Regional manufacturing in the Czech Republic

References

• Arias, H., & Antosová, G. (2020). Regional specialization in the Colombian manufacturing industry: A new economic geography approach. Ekonomista, 4, 573–20. https://doi.org/10.52335/dvqp.te179
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (1990). Economic theory in retrospect. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., & Csank, P. (2005). The west-east gradient and regional development: The case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica, 1–2, 89–108. online. http://web.natur.cuni.cz/~ksgrrsek/acta/2005/AUC_2005_40_1-2_blazek_zapado-vychodni_gradient_a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blazek, J., Zizalova, P., Rumpel, P., & Skokan, K. (2011). Where does the knowledge for knowledge-intensive industries come from? The case of biotech in Prague and ICT in Ostrava. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1277–1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakmann, S. Garretsen, H. & van Marrewijk, C. (2009). The new introduction to geographical economics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818745
   Google Scholar
• Daniele, V., Malanima, P., & Ostuni, N. (2016). Unequal development. Geography and market potential in Italian industrialization 1871-2001. Papers in Regional Science, 97(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & Weinstein, D. (1996) Does economic geography matter for international specialization. NBER Working Paper 5706.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořáčková, T. (2016) Současné dopady socialistické industrializace V České Republice. Current impacts of socialistic industrialization in the Czech Republic. Diplomová práce. 2016. Masarykova univerzita Ekonomicko-správní fakulta [ online] https://is.muni.cz/th/shn1g/Dvorackova_Tereza_DP-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grubel, H. (1967). Intra-industry specialization and the pattern of trade. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 33(3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/139914
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (1995). Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities. The trends in U. S. regional manufacturing structure, 1860-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (1998). Economic integration and convergence: US regions, 1840-1987. The Journal of Economic History, 58(3), 659–683. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700021112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1993). On the relationship between trade theory and location theory. Review of International Economics, 1(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.1993.tb00009.x
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1999) ‘Was it all in Ohlin?’. [ online] http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ohlin.html
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2008). The increasing returns revolution in trade and geography. Nobel Prize Lecture Stockholm, online https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/krugman_lecture.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. (1995). ‘The Heckscher–Ohlin model in theory and practice’. International Finance Section. Department of Economics, Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, & Lixing. (2007). Comparative Advantage and Trade Intensity: Are Traditional Endowments Destiny? In D. Lederman & W. F. Maloney (Eds.), Neither Curse Nor Destiny: Natural Resources and Development. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry and Trade. (2018). Panorama of the manufacturing industry of the Czech Republic. [ online]https://www.mpo.cz/assets/en/industry/manufacturing-industry/panorama-of-the-manufacturing-industry/2019/10/panorama_aj_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mundell, R. (1957). International trade and factor mobility. The American Economic Review, 47(3), 321–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottaviano, G., & Puga, D. (1997). International trade and factor mobility. Agglomeration in the global economy: A survey of the new economic geography. Centre for Economic Performance-LSE Discussion Paper, 356, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00160
   Google Scholar
• Pflüger, M., & Tabuchi, T. (2016). ‘Comparative advantage and agglomeration of economic activity’. Institute for the Study of Labor. Discussion Paper 10273. [ online] http://ftp.iza.org/dp10273.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Puga, D. (1999). ‘The rise and fall of regional inequalities’. European Economic Review, 43(2), 303–334. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00061-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, L. (1997). A Ricardian model of new trade and location theory. Journal of Economic Integration, 12(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.1997.12.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, L. (1999). Economic geography and comparative advantage: Agglomeration versus specialization. European Economic Review, 43(2), 357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. (2008) ‘Trade and geography economies of scale, differentiated products and transport cost’. [online] http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2008/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Sadilek, T. (2017). Regional distribution of the metallurgical industry in the Czech Republic. Metalurgija, 56(1–2), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-8852.12161
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ženka, J., Novotný, J., Slach, O., & Květoň, V. Industrial specialization and economic performance: A case of Czech microregions. (2015). Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography, 69(2), 67–79. online. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2015.1009859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar