653
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A dramatic morphological transformation from a spontaneous, organic street pattern to pre-planned-based order: learning from Baghdad city

Article: 2287569 | Received 09 Oct 2023, Accepted 20 Nov 2023, Published online: 27 Nov 2023

References

  • Al-Akkam, A. J. (2011). Urban characteristics: The classification of commercial street in Baghdad city. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 16(2), 49–26.
  • Alawadi, K., Hong Nguyen, N., Alrubaei, E., & Scoppa, M. (2021). Streets, density, and the superblock: Neighborhood planning units and street connectivity in Abu Dhabi. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1944281
  • Allen, E. Measuring the new urbanism with community indicators. in Contrasts and transitions, American Planning Association National Conference American Planning Association, San Diego, CA. 1997.
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E. (2019a). Measuring urban form and urban life: Four case studies in Baghdad. University of Strathclyde.
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E. (2019b). Measuring urban form and urban life: Four case studies in Baghdad, Iraq, in Architecture. University of Strathclyde, Department of Architecture.
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E. (2020a). Lessons from Baghdad city conformation and essence. In A. Almusaed, A. Almusaed, & L. Truong - Hong (Eds.), Sustainability in urban planning and design (pp. 387–417). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88599
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E. (2020b). Urban form elements and urban Potentiality (literature review). Journal of Engineering, 26(9), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2020.09.05
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E. (2020c). Urban Morphological Studies (Concepts, Techniques, and Methods). Journal of Engineering, 26(8), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2020.08.08
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E., & Alobaydi, D. (2021a). Measuring geometric properties of urban blocks in Baghdad: A comparative approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3285–3295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.020
  • Al-Saaidy, H. J. E., & Alobaydi, D. (2021b). Studying street centrality and human density in different urban forms in Baghdad, Iraq. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 1111–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.06.008
  • Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., & Istek, C. (2001). Characterization of the street networks in the traditional Turkish urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(5), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2718
  • Aultman-Hall, L., Roorda, M., & Baetz, B. W. (1997). Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 123(1), 10–17. (1997)123:1(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1997)123:1(10)
  • Betanzo, D. (2009). Exploring density liveability relationships. The Built & Human Environment Review, 2(1), 23–42.
  • Bourdic, L., Salat, S., & Nowacki, C. (2012). Assessing cities: A new system of cross-scale spatial indicators. Building Research & Information, 40(5), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.703488
  • Cervero, R., & Radisch, C. (1996). Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy, 3(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070x(96)00016-9
  • Chan, E. T., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2021). Towards a multiple-scenario approach for walkability assessment: An empirical application in Shenzhen, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102949
  • Crane, R., & Crepeau, R. (1998). Does neighborhood design influence travel?: A behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. Transportation Research part D. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 3(4), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00001-7
  • Dalvi, M. Q. (2021). Behavioural modelling, accessibility, mobility and need: Concepts and measurement, in Behavioural travel modelling. Routledge.
  • Dill, J. Measuring network connectivity for bicycling and walking. in 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. 2004.
  • Ewing, R. (1999). Pedestrian and transit friendly design: A primer for Smart growth. 1999. International City/County Management Association and Smart Growth Network.
  • Ewing, R. H. (1996). Pedestrian and transit friendly design. Florida Department of Transportation: American Planning Association.
  • G.I.S.Department. (2016). The traditional area of Baghdad based on Polservice, Geokart, Poland, rectified by Dep. Of GIS, in department of geographic information system GIS, mayoralty of Baghdad. The official letter, No.: O.P.U 420, Date: 24/10/2016 issued by University of Technology, Office of the President.
  • Hall, P. M. (2014). Good cities, better lives: How Europe discovered the lost art of urbanism. (F. Nicholas, Ed.). Abingdon.
  • Handy, S. (1996). Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1552(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155200119
  • Handy, S., Paterson, R. G., & Butler, K. S. (2003). Planning for street connectivity: Getting from here to there. American Planning Association, Planning Advisory Service.
  • Hashim, N., Moirongo, B., & Makworo, M. (2014). The role of urban space design characteristics in influencing social life of Swahili streets: The case of old town Mombasa. Journal of Agriculture Science & Technology, 15(1), 180–191.
  • Hess, P. M. (1997). Measures of connectivity [streets: Old paradigm, new investment]. Places, 11(2), 58–65.
  • Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., & Bedford, M. (1976). Space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 3(2), 147–185. https://doi.org/10.1068/b030147
  • Jacobs, A. B. (1993). Great streets. MIT Press.
  • Jiang, B., Claramunt, C., & Batty, M. (1999). Geometric accessibility and geographic information: Extending desktop GIS to space syntax. computers. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00017-4
  • Khder, H. M., Mousavi, S. M., & Khan, T. H. (2016). Impact of street’s physical elements on walkability: A case of Mawlawi street in Sulaymaniyah, Iraq. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v3.n1.106
  • Kim, J. Testing the street connectivity of new urbanism projects and their surroundings in Metro Atlanta region. in Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul, İstanbul, Turkey. 2007.
  • Lucchesi, S. T., Larranaga, A. M., Bettella Cybis, H. B., Abreu e Silva, J. A. D., & Arellana, J. A. (2021). Are people willing to pay more to live in a walking environment? A multigroup analysis of the impact of walkability on real estate values and their moderation effects in two global south cities. Research in Transportation Economics, 86, 100976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100976
  • Marshall, S. (2005). Streets and patterns. (Dawsonera, Ed). Spon.
  • Massingue, S. A., & Oviedo, D. (2021). Walkability and the right to the city: A snapshot critique of pedestrian space in Maputo. Mozambique Research in Transportation Economics, 86, 101049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101049
  • Matley, T., Goldman, L., & Fineman, B. (2000). Pedestrian travel potential in Northern new Jersey: A metropolitan Planning organization’s approach to identifying investment priorities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1705(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/1705-01
  • Mehaffy, M., Porta, S., Rofè, Y., & Salingaros, N. (2010). Urban nuclei and the geometry of streets: The ‘emergent neighborhoods’ model. Urban Design International, 15(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.26
  • Monteiro, C., & Pinho, P. (2021). Comparing approaches in urban morphology. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 15(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1936602
  • Nystuen, J. D., & Dacey, M. F. (1961). A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. Papers in Regional Science, 7(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1961.tb01769.x
  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006a). The network analysis of urban streets: A dual approach. physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 369(2), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.063
  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006b). The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 33(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045
  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2008). Multiple centrality assessment in Parma: A network analysis of paths and open spaces. urban design International. Urban Design International, 13(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2008.1
  • Porta, S., & Romice, O. (2010a). Analysis brief: Comparative analysis of urban Fabrics. Strathclyde University.
  • Porta, S. and Romice, O. (2010b). Plot-based urbanism: Towards time-consciousness in place-making. Working paper. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. UDSU - Urban Design Studies Unit, University of Strathclyde, Dept. of Architecture. 1–39.
  • Porta, S., Romice, O., Maxwell, J. A., Russell, P., & Baird, D. (2014). Alterations in scale: Patterns of change in main street networks across time and space. Urban Studies, 51(16), 3383–3400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013519833
  • Porta, S., Strano, E., Iacoviello, V., Messora, R., Latora, V., Cardillo, A., Wang, F., & Scellato, S. (2009). Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design. Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 36(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1068/b34098
  • Randall, T. A., & Baetz, B. W. (2001). Evaluating pedestrian connectivity for suburban sustainability. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 127(1), 1–15. (2001)127:1(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2001)127:1(1)
  • Reilly, M. and Landis, J. (2003). The influence of built-form and land use on mode choice. University of California, Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center Research Paper.
  • Remali, A. M. (2014). Capturing the essence of the capital city : Urban form and urban life in the city centre of Tripoli, Libya. In Department of Architecture. United Kingdom: University of Strathclyde.
  • Roosta, M., Javadpoor, M., & Ebadi, M. (2021). A study on street network resilience in urban areas by urban network analysis: Comparative study of old, new and middle fabrics in shiraz. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1911676
  • R.S.GIS.U. (2017). The georeferencing aerial imagery, in remote sensing and GIS unit, building and construction Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad. The official letter, No.: 1578, Date: 01/11/2017.
  • Shields, R., Gomes da Silva, E. J., Lima e Lima, T., & Osorio, N. (2021). Walkability: A review of trends. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1936601
  • Sommer, R. (2002). A practical guide to behavioral research : Tools and techniques. (S. Barbara Baker, Ed). Oxford University Press.
  • Song, Y. (2003). Impacts of urban growth management on urban form: A comparative study of Portland, Oregon, Orange County, Florida and Montgomery County, Maryland. National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland.
  • Song, Y., & Knaap, G.-J. (2004). Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976371
  • Strano, E., Viana, M., da Fontoura Costa, L., Cardillo, A., Porta, S., & Latora, V. (2013). Urban street networks, a comparative analysis of ten European cities. Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 40(6), 1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38216
  • Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2019). Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
  • Tal, G., & Handy, S. (2012). Measuring nonmotorized accessibility and connectivity in a robust pedestrian network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2299(1), 48–56. DOI. https://doi.org/10.3141/2299-06
  • Wachs, M., & Koenig, J. G. (2021). Behavioural modelling, accessibility, mobility and travel needs. Edited by: David A. Hensher, Peter R. Stopher. In Behavioural travel modelling (pp. 698–710). Routledge.
  • Yang, S., Chen, X., Wang, L., Wu, T., Fei, T., Xiao, Q., Zhang, G., Ning, Y., & Jia, P. (2021). Walkability indices and childhood obesity: A review of epidemiologic evidence. Obesity Reviews, 22(S1), e13096. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13096
  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research : Design and methods. SAGE.
  • Zlatkovic, M., Zlatkovic, S., Sullivan, T., Bjornstad, J., & Kiavash Fayyaz Shahandashti, S. (2019). Assessment of effects of street connectivity on traffic performance and sustainability within communities and neighborhoods through traffic simulation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.037