1,015
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of drivers and barriers in the adoption of Mobility as a Service (MaaS): a case study of Noida, India

, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2247044 | Received 05 Jul 2023, Accepted 07 Aug 2023, Published online: 22 Aug 2023

References

  • Butler, L., Yigitcanlar, T., & Paz, A. (2021). Barriers and risks of mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature. Elsevier, 109, 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103036
  • Cats, O., Kucharski, R., Danda, S. R., Yap, M., & Zhang, W. (2021). Beyond the dichotomy: How ride-hailing competes with and complements public transport. PloS One, 17(1), e0262496. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262496
  • Edrisi, A., & Rezaei, H. (2020). Assessment of how ride-hailing services affect individual’s travel mode choice in urban transportation. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJHCUM.2021.01.07
  • Gupta, S., & Sinha, K. (2022). Assessing the factors Impacting transport usage of mobility app users in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, India. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113768
  • Jamal, S., & Habib, M. A. (2019). Smartphone and daily travel: How the use of smartphone applications affect travel decisions. Elsevier, 53, 101939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101939
  • Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., Alonso-González, M. J., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a Service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Cogitatio, 2(2), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
  • Kayikci, Y., & Kabadurmus, O. (2022). Barriers to the adoption of the mobility-as-a-service concept: The case of Istanbul, a large emerging metropolis. Elsevier - Transport Policy.
  • Krauss, K., Reck, D. J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2023). How does transport supply and mobility behaviour impact preferences for MaaS bundles? A multi-city approach. Transportation Research Part C, 147, 104013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104013
  • Kumar, M. P., & Ram, S. (2022). Infrastructure evaluation, role of public bike sharing systems – Global and Indian context. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(3), 1841–1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.013
  • Lyons, G., Hammond, P., & Mackay, K. (2019). The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS. elsevier, 121, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.010
  • Mitra, S., Karmakar, S., & Bhaskar, A. (2021). Developing a sustainable mobility framework for Indian cities: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65, 102606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102606
  • Raj, P., Bhaduri, E., Moeckel, R., & Kishore Goswami, A. (2023). Analyzing user behavior in selection of RideHailing services for urban travel in developing countries. Transportation in Developing Economies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00172-5
  • Sinha, K., & Gupta, S. (2022). Smartphone app usage patterns for trip planning purposes and stated impacts in the city of Bhopal, India. MDPI, 7(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7010025
  • Sunghoon Jang, V. C. (2020). Does MaaS contribute to sustainable transportation? A mode choice perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL of SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 15(5), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1783726
  • Tarnovetckaia, R., & Mostofi, H. (2022). Impact of car-sharing and Ridesourcing on public transport use: Attitudes, preferences, and future intentions regarding sustainable urban mobility in the post-soviet city. Urban Science - MDPI, 6(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6020033
  • Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Exploring relationship between ride sharing and public transit use in USA. MDPI - MDPI - ENvironmental Research and Public Health.