Expanding the Brussels ring road and the myth of travel time savings

References

• Banister, D., & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 209–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00013-8
   Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, H. S. (2014). The cold-war origins of the value of statistical life. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2012). Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transportation Research Part A, 46(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., Hugosson, M. B., & Brundell-Freij, K. (2012). The Stockholm congestion charges—5 years on. Effects, Acceptability and Lessons Learnt Transport Policy, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussauw, K. (2014). Bredere wegen, bredere files? Agora - Magazine Voor Sociaalruimtelijke Vraagstukken, 30(2), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.21825/agora.v30i2.2516
   Google Scholar
• Brent, R. J. (2017). Advanced Introduction to Cost–Benefit Analysis. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Button, K., & Verhoef, E. (1998). Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Delhaye, E., De Ceuster, G., & Proost, S. (2012). Second Opinion Brusselse Ring. Transport & Mobility Leuven/Groen.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Turner, M. A. (2011). The fundamental law of road congestion: Evidence from US cities. The American Economic Review, 101(6), 2616–2652. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, J. (2009). A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transportation Research Part A, 43(4), 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.014
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-López, M. -À., Pasidis, I., & Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2020). Congestion in highways when tolls and railroads matter: Evidence from European cities. EB Working Paper, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R. (2019). The gentle tyranny of cost–benefit analysis in transport appraisal. In I. Docherty & J. Shaw (Eds.), Transport matters: Why transport matters and how we can make it better (pp. 131–152). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell, B. J. (2006). Implementing QALYs in the analysis of air pollution regulations. Environmental & Resource Economics, 34, 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-004-7437-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymel, K. (2019). If you build it, they will drive: Measuring induced demand for vehicle travel in urban areas. Transport Policy, 76, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keblowski, W., & Bassens, D. (2018). “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: The uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geography, 39(3), 413–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1336320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kip Viscusi, W., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 5–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025598106257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T., & Brenman, M. (2012). A new social equity agenda for sustainable transportation. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T., & Colman, S. B. (2001). Generated traffic: Implications for transport planning. ITE Journal, 71(4), 38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & van Weelden, P. (2014). Decision-making on transport infrastructure and contested information: A critical analysis of three approaches. European Planning Studies, 22(3), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.783665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, D. (2008a). The myth of travel time saving. Transport Reviews, 28(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640701642348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, D. (2008b). Response to the responses. Transport Reviews, 28(6), 713–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802536027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, D. (2021). Economic benefits of road widening: Discrepancy between outturn and forecast. Transportation Research Part A, 147, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.023
   Google Scholar
• Mouter, N., Annema, J. A., & Van Wee, B. (2015). Managing the insolvable limitations of cost-benefit analysis: Results of an interview based study. Transportation, 42, 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9539-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, P. (2006). Cost-benefit analyses of transportation investments: Neither critical nor realistic. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1558/jocr.v5i1.32
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P., Andersen, J., Nicolaisen, M. S., & Strand, A. (2014). Transport modelling in the context of the ‘predict and provide’ paradigm. European Journal of Transport & Infrastructure Research, 14(2), 102–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, P., Nicolaisen, M. S., & Strand, A. (2012). Traffic forecasts ignoring induced demand: A shaky fundament for cost-benefit analyses. European Journal of Transport & Infrastructure Research, 12(3), 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen, M. S., & Naess, P. (2015). Roads to nowhere: The accuracy of travel demand forecasts for do-nothing alternatives. Transport Policy, 37, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. (2005). Environmental assessment and planning theory: Four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronse, W., Boussauw, K., & Lauwers, D. (2015). Shopping centre siting and modal choice in Belgium: A destination based analysis. European Planning Studies, 23(11), 2275–2291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.965132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, D., Catalano, G., Genco, M., Pancotti, C., Sirtori, E., Vignetti, S., & Del Bo, C. (2014). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects: Economic appraisal tool for cohesion policy 2014-2020. European Commission - Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. D. (2004). The politics of congestion mitigation. Transport Policy, 11(3), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B. (2012). How suitable is CBA for the ex-ante evaluation of transport projects and policies? A discussion from the perspective of ethics. Transport Policy, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker, J., & Handy, S. (2020). Induced travel calculator: Background on induced travel. UC Davis - National Center for Sustainable Transportation. https://travelcalculator.ncst.ucdavis.edu/about.html
   Google Scholar
• Volker, J. M. B., Lee, A. E., & Handy, S. (2020). Induced vehicle travel in the environmental review process. Transportation Research Record, 2674(7), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120923365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VRT NWS, (2019, 9 April). Ben Weyts (N-VA) stapt af van kilometerheffing: ‘Ik zie geen politiek draagvlak, ook niet bij de bevolking’. https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2019/04/09/ben-weyts-over-kilometerheffing/
   Google Scholar
• Werkvennootschap, D. (2019). Visienota Programma Werken aan de Ring. De Werkvennootschap.
   Google Scholar
• Werkvennootschap, D. (2021a). Gewestelijk ruimtelijk uitvoeringsplan ‘Ruimtelijke herinrichting van de Ring rond Brussel (R0)—Deel Noord: Scopingnota 2. De Werkvennootschap en Departement Omgeving. https://www.werkenaandering.be/sites/default/files/2020-02/Scopingnota.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Werkvennootschap, D. (2021b). Gewestelijk ruimtelijk uitvoeringsplan ‘Ruimtelijke herinrichting van de Ring rond Brussel (R0)—Deel Noord: Scopingnota 2—Bijlage 10: Resultaten Maatschappelijke kosten-baten analyse Loop 1. De Werkvennootschap en Departement Omgeving. https://www.werkenaandering.be/docs/scopingnota-2-bijlage-10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Werkvennootschap, D. (2021c). Gewestelijk ruimtelijk uitvoeringsplan ‘Ruimtelijke herinrichting van de Ring rond Brussel (R0)—Deel Noord: Scopingnota 2—Bijlage 8: Resultaten Milieueffectenonderzoek Loop 1. De Werkvennootschap en Departement Omgeving. https://www.werkenaandering.be/docs/scopingnota-2-bijlage-8.pdf
   Google Scholar