Prefigurative politics in action research for just cycling futures

References

• Abord de Chatillon, M. (2022). Velonomy and material mobilities: Practices of cycle repair and maintenance in Lyon, France, and Melbourne, Australia (Doctoral dissertation, École nationale des travaux publics de l’État (ENTPE))
   Google Scholar
• Ackroyd, S. (2009). Research designs for realist research. In D. Buchanan, & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 532–18). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Aldred, R. (2015). A matter of utility? Rationalising cycling, cycling rationalities. Mobilities, 10(5), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.935149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argüelles, L., Anguelovski, I., & Dinnie, E. (2017). Power and privilege in alternative civic practices: Examining imaginaries of change and embedded rationalities in community economies. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 86, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. (2005). Using learning processes to promote change for sustainable development. Action Research, 3(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305052138
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D., & Hickman, R. (2013). Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable. Transport Policy, 29, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. (2023). Experiential learning: A relational approach to sustaining community-led social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 36(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2121268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. (1977). Marxism, prefigurative communism and the problem of workers’ control. Radical America, 6(Winter), 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., Waddell, S., O’Brien, K., Apgar, M., Teehankee, B., & Fazey, I. (2019). A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cass, N., & Manderscheid, K. (2018). The autonomobility system: Mobility justice and freedom under sustainability. In N. Cook & D. Butz (Eds.), Mobilities, mobility justice and social justice (pp. 101–115). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, P. (2020). From the right to mobility to the right to the mobile city: Playfulness and mobilities in Bogotá’s cycling activism. Antipode, 52(1), 58–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavé, D. (2023). Connecting to Make a Difference: Social Learning and Radical Collective Change in Prefigurative Online Communities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cumbria.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (2020). Towards an adventurous institutional politics: The prefigurative ‘as if’and the reposing of what’s real. The Sociological Review, 68(5), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120915148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, P. (2023). Vélomobility is to degrowth as automobility is to growth: Prefigurative cycling imaginaries. Applied Mobilities, 8(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2022.2087134
   Google Scholar
• Cupples, J., & Ridley, E. (2008). Towards a heterogeneous environmental responsibility: Sustainability and cycling fundamentalism. Area, 40(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00810.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2023). Prefigurative planning: Performing concrete utopias in the here and now. European Planning Studies, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinerstein, A. (2015). The politics of autonomy in Latin America. The art of organizing hope. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru, O. C., Webb, T. L., & Norman, P. (2021). What is the best way to promote cycling? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 81, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, K., & Murray, L. (2016). Discourses of mobility: Institutions, everyday lives and embodiment. Mobilities, 11(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.941257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Karvonen, A., & Raven, R. (Eds.). (2016). The experimental city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, S. (2017). Velotopia: The production of cyclespace in our minds and our cities. nai010.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Hartmann-Petersen, K., Kjærulff, A. A., & Nielsen, L. D. (2017). Interactive environmental planning: Creating utopias and storylines within a mobilities planning project. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1189817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, R., Goodman, A., Aldred, R., Nakamura, R., Tatah, L., Garcia, L. M. T., Zapata-Diomedi, B., de Sa, T. H., Tiwari, G., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M., Buehler, R., Götschi, T., & Woodcock, J. (2022). Cycling behaviour in 17 countries across 6 continents: Levels of cycling, who cycles, for what purpose, and how far? Transport Reviews, 42(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1915898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Trans. Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. P., Nielsen, B. S., Sriskandarajah, N., & Gunnarsson, E. (2016). Commons, sustainability, democratization: Action research and the basic renewal of society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., Saxena, S., Banister, D., & Ashiru, O. (2012). Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorthol, R., & Fyhri, A. (2009). Do organized leisure activities for children encourage car-use? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. L. (2016). Bike lanes are white lanes: Bicycle advocacy and urban planning. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2010). Prising open the black box: Critical realism, action research and social work. Qualitative Social Work, 9(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009355622
   Google Scholar
• Hult, A., & Bradley, K. (2017). Planning for sharing–providing infrastructure for citizens to be makers and sharers. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1321776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince, A. (2012). In the shell of the old: Anarchist geographies of territorialisation. Antipode, 44(5), 1645–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishkanian, A., & Peña Saavedra, A. (2019). The politics and practices of intersectional prefiguration in social movements: The case of sisters uncut. The Sociological Review, 67(5), 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118822974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, C., & Dyson, J. (2021). Geographies of the future: Prefigurative politics. Progress in Human Geography, 45(4), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520926569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karner, A., Bills, T., & Golub, A. (2023). Emerging perspectives on transportation justice. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 116, 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karner, A., London, J., Rowangould, D., & Manaugh, K. (2020). From transportation equity to transportation justice: Within, through, and beyond the state. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(4), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220927691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, L. (1998). Growing up in Amsterdam: Differentiation and segregation in children’s daily lives. Urban Studies, 35(3), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulick, R. (2014). Making media for themselves: Strategic dilemmas of prefigurative work in independent media outlets. Social Movement Studies, 13(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.831754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. (2018). Hackney: A cycling borough for whom? Applied Mobilities, 3(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1305151
   Google Scholar
• Maag, C. (2019). The secret bike subculture of danger and fun. Retrieved November 30, 2023, from https://www.christophermaag.com/bikelife
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2011). Doing Is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategic Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545223
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). The international handbook on social innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M., & Trubina, E. (2020). Improvising urban spaces, inhabiting the in-between. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(4), 664–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820922235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nello-Deakin, S., & Harms, L. (2019). Assessing the relationship between neighbourhood characteristics and cycling: Findings from Amsterdam. Transportation Research Procedia, 41, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., Te Brömmelstroet, M., Raven, R., & Ranson, J. (2019). Smart cycling futures: Charting a new terrain and moving towards a research agenda. Journal of Transport Geography, 79, 102486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, D. V., & Schwanen, T. (2018). Emergent and integrated justice: Lessons from community initiatives to improve infrastructures for walking and cycling. In N. Cook, & D. Butz (Eds.), Mobilities, mobility justice and social justice (pp. 129–141). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Popan, C. (2019). Bicycle utopias: Imagining fast and slow cycling futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psarikidou, K. (2020). Em-‘powering’niche innovations: Learning from cycling inequalities. Applied Mobilities, 5(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2020.1723386
   Google Scholar
• Raekstad, P., & Gradin, S. S. (2020). Prefigurative politics: Building tomorrow today. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., Newig, J., Parrish, B., Prell, C., Raymond, C., & Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 51(4), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19826085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., Boterman, W. R., Van Gent, W. P., & Majoor, S. (2016). Amsterdam in the 21st century: Geography, housing, spatial development and politics. Cities, 52, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, B., Bicket, M., Elliott, B., Fagan-Watson, B., Mocca, E., & Hillman, M. (2015). Children’s independent mobility: an international comparison and recommendations for action. Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2014). The new mobilities paradigm for a live sociology. Current Sociology, 62(6), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Silonsaari, J. (in press). Assembling velomobile commons for children and young people in a multicultural and marginalized part of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Silonsaari, J., Simula, M., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2023). From intensive car-parenting to enabling childhood velonomy? Explaining parents’ representations of children’s leisure mobilities. Mobilities, 19(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2200146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silonsaari, J., Simula, M., Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Kokko, S. (2022). Unravelling the rationalities of childhood cycling promotion. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 14, 100598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100598
   Google Scholar
• Simón i Mas, G. (2023). Results of the BICI Bus Survey. City Lab Barcelona. Retrieved December 11, 2023, from https://citylabbcn.org/2023/06/28/results-of-the-bici-bus-survey
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2018). Fixing mobility in the neoliberal city: Cycling policy and practice in London as a mode of political–economic and biopolitical governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 450–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2020). Understanding urban cycling: Exploring the relationship between mobility, sustainability and capital. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J. G. (2019). Cyclescapes of the unequal city: Bicycle infrastructure and uneven development. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, D. (2019). Not not but not yet: Present and future in prefigurative politics. Political Studies, 67(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717741233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A. (2023). Prefigurative infrastructure: Mobility, citizenship, and the agency of objects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 47(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnberg, A. (2021). Prefigurative politics and social change: A typology drawing on transition studies. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 22(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2020.1856161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini, D., & Butler, A. (2023). Bike kitchens and the sociomateriality of practice change: Exploring cycling-repair relations. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 11(1), 2259235. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2023.2259235
   Google Scholar
• Verlinghieri, E., & Schwanen, T. (2020). Transport and mobility justice: Evolving discussions. Journal of Transport Geography, 87, 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wals, A. E. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Westhorp, G., Stevens, K., & Rogers, P. J. (2016). Using realist action research for service redesign. Evaluation, 22(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016656514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S., & Green, K. (2019). ‘The helping, the fixtures, the kits, the gear, the gum shields, the food, the snacks, the waiting, the rain, the car rides … ’: Social class, parenting and children’s organised activities. Sport, Education and Society, 24(8), 788–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1470087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2015). Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.870883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2021). Prefigurative politics and social movement strategy: The roles of prefiguration in the reproduction, mobilisation and coordination of movements. Political Studies, 69(4), 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720936046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata Campos, M. J., Zapata, P., & Ordoñez, I. (2020). Urban commoning practices in the repair movement: Frontstaging the backstage. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 52(6), 1150–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar