Land-use policy instruments for sustainable housing: insights from municipality planners in Finland

References

• Albrechts, L., & Balducci, A. (2013). Practicing strategic planning: In search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans. disP – the Planning Review, 49(3), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2013.859001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., Häikiö, L., Leino, H., & Kanninen, V. (2018). Bypassing publicity for getting things done: Between informal and formal planning practices in Finland. Planning, Practice & Research, 33, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1378978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, B. (2009). Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Policy, 26(Supplement 1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beavers, A., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7275/qv2q-rk76
   Google Scholar
• Chao-Ying Joanne Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M.(2010). An introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598786
   Google Scholar
• Choguill, C. L. (2007). The search for policies to support sustainable housing. Habitat International, 31(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., & Morone, P. (2022). Economic sustainable development goals: Assessments and perspectives in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., Mattila, H., Mäntysalo, R., Hirvensalo, A., Teerikangas, S., & Kalliomäki, H. (2021). Multiple dimensions of strategic spatial planning: Local authorities navigating between rationalities in competitive and collaborative settings. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1904148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., Sarjamo, S., & Mäntysalo, R. (2019). Polycentricity as spatial imaginary: The case of Helsinki city plan. European Planning Studies, 27(4), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1569596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harju, C., & Lähtinen, K. (2022). Consumers’ consciousness for sustainable consumption and their perceptions of wooden building product quality. Forest Products Journal, 72(3), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-22-00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, B.-J. (2019). Towards the next generation of green building for urban heat island mitigation: Zero UHI impact building. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A. M., Oliveira, E., Pagliarin, S., Palka, G., Verburg, P., Bolliger, J., & Grădinaru, S. (2018). Urban land-use change: The role of strategic spatial planning. Global Environmental Change, 51, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., Deas, I., & Haughton, G. (2017). Real geographies, real economies and soft spatial imaginaries: Creating a ‘more than Manchester’ region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: Instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(04)70030-2
   Google Scholar
• Hytönen, J. (2019). Limits of localism: Institutional perspectives on communicativeness, neoliberalization and sustainability in Finnish spatial planning. Nordia Geographical Publications, 48(4), 110. Doctoral thesis + publications.
   Google Scholar
• Janjua, S. Y., Sarker, P. K., & Biswas, W. K. (2020). Development of triple bottom line indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment of residential buildings. Journal of Environmental Management, 264(15 June 2020), 110476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110476
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen, A., Leino, H., Bäcklund, P., & Laine, M. (2018). Strategic planning harnessing urban policy mobilities: The gradual development of local sustainability fix. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(5), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1454828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhola, S. (2014). Barriers to the implementation of climate change adaptation in land use planning a multi-level governance problem? International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2014-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutila, J., & Outila, T. (2022). Exploring the resilience of local detailed plans in the context of car parking at three study areas in the city of Oulu, Finland. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 10(1), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2087730
   Google Scholar
• Kaczorowska, A., Kain, J.-H., Kronenberg, J., & Haase, D. (2016). Ecosystem services in urban land use planning: Integration challenges in complex urban settings – case of Stockholm. Ecosystem Services, 22, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, H. R., & Ryynänen, S. P. (2022). Fostering smart specialisation: The emergence of guided self-organisation at the regional level. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 10(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2022.2057357
   Google Scholar
• Kanters, J., & Wall, M. (2014). The impact of urban design decisions on net zero energy solar buildings in Sweden. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 2(1), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2014.939297
   Google Scholar
• Kanters, J., & Wall, M. (2018). Experiences from the urban planning process of a solar neighbourhood in Malmö, Sweden. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 6(1), 54–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2018.1478323
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, K., & Taponen, S. (2022). Collaborators, supplementers, purchasers and privatizers – profiling the social and health care delivery forms of Finnish municipalities through cluster analysis. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2150882. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, K., & Taponen, S.(2022). Collaborators, supplementers, purchasers and privatizers - profiling the social and health care delivery forms of finnish municipalities through cluster analysis. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.215088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P., Heino, H., Rasinkangas, J., & Jauhiainen, J. S. (2020). Addressing local sustainability: Strategic thinking in the making. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 24(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v24i2.8614
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Kangas, H. L., & Lazarevic, D. (2017). Client-oriented evaluation of creative destruction in policy mixes: Finnish policies on building energy efficiency transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskivaara, A., & Lähtinen, K. (2023). Land-use planning in municipalities as a driver for sustainable residential areas in Finland – a regional innovation system approach. Journal of Sustainability Research, 5(Special issue), e230006. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20230006
   Google Scholar
• Krantz, V., & Gustafsson, S. (2021). Localizing the sustainable development goals through an integrated approach in municipalities: Early experiences from a Swedish forerunner. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(14), 2641–2660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1877642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuittinen, M., & Häkkinen, T. (2020). Reduced carbon footprints of buildings: New Finnish standards and assessments. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.30
   Google Scholar
• Kuronen, M., Junnila, S., Majamaa, W., & Niiranen, I. (2010). Public‐private‐people partnership as a way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from residential development. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 14(3), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2010.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Häyrinen, L., Roos, A., Toppinen, A., Aguilar Cabezas, F. X., Thorsen, B. J., Hujala, T., Nyrud, A. Q., & Hoen, H. F. (2021). Consumer housing values and prejudices against living in wooden homes in the Nordic region. Silva Fennica, 55(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lähtinen, K., Toppinen, A., & Malm, N. (2019). Lobbying urban planners’ views on wood material in multi-storey building sector in Finland. Bioproducts Business, 4(7), 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Land Use and Building Act. (1999). 52.1999/132. Finnish Acts of Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P., & Antikainen, R. (2020). Finland’s wood-frame multi-storey construction innovation system: Analysing motors of creative destruction. Forest Policy and Economics, 110, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Government Act. (2015). 10.4.2015/410. Finnish Acts of Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Lumijärvi, I., & Lepojärvi, U. (2014). Strategic management in Finnish municipalities. In P. Joyce & A. Drumaux (Eds.), Strategic management in public organizations – European practices and perspectives (p. 28). Routlegde Critical Studies in Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Balducci, A., & Kangasoja, J. (2011). Planning as agonistic communication in a trading zone: Re-examining Lindblom’s partisan mutual adjustment. Planning Theory, 10(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210397147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Jarenko, K., Nilsson, K. L., & Saglie, I.-L. (2015). Legitimacy of informal strategic urban planning – observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.861808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Tuomisaari, J., Granqvist, K., & Kanninen, V. (2019). The strategic incrementalism of Lahti master planning: Three lessons. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(4), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1652336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (2000). Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. The American Statistician, 54(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression – a primer. In Sage university papers. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences (p. 86). Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, L., & Sairinen, R. (2010). Integrating impact assessment and conflict management in urban planning: Experiences from Finland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(5), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, C.-Y. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209598786
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F., & Frisk, H. (2016). Soft space regional planning as an approach for integrated transport and land use planning in Sweden – challenges and ways forward. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 4(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2016.1156020
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, S. (2006). The Finnish Planning Profession and the Communicative Turn in Planning. Publications of Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, A 34 ( Doctoral thesis (in Finnish)). Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Rantanen, A., & Rajaniemi, J. (2020). Urban planning in the post-zoning era: From hierarchy to self-organisation in the reform of the Finnish land use and building act. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319893686
   Google Scholar
• Rekola, M., Häkkinen, T., Ala-Juusela, M., Pulakka, S., Mäkeläinen, T., Haapio, A., & Ruuska, A. (2014). Kestävän rakentamisen ohjaus kunnissa. VTT. https://publications.vtt.fi/pdf/technology/2014/T179.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. C. (2009). Green buildings and building assessment systems. A new area of interest for planners. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0885412209349589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahamies, K., Haveri, A., & Anttiroiko, A. V. (2022). Local governance platforms: Roles and relations of city governments, citizens, and businesses. Administration & Society, 54(9), 1710–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211072531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. (2020). Kuntapäättäjätutkimus [municipality leader research]. Association of Finnish Municipalities. https://www.kuntaliitto.fi/sites/default/files/media/file/P%C3%A4%C3%A4t%C3%B6ksentekoilmapiiri%20kunnissa%202020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Säynäjoki, E. S., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2014). The power of urban planning on environmental sustainability: A focus group study in Finland. Sustainability, 6(10), 6622–6643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, P., Walz, A., Albert, C., & Lipp, T. (2021). Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: Use of formal and informal planning instruments. Land Use Policy, 109, 105722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shama, Z. S., & Motlak, J. B. (2019). Indicators for sustainable housing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 518(2), 022009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/518/2/022009
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L., Qi, X., Yang, Z., Tao, L., Li, Y., Qiu, J., & Jiang, X. (2023). Comparative study of greenhouse gas emission calculations and the environmental impact in the life cycle assessment of buildings in China, Finland, and the United States. Journal of Building Engineering, 70, 106396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E., & Acheampong, R. (2015). Developing an inventory and typology of land-use planning systems and policy instruments in OECD countries. OECD Environment Working Papers, 94. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrp6wgxp09s-en
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, O., Holst, D., & Lind, S. O. (1999). Validity of a questionnaire survey: The role of non-response and incorrect answers. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 57(5), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solly, A. (2021). Land use challenges, sustainability and the spatial planning balancing act: Insights from Sweden and Switzerland. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1765992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2021). Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stender, M., & Walter, A. (2019). The role of social sustainability in building assessment. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1468057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellmann, S. M. (2012). The constrained influence of discourses: The case of Norwegian climate policy. Environmental Politics, 21(5), 734–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.692936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/GABC_Buildings-GSR-2021_BOOK.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Valtonen, E., Falkenbach, H., & Viitanen, K. (2017). Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: Empirical evidence from Finland. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1301885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. (2018). Local autonomy, municipal size and local political participation in Europe. Policy Studies, 39(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1451500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihemäki, H., Toppinen, A., & Toivonen, R. (2020). Intermediaries to accelerate the diffusion of wooden multi-storey construction in Finland. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljanen, A., Lähtinen, K., Kanninen, V., & Toppinen, A. (2023). A tale of five cities: The role of municipalities in the market diffusion of wooden residential multistory construction and retrofits. Forest Policy and Economics, 153(August 2023), 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102991
   Google Scholar
• Wiedenhofer, D., Smetschka, B., Akenji, L., Jalas, M., & Haberl, H. (2018). Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: A review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 °C climate target. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 30, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, N. (2014). Sustainable communities? A comparative perspective on urban housing in the European Union. European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1384–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.788612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, N. (2022). Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yrjänä, L., Rashidfarokhi, A., Toivonen, S., & Viitanen, K. (2018). Looking at retail planning policy through a sustainability lens: Evidence from policy discourse in Finland. Land Use Policy, 79, 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar