Editorial for Section Mobilities and Geographies

References

• https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/urban-population, Accessed December 19, 2023
   Google Scholar
• Adey, P. (2017). Mobility. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bærenholdt, J. O. (2013). Governmobility: The Powers of Mobility. Mobilities, 8(1), 20–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.747754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2011). Mobilities I: Catching up. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510383348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., Dorow, S., & Roseman, S. (2016). Putting mobility theory to work: Conceptualizing employment-related geographical mobility. Environment and Planning A, 48(9), 1787–1803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16649184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., & Merriman, P. (eds.). (2011). Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects; Ashgate, Surrey.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Hannan, K., & Kesselring, S. (2016). Applied mobilities, transitions and opportunities. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1150562
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., & Kesselring, S. (2016). Mobilities, Futures & the City: Repositioning discourses – Changing perspectives – Rethinking policies. Mobilities, 11(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. (2016). Of ‘other’ materialities: Why (mobilities) design is central to the future of mobilities research. Mobilities, 11(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., BendixLanng, D., & Wind, S. (2016). Mobilities design – Towards a research agenda for applied mobilities research. Applied Mobilities, 1(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1147782
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, V. (2011). Rethinking the city: Urban dynamics and motility. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. (2017). Urban mobilities and materialities – A critical reflection of a “sustainable” development project. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1285169
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. (2020). Spatial dimension of the marginalisation of cycling – Marginalisation through rationalisation? In Cox & Koglin (Eds.), The politics of cycling infrastructure: Spaces and (In)Equalities (pp. 55–71). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Pettersson, F. (2017). Changes, problems and challenges in Swedish spatial planning. Sustainability, 9(10), 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Rye, T. (2014). The marginalisation of bicycling in Modernist urban transport planning. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(4), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1974]). The production of space. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lukas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2016). Transport Justice – Designing Fair Transportation System. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Lucas, K. (2018). Perspectives on transport and social justice. In Craig (Ed.), Handbook on Global Social Justice (pp. 351–370). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, P., & Pearce, L. (2017). Mobility and the Humanities. Mobilities, 12(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1330853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P. D. (2011). Fighting traffic: The Dawn of the motor age in the American city. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, D. (2011a). Cities: Moving, Plugging In, Floating, Dissolving. In Cresswell & Merriman (Eds.), Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Ashgate, Surrey (pp. 167–188).
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, D. (2011b). Errant paths: The poetics and politics of walking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 672–692. https://doi.org/10.1068/d10808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2014). The new mobilities paradigm for a live sociology. Current Sociology Review, 62(6), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in An Age of Extremes. Verso Book.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2015). Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474014558988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2021). Understanding urban cycling: Exploring the relationship between mobility, sustainability and capital. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J., Hodson, M., & McMeekin, A. (2020). Platform mobilities and the production of urban space: Toward a typology of platformization trajectories. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(7), 1250–1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19896801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J., & Payne, W. (2023). Disposable infrastructures: ‘Micromobility’ platforms and the political economy of transport disruption in Austin, Texas. Urban Studies, 60(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221091486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2020). Framing systemic traffic violence: Media coverage of Dutch traffic crashes. Transportation Research: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5, 100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100109
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. Routledge.
   Google Scholar