Sustainable circular biorefinery approach for novel building blocks and bioenergy production from algae using microbial fuel cell

References

• IEA. CO2 emissions – Global Energy Review 2021 – Analysis - IEA [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 7]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021/co2-emissions.
   Google Scholar
• Benson NU, Bassey DE, Palanisami T. COVID pollution: impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global plastic waste footprint. Heliyon. 2021;7(2):e06343. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmaltz E, Melvin EC, Diana Z, et al. Plastic pollution solutions: emerging technologies to prevent and collect marine plastic pollution. Environ Int. 2020;144:106067. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1 Seventieth session. 2015
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Fevre M, Jones GO, et al. Catalysis as an enabling science for sustainable polymers. Chem Rev [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Jun 7];118(2):839–885. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balina K, Romagnoli F, Blumberga D. Seaweed biorefinery concept for sustainable use of marine resources. Energy Procedia. 2017;128:504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.067
   Google Scholar
• Loh SR, Tan IS, Foo HCY, et al. Exergy analysis of a holistic zero waste macroalgae-based third-generation bioethanol biorefinery approach: biowaste to bioenergy. Environ Technol Innov. 2023;30:103089. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KH, Tan IS, Foo HCY, et al. Third-generation bioethanol and L-lactic acid production from red macroalgae cellulosic residue: prospects of Industry 5.0 algae. Energy Convers Manag [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 7];253:115155. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasa ET, Ögmundarson Ó, Gavala HN, et al. Commodity chemical production from third-generation biomass: a techno-economic assessment of lactic acid production. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin [Internet]. 2021;15(1):257–281. doi: 10.1002/bbb.2160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostas ET, Adams JMM, Ruiz HA, et al. Macroalgal biorefinery concepts for the circular bioeconomy: a review on biotechnological developments and future perspectives. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;151:111553. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong KTX, Tan IS, Foo HCY, et al. Advancement of biorefinery-derived platform chemicals from macroalgae: a perspective for bioethanol and lactic acid. Biomass Convers Biorefin [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 18];1:1–37. doi: 10.1007/s13399-022-02561-7
   Google Scholar
• Tong KTX, Tan IS, Foo HCY, et al. Third-generation L-Lactic acid production by the microwave-assisted hydrolysis of red macroalgae Eucheuma denticulatum extract. Bioresour Technol. 2021;342:125880. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebreslassie TR, Nguyen PKT, Yoon HH, et al. Co-production of hydrogen and electricity from macroalgae by simultaneous dark fermentation and microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol. 2021;336:125269. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoroafor T, Haile S, Velasquez-Orta S. Life cycle assessment of microbial electrosynthesis for commercial product generation. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 8];25(1):04020062. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savla N, Suman PS, Pandit S, et al. Techno-economical evaluation and life cycle assessment of microbial electrochemical systems: a review. Curr Res Green Sustainable Chem. 2021;4:100111. doi: 10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100111
   Google Scholar
• Kasirajan S, Umapathy D, Chandrasekar C, et al. Preparation of poly(lactic acid) from Prosopis juliflora and incorporation of chitosan for packaging applications. J Biosci Bioeng. 2019;128(3):323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA IEA. Biorefineries: adding value to the sustainable utilisation of biomass. 2013;
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou X, Okoroafor T, Parry S, et al. The use of carbon dioxide in microbial electrosynthesis: advancements, sustainability and economic feasibility. J CO2 Util. 2017;18:390–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar B, Bhardwaj N, Agrawal K, et al. Current perspective on pretreatment technologies using lignocellulosic biomass: an emerging biorefinery concept. Fuel Process Technol. 2020;199:106244. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO F and A. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department - Yearbook of Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics - Aquaculture production [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jun 1]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fishery/static/Yearbook/YB2017_USBcard/navigation/index_content_aquaculture_e.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cesário MT, da Fonseca MMR, Marques MM, et al. Marine algal carbohydrates as carbon sources for the production of biochemicals and biomaterials. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(3):798–817. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhu C, Jiang J, et al. Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of Gracilaria corticata macroalgae: effects of process parameter on bio-oil up-gradation. Bioresour Technol. 2021;319:124163. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravanal MC, Camus C, Buschmann AH, et al. Production of Bioethanol From Brown Algae. Advances in Feedstock Conversion Technologies for Alternative Fuels and Bioproducts: New Technologies, Challenges and Opportunities. Energy. Woodhead Publishing; 2019. p. 69–88. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817937-6.00004-7
   Google Scholar
• Rocher DF, Cripwell RA, Viljoen-Bloom M. Engineered yeast for enzymatic hydrolysis of laminarin from brown macroalgae. Algal Res. 2021;54:102233. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102233
   Google Scholar
• Madany MA, Abdel-Kareem MS, Al-Oufy AK, et al. The biopolymer ulvan from Ulva fasciata: extraction towards nanofibers fabrication. Int j biol macromol. 2021;177:401–412. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho M, Carpenter RC. Differential growth responses to water flow and reduced pH in tropical marine macroalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2017;491:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2017.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 1]; Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/online/sofia/2022/aquaculture-production.html.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte CM, Gattuso JP, Hancke K, et al. Global estimates of the extent and production of macroalgal forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 1];31(7):1422–1439. doi: 10.1111/geb.13515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven JA. The possible roles of algae in restricting the increase in atmospheric CO2 and global temperature. European J Phycol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jun 14];52(4):506–522. doi: 10.1080/0967026220171362593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seghetta M, Hou X, Bastianoni S, et al. Life cycle assessment of macroalgal biorefinery for the production of ethanol, proteins and fertilizers – a step towards a regenerative bioeconomy. J Clean Prod. 2016;137:1158–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl M, Schneider Covachã S, Saderne V, et al. Macroalgae may mitigate ocean acidification effects on mussel calcification by increasing pH and its fluctuations. Limnol Oceanogr [Internet]. 2018;63(1):3–21. doi: 10.1002/lno.10608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEA PEA Sustainable plastics strategy • Plastics Europe [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 27]. Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/sustainable-plastics-strategy/.
   Google Scholar
• Alfonsín V, Maceiras R, Gutiérrez C. Bioethanol production from industrial algae waste. Waste Manage. 2019;87:791–797. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farobie O, Matsumura Y, Syaftika N, et al. Recent advancement on hydrogen production from macroalgae via supercritical water gasification. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2021;16:100844. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100844
   Google Scholar
• Bolognesi S, Cecconet D, Callegari A, et al. Bioelectrochemical treatment of municipal solid waste landfill mature leachate and dairy wastewater as co-substrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(19):24639–24649. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10167-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang AT, Nižetić S, Ng KH, et al. Microbial fuel cells for bioelectricity production from waste as sustainable prospect of future energy sector. Chemosphere. 2022;287:132285. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan N, Donnellan P. Algae-assisted microbial fuel cells: a practical overview. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2021;15:100747. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100747
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen PKT, Kim J, Das G, et al. Optimization of simultaneous dark fermentation and microbial electrolysis cell for hydrogen production from macroalgae using response surface methodology. Biochem Eng J. 2021;171:108029. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Zhou M. A photosynthetic algal microbial fuel cell for treating swine wastewater. 2019 Environ Sci Pollut Res [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 29];26(6):6182–6190. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3960-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Bioplastics. Global bioplastics production defies challenges by showing significant increase [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 3]. Available from: https://www.european-bioplastics.org/global-bioplastics-production-defies-challenges-by-showing-significant-increase/
   Google Scholar
• Jem KJ, Tan B. The development and challenges of poly (lactic acid) and poly (glycolic acid). Adv Ind Eng Poly Res. 2020;3(2):60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2020.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Sun Y, Li J, et al. Research on the influence of microplastics on marine life. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;631(1):012006. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/631/1/012006
   Google Scholar
• Verla AW, Enyoh CE, Verla EN, et al. Microplastic–toxic chemical interaction: a review study on quantified levels, mechanism and implication. SN Appl Sci [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 4];1(11):1–30. doi; 10.1007/s42452-019-1352-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamas A, Moon H, Zheng J, et al. Degradation rates of plastics in the environment. ACS Sustain Chem Eng [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 3];8(9):3494–3511. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenboom JG, Langer R, Traverso G. Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nat Rev Mater[Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 4];7(2):117–137. doi; 10.1038/s41578-021-00407-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li FJ, Tan LC, Zhang SD, et al. Compatibility, steady and dynamic rheological behaviors of polylactide/poly(ethylene glycol) blends. J Appl Polym Sci [internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 22];133(4): doi: 10.1002/app.42919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H-T, Huang M-Y, Kao T-Y, et al. Production of lactic acid from seaweed hydrolysates via lactic acid bacteria fermentation. Fermentation [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 2];6(1):37. doi: 10.3390/fermentation6010037
   Google Scholar
• Chai CY, Tan IS, Foo HCY, et al. Sustainable and green pretreatment strategy of Eucheuma denticulatum residues for third-generation l-lactic acid production. Bioresour Technol. 2021;330:124930. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohanka M. D-Lactic acid as a metabolite: toxicology, diagnosis, and detection. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2020/3419034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV. Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 4];127(6):1612–1626. doi: 10.1111/jam.14290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morettini G, Palmieri M, Capponi L, et al. Comprehensive characterization of mechanical and physical properties of PLA structures printed by FFF-3D-printing process in different directions. Prog Addit Manuf [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 5];7:1111–1122. doi: 10.1007/s40964-022-00285-8
   Google Scholar
• Casalini T, Rossi F, Castrovinci A, et al. A perspective on polylactic acid-based polymers use for nanoparticles synthesis and applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:259. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morão A, de Bie F. Life cycle impact assessment of Polylactic Acid (PLA) produced from sugarcane in Thailand. J Polym Environ [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jun 9];27(11):2523–2539. doi: 10.1007/s10924-019-01525-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul-Latif NIS, Ong MY, Nomanbhay S, et al. Estimation of carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction by utilization of algal biomass bioplastic in Malaysia using carbon emission pinch analysis (CEPA). Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):154. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1718471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola G, Gaudio MT, Lopresto CG, et al. Bioplastic from renewable biomass: A facile solution for a greener environment. Earth Syst Environ. 2021;5(2):231–251. doi: 10.1007/s41748-021-00208-7
   Google Scholar
• Feng S, Takahashi K, Miura H, et al. One-pot synthesis of lactic acid from glycerol over a Pt/L-Nb2O5 catalyst under base-free conditions. Fuel Process Technol. 2020;197:106202. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedi E, Hashemi SMB. Lactic acid production – producing microorganisms and substrates sources-state of art. Heliyon [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 6];6(10):e04974. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Dong L, Alam MA, et al. Carbon catabolite repression governs diverse physiological processes and development in aspergillus nidulans. MBio [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 6];13(1): doi: 10.1128/mbio.03734-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan J, Abdel-Rahman MA, Numaguchi M, et al. Thermophilic Enterococcus faecium QU 50 enabled open repeated batch fermentation for L-lactic acid production from mixed sugars without carbon catabolite repression. RSC Adv [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Jun 6];7(39):24233–24241. doi: 10.1039/C7RA03176A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Song S, Tian H, et al. Functional analysis of the role of CcpA in Lactobacillus plantarum grown on fructooligosaccharides or glucose: A transcriptomic perspective. Microb Cell Fact [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jun 7];17(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12934-018-1050-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Onyeabor M, Martinez R, Kurgan G, et al. Engineering transport systems for microbial production. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2020;111:33–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahorsu R, Cintorrino G, Medina F, et al. Microwave processes: a viable technology for obtaining xylose from walnut shell to produce lactic acid by Bacillus coagulans. J Clean Prod. 2019;231:1171–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arioli S, Della Scala G, Remagni MC, et al. Streptococcus thermophilus urease activity boosts Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus homolactic fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;247:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wu J, Lv M, et al. Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and the expanding applications in food industry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol [Internet] . 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 8];9:612285. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.612285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashi M, Toyodome T, Kano K, et al. Photoelectrochemical lactate production from pyruvate via in situ NADH regeneration over a hybrid system of CdS photoanode and lactate dehydrogenase. Electrochim Acta. 2023;460:142590. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellut K, Krogerus K, Arendt EK. Lachancea fermentati strains isolated from kombucha: fundamental insights, and practical application in low alcohol beer brewing. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:764. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Chandrasekhar K, Kumari A, et al. Electro-fermentation in aid of bioenergy and biopolymers. Energies. 2018;11:343. doi: 10.3390/en11020343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanthi Sravan J, Tharak A, Annie Modestra J, et al. Emerging trends in microbial fuel cell diversification - critical analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2021;326:124676. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscoviz R, Toledo-Alarcón J, Trably E, et al. Electro-fermentation: how to drive fermentation using electrochemical systems. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34(11):856–865. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoruklu HC, Koroglu EO, Demir A, et al. The Electromotive-Induced Regulation of Anaerobic Fermentation: Electrofermentation. Microbial Electrochemical Technology. Biomass, Biofuels and Biochemicals. Elsevier; 2019. p. 739–756. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64052-9.00030-3
   Google Scholar
• Choi O, Sang BI. Extracellular electron transfer from cathode to microbes: application for biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0426-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamashita T, Yokoyama H. Molybdenum anode: a novel electrode for enhanced power generation in microbial fuel cells, identified via extensive screening of metal electrodes. Biotechnol Biofuels [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Jul 24];11(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1046-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avci O, Büyüksünetçi YT, Güley Z, et al. L. Lactis Subsp. Lactis of cheese origin based microbial fuel cell. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6(32):8270–8274. doi: 10.1002/slct.202102229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu Arulmani SR, Ganamuthu HL, Ashokkumar V, et al. Biofilm formation and electrochemical metabolic activity of Ochrobactrum Sp JSRB-1 and Cupriavidus Sp JSRB-2 for energy production. Environ Technol Innov. 2020;20:101145. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvaraj D, Somanathan A, Jeyakumar RB, et al. Generation of electricity by the degradation of electro-Fenton pretreated latex wastewater using double chamber microbial fuel cell. Int J Energy Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 10];44(15):12496–12505. doi: 10.1002/er.5503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• . Palanisamy D, Chockalingam LR, Murugan D. Microbial fuel cell for effluent treatment and sustainable power generation. Energy Sources Part A [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 10];1–13. doi: 10.1080/1556703620201796844.
   Google Scholar
• Winfield J, Greenman J, Ieropoulos I. Response of ceramic microbial fuel cells to direct anodic airflow and novel hydrogel cathodes. Int J Hydrogen Energy [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 10];44(29):15344. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson K, Rossi R, Regan JM, et al. Impact of cathodic electron acceptor on microbial fuel cell internal resistance. Bioresour Technol. 2020;316:123919. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah Nadiah Rusli S, Hani Abu Bakar M, Jemiah Abdul Rani S, et al. Aryl diazonium modification for improved graphite fiber brush in microbial fuel cell. JSM [Internet]. 2018;47(12):3017–3023. doi: 10.17576/jsm-2018-4712-11
   Google Scholar
• Ucar D, Zhang Y, Angelidaki I. An overview of electron acceptors in microbial fuel cells. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:248548. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Hu J, Liu B, et al. Degradation of refractory organics in dual-cathode electro-Fenton using air-cathode for H2O2 electrogeneration and microbial fuel cell cathode for Fe2+ regeneration. J Hazard Mater. 2021;412:125269. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Liu H, Liu L. Potassium permanganate as an oxidant for a microfluidic direct formate fuel cell. Int J Electrochem Sci [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 11];14(5):4557–4570. doi: 10.20964/2019.05.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria AD, Mercy FT. Enhancing electricity generation with the use of KMnO 4 as an electron acceptor in microbial fuel cell. Jordan J Biol Sci [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 11];14:229–238. doi: 10.54319/jjbs/140205
   Google Scholar
• Tang C, Zhao Y, Kang C, et al. Towards concurrent pollutants removal and high energy harvesting in a pilot-scale CW-MFC: insight into the cathode conditions and electrodes connection. Chem Eng J. 2019;373:150–160. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano E, Berretti E, Capozzoli L, et al. Boosting DMFC power output by adding sulfuric acid as a supporting electrolyte: effect on cell performance equipped with platinum and platinum group metal-free cathodes. J Power Sources. 2023;563:232806. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halim MA, Rahman MO, Eti IA, et al.Electricity generation in different cell connections with optimized anodic materials in microbial fuel cells. Energy Sources Part A [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 11];1–13. doi: 10.1080/1556703620201851818
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan R, Krishna H, Singh AK, et al. A review on copper and its alloys used as electrode in EDM. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jun 11];377:012183. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012183.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Yao H. Recent development of carbon electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Energy Rep. 2022;8:656–661. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelaalincy MJ, Navanietha Krishnaraj R, Shakambari G, et al. Biofilm engineering approaches for improving the performance of microbial fuel cells and bioelectrochemical systems. Front Energy Res. 2018;6:308237. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atnafu T, Leta S. A novel fragmented anode biofilm microbial fuel cell (FAB–MFC) integrated system for domestic wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation. Bioresour Bioprocess [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 12];8(1):1–17. doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00442-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar SS, Kumar V, Malyan SK, et al. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for bioelectrochemical treatment of different wastewater streams. Fuel. 2019;254:115526. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Lee KS, Sorcar S, et al. Wastewater treatment and electricity generation from a sunlight-powered single chamber microbial fuel cell. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2018;358:432–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou S, Kashima H, Aaron DS, et al. Full cell simulation and the evaluation of the buffer system on air-cathode microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources. 2017;347:159–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoudi M, Rahimnejad M, Mashkour M. Fabrication of anode electrode by a novel acrylic based graphite paint on stainless steel mesh and investigating biofilm effect on electrochemical behavior of anode in a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Electrochim Acta. 2020;344:136168. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Yeo J, Yang Y, et al. Boosting voltage without electrochemical degradation using energy-harvesting circuits and power management system-coupled multiple microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources. 2019;410-411:171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffi NJ, Okabe S. High voltage generation from wastewater by microbial fuel cells equipped with a newly designed low voltage booster multiplier (LVBM). Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 12];10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75916-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejedor-Sanz S, Stevens ET, Li S, et al. Extracellular electron transfer increases fermentation in lactic acid bacteria via a hybrid metabolism. Elife. 2022;11:70684. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenman J, Gajda I, You J, et al. Microbial fuel cells and their electrified biofilms. Biofilm. 2021;3:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2021.100057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varanasi JL, Prasad S, Singh H, et al. Improvement of bioelectricity generation and microalgal productivity with concomitant wastewater treatment in flat-plate microbial carbon capture cell. Fuel. 2020;263:116696. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai W, Lesnik KL, Wade MJ, et al. Incorporating microbial community data with machine learning techniques to predict feed substrates in microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;133:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues ICB, Leão VA. Producing electrical energy in microbial fuel cells based on sulphate reduction: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jun 13];27(29):36075–36084. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09728-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirkosh M, Hojjat Y, Mardanpour MM. Boosting microfluidic microbial fuel cells performance via investigating electron transfer mechanisms, metal-based electrodes, and magnetic field effect. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 5];12(1):1–16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11472-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab L, Rago L, Koch C, et al. Identification of Clostridium cochlearium as an electroactive microorganism from the mouse gut microbiome. Bioelectrochemistry. 2019;130:107334. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Tian H, Gardner CL, et al. A miniaturized microbial fuel cell with three-dimensional graphene macroporous scaffold anode demonstrating a record power density of over 10 000 W m −3. Nanoscale [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Jul 5];8:3539–3547. doi: 10.1039/C5NR07267K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai-Prochnow A, Clauson M, Hong J, et al. Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/srep38610
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto D, Coradin T, Laberty-Robert C. Effect of anode polarization on biofilm formation and electron transfer in Shewanella oneidensis/graphite felt microbial fuel cells. Bioelectrochemistry. 2018;120:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndayisenga F, Yu Z, Yan G, et al. Using easy-to-biodegrade co-substrate to eliminate microcystin toxic on electrochemically active bacteria and enhance bioelectricity generation from cyanobacteria biomass. Sci Total Environ. 2021;751:142292. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Mayagoitia S, Fernández-Luqueño F, Morales-Acosta D, et al. Energy generation from pharmaceutical residual water in microbial fuel cells using ordered mesoporous carbon and bacillus subtilis as bioanode. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:12179–12187. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilas Boas J, Oliveira VB, Marcon LRC, et al. Optimization of a single chamber microbial fuel cell using Lactobacillus pentosus: influence of design and operating parameters. Sci Total Environ. 2019;648:263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You LX, Liu LD, Xiao Y, et al. Flavins mediate extracellular electron transfer in Gram-positive Bacillus megaterium strain LLD-1. Bioelectrochemistry. 2018;119:196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Ali MA, Xu Z, et al. Integrated microfluidic flow-through microbial fuel cells. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jul 26];7:1–12. doi: 10.1038/srep41208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai HN, Duong Nguyen TA, My LE LP, et al. Power generation of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 microbial fuel cells in bamboo fermentation effluent. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(31):16612–16621. doi: 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2020.09.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi M, Ahmad A, Jafary T, et al. Assessment of immobilized cell reactor and microbial fuel cell for simultaneous cheese whey treatment and lactic acid/electricity production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(14):9107–9115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jothinathan D, Wilson RT Comparative analysis of power production of pure, coculture, and mixed culture in a microbial fuel cell. 2017;39:520–527. doi: 10.1080/1556703620161233306.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Song R, Cao L, et al. Harvesting energy from cellulose through Geobacter sulfurreducens in Unique ternary culture. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1050:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.10.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Li N, Du M, et al. Study on the effect of synergy effect between the mixed cultures on the power generation of microbial fuel cells. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):844. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1883280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Gelel IY, Abdel-Mongy M, Hamza HA, et al. Bioelectricity production from different types of bacteria using mfc under optimizing factors and new bacterial strain bioelectricity production isolated from milk sample in Egypt. Ann. Romanian Soc. Cell Biol. 2021;25:1583–6258.
   Google Scholar
• Lin T, Bai X, Hu Y, et al. Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Shewanella oneidensis consortium enables glucose-fed high-performance microbial fuel cell. AIChE J. 2017;63(6):1830–1838. doi: 10.1002/aic.15611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C, Song YE, Lee CR, et al. Glycerol-fed microbial fuel cell with a co-culture of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Klebsiella pneumonae J2B. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43(10):1397–1403. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1807-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondaveeti S, Lee SH, Park HD, et al. Specific enrichment of different Geobacter sp. in anode biofilm by varying interspatial distance of electrodes in air-cathode microbial fuel cell (MFC). Electrochim Acta. 2020;331:135388. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian T, Fan X, Feng M, et al. Flavin-mediated extracellular electron transfer in Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus cereus DIF1 and Rhodococcus ruber DIF2. RSC Adv. 2019;9(70):40903–40909. doi: 10.1039/C9RA08045G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai Chun CN, Tajarudin HA, Ismail N, et al. Elucidation of mechanical, physical, chemical and thermal properties of microbial composite films by integrating sodium alginate with Bacillus subtilis sp. Polymers. 2021;13(13):2103. doi: 10.3390/polym13132103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Mu H, Liu W, et al. Electricigens in the anode of microbial fuel cells: pure cultures versus mixed communities. Microb Cell Fact [Interneet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 14];18(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1087-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatti-Kaul R, Chen L, Dishisha T, et al. Lactic acid bacteria: from starter cultures to producers of chemicals. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365(20):213. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franza T, Gaudu P. Quinones: more than electron shuttles. Res Microbiol. 2022;173(6–7):103953. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2022.103953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seselj N, Engelbrekt C, Zhang J. Graphene-supported platinum catalysts for fuel cells. Sci Bull (Beijing). 2015;60(9):864–876. doi: 10.1007/s11434-015-0745-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzuma A, Kato S, Watanabe K. Microbial interspecies interactions: recent findings in syntrophic consortia. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:477. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou S, Kashima H, Aaron DS, et al. Multi-variable mathematical models for the air-cathode microbial fuel cell system. J Power Sources. 2016;314:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandomi YA, Aaron DS, Zawodzinski TA, et al. In Situ potential distribution measurement and validated model for all-vanadium redox flow battery. J Electrochem Soc. 2016;163(1):A5188–A5201. doi: 10.1149/2.0211601jes
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Lv Y, Wang Y, et al. Endogenous inorganic carbon buffers accumulation and self-buffering capacity enhancement of air-cathode microbial fuel cells through anolyte recycling. Sci Total Environ. 2019;676:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajracharya S, Vanbroekhoven K, Buisman CJN, et al. Bioelectrochemical conversion of CO2 to chemicals: CO2 as a next generation feedstock for electricity-driven bioproduction in batch and continuous modes. Faraday Dis. 2017;202:433–449. doi: 10.1039/C7FD00050B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelabhotla ABT, Dinamarca C. Electrochemically mediated CO2 reduction for bio-methane production: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2018;17(3):531–551. doi: 10.1007/s11157-018-9470-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Zhang Y, Li X, et al. Microbial electrolytic capture, separation and regeneration of CO2 for biogas upgrading. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(16):9371–9378. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovley DR. Syntrophy goes electric: direct interspecies electron transfer. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017;71:643–664. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-030117-020420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao L, Sun R, Zhang P, et al. Simultaneous intensification of direct acetate cleavage and CO2 reduction to generate methane by bioaugmentation and increased electron transfer. Chem Eng J. 2019;378:122229. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassilev I, Hernandez PA, Batlle-Vilanova P, et al. Microbial electrosynthesis of isobutyric, butyric, caproic acids, and corresponding alcohols from carbon dioxide. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(7):8485–8493. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batlle-Vilanova P, Ganigué R, Ramió-Pujol S, et al. Microbial electrosynthesis of butyrate from carbon dioxide: production and extraction. Bioelectrochemistry. 2017;117:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araújo Cavalcante W, Leitão RC, Gehring TA, et al. Anaerobic fermentation for n-caproic acid production: a review. Process Biochemistry query. 2017;54:106–119. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykstra CM, Pavlostathis SG. Methanogenic biocathode microbial community development and the role of bacteria. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(9):5306–5316. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar SD, Saha P, Mol AR, et al. Competition between methanogens and acetogens in biocathodes: a comparison between potentiostatic and galvanostatic control. IJMS. 2017;18(1):204. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010204
   Google Scholar
• Rewatkar P, Bandapati M, Goel S. Miniaturized additively manufactured co-laminar microfluidic glucose biofuel cell with optimized grade pencil bioelectrodes. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(59):31434–31444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Zhang F, Xu L, et al. The applications and prospect of fuel cells in medical field: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;67:574–580. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter G, Kulkarni T. A self-powered glucose biosensing system. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;78:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ye D, Li J, et al. Microfluidic microbial fuel cells: from membrane to membrane free. J Power Sources. 2016;324:113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerami A, Alzahid Y, Mostaghimi P, et al. Microfluidics for porous systems: fabrication, microscopy and applications. Transp Porous Media [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 18];130(1):277–304. doi: 10.1007/s11242-018-1202-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Wu Y, Fu JZ, et al. Developments of 3D printing microfluidics and applications in chemistry and biology: a review. Electroanalysis [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Jul 21];28(8):1658–1678. doi: 10.1002/elan.201600043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Xie W, Wang R, et al. Fast start-up microfluidic microbial fuel cells with serpentine microchannel. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2816. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath D, Sai Kiran P, Rewatkar P, et al. Escherichia coli fed paper-based microfluidic microbial fuel cell with MWCNT composed bucky paper bioelectrodes. IEEE Trans NanoBiosci. 2019;18(3):510–515. doi: 10.1109/TNB.2019.2919930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Park J, Do RZ. Practical energy harvesting for microbial fuel cells: a review. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(6):3267–3277. doi: 10.1021/es5047765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel S. From waste to watts in micro-devices: review on development of membraned and membraneless microfluidic microbial fuel cell. Appl Mater Today. 2018;11:270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney SA, Rufford TE, Johnson D, et al. The effect of rank, lithotype and roughness on contact angle measurements in coal cleats. Int J Coal Geol. 2017;179:302–315. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden SA, Tanino Y, Akamairo B, et al. Recreating mineralogical petrographic heterogeneity within microfluidic chips: assembly, examples, and applications. Lab Chip [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Jul 19];16(24):4677–4681. doi: 10.1039/C6LC01209D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi MR, Ghasemi S, Sanaee Z, et al. Improvement of the microfluidic microbial fuel cell using a nickel nanostructured electrode and microchannel modifications. J Power Sources. 2019;437:226891. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.226891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rewatkar P, Goel S. Microfluidic paper based membraneless biofuel cell to harvest energy from various beverages. J Electrochem Sci Eng [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2022 Jul 20];10(1):49–54. doi: 10.5599/jese.687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi N, Lackore JM, Sharifi F, et al. A paper-based microbial fuel cell operating under continuous flow condition. 2016;4:98–103. doi: 10.1142/S2339547816400124.
   Google Scholar
• González-Guerrero MJ, Del Campo FJ, Esquivel JP, et al. Paper-based enzymatic microfluidic fuel cell: from a two-stream flow device to a single-stream lateral flow strip. J Power Sources. 2016;326:410–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, et al. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos B Eng. 2017;110:442–458. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran P, Ngo TD, Ghazlan A, et al. Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings. Compos B Eng. 2017;108:210–223. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman MC, Kou T, Wang S, et al. 3D printing of living bacteria electrode. Nano Res [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 21];13(5):1318–1323. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2534-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian B, Wang C, Hu M, et al. Application of 3D printed porous copper anode in microbial fuel cells. Front Energy Res. 2018;6:50. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You J, Preen RJ, Bull L, et al. 3D printed components of microbial fuel cells: towards monolithic microbial fuel cell fabrication using additive layer manufacturing. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess. 2017;19:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodosiou P, Greenman J, Ieropoulos I. Towards monolithically printed Mfcs: development of a 3d-printable membrane electrode assembly (mea). Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019;44(9):4450–4462. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiam BG, El Magri A, Vanaei HR, et al. 3D printed and conventional membranes—a review. Polymers. 2022;14(5):1023. doi: 10.3390/polym14051023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonawane JM, Yadav A, Ghosh PC, et al. Recent advances in the development and utilization of modern anode materials for high performance microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;90:558–576. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilajeliu-Pons A, Puig S, Salcedo-Dávila I, et al. Long-term assessment of six-stacked scaled-up MFCs treating swine manure with different electrode materials. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2017;3(5):947–959. doi: 10.1039/C7EW00079K
   Google Scholar
• Chen BY, Tsao YT, Chang SH. Cost-effective surface modification of carbon cloth electrodes for microbial fuel cells by candle soot coating. Coatings. 2018;8(12):468. doi: 10.3390/coatings8120468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Sun C, Gao Y, et al. Improving the electrochemical properties of carbon paper as cathodes for microfluidic fuel cells by the electrochemical activation in different solutions. ACS Omega [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 24];6(29):19153–19161. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c02507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogel R, Limson JL. Applications of Nanomaterials in Microbial Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials for Fuel Cell Catalysis. Nanostructure Science and Technology. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 551–575. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29930-3_14
   Google Scholar
• Bandapati M, Rewatkar P, Krishnamurthy B, et al. Functionalized and enhanced HB pencil graphite as bioanode for glucose-O2 biofuel cell. IEEE Sens J. 2019;19(3):802–811. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2878582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SH, Huang BY, Wan TH, et al. Surface modification of carbon cloth anodes for microbial fuel cells using atmospheric-pressure plasma jet processed reduced graphene oxides. RSC Adv. 2017;7(89):56433–56439. doi: 10.1039/C7RA11914C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejedor-Sanz S, Quejigo JR, Berná A, et al. The planktonic relationship between fluid-like electrodes and bacteria: Wiring in motion. ChemSuschem. 2017;10(4):693–700. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201601329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Xiong F, Zhu S, et al. Defect engineering in molybdenum-based electrode materials for energy storage. eScience. 2022;2(3):278–294. doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2022.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Saadi M, Pézard J, Haddour N, et al. Stainless steel coated with carbon nanofiber/PDMS composite as anodes in microbial fuel cells. Mater Res Express. 2020;7(2):025504. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab6c99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Feng H, Shen D, et al. Enhancement of anodic biofilm formation and current output in microbial fuel cells by composite modification of stainless steel electrodes. J Power Sources. 2017;342:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhey P, Sahu R. Microfluidic microbial fuel cells: recent advancements and future prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(4):3105–3123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Chang IS. Elimination of voltage reversal in multiple membrane electrode assembly installed microbial fuel cells (Mmea-MFCs) stacking system by resistor control. Bioresour Technol. 2018;262:338–341. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Nikiforidis G, Leung MKH, et al. Vanadium microfluidic fuel cell with novel multi-layer flow-through porous electrodes: model, simulations and experiments. Appl Energy. 2016;177:729–739. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rewatkar P, Enaganti PK, Rishi M, et al. Single-step inkjet-printed paper-origami arrayed air-breathing microfluidic microbial fuel cell and its validation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021;46(71):35408–35419. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkata Mohan S, Nikhil GN, Chiranjeevi P, et al. Waste biorefinery models towards sustainable circular bioeconomy: critical review and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2016;215:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessami MJ, Cheng SF, Ambati RR, et al. Bioethanol production from agarophyte red seaweed, Gelidium elegans, using a novel sample preparation method for analysing bioethanol content by gas chromatography. Biotech [Internet] . 2019 [cited 2021 Sep 1];9:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1549-8.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia Vaquero M, Rajauria G, Tiwari B, et al. Conventional extraction techniques: Solvent extraction. Sustainable Seaweed Technol: Cultivation, Biorefinery, and Applications. Advances in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. Elsevier; 2020. p. 171–189. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817943-7.00006-8
   Google Scholar
• Park EY, Park JK. Hydrochloric acid-catalyzed hydrothermal pretreatment of brown seaweed residues for enhancing biofuel production. BioResources. 2020;15(1):1629–1640. doi: 10.15376/biores.15.1.1629-1640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ra CH, Nguyen TH, Jeong GT, et al. Evaluation of hyper thermal acid hydrolysis of Kappaphycus alvarezii for enhanced bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2016;209:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson TM, Young BR, Baroutian S. Advances in the pretreatment of brown macroalgae for biogas production. Fuel Process Technol. 2019;195:106151. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebbale D, Ramachandra TV. Optimal sugar release from macroalgal feedstock with dilute acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2021;1:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gu D, Wang K, Lu T, et al. Vibrio parahaemolyticus CadC regulates acid tolerance response to enhance bacterial motility and cytotoxicity. J Fish Dis. 2021;44(8):1155. doi: 10.1111/jfd.13376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamilarasan K, Banu JR, Kumar MD, et al. Influence of mild-ozone assisted disperser pretreatment on the enhanced biogas generation and biodegradability of green marine macroalgae. Front Energy Res. 2019;7:89. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, IKM Y, Cho DW, et al. Microwave-assisted low-temperature hydrothermal treatment of red seaweed (Gracilaria lemaneiformis) for production of levulinic acid and algae hydrochar. Bioresour Technol. 2019;273:251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travaini R, Martín-Juárez J, Lorenzo-Hernando A, et al. Ozonolysis: an advantageous pretreatment for lignocellulosic biomass revisited. Bioresour Technol. 2016;199:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrone OM, Rossi JS, de Souza Moretti MM, et al. Influence of ozonolysis time during sugarcane pretreatment: effects on the fiber and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour Technol. 2017;224:733–737. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulakhudair AR, Hanotu J, Zimmerman W. Exploiting ozonolysis-microbe synergy for biomass processing: application in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy. 2017;105:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulfahri MS, Langford A, Langford A, et al. Ozonolysis as an effective pretreatment strategy for bioethanol production from marine algae. Bioenerg Res [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 29];13(4):1269–1279. doi. 10.1007/s12155-020-10131-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandri M, Neu A-K, Schneider R, et al. Evaluation of various Bacillus coagulans isolates for the production of high purity L-lactic acid using defatted rice bran hydrolysates. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2019;54(4):1321–1329. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z-Z, Li D-Y, Cheng Y-S. Application of ensilage as a green approach for simultaneous preservation and pretreatment of macroalgae Ulva lactuca for fermentable sugar production. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2018;20(9):2057–2065. doi: 10.1007/s10098-018-1574-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mis Solval K, Chouljenko A, Chotiko A, et al. Growth kinetics and lactic acid production of Lactobacillus plantarum NRRL B-4496, L. acidophilus NRRL B-4495, and L. reuteri B-14171 in media containing egg white hydrolysates. LWT. 2019;105:393–399. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.01.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iñiguez-Franco F, Auras R, Dolan K, et al. Chemical recycling of poly(lactic acid) by water-ethanol solutions. Polym Degrad Stab. 2018;149:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari D, Mukai M, Kubota K, et al. Degradation of bioplastics in soil and their degradation effects on environmental microorganisms. J Agric Chem Environ. 2016;5(01):23–34. doi: 10.4236/jacen.2016.51003
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi N, Misra M, Mohanty AK. Durable polylactic acid (PLA)-based sustainable engineered blends and biocomposites: recent developments, challenges, and opportunities. ACS Eng Au. 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 6];1(1):7–38. doi: 10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00011
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. COP26: Together for our planet | United Nations. Climate Action [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 May 24]; Available from: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/cop26.
   Google Scholar
• Moradian JM, Fang Z, Yong YC. Recent advances on biomass-fueled microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Bioprocess [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 13];8(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00365-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar