Decision support system for evaluating park & ride system using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method

References

• Aros-Vera, F., Marianov, V., & Mitchell, J. E. (2013). P-Hub approach for the optimal park-and-ride facility location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 277–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Barona, P., & Ghorbanzadeh, O. (2018). Comparing classic and interval analytical hierarchy process methodologies for measuring area-level deprivation to analyze health inequalities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K., & Owen, A. (2019). Accessibility impacts of park-and-ride systems. Transportation Research Record, 2673(9), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119845665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, K., & Kar, S. (2016). Multi-criteria analysis of supply chain risk management using interval valued fuzzy TOPSIS. OPSEARCH, 53(3), 474–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-015-0241-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Liu, Z., Kim, I., & Cheng, Q. (2018). Modeling asymmetric and non-additive P&R schemes in multimodal network equilibrium problem. CICTP 2017: Transportation Reform and Change - Equity, Inclusiveness, Sharing, and Innovation - Proceedings of the 17th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480915.289
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Xia, J. C., Irawan, B., & Caulfied, C. (2014). Development of location-based services for recommending departure stations to park and ride users. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 48, 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., & Yang, Y. (2011). A Fuzzy ANP-Based approach to evaluate region agricultural drought risk. Procedia Engineering, 23, 822–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2588
   Google Scholar
• Cherrington, L. K., Brooks, J., Cardenas, J., Elgart, Z., Galicia, L. D., Hansen, T., Miller, K., Walk, M. J., Ryus, P., Semler, C., & Coffel, K. (2017). Decision-making toolbox to plan and manage park-and-ride facilities for public transportation: guidebook on planning and managing park-and-ride. In Decision-Making Toolbox to Plan and Manage Park-and-Ride Facilities for Public Transportation: Guidebook on Planning and Managing Park-and-Ride. https://doi.org/10.17226/24770
   Google Scholar
• de Brito, M. M., Evers, M., & Almoradie, A. D. S. (2018). Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: A multi-criteria approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(1), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-373-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Brucker, K., Macharis, C., & Verbeke, A. (2013). Multi-criteria analysis and the resolution of sustainable development dilemmas: A stakeholder management approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(1), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duleba, S. (2019). An AHP-ISM approach for considering public preferences in a public transport development decision. Transport, 34(6), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.9080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, S., & Bridgelall, R. (2021). A fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy model to rank factors influencing public transit mode choice: A case study. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 39, 100496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entani, T., & Sugihara, K. (2012). Uncertainty index based interval assignment by Interval AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, K. -S., Miller, E. J., & Badoe, D. (1993). Modeling rail access mode and station choice. Transportation Research Record, (1413), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Feizizadeh, B., & Ghorbanzadeh, O. (2017). GIS-based interval pairwise comparison matrices as a novel approach for optimizing an analytical hierarchy process and multiple criteria weighting. GI_Forum, 1, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2017_01_s27
   Google Scholar
• Fu, S., Yan, X., Zhang, D., & Zhang, M. (2018). Risk influencing factors analysis of Arctic maritime transportation systems: A Chinese perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1448477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh, O., Feizizadeh, B., & Blaschke, T. (2018). Multi-criteria risk evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 9(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1413012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. N., Mahmoud, M. S., & Coleman, J. (2013). Effect of parking charges at transit stations on park-and-ride mode choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2351(1), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.3141/2351-18
   Google Scholar
• Hou, B., Zhao, S., & Liu, H. (2020). A combined modal split and traffic assignment model with capacity constraints for siting remote park-and-ride facilities. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991165
   Google Scholar
• Janiak, M. K., & Żak, J. (2014). Multiple criteria evaluation of different redesign variants of the public tram system. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.048
   Google Scholar
• Lakusic, S. (2018). Ranking conceptual locations for a park-and-ride parking lot using EDAS method. Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers, 70(11), 975–983. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1961.2016
   Google Scholar
• Larimian, T., Zarabadi, Z. S. S., & Sadeghi, A. (2013). Developing a fuzzy AHP model to evaluate environmental sustainability from the perspective of secured by design scheme—a case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 7, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehner, A., Erlacher, C., Schlögl, M., Wegerer, J., Blaschke, T., & Steinnocher, K. (2018). Can ISO-Defined urban sustainability indicators be derived from remote sensing: An expert weighting approach. Sustainability, 10(4), 1268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z. C., Lam, W. H. K., Wong, S. C., Zhu, D. L., & Huang, H. J. (2007). Modeling park-and-ride services in a multimodal transport network with elastic demand. Transportation Research Record, 1994(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3141/1994-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., & Meng, Q. (2014). Bus-based park-and-ride system: A stochastic model on multimodal network with congestion pricing schemes. International Journal of Systems Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2012.743617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., de Witte, A., & Ampe, J. (2009). The multi-actor, multi-criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 43(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.5670430206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2015). MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TECHNIQUES in TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW of the STATE of the ART LITERATURE. TRANSPORT, 31(3), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1121517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molan, V., & Simicevice, J. (2018). Park-and-ride system: Urban parking management policy. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 8(4), 426–445.
   Google Scholar
• Moslem, S., & Çelikbilek, Y. (2020). An integrated grey AHP-MOORA model for ameliorating public transport service quality. European Transport Research Review, 12(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00455-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslem, S., Saraji, M. K., Mardani, A., Alkharabsheh, A., Duleba, S., & Esztergar-Kiss, D. (2023). A systematic review of analytic hierarchy process applications to solve transportation problems: From 2003 to 2022. IEEE Access, 11, 11973–11990. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., Moslem, S., Palaguachi, J., Ortega, M., Campisi, T., & Torrisi, V. (2021). An integrated multi criteria decision making model for evaluating park-and-ride facility location issue: A case study for cuenca city in ecuador. Sustainability, 13(13), 7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., Tóth, J., & Péter, T. (2021). A comprehensive model to study the dynamic accessibility of the park & ride system. Sustainability, 13 (7), 4064. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, H., & Khani, A. (2018). Modeling park-and-ride location choice of heterogeneous commuters. Transportation, 45(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9723-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroso, G., Bermann, C., & Sanches-Pereira, A. (2018). Combining the functional unit concept and the analytic hierarchy process method for performance assessment of public transport options. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 722–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning. MacGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company. Priority Setting. Resource Allocation
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2013). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process (Vol. 195). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B., Hickman, M., & Nassir, N. (2019). Park-and-ride lot choice model using random utility maximization and random regret minimization. Transportation, 46(1), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9804-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suganthi, L. (2018). Multi expert and multi criteria evaluation of sectoral investments for sustainable development: An integrated fuzzy AHP, VIKOR/DEA methodology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C. -C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7745–7754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar