Exploring the Shared Use Pathway: A Review of the Design and Demand Estimation Approaches

References

• AASHTO. (2012). Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition. www.transportation.org
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO. (2018). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (7th ed.). Washington DC
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. P., Rouphail, N., Hummer, J. E., & Milazzo, J. S. (1998). Operational analysis of uninterrupted bicycle facilities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1636(1), 29–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/1636-05
   Google Scholar
• Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., González, V. I., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 139, 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2020.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aultman-Hall, L., & LaMondia, J. (2005). Evaluating the safety of shared-use paths: Results from three corridors in Connecticut. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1939(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193900112
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, J., Hutt, L., Thomas, J., Kortegast, P., Cooper, N. D., & Burton, J. (2021). Latent Demand for Walking and Cycling. www.nzta.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, H. (2015). Best Practices for Busy Shared-Use Paths. Prepared for Metro. October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Beiler, M. O., Asce, M., Waksmunski, E., & Asce, A. M. (2015). Measuring the sustainability of shared-use paths: Development of the GreenPaths rating system. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 141(11), 141(11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000796.
   Google Scholar
• Bhowmick, D., Saberi, M., Stevenson, M., Thompson, J., Winters, M., Nelson, T., Leao, S. Z., Seneviratne, S., Pettit, C., Vu, H. L., Nice, K., & Beck, B. (2022). A systematic scoping review of methods for estimating link-level bicycling volumes. Transport Reviews, 43(4), 622–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2022.2147240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bill, S., Dan, G., Lauren, W., Dan, R., & Mary, E. (2019). Bikeway Selection Guide. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. C. (2003). Introduction to Stated Preference Methods. In A primer on nonmarket valuation. The economics of non-market goods and resources (Vol. 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_4
   Google Scholar
• BTS. (2022). National Transit Map Data |. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. https://www.bts.gov/national-transit-map/national-transit-map-data-maps-and-apps
   Google Scholar
• Buck, B., Buck, D., & Buehler, R. (2012). Bike Lanes and Other Determinants of Capital Bikeshare Trips. Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting. http://data.dc.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Burmester, B., & LaMondia, J. J. (2018). Cyclists’ preferences for bicycle lanes versus road-adjacent shared-use paths using a year-long bike share gps dataset. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., United States.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Xie, Z., & Qian, C. (2010). Traffic conflict models on shared-use paths used by pedestrians, cyclists, and electric bicycle riders. ICCTP 2010: Integrated Transportation Systems: Green, Intelligent, Reliable - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals, 382, 1925–1931. https://doi.org/10.1061/41127(382)208
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K. J., & Moura, F. (2017). Conceptual framework for understanding latent demand: Accounting for unrealized activities and travel. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2668(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.3141/2668-08
   Google Scholar
• Creany, N. E., Monz, C. A., D’Antonio, A., Sisneros-Kidd, A., Wilkins, E. J., Nesbitt, J., & Mitrovich, M. (2021). Estimating trail use and visitor spatial distribution using mobile device data: An example from the nature reserve of orange county, California USA. Environmental Challenges, 4, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100171
   Google Scholar
• Dadashova, B., & Griffin, G. P. (2020). Random parameter models for estimating statewide daily bicycle counts using crowdsourced data. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 84, 102368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2020.102368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, H. (2016). Walking and Cycling Interactions on Shared-Use Paths. University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, H. B., Parkhurst, G. B., & Melia, S. M. (2017). Walking and cycling on shared-use paths: The user perspective. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Municipal Engineer. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.16.00033
   Google Scholar
• Dhanani, A., Tarkhanyan, L., & Vaughan, L. (2017). Estimating pedestrian demand for active transport evaluation and planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 103, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2017.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman, D., Falbo, N., Durrant, S., Gilpin, J., Gastaldi, G., Morril, P., Ward, C., Walker, W., Jones, B., Cheng, C., Portelance, J., Kack, D., Gleason, R., Lonsdale, T., Nothstine, K., Morgan, J., & Pressly, R. (2016). Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks. No. FHWA-HEP-17-024. United States: Federal Highway Administration. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2013). Four types of cyclists?: Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behavior and potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. (2021). Smart Location Mapping | US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/smart-location-mapping#SLD
   Google Scholar
• Ermagun, A., Lindsey, G., & Loh, T. H. (2018a). Bicycle, pedestrian, and mixed-mode trail traffic: A performance assessment of demand models. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermagun, A., Lindsey, G., & Loh, T. H. (2018b). Urban trails and demand response to weather variations. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 63, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2018.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). A direct-demand model for bicycle counts: The impacts of level of service and other factors. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515602568
   Google Scholar
• Fan, W. (., & Lin, Z. (2019). Evaluating the potential use of crowdsourced bicycle data in North Carolina. University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647
   Google Scholar
• FDOT. (2018). Topic #625-000-002 FDOT design manual 224-shared Use Paths. Florida Department of Transportation. Retrieved January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, M., Lloyd, W., Munro, C. (2010). Shared Path Widths. IPENZ Transportation Group Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, March, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., Hong, A., & Ngo, V. D. (2021). Build it and they will cycle: Causal evidence from the downtown Vancouver Comox Greenway. Transport Policy, 105, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B., & Appleton, K. M. (2007). Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 41(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, S. R., & Reardon, T. G. (2020). Direct demand modelling approach to forecast cycling activity for a proposed bike facility. Transportation Planning and Technology, 44(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2020.1849959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, R. (2006). Four Types of Cyclists. https://www.portland.gov/transportation/walking-biking-transit-safety/bicycle-counts
   Google Scholar
• Gobster, P. H., Sachdeva, S., & Lindsey, G. (2017). Up on the 606: Understanding the use of a new elevated pedestrian and bicycle trail in Chicago, Illinois. Transportation Research Record, 2644(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3141/2644-10
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G. (2009). Simple techniques for forecasting bicycle and pedestrian demand. American Institute of Certified Planners, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647
   Google Scholar
• GTFS. (2022). General Transit Feed Specification. https://gtfs.org/
   Google Scholar
• Gurbuz, O., Vargas, E., Sener, I. N., & Aldrete, R. M. (2022). The potential role and application of emerging data in a border crossing context. Report prepared by Center for International Intelligent Transportation Research. October 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hankey, S., Lindsey, G., Wang, X., Borah, J., Hoff, K., Utecht, B., & Xu, Z. (2012). Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankey, S., Zhang, W., Le, H. T. K., Hystad, P., & James, P. (2021). Predicting bicycling and walking traffic using street view imagery and destination data. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 90, 102651. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2020.102651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasnine, M. S., Dianat, A., & Habib, K. N. (2020). Investigating the factors affecting the distance travel and health conditions of e-bike users in Toronto. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100265
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, J., & Prabhakharan, P. (2016). An investigation of behaviour and attitudes relevant to the user safety of pedestrian/cyclist shared paths. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 40, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2016.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT). Shared use paths. https://hidot.hawaii.gov/highways/files/2013/07/Pedest-Tbox-Toolbox_7-Shared-Use-Paths.pdf (accessed June 28 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Hochmair, H. H., Bardin, E., & Ahmouda, A. (2019). Estimating bicycle trip volume for Miami-Dade county from Strava tracking data. Journal of Transport Geography, 75, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2019.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosford, K., Laberee, K., Fuller, D., Kestens, Y., & Winters, M. (2020). Are they really interested but concerned? A mixed methods exploration of the Geller bicyclist typology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 75, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2020.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HPRD. (2018). Houston Parks and Recreation Department/Houston Parks Board 2018 H-GAC Call for Projects. https://www.houstontx.gov/parks/
   Google Scholar
• Hummer, J. E., Rauphail, N. M., Toole, J. L., Patten, R. S., Schneider, R. J., Green, J. S., Hughes, R. G., & Fain, S. J. (2006). Evaluation of Safety, Design, and Operation of Shared-Use Paths―Final Report. Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-137.
   Google Scholar
• Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT). (2023). Shared Use Path Design. Retrieved June 28, 2023, from https://www.iowadot.gov/design/dmanual/12B-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs. (2022). I-20 shared use path study demand projections and analysis methodology. Presentation prepared for TxDOT. January 28, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Ryan, S., Donlon, J., Ledbetter, L., Ragland, D. R., & Arnold, L. S. (2010). Seamless Travel: Measuring Bicycle and Pedestrian Activity in San Diego County and Its Relationship to Land Use, Transportation, Safety, and Facility Type. https://safetrec.berkeley.edu/publications/seamless-travel-measuring-bicycle-and-pedestrian-activity-san-diego-county-and-its
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, L., Hochmair, H. H., Juhász, L., & Hochmair, H. (2020). Studying spatial and temporal visitation patterns of points of interest using safegraph data in Florida. GIS Center, 8(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2020_01_s119
   Google Scholar
• Kroes, E., & Sheldon, R. (1988). Stated Preference Methods: An Introduction on JSTOR. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 11–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20052832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmyak, J. R., Walters, J., Bradley, M., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014). Estimating bicycling and walking for planning and project development: A guidebook. No. Project 08–78. https://doi.org/10.17226/22330
   Google Scholar
• Kwigizile, V., Oh, J.-S., Kwayu, K., & University, W. M. (2019). Integrating crowdsourced data with traditionally collected data to enhance estimation of bicycle exposure measure. Western Michigan University. Transportation Research Center for Livable Communities. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Sener, I. N. Understanding potential exposure of bicyclists on roadways to traffic-related air pollution: Findings from El Paso, Texas, using Strava Metro Data. (2019). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 371. 16(3. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH16030371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Sener, I. N. (2021). Strava Metro data for bicycle monitoring: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 41(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1798558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., Yin, J., Pan, B., Lin, M., & Chi, G. (2021). Assessing the validity of SafeGraph data for visitor monitoring in Yellowstone National Park. Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ttra/2021/research_papers/1
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, G., & Nguyen, D. (2004). Use of Greenway Trails in Indiana. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 130(4), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:4(213)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, G., Peterka, M., Wang, J., & Hankey, S. (2017). Monitoring Shared-use Paths: Applying warrants for pedestrian hybrid beacons and Traffic Signals. In Presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C., United States: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., & Fan, W. (. (2020). Modeling bicycle volume using crowdsourced data from Strava smartphone application. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 9(4), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJTST.2020.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., & Fan, W. D. (2020). Bicycle ridership using crowdsourced Data: Ordered Probit Model Approach. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 146(8), 04020076. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Bade, D., & Chow, J. Y. J. (2021). Bike count forecast model with multimodal network connectivity measures. Transportation research record, 2675(7), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211021849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louch, H., Davis, B., Voros, K., OToole, K., & Piper, S. (2016). Innovation in Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts. A Review of Emerging Technology. http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/171973.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, T., Mondschein, A., Buehler, R., & Hankey, S. (2018). Adding temporal information to direct-demand models: Hourly estimation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Blacksburg, VA. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2021). Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Planning Data. A Review of Latent Bicycle and Pedestrian Demand in the South Central Planning and Development District Region. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/00ffa5c04ec745cea56f900676b7d6fc#n-mdicQw
   Google Scholar
• Mekuria, M. C., Furth, P. G., & Nixon, H. (2012). Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity. http://transweb.sjsu.edu
   Google Scholar
• Miah, M. M., Hyun, K. K., Mattingly, S. P., & Khan, H. (2022). Estimation of daily bicycle traffic using machine and deep learning techniques. Transportation, 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10290-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-Moreno, L. F., & Fernandes, D. (2011). Modeling of pedestrian activity at signalized intersections: Land Use, Urban Form, Weather, and Spatiotemporal Patterns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2264(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.3141/2264-09
   Google Scholar
• Munira, S., Sener, I. N., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Estimating bicycle demand in the Austin, texas area: Role of a bikeability index. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 147(3), 04021036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutrie, N., Carney, C., Blamey, A., Crawford, F., Aitchison, T., & Whitelaw, A. (2002). “Walk in to Work Out”: A randomised controlled trial of a self help intervention to promote active commuting. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56(6), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.56.6.407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCTCOG. (2022). Bicycle and Walking Demand Zones: GIS Methodology to Calculate Demand Zones. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/00ffa5c04ec745cea56f900676b7d6fc#n-mdicQw
   Google Scholar
• NOWData. (2022). NOAA Online Weather Data (NOWData). https://www.weather.gov/climateservices/nowdatafaq
   Google Scholar
• Noyce, D., & Dutta, A. (2005). Wisconsin Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Use Study ( 2005). www.topslab.wisc.edu
   Google Scholar
• Orvin, M. M., Fatmi, M. R., & Chowdhury, S. (2021). Taking another look at cycling demand modeling: A comparison between two cities in Canada and New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, 97, 103220. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTRANGEO.2021.103220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSM. (2022). OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=4/38.01/-95.84
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, T., & Dodge, N. (2014). Cycling Demand Analysis. https://www.transportprojects.org.nz/assets/Documents/cycling-demand-analysis-june-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pioneer Valley Planning Commission (PVPC). (2019). At-Grade Shared Use Path and Roadway Intersections in the Pioneer Valley. Springfield, MA: Pioneer Valley Planning Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, J. F., & Proulx, F. R. (2018). Estimating Annual Average Daily Bicycle Traffic without Permanent Counter Stations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(43), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118798243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryus, P., Ferguson, E., Laustsen, K. M., Schneider, R. J., Proulx, F. R., Hull, T., & Miranda-Moreno, L. (2014). Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/11q5p33w
   Google Scholar
• SafeGraph (n.d.). https://www.safegraph.com/
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. L., Frackelton, A., Gardner, S., Schneider, R., & Hintze, M. (2017). Ballpark method for estimating pedestrian and bicyclist exposure in Seattle, Washington. Transportation Research Record, 2605(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.3141/2605-03
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. J., Arnold, L. S., & Ragland, D. R. (2009). Pilot model for estimating pedestrian intersection crossing volumes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2140(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.3141/2140-02
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R., Henry, T., Mitman, M., Stonehill, L., & Koehler, J. (2012). Development and application of volume model for pedestrian intersections in San Francisco, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2299(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.3141/2299-08
   Google Scholar
• Silber, H., Burdett, B., Bill, A. R., & Noyce, D. A. (2016). Shared-use path intersection control compliance. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th annual meeting, Washinton D.C., United States.
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, M. A., Porter, C. D., Proussaloglou, K. E., Calix, R., & Chu, C. (2014). Modeling the impacts of bicycle facilities on work and recreational bike trips in Los Angeles County, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2468(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-10
   Google Scholar
• Strava. (2022). Strava Global Heatmap. https://www.strava.com/heatmap#6.49/-102.34672/31.56091/gray/all
   Google Scholar
• Streetlight. (2022). Transportation Analytics on Demand | StreetLight Data. https://www.streetlightdata.com/
   Google Scholar
• Tabeshian, M., & Kattan, L. (2014). Modeling nonmotorized travel demand at intersections in Calgary, Canada. Transportation Research Record, 2430(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2430-05
   Google Scholar
• Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2021). TxDOT Bikeway Guidance. United States: Texas Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S., Benz, R., Hudson, J., Griffin, G., Lasley, P., Dadashova, B., & Das, S. (2019). Improving the amount and availability of pedestrian and bicyclist count data in Texas. Report No. FHWA/TX-19/0-6927-R1. Texas A & M Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S., Sener, I. N., Martin, M. E., Das, S., Shipp, E., Hampshire, R. C., Fitzpatrick, K., Molnar, L. J., Wijesundera, R. K., Colety, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Synthesis of methods for estimating pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to risk at areawide levels and on specific transportation facilities. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S., Shunk, G., & Hottenstein, A. (1998). Development of a methodology to estimate bicycle and pedestrian travel demand. Report No. FHWA/TX-99/1723-S, Proj Summary Rept 1723-S, TTI: 0-1723. United States: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• TXDOT. (2022). Roadway Design Manual. http://onlinemanuals.txdot.gov/txdotmanuals/rdw/rdw.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USCB. (2022a). American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs
   Google Scholar
• USCB. (2022b). Decennial Census of Population and Housing. https://www.census.gov/decennial-census
   Google Scholar
• Vernez Moudon, A., Hess, P. M., Matlick, J. M., & Pergakes, N. (2002). Pedestrian location identification tools: identifying suburban areas with potentially high latent demand for pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1818(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.3141/1818-15
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Hankey, S., Wu, X., & Lindsey, A. G. (2016). Monitoring and modeling of urban trail traffic: Validation of direct demand models in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Columbus, Ohio. Transportation Research Record, 2593(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.3141/2593-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., Tight, M., & Page, M. (2007). Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 41(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2006.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WSDOT. Shared Use Paths. https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/fulltext/M22-01/1515.pdf Retrieved June 28, 2023
   Google Scholar
• WSDOT. (2022). WSDOT Design Manual. https://wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/fulltext/M22-01/1515.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, W. N. (1996). A GIS based method for trail alignment planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(96)00303-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., Sayed, T., & Guo, Y. (2019). Investigating factors that influence pedestrian and cyclist violations on shared use path: An observational study on the Brooklyn bridge promenade. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(7), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1575495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Kim, G., Wang, J., & Wilson, K. (2022). Investigating the association between the socioeconomic environment of the service area and fast food visitation: A context-based crystal growth approach. Health & Place, 76, 102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2022.102855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar