP and PFLP proteins in genetically modified bananas resistant to Xanthomonas wilt disease. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;109(Pt 1):81–89. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tripathi L, Ntui VO, Tripathi JN. Control of bacterial disease of banana using CRISPR/Cas-based gene editing. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3619. doi:10.3390/ijms23073619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service (CRC), R46737. Agricultural biotechnology: overview, regulation, and selected policy issues. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• FDA Federal Registrar (U.S. Department of health and human services-food and drug administration). Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varieties. Fed Regist. 1992;57:22984–3005.
   Google Scholar