Sustainability of the anaerobic digestion of oil refinery secondary sludge

References

• Bahadori A. Waste management in the chemical and petroleum industries. Ltd.United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. doi: 10.1002/9781118731741.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf L, Eddy HP. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jens MM, Holm-Nielsen B, Esbensen KH. Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: a review perspective. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2011;15(6):3141–3155. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renou S, Thomas JS, Aoustin E, et al. Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA. J Clean Prod. 2008;16(10):1098–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Li L, Zhao X, et al. Anaerobic digestion: a review on process monitoring. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2019;103:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Sperling M. Activated Sludges. 2nd ed. Editora UFMG, Belo Horizonte (in Portuguese), Universidade Federal de MInas Gerais: 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Foladori P, Andreottola G, Ziglio G. Sludge reduction technologies in wastewater treatment plants. IWA Publishing, Londres: 2010. doi: 10.2166/9781780401706
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida H, Christensen TH, Scheutz C. Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: a review. Waste Manage Res. 2013; 31(11):1083–1101. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13504446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu SW, Shy CM. Health effects of waste incineration: a review of epidemiologic studies. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001;51(7):1100–1109. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andreoli CV, Von Sperling M, Fernandes F. Sewage sludge: treatment and final disposal. 2nd ed. Belo Horizonte (in Portuguese): Editora UFMG; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Chopra AK, Kumar A. A review on sewage sludge (Biosolids) a resource for sustainable agriculture. Arch Agric Envir Sci. 2017;2(4):340–347. doi: 10.26832/24566632.2017.020417
   Google Scholar
• Usman K, Khan S, Ghulam S, et al. Sewage sludge: an important biological resource for sustainable agriculture and its environmental implications. Am J Plant Sci. 2012;3(12):1708–1721. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2012.312209
   Google Scholar
• Wake H. Oil refineries: a review of their ecological impacts on the aquatic environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2005;62(1–2):131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2004.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro TMS, Cammarota MC, Pacheco EBAV. Anaerobic co-digestion of oil refinery waste activated sludge and food waste. Environ Technol. 2022;43(27):4279–4290. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2021.1946598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meegoda JN, Li B, Patel K, et al. A review of the processes, parameters, and optimization of anaerobic digestion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, et al. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2015;45:540–555. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molino A, Nanna F, Ding Y. Biomethane production by anaerobic digestion of organic waste. Fuel. 2013;103:1003–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patinvoh RJ, Osadolor OA, Chandolias K, et al. Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production. Bioresource Technol. 2016;224:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Güiza MS, et al. A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2014;36:412–427. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique MNI, Wahid ZA. Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. J Clean Prod. 2018;194:359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aich A, Ghosh SK. Application of SWOT analysis for the selection of technology for processing and disposal of MSW. Procedia Envir Sci. 2016;35:209–228. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.083
   Google Scholar
• Majlessi M, Vaezi A, Rabori MM. Strategic management of solid waste in Tehran: a case study in District n°. 1. Environ Health Eng Manage J. 2015;2(2):59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava PK, Kulshreshtha K, Mohanty CS, et al. Stakeholder-based SWOT analysis for successful municipal solid waste management in Lucknow, India. Waste Manage. 2005;25(5):531–537. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried O, De Clercq D, Blair E, et al. SWOT-AHP-TOWS analysis of private investment behavior in the Chinese biogas sector. J Clean Prod. 2018;184:632–647. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubule A, Romagnoli F, Rošā M, et al. SWOT analysis approach for advancement of waste-to-energy cluster in Latvia. Energ Procedia. 2015;72:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.023
   Google Scholar
• Thi NBD, Lin C, Kumar G. Waste- to-wealth for valorization of food waste to hydrogen and methane towards creating a sustainable ideal source of bioenergy. J Clean Prod. 2016;122:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xingang Z, Jiaoli K, Bei L. Focus on the development of shale gas in China - Based on SWOT analysis. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2013;21:603–613. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Yan H. Assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China. Renew Energ. 2012;37(1):53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingyun Z, Ming C. A SWOT and AHP methodology for the formulation of development strategies for China’s Waste EV battery recycling industry. In: Pehlken A, Kalverkamp M Wittstock R Eds. Cascade Use in Technologies 2018. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg; 2019pp. 83–92.doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-57886-5_11
   Google Scholar
• Narooie MR, Azizabadi H, Amiri R, et al. Determining appropriate strategy to improve performance of solid waste recycling system in Zahedan by SWOT method. Pollut Res. 2017;36:437–444.
   Google Scholar
• Raharjo S, Matsumoto T, Ihsan T, et al. Community-based solid waste bank program for municipal solid waste management improvement in Indonesia: a case study of Padang city. J Mat Cycles Waste Manage. 2017;19(1):201–212. doi: 10.1007/s10163-015-0401-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adar E, Karatop B, İnce M, et al. Comparison of methods for sustainable energy management with sewage sludge in Turkey based on SWOT-FAHP analysis. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2016;62:429–440. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samolada MC, Zabaniotou AA. Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece. Waste Manage. 2013;34(2):411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürel E. Swot Analysis: a theoretical review. J Int Social Res. 2017;10(51):994–1006. doi: 10.17719/jisr.2017.1832
   Google Scholar
• Helms MM, Nixon J. Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. J Strategic Manage. 2010;3(3):215–251. doi: 10.1108/17554251011064837
   Google Scholar
• Anastas PT, Warner JC. Green chemistry: theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. Design through the twelve principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(5):94A–101A. doi: 10.1021/es032373g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham MA, Nguyen N. Green Engineering: defining the Principles and Results from the San Destin Conference. Environ Prog. 2003;22:233–236. doi: 10.1002/ep.670220410.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Eli MU. Sustainability: definition and five core principles, a systems perspective. Sustain Sci. 2018;13(5):1337–1343. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0564-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo OQF, Medeiros JL, Yokoyama L, et al. Metrics for sustainability analysis of post-combustion abatement of CO2 emissions: microalgae mediated routes and CCS (carbon capture and storage). Energy. 2015;92:556–568. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velho SRK, Simonetti ML, Souza CRP, et al., Technological maturity level: a system for ordering technologies. Parcerias Estratégicas Brasília. 2017;22(45):119–140. Accessed 5 July 2021(in Portuguese http://seer.cgee.org.br/index.php/parcerias_estrategicas/article/viewFile/867/793.
   Google Scholar
• Reißmann D, Thr€an D, Bezama A. Techno-economic and environmental suitability criteria of hydrothermal processes for treating biogenic residues: a SWOT analysis approach. J Clean Prod. 2018;200:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernicharo CAL. Anaerobic reactors - vol 5: principles of biological wastewater Treatment. 2nd ed. Belo Horizonte, Brasil (in Portuguese): Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchi F, Cavinato C. Anaerobic digestion of bio-waste: a mini-review focusing on territorial and environmental aspects, waste manage res. Waste Manage Res J Sus Circular Eco. 2015;33(5):429–438. doi: 10.1177/0734242X14568610
   Google Scholar
• Fusi A, Bacenetti J, Fiala M, et al. Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Fronts Bioeng Biotech. 2016;4(26):1–17. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peres CS, Sanchez CR, Matumoto C, et al. Anaerobic biodegradability of the organic components of municipal solid waste. Water Sci Technol. 1992; 25(7):285–293. doi: 10.2166/wst.1992.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand M, Aissani1 L, Mallard P, et al. Odour and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in waste management: a local assessment proposal. Waste Biomass Valori. 2013;4(3):607–617. doi: 10.1007/s12649-012-9173-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendry P, Looney J, Mckenzie A) Managing Odour risk at landfill sites: main report. Technical Report. ISSN 1478-0143. MSE Ltd & Viridis. 2002. https://pdf4pro.com/amp/view/p-mckendry-j-h-looney-a-mckenzie-cschi-49192d.html. Accessed 5 July 2022
   Google Scholar
• Oladejo J, Shi K, Luo X, et al. A review of sludge-to-energy recovery methods. Energies. 2019;12(60):1–38. doi: 10.3390/en12010060
   Google Scholar
• Ginestet P. Comparative evaluation of sludge reduction routes. IWA Publishing, Londres; 2007. doi: 10.2166/9781780402352.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2017;127:221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims R, Schaeffer R, Creutzig F, et al. In: climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. contribution of working group iii to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T JC M Eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2014. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter8.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2022
   Google Scholar
• Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Epharaums JJ. Climate change – the IPCC scientific assessement. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Alatriste-Mondragon F, Samar P, Cox HHJ, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal, farm, and industrial organic wastes: a survey of recent literature. Water Envir Res. 2006;78(6):607–636. doi: 10.2175/106143006x111673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards J, Maazuza O, Burn S. A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia. Renew Sust Energ Ver. 2015;52:815–828. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaverková M. Landfill impacts on the environment— review. Geosciences. 2019;9(10):2–16. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9100431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar