A qualitative exploration of actors’ power resources and relations in Swiss transit station district planning

References

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984973
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A. (1998). Rethinking Power. Hypatia, 13(1), 21–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01350.x
   Google Scholar
• ARE. (2021). Schweizerische Verkehrsperspektiven. Schlussbericht https://www.are.admin.ch/dam/are/de/dokumente/verkehr/publikationen/verkehrsperspektiven-schlussbericht.pdf.download.pdf/verkehrsperspektiven-schlussbericht.pdf
   Google Scholar
• AUSTA der Stadt Bern. (2021). Agglomeration Bern https://www.bern.ch/themen/stadt-recht-und-politik/bern-in-zahlen/katost/00gruube/downloads/g-00-00-010.pdf/download
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2011). A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, I. (2022). Railopolis: City Within a City. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2074523
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, B., & Ruonavaara, H. (2017). Comparative process tracing: Making historical comparison structured and focused. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 47(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116658549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2014). Process tracing. From philosophical roots to best practices. In A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing. From metaphor to analytic tool (pp. 3–38). Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (1996). Nodes and places: Complexities of railway station redevelopment. European Planning Studies, 4(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720349
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., Curtis, C., & Renne, J. L. (2012). Station area projects in Europe and beyond: Towards transit oriented development? Built Environment, 38(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.38.1.31
   Google Scholar
• BFS. (2022). Statistischer Atlas der Schweiz. Ständige Wohnbevölkerung, 2020 https://www.atlas.bfs.admin.ch/maps/13/de/16214_72_71_70/25203.html
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
   Google Scholar
• Brons, M., Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BVD des Kantons Bern. (2019). Richtplan ESP Wankdorf (Stand Vorprüfung) https://www.espwankdorf.bvd.be.ch/content/dam/espwankdorf_bvd/dokumente/de/kommunikation/1613_350_VP_ESP_Wankdorf_RP_2019_V191217_Vers200113_bereinig.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BVD des Kantons Bern. (2022). ESP Wankdorf: Der ESP https://www.espwankdorf.bvd.be.ch/de/start/der-esp.html
   Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis. Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton Architectural.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2002). Stories and Silences: Disclosures and Self in Chronic Illness. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 302–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800307
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., & Kundu, R. (2020). Co-Production or contested production? Complex arrangements of actors, infrastructure, and practices in everyday water provisioning in a small town in India. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2020.1852408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1958). Relational analysis: The study of social organizations with survey methods. Human Organization, 17(4), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.17.4.q5604m676260q8n7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskafi, M., Fazeli, R., Dastgheib, A., Taneja, P., Ulfarsson, G. F., Thorarinsdottir, R. I., & Stefansson, G. (2019). Stakeholder salience and prioritization for port master planning, a case study of the multi-purpose port of Isafjordur in Iceland. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 19(3), 214–260. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2019.19.3.4386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and Power. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2021). Our curious silence about kindness in planning: Challenges of addressing vulnerability and suffering. Planning Theory, 20(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220930766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedli, B. (2020). Abschluss Phase 2 “Konkretisierung Mobilitätshubs Knoten Bern”. Internal Memo (SBB).
   Google Scholar
• Frimpong Boamah, E. (2022). Planning as polycentric: Institutionalist lessons for communicative and collaborative planning in Global South contexts. Planning Theory, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952221115871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research. European Journal of Futures Research, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). Tracing power in transdisciplinary sustainability research: An exploration. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, E., Cervero, R., & Tischler, D. (2012). Half-mile circle: Does it best represent transit station catchments? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2276(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3141/2276-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habeeb, W. M. (1988). Power and tactics in international negotiation: How weak nations bargain with strong nations. Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379x.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., Garcia, M. M., Arnd, M., & Peixoto, L. F. G. (2021). Euston station redevelopment: Regeneration or gentrification? Journal of Transport Geography, 90(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102923
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Planning culture—A concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2133–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interview views: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Prato, C. G., & Corcoran, J. (2021). Disentangling the behavioural side of the first and last mile problem: The role of modality style and the built environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 91(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102936
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, M., & Van Der Krabben, E. (2018). Informal institutional change in De Achterhoek region: from citizen initiatives to participatory governance. European Planning Studies, 26(4), 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1424119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, S. M., Stadler Benz, P., Wehrle, C., & Wicki, M. (2022). Co-Creating Mobility Hubs (CCMH) – Ein transdisziplinäres Forschungsprojekt der SBB zusammen mit der ETH Zürich und der EPF Lausanne. Internal Report (SBB)
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T.(1980). Getting the Facts: A Field Work Guide for Evaluators and Policy Analysts. Goodyear.
   Google Scholar
• Nostikasari, D., & Casey, C. (2020). Institutional barriers in the coproduction of knowledge for transportation planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(5), 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1849777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’mundo. (2021). Räumliche Entwicklungsstrategie RES. Gesamtbericht https://www.omundo.ch/wAssets/docs/downloads/2021_Omundo_RES_Gesamtbericht_Web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OpenStreetMap. (2022). Default Map Layer https://www.openstreetmap.org
   Google Scholar
• Papa, E., & Bertolini, L. (2015). Accessibility and transit-oriented development in European metropolitan areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 47(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L. (2015). Kein Wandel ohne Macht ‐ Nachhaltigkeitsforschung braucht ein mehrdimensionales Machtverständnis. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L. (2017). ‘Power with’ and ‘power to’ in environmental politics and the transition to sustainability. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1256961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, F. R., & Landau, A. (2000). Symmetry and asymmetry in international negotiations. International Negotiation, 5(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718060020848631
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., Humer, A., & Mattila, H. (2021). Subnational and dynamic conceptualisations of planning culture: The culture of regional planning and regional planning cultures in Finland. Planning Theory & Practice, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., Sielker, F., & Stead, D. (2021). Soft planning in macro-regions and megaregions: Creating toothless spatial imaginaries or new forces for change? International Planning Studies, 27(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1972796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, M. (2013). Planning cultures in transition: Sustainability management and institutional change in spatial planning. Sustainability, 5(11), 4653–4673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5114653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reusser, D. E., Loukopoulos, P., Stauffacher, M., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions – balancing node and place functions. Journal of Transport Geography, 16(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rongen, T., Tillema, T., Arts, J., Alonso-González, M. J., & Witte, J.-J. (2022). An analysis of the mobility hub concept in the Netherlands: Historical lessons for its implementation. Journal of Transport Geography, 104(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103419
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Sanli, T., & Townshend, T. (2018). Hegemonic power relations in real practices of spatial planning: The case of Turkey. European Planning Studies, 26(6), 1242–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1448755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkel, W., & Plüss, L. (2021). Spatial planning and metropolitan governance in Switzerland. disP – the Planning Review, 57(4), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.2060571
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• SPA und VP der Stadt Bern. (2017). STEK 2016. Gesamtbericht https://www.bern.ch/themen/planen-und-bauen/stadtentwicklung/stadtentwicklungsprojekte/stek-2016/unterlagen/downloads/stek2016-berngesamt-161207-grb-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taufiq, M., Suhirman, S., Sofhani, T. F., & Kombaitan, B. (2022). Power dynamics in collaborative rural planning: The case of Pematang Tengah, Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221092668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., Pojani, D., Lenferink, S., Bertolini, L., Stead, D., & Van Der Krabben, E. (2018). Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept? Regional Studies, 52(9), 1201–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1428740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro López, M., Scheers, J., & Van Den Broeck, P. (2021). The socio-politics of the urbanization - transportation nexus: Infrastructural projects in the department of Antioquia in Colombia through the lens of technological politics and institutional dynamics. International Planning Studies, 26(3), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2020.1850238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valler, D., & Phelps, N. A. (2018). Framing the future: On local planning cultures and legacies. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1537448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Acker, M., & Triggianese, M. (2020). The spatial impact of train stations on small and medium-sized European cities and their contemporary urban design challenges. Journal of Urban Design, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2020.1814133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, A., Henriksson, M., & Isaksson, K. (2021). The role of local public authorities in steering toward smart and sustainable mobility: Findings from the Stockholm metropolitan area. Planning Practice & Research, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.1874638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, A. (2020). Planning culture – dynamics of power relations between actors. European Planning Studies, 28(11), 2213–2236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1714553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemp, S., Stauffacher, M., Lang, D. J., & Scholz, R. W. (2011a). Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: Context matters! Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemp, S., Stauffacher, M., Lang, D. J., & Scholz, R. W. (2011b). Generic functions of railway stations—A conceptual basis for the development of common system understanding and assessment criteria. Transport Policy, 18(2), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K., & Momm, S. (2022). Planning systems and cultures in global comparison. The case of Brazil and Germany. International Planning Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2022.2042212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar