Engineered yeasts and lignocellulosic biomaterials: shaping a new dimension for biorefinery and global bioeconomy

References

• Amponsah NY, Troldborg M, Kington B, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: a review of lifecycle considerations. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;39:461–31. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karan H, Funk C, Grabert M, et al. Green bioplastics as part of a circular bioeconomy. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24(3):237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Hernandez E, Campbell G, Sadhukhan J. Economic value and environmental impact (EVEI) analysis of biorefinery systems. Chem Eng Res Des. 2013;91(8):1418–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2013.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Qu Y. Integrated engineering of enzymes and microorganisms for improving the efficiency of industrial lignocellulose deconstruction. Eng Microbiol. 2021;1:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2021.100005
   Google Scholar
• Santos VEN, Magrini A. Biorefining and industrial symbiosis: a proposal for regional development in Brazil. J Clean Prod. 2018;177:19–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin L, Hashim H, Mahadi Z, et al. Attitudes towards biodiesel. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0908-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore RH, Thornhill KL, Weinzierl B, et al. Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions. Nature. 2017;543(7645):411–415. doi: 10.1038/nature21420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendamme R, Behaghel de Bueren J, Gracia-Vitoria J, et al. Aldehyde-assisted lignocellulose fractionation provides unique lignin oligomers for the design of tunable polyurethane bioresins. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(10):4135–4148. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj T, Chandrasekhar K, Naresh Kumar A, et al. Recent advances in commercial biorefineries for lignocellulosic ethanol production: current status, challenges and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2022;344:126292. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira MHL, Morais ARC, da Costa Lopes AM, et al. Current pretreatment technologies for the development of cellulosic ethanol and biorefineries. ChemSuschem. 2015;8(20):3366 3390. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201500282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Correia MAS, Pires VMR, et al. Novel insights into the degradation of β-1,3-glucans by the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum revealed by structure and function studies of a family 81 glycoside hydrolase. Int j biol macromol. 2018;117:890–901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit AT, van Zomeren A, Dussan K, et al. Biomass pre-extraction as a versatile strategy to improve biorefinery feedstock flexibility, sugar yields, and lignin purity.ACS sustain. 2022. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2022;10(18):6012–6022. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c00838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asemoloye MD, Ahmad R, Jonathan SG. Transcriptomic responses of catalase, peroxidase and laccase encoding genes and enzymatic activities of oil spill inhabiting rhizospheric fungal strains. Environ Pollut. 2018;235:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt BA, García-Aparicio MDP, Görgens JF, et al. Rational engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae towards improved tolerance to multiple inhibitors in lignocellulose fermentations. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-02021-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M-M, Xiong L, Tang Y-J, et al. Enhanced acetic acid stress tolerance and ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by modulating expression of the de novo purine biosynthesis genes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1456-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko JK, Lee JH, Jung JH, et al. Recent advances and future directions in plant and yeast engineering to improve lignocellulosic biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2020;134:110390. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majidian P, Tabatabaei M, Zeinolabedini M, et al. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;82:3863–3885. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spagnuolo M, Yaguchi A, Blenner M. Oleaginous yeast for biofuel and oleochemical production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;57:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asemoloye MD, Marchisio MA. Synthetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae tolerate and degrade highly pollutant complex hydrocarbon mixture. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;241:113768. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues RC, Sene L, Matos GS, et al. Enhanced xylitol production by precultivation of Candida guilliermondii cells in sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate. Curr Microbiol. 2006;53(1):53–59. doi: 10.1007/s00284-005-0242-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revuelta JL, Ledesma-Amaro R, Lozano-Martinez D, et al. Bioproduction of riboflavin: a bright yellow history. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44(4–5):659–665. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1842-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niehus X, Crutz-Le Coq AM, Sandoval G, et al. Engineering yarrowia lipolytica to enhance lipid production from lignocellulosic materials. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1010-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patinvoh RJ, Osadolor OA, Chandolias K, et al. Innovative pretreatment strategies for biogas production. Biores Technol. 2017;224:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, et al. Pretreatment of LCB for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energ Combust Sci. 2014;42(1):35–53. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Titiladunayo IF, McDonald AG, Fapetu OP. Effect of temperature on biochar product yield from selected lignocellulosic biomass in a pyrolysis process. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2012;3(3):311–318. doi: 10.1007/s12649-012-9118-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Fu S, Gan L. Lignin Chemistry and applications. Elsevier; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rabemanolontsoa H, Ayada S, Saka S. Quantitative method applicable for various biomass species to determine their chemical composition. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(11):4630–4635. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komolwanich T, Tatijarern P, Prasertwasu S, et al. Comparative potentiality of Kans grass (saccharumspontaneum) and giant reed (arundodonax) as lignocellulosic feedstocks for the release of monomeric sugars by microwave/chemical pretreatment. Cellul. 2014;21(3):1327–1340. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-0161-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scordia D, Cosentino SL, Jeffries TW. Second generation bioethanol production from Saccharum spontaneum L. ssp. Aegyptiacum (Willd.) hack. Biores Technol. 2010;101(14):5358–5365. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Qi F, Liu D. Nanotechnology production and biofuel for Bioenergy. M. Rai, S. S. D S Eds. Springer; 2017. 10.1007/978-3-319-45459-7_13
   Google Scholar
• Dhyani V, Bhaskar T. Chapter 9—pyrolysis of biomass. In: Pandey A, Larroche C, Dussap C-G, Gnansounou E, Khanal SK Ricke S, editors. Biofuels: alternative feedstocks and conversion processes for the production of liquid and gaseous biofuels. Second Edition) ed. Vol. 2019. Academic Press. pp. 217–244. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816856-1.00009-9
   Google Scholar
• Somerville C. Cellulose synthesis in higher plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22(1):53–78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.022206.160206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison BH, Parks J, Davis MF, et al. Plant cell walls: basics of structure, Chemistry, accessibility and the Influence on conversion. In: Wyman CE, editor. Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013. pp. 23–38. DOI:10.1002/9780470975831.ch3.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Zhao X, Wang A, et al. Catalytic Transformation of lignin for the production of chemicals and fuels. Chem Rev. 2015;115(21):11559–11624. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma HK, Xu C, Qin W. Biological pretreatment of LCB for Biofuels and bioproducts: an overview. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2019;10(2):235–251. doi: 10.1007/s12649-017-0059-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, et al. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44(22):3358–3393. doi: 10.1002/anie.200460587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Zhang Q, Liu ZY, et al. Emerging technologies for the pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for bio-based products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(2):455–473. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10158-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SS, Williams GA, Jaiswal AK. Lignocellulosic biorefineries in Europe: Current state and prospects. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(3):231–234. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Ouyang D, Zhou Z, et al. LCB as sustainable feedstock and materials for power generation and energy storage. J Energy Chem. 2021;57:247–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isikgora FH, Becer CR. LCB: a sustainable platform for production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polym Chem. 2010;1(1):13. doi: 10.1039/c000660m
   Google Scholar
• Rowell R, Pettersen R, Tshabalala M. Handbook of wood Chemistry and wood composites. Handbook Of Wood Chemistry And Wood Composites, Second Edition. 2012. doi: 10.1201/b12487-5
   Google Scholar
• Zakzeski J, Bruijnincx PCA, Jongerius AL, et al. The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals. Chem Rev. 2010;110(6):3552–3599. doi: 10.1021/cr900354u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mielenz JR. Ethanol production from biomass: technology and commercialization status. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001;4(3):324–329. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00211-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banu J, Preethi Kavitha S, Tyagi VK, et al. LCB based biorefinery: a successful platform towards circular bioeconomy. Fuel. 2021;302(May):121086. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121086
   Google Scholar
• Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, et al. Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:67–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy N, Yang Y. Biofibers from agricultural byproducts for industrial applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23(1):22 27. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L. Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech. 2015;5(4):337 353. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0246-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buranov AU, Mazza G. Lignin in straw of herbaceous crops. Ind Crops Prod. 2008b;28(3):237–259. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Long J, Wang T, et al. Process intensification effect of ball milling on the hydrothermal pretreatment for corn straw enzymolysis. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;101:481–488. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpathy SK, Tabil LG, Meda V, et al. Torrefaction of wheat and barley straw after microwave heating. Fuel. 2014;124:269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.01.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merali Z, Marjamaa K, Käsper A, et al. Chemical characterization of hydrothermally pretreated and enzyme-digested wheat straw: an evaluation of recalcitrance. Food Chem. 2016;198:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Adhikari S, Wang Z, et al. Characterization of bamboo species at different ages and bio-oil production. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2015b. 2015;116:215–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buranov AU, Mazza G. Lignin in straw of herbaceous crops. Ind Crops Prod. 2008a;28(3):237–259. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2008.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si S, Chen Y, Fan C, et al. Lignin extraction distinctively enhances biomass enzymatic saccharification in hemicelluloses-rich miscanthus species under various alkali and acid pretreatments. Biores Technol. 2015;183:248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Adhikari S, Wang Z, et al. Characterization of bamboo species at different ages and bio-oil production. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2015a. 2015;116:215–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J. Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2010;41(4):480–488. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda S, Reddy SN, Vo DSB, et al. Catalytic gasification of wheat straw in hot compressed (subcritical and supercritical) water for hydrogen production. Energy Science & Engineering. 2018;6(5):448–459. doi: 10.1002/ese3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muh E, Tabet F, Amara S. Biomass conversion to fuels and value-added chemicals: a comprehensive review of the thermochemical processes. Curr Altern Energy. 2021;4(1):3–25. doi: 10.2174/2405463103666191022121648
   Google Scholar
• Dahmen N, Abeln J, Eberhard M, et al. The bioliq process for producing synthetic transportation fuels. WIREs Energy Environ. 2017;6(3):e236. doi: 10.1002/wene.236
   Google Scholar
• Antonetti C, Gori S, Licursi D, et al. One-Pot Alcoholysis of the lignocellulosic eucalyptus nitens biomass to n-butyl levulinate, a valuable additive for diesel motor fuel. Catalysts. 2020;10(5):509. doi: 10.3390/catal10050509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeleye AT, Odoh CK, Enudi OC, et al. Sustainable synthesis and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from biomass. Process Biochem. 2020;96:174–193. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jae J, Tompsett GA, Lin YC, et al. Depolymerization of lignocellulosic biomass to fuel precursors: maximizing carbon efficiency by combining hydrolysis with pyrolysis. Energy Environ Sci. 2010;3(3):358–365. doi: 10.1039/B924621P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Nieves D, Ruiz HA, Aguilar CN, et al. Process alternatives for bioethanol production from mango stem bark residues. Biores Technol. 2017;239:430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenhaller S, Kirchhoff J, Kirschhöfer F, et al. Integrated process for the enzymatic production of fatty acid sugar esters completely based on lignocellulosic substrates. Front Chem. 2018;6. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00421. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fchem.2018.00421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øverland M, Skrede A. Yeast derived from lignocellulosic biomass as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture: yeast from lignocellulosic biomass as a feed in aquaculture. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97(3):733–742. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshmy R, Philip E, Madhavan A, et al. Lignocellulose in future biorefineries: strategies for cost-effective production of biomaterials and bioenergy. Biores Technol. 2022;344:126241. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feser J, Gupta A. Performance and emissions of drop-in aviation biofuels in a lab-scale gas turbine combustor. J Energy Resour Technol. 2021;143(4). doi: 10.1115/1.4048243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Liu D, Zhao X. Conversion of lignocellulose to biofuels and chemicals via sugar platform: an updated review on chemistry and mechanisms of acid hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;146:111169. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray MJ, Leak DJ, Spanu PD, et al. Brown rot fungal early stage decay mechanism as a biological pretreatment for softwood biomass in biofuel production. Biomass Bioenergy. 2010;34(8):1257–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh T, Vaidya AA, Donaldson LA, et al. Improvement in the enzymatic hydrolysis of biofuel substrate by a combined thermochemical and fungal pretreatment. Wood Sci Technol. 2016;50(5):1003–1014. doi: 10.1007/s00226-016-0838-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Khan MT, Perecin D, et al. Sugarcane for bioethanol production: potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2020;133:110296. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT statistical database. 2020. Retrieved 2022 May 17 https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2015
   Google Scholar
• Teoh YH, Yu KH, How HG, et al. Experimental investigation of performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a common-rail diesel engine fuelled with bioethanol as a fuel additive in coconut oil biodiesel blends. Energies. 2019;12(10):1954. doi: 10.3390/en12101954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekofteh M, Gundoshmian TM, Jahanbakhshi A, et al. Performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs-OH) and diesel–biodiesel–bioethanol blends. Energy Rep. 2020;6:1438–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niphadkar S, Bagade P, Ahmed S. Bioethanol production: insight into past, present and future perspectives. Biofuels. 2018;9(2):229–238. doi: 10.1080/17597269.2017.1334338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse TJ, Wiens DJ, Reaney MJT. Production of Bioethanol—A Review of Factors Affecting Ethanol Yield. Fermentation. 2021;7(4):268. doi: 10.3390/fermentation7040268
   Google Scholar
• Sydney EB, Letti LAJ, Karp SG, et al. Current analysis and future perspective of reduction in worldwide greenhouse gases emissions by using first and second generation bioethanol in the transportation sector. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100234
   Google Scholar
• Boluk G, Koc AA. The implications of biofuel policy in Turkey. Int J Energy Econ Policy. 2013;3(4S):14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Xia Q, Chen C, Yao Y, et al. A strong, biodegradable and recyclable lignocellulosic bioplastic. Nat Sustain. 2021;4(7):627–635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00702-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia SK, Gurav R, Choi TR, et al. Bioconversion of plant biomass hydrolysate into bioplastic (polyhydroxyalkanoates) using ralstonia eutropha 5119. Biores Technol. 2019;271:306–315. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa NA, Farag AA, Abo-Dief HM, et al. Production of biodegradable plastic from agricultural wastes. Arabian J Chem. 2018;11(4):546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick J, Kricka W, James TC, et al. Expression of three Trichoderma reesei cellulase genes in Saccharomyces pastorianus for the development of a two-step process of hydrolysis and fermentation of cellulose. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;117(1):96–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su J, Qiu M, Shen F, et al. Efficient hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose in water by agricultural residue-derived solid acid catalyst. Cellul. 2018;25(1):17–22. doi: 10.1007/s10570-017-1603-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Wang P, Xue S, et al. Green biorefinery—the ultra-high hydrolysis rate and behavior of populus tomentosa hemicellulose autohydrolysis under moderate subcritical water conditions. RSC Adv. 2020;10(32):18908–18917. doi: 10.1039/D0RA02350G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soongprasit K, Sricharoenchaikul V, Atong D. Phenol-derived products from fast pyrolysis of organosolv lignin. Energy Rep. 2020;6:151–167. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji XJ, Huang H, Nie ZK, et al. Fuels and chemicals from hemicellulose sugars. Adv Biochem Engin/Biotechnol. 2012;128:199–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varanasi P, Singh P, Auer M, et al. Survey of renewable chemicals produced from LCB during ionic liquid pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mamaye M, Kiflie Z, Feleke S, et al. Valorization of Ethiopian sugarcane bagasse to assess its suitability for pulp and paper production. Sugar Tech. 2019;21(6):995–1002. doi: 10.1007/s12355-019-00724-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RS, Singh T, Pandey A. Chapter 1—microbial enzymes—an overview. In: Singh RS, Singhania RR, Pandey A Larroche C, editors. Advances in enzyme technology. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 1–40. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-64114-4.00001-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mongkhonsiri G, Gani R, Malakul P, et al. Integration of the biorefinery concept for the development of sustainable processes for pulp and paper industry. Comput Chem Eng. 2018;119:70–84. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abid K, Jabri J, Yaich H, et al. In vitro study on the effects of exogenic fibrolytic enzymes produced from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on ruminal degradation of olive mill waste. Arch Anim Breed. 2022;65(1):79–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-65-79-2022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabri J, Ammar H, Abid K, et al. Effect of Exogenous fibrolytic enzymes Supplementation or functional feed additives on in vitro ruminal fermentation of chemically pre-treated sunflower heads. Agriculture. 2022;12(5):696. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12050696
   Google Scholar
• Singh A, Bajar S, Devi A, et al. An overview on the recent developments in fungal cellulase production and their industrial applications. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2021;14:100652. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100652
   Google Scholar
• Singh P, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, et al. Using biomass residues from oil palm industry as a raw material for pulp and paper industry: potential benefits and threat to the environment. Environ Develop Sustainab. 2012;15(2):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10668-012-9390-4
   Google Scholar
• Yang H, Xie Y, Zheng X, et al. Comparative study of lignin characteristics from wheat straw obtained by soda-AQ and kraft pretreatment and effect on the following enzymatic hydrolysis process. Biores Technol. 2016;207:361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dea RM, Pranda PA, Luo Y, et al. Ambient-pressure lignin valorization to high-performance polymers by intensified reductive catalytic deconstruction. Sci Adv. 2022;8(3):eabj7523. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj7523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Zhang J, Zhu L, et al. Minimize the xylitol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by balancing the xylose redox metabolic pathway. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.639595. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2021.639595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabhane J, Kumar S, Sarma AK. Effect of glycerol thermal and hydrothermal pretreatments on lignin degradation and enzymatic hydrolysis in paddy straw. Renewable Energy. 2020;154:1304–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isikgor FH, Becer CR. LCB: a sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polym Chem. 2015;6(25):4497–4559. doi: 10.1039/C5PY00263J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebreiros F, Risso F, Cagno M, et al. Enhanced production of butanol and xylosaccharides from eucalyptus grandis wood using steam explosion in a semi-continuous pre-pilot reactor. Fuel. 2021;290:119818. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabihi S, Sharafi A, Motamedi H, et al. Environmentally friendly acetic acid/steam explosion/supercritical carbon dioxide system for the pre-treatment of wheat straw. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(28):37867–37881. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13410-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Patiño JC, Ruiz E, Romero I, et al. Combined acid/alkaline-peroxide pretreatment of olive tree biomass for bioethanol production. Biores Technol. 2017;239:326–335. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonari AA, Mahar RB, Sahito AR, et al. Effects of isolated fungal pretreatment on bio-methane production through the co-digestion of rice straw and buffalo dung. Energy. 2020;206:118107. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houfani AA, Anders N, Spiess AC, et al. Insights from enzymatic degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose to fermentable sugars– a review. Biomass Bioenergy. 2020;134:105481. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Li Z, Liu T, et al. Production of high-concentration fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass by using high solids fed-batch enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J. 2021;176:108186. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoli R, Olson DG. Chapter three - Clostridium thermocellum: a microbial platform for high-value chemical production from lignocellulose. In: editors Gadd GM Sariaslani S. Advances in applied microbiology. Academic Press; 2020Vol. 113pp. 111–161. doi:10.1016/bs.aambs.2020.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Thakur A, Sharma K, Mutreja R, et al. Thermostable enzymes from Clostridium thermocellum. In: Thatoi H, Mohapatra S Das SK, editors. Bioprospecting of enzymes in industry, Healthcare and sustainable environment. Springer; 2021. pp. 251–267. DOI:10.1007/978-981-33-4195-1_12.
   Google Scholar
• Nhim S, Waeonukul R, Uke A, et al. Biological cellulose saccharification using a coculture of Clostridium thermocellum and thermobrachium celere strain A9. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(5):2133–2145. doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-11818-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudel S, Giannone RJ, Rodriguez M, et al. Integrated omics analyses reveal the details of metabolic adaptation of Clostridium thermocellum to lignocellulose-derived growth inhibitors released during the deconstruction of switchgrass. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0697-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajulapati V, Goyal A. Molecular Cloning, expression and characterization of Pectin Methylesterase (CtPME) from Clostridium thermocellum. Mol Biotechnol. 2017;59(4):128–140. doi: 10.1007/s12033-017-9997-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger E, Zhang D, Zverlov VV, et al. Two noncellulosomal cellulases of Clostridium thermocellum, Cel9I and Cel48Y, hydrolyse crystalline cellulose synergistically. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;268(2):194–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00583.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa K, Ichikawa S, Nigorikawa M, et al. Enhanced production of reducing sugars from transgenic rice expressing exo-glucanase under the control of a senescence-inducible promoter. Transgenic Res. 2014;23(3):531–537. doi: 10.1007/s11248-014-9786-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyoshi K, Furukawa M, Seyama T, et al. Butanol production from alkali-pretreated rice straw by co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum. Biores Technol. 2015;186:325–328. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluvinage B, Fillo A, Massel P, et al. Structural analysis of a family 81 glycoside hydrolase implicates its recognition of β-1,3-glucan quaternary structure. Structure. 2017;25(9):1348–1359.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basit A, Liu J, Rahim K, et al. Thermophilic xylanases: from bench to bottle. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018;38(7):989–1002. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2018.1425662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraïs S, Heyman A, Barak Y, et al. Enhanced cellulose degradation by nano-complexed enzymes: synergism between a scaffold-linked exoglucanase and a free endoglucanase. J Biotechnol. 2010;147(3):205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern J, Moraïs S, Lamed R, et al. Adaptor Scaffoldins: an original strategy for extended Designer cellulosomes, inspired from nature. MBio. 2016;7(2):e00083–16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00083-16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Sajjad M, Altayb HN, et al. Engineering processive cellulase of Clostridium thermocellum to divulge the role of the carbohydrate‐binding module. Biotech And App Biochem. 2022;70(1):290–305. bab.2352. doi: 10.1002/bab.2352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Tao L, Yang X, et al. Comparative study on pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis upgrading of biomass model compounds: thermochemical behaviors, kinetics, and aromatic hydrocarbon formation. J Energy Inst. 2019;92(5):1348–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2018.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansaniwal SK, Rosen MA, Tyagi SK. Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;80:23–43. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty D, Joshi A, Dagar SS, et al. Bioaugmentation of anaerobic fungus orpinomyces joyonii boosts sustainable biomethanation of rice straw without pretreatment. Biomass Bioenergy. 2020;138:105546. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga Nan L, Trably E, Santa-Catalina G, et al. Biomethanation processes: new insights on the effect of a high H2 partial pressure on microbial communities. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-01776-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar RA, Parmar M, Dar EA, et al. Biomethanation of agricultural residues: potential, limitations and possible solutions. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;135:110217. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins G, Batalha N, Kumar A, et al. Recent advances in liquefaction technologies for production of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from biomass and carbonaceous wastes. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2019;115:109400. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Yang T, Li R, et al. Co-generation of liquid biofuels from lignocellulose by integrated biochemical and hydrothermal liquefaction process. Energy. 2020;200:117524. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah WY, Sankaran R, Show PL, et al. Pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biofuels production: Current advances, challenges and future prospects. Biofuel Res J. 2020;7(1):1115–1127. doi: 10.18331/BRJ2020.7.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo E, Brabo-Catala L, Dogaris I, et al. Biochemical conversion of sweet sorghum bagasse to succinic acid. J Biosci Bioeng. 2020;129(1):104–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo S, Mateo P, Barbanera M, et al. Acid hydrolysis of olive tree leaves: preliminary study towards biochemical conversion. Processes. 2020;8(8):886. doi: 10.3390/pr8080886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meenakshisundaram S, Fayeulle A, Léonard E, et al. Combined biological and chemical/Physicochemical pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol and Biomethane energy production—A review. Appl Microbiol. 2022;2(4):716–734. doi: 10.3390/applmicrobiol2040055
   Google Scholar
• Oliva JM, Negro MJ, Álvarez C, et al. Fermentation strategies for the efficient use of olive tree pruning biomass from a flexible biorefinery approach. Fuel. 2020;277:118171. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asemoloye MD, Ahmad R, Jonathan SG. Synergistic action of rhizospheric fungi with megathyrsus maximus root speeds up hydrocarbon degradation kinetics in oil polluted soil. Chemosphere. 2017;187:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad RK, Chatterjee S, Mazumder PB, et al. Study on cellulase (Β-1,4-endoglucanase) activity of gut bacteria of sitophilus oryzae in cellulosic waste biodegradation. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100274. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100274
   Google Scholar
• Tsegaye B, Balomajumder C, Roy P. Icrobial delignification and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to enhance biofuel production: an overview and future prospect. Bull National Res Centre. 2019;43(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s42269-019-0094-x
   Google Scholar
• Pérez J, Muñoz-Dorado J, De La Rubia T, et al. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol. 2002;5(2):53–63. doi: 10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodell B. Fungi involved in the biodeterioration and bioconversion of lignocellulose substrates. In: Benz JP Schipper K, editors. Genetics and biotechnology. Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 369–397. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-49924-2_15.
   Google Scholar
• Saadeddin A. The complexities of hydrolytic enzymes from the termite digestive system. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2012;34(2):115–122. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2012.727379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo HL, Hazen TC, Simmons BA, et al. Enzyme activities of aerobic lignocellulolytic bacteria isolated from wet tropical forest soils. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012. 2014;37(1):60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L. Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. Biotech. 2015;5(4):337–353. doi: 10.1007/s13205-014-0246-5
   Google Scholar
• Hemmerle L, Maier BA, Bortfeld-Miller M, et al. Dynamic character displacement among a pair of bacterial phyllosphere commensals in situ. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2836. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30469-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang H, Du X, Wang J, et al. Insight into cold-active xylanase production and xylan degradation pathways in psychrotrophic Acinetobacter sp. HC4 from the cold region of China. Cellul. 2020;27(13):7575–7589. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03286-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake AD, Beri NR, Guttman HS, et al. The complex physiology of cellvibrio japonicus xylan degradation relies on a single cytoplasmic β‐xylosidase for xylo‐oligosaccharide utilization. Mol Microbiol. 2018;107(5):610–622. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šuchová K, Fehér C, Ravn JL, et al. Cellulose- and xylan-degrading yeasts: enzymes, applications and biotechnological potential. Biotechnol Adv. 2022;59:107981. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107981
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helal GA, Khalil RR, Galal YG, et al. Studies on cellulases of some cellulose-degrading soil fungi. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02705-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamilla C, Pavez M, Santos A, et al. Bioprospecting for extracellular enzymes from culturable actinobacteria from the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biology. 2017;40(3):719–726. doi: 10.1007/s00300-016-1977-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajkumar J, Dilipan E, Ramachandran M, et al. Bioethanol production from seagrass waste, through fermentation process using cellulase enzyme isolated from marine actinobacteria. Vegetos. 2021;34(3):581–591. doi: 10.1007/s42535-021-00239-5
   Google Scholar
• Arelli V, Mamindlapelli NK, Juntupally S, et al. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse at different solid concentrations: impact of bio augmented cellulolytic bacteria on methane yield and insights on microbial diversity. Biores Technol. 2021;340:125675. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manni A, Filali-Maltouf A, Manni A, et al. Diversity and bioprospecting for industrial hydrolytic enzymes of microbial communities isolated from deserted areas of south-east Morocco. AIMS microbiol. 2022;8(1):5–25. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi YL, Sun Y, Ruan ZY, et al. Cellulomonas telluris sp. Nov., an endoglucanase-producing actinobacterium isolated from Badain Jaran desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. n.d;70(1):631–635. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Zhao J, Yuan Y, et al. Comparative metagenomic discovery of the dynamic cellulose-degrading process from a synergistic cellulolytic microbiota. Cellul. 2021;28(4):2105–2123. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03671-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul M, Nayak DP, Thatoi H. Optimization of xylanase from Pseudomonas mohnii isolated from simlipal biosphere reserve, Odisha, using response surface methodology. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2020;18(1):1–19. doi: 10.1186/s43141-020-00099-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingle AP, Chandel AK, Silva SS. Biorefining of lignocellulose into valuable products. In: Ingle A, Chandel A Silva S editors. Lignocellulosic biorefining technologies 2020. 1st ed. Wiley. pp. 1–5. 10.1002/9781119568858.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Tushar MSHK, Dutta A. Efficiency analysis of crude versus pure cellulase in industry. In: Srivastava N, Srivastava M, Mishra P Gupta V, editors. Biofuel production technologies: critical analysis for sustainability. Springer; 2020. pp. 283–298. DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-8637-4_10.
   Google Scholar
• Gavande PV, Nath P, Kumar K, et al. Highly efficient, processive and multifunctional recombinant endoglucanase RfGH5_4 from ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 v3 for recycling lignocellulosic plant biomasses. Int j biol macromol. 2022;209:801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang H, Wohlschlager L, Csarman F, et al. Real-time measurement of cellobiose and glucose formation during enzymatic biomass hydrolysis. Anal Chem. 2021;93(21):7732–7738. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Feng Y, Patel G, et al. Production, immobilization and characterization of beta-glucosidase for application in cellulose degradation from a novel Aspergillus versicolor. Int j biol macromol. 2021;177:437–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidetzky B, Zhong C. Phosphorylase-catalyzed bottom-up synthesis of short-chain soluble cello-oligosaccharides and property-tunable cellulosic materials. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;51:107633. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebami GE, Kuila A, Ajunwa OM, et al. Genetics and metabolic engineering of yeast strains for efficient ethanol production. J Food Process Eng. 2022;45(7). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan Q, Duan Y, Wu P, et al. Coordinately express hemicellulolytic enzymes in Kluyveromyces marxianus to improve the saccharification and ethanol production from corncobs. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02070-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Li X, Wu L, et al. The advanced performance of microbial consortium for simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose to produce lactic acid directly from dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02085-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao M, Ploessl D, Shao Z. Enhancing the co-utilization of biomass-derived mixed sugars by yeasts. Front Microbiol. 2019;9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebami GE. Adebayo-tayo BC.Chapter 8—development of cellulolytic strain by genetic engineering approach for enhanced cellulase production. In: Kuila A Sharma V, editors. Genetic and metabolic engineering for improved biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 103–136. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-817953-6.00008-7.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SR, Park YC, Jin YS, et al. Strain engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced xylose metabolism. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(6):851–861. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu BCH, Lee H. Genetic improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25(5):425–441. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peris D, Alexander WG, Fisher KJ, et al. Synthetic hybrids of six yeast species. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2085. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15559-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Xian M, Liu M, et al. Biochemical routes for uptake and conversion of xylose by microorganisms. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-020-1662-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knychala MM, dos Santos AA, Kretzer LG, et al. Strategies for efficient expression of heterologous monosaccharide transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal Of Fungi. 2022;8(1):84. doi: 10.3390/jof8010084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Zhang B, Li Y. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: reflections and perspectives. Biotechnol J. 2012;7(1):34–46. doi: 10.1002/biot.201100053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Sun Y, Fu S, et al. Improving the production of riboflavin by introducing a mutant ribulose 5-phosphate 3-epimerase gene in Bacillus subtilis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fbioe.2021.704650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries TW. Engineering yeasts for xylose metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17(3):320–326. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Liu ZL, Moon J. Genetic engineering of inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved xylose utilization in ethanol production. BioEnergy Res. 2012;5(2):459–469. doi: 10.1007/s12155-011-9176-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim KA, El-Ghwas DE, Easa SM, et al. Bioethanol a microbial biofuel metabolite; new insights of yeasts metabolic engineering. Fermentation. 2018;4(1):16. doi: 10.3390/fermentation4010016
   Google Scholar
• Li YJ, Wang MM, Chen YW, et al. Engineered yeast with a CO2-fixation pathway to improve the bioethanol production from xylose-mixed sugars. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):43875. doi: 10.1038/srep43875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Favaro L, Jansen T, van Zyl WH. Exploring industrial and natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for the bio-based economy from biomass: the case of bioethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39(6):800–816. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2019.1619157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xie Z, Wang Z, et al. Unveiling the adsorption mechanism of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 with high efficiency for removal of copper ions from aqueous solutions. Dalton Trans. 2016;45(32):12653–12660. doi: 10.1039/c6dt01827k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scordia D, Cosentino SL, Lee JW, et al. Bioconversion of giant reed (arundo donax L.) hemicellulose hydrolysate to ethanol by Scheffersomyces stipitis CBS6054. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;39:296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuroff TR, Xiques SB, Curtis WR. Consortia-mediated bioprocessing of cellulose to ethanol with a symbiotic Clostridium phytofermentans/yeast co-culture. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damayanti D, Supriyadi D, Amelia D, et al. Conversion of lignocellulose for bioethanol production, applied in bio-polyethylene terephthalate. Polymers. 2021;13(17):2886. doi: 10.3390/polym13172886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussatto SI, Yamakawa CK, van der Maas L, et al. New trends in bioprocesses for lignocellulosic biomass and CO2 utilization. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;152:111620. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CR, Sung BH, Lim KM, et al. Co-fermentation using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains hyper-secreting different cellulases for the production of cellulosic bioethanol. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04815-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakatani Y, Yamada R, Ogino C, et al. Synergetic effect of yeast cell-surface expression of cellulase and expansin-like protein on direct ethanol production from cellulose. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12(1):66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kricka W, Fitzpatrick J, Bond U. Metabolic engineering of yeasts by heterologous enzyme production for degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose from biomass: a perspective. Front Microbiol. 2014;5. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seok JY, Yang J, Choi SJ, et al. Directed evolution of the 3-hydroxypropionic acid production pathway by engineering aldehyde dehydrogenase using a synthetic selection device. Metab Eng. 2018;47:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roell GW, Zha J, Carr RR, et al. Engineering microbial consortia by division of labor. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-019-1083-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanase S, Yamada R, Kaneko S, et al. Ethanol production from cellulosic materials using cellulase-expressing yeast. Biotechnol J. 2010;5(5):449–455. doi: 10.1002/biot.200900291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek S-H, Kim S, Lee K, et al. Cellulosic ethanol production by combination of cellulase-displaying yeast cells. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2012;51(6):366–372. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Du J-L, Zhan Y-J, et al. Consolidated bioprocessing for cellulosic ethanol conversion by cellulase–xylanase cell-surfaced yeast consortium. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;48(7):653–661. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2018.1487846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao W, Li H, Xia W, et al. Co-expression of cellulase and xylanase genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae toward enhanced bioethanol production from corn stover. Bioengineered. 2019;10(1):513–521. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2019.1682213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak S, Jin Y-S. Production of fuels and chemicals from xylose by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review and perspective. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0694-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robak K, Balcerek M. Review of second generation bioethanol production from residual biomass. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2018;56(2):174–187. doi: 10.17113/ftb.56.02.18.5428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussatto SI, Machado EMS, Carneiro LM, et al. Sugars metabolism and ethanol production by different yeast strains from coffee industry wastes hydrolysates. Appl Energy. 2012;92:763–768. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari R, Pramanik K. Bioethanol production from ipomoea carnea biomass using a potential hybrid yeast strain. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;171(3):771–785. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0398-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen BM, Hon S, Covalla SF, et al. Increasing anaerobic acetate consumption and ethanol yields in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with NADPH-specific alcohol dehydrogenase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(23):8108–8117. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01689-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapetridis I, van Dijk M, Dobbe AP, et al. Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0465-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papapetridis I, Dijk M, Maris AJ, et al. Metabolic engineering strategies for optimizing acetate reduction, ethanol yield and osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0791-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei N, Quarterman J, Kim SR, et al. Enhanced biofuel production through coupled acetic acid and xylose consumption by engineered yeast. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):2580. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3580
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang NK, Lee JW, Ort DR, et al. L-malic acid production from xylose by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Journal. 2021;2021(3):e2000431. doi: 10.1002/biot.202000431
   Google Scholar
• Adeboye P, Bettiga M, Olsson L. ALD5, PAD1, ATF1 and ATF2 facilitate the catabolism of coniferyl aldehyde, ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):42635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42635
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang C, Mas A, Esteve-Zarzoso B. The interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeast during Alcoholic fermentation is species and strain specific. Front Microbiol. 7 2016 Apr 13: 502. PMID: 27148191; PMCID: PMC4829597. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Bao X, Li Y, et al. Cloning and characterization of heterologous transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of important amino acids for xylose utilization. Metab Eng. 2015;30:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin HY, Nijland JG, de Waal PP, et al. An engineered cryptic Hxt11 sugar transporter facilitates glucose–xylose co-consumption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0360-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin HY, Nijland JG, de Waal PP, et al. The amino-terminal tail of Hxt11 confers membrane stability to the Hxt2 sugar transporter and improves xylose fermentation in the presence of acetic acid. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(9):1937–1945. doi: 10.1002/bit.26322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland JG, Shin HY, Boender LGM, et al. Improved xylose metabolism by a CYC8 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(11):e00095–17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00095-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu R, Chen D, Cao S, et al. Enhanced ethanol production from sugarcane molasses by industrially engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae via replacement of the PHO4 gene. RSC Adv. 2020;10(4):2267–2276. doi: 10.1039/C9RA08673K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtap RS, Mahajan DM, Mistry SR, et al. Improving ethanol yields in sugarcane molasses fermentation by engineering the high osmolarity glycerol pathway while maintaining osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(2):1031–1042. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9532-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinnen S, Henriques SF, Shrestha R, et al. Improvement of yeast tolerance to acetic acid through Haa1 transcription factor engineering: towards the underlying mechanisms. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0621-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu Z, Jiang R. Improving Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanol production and tolerance via RNA polymerase II subunit Rpb7. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10(1):125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0806-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasunuma T, Sakamoto T, Kondo A. Inverse metabolic engineering based on transient acclimation of yeast improves acid-containing xylose fermentation and tolerance to formic and acetic acids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(2):1027–1038. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7094-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou J, Jiao C, Peng B, et al. Mutation of a regulator Ask10p improves xylose isomerase activity through up-regulation of molecular chaperones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2016;38:241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Kim S, Sorek H, et al. PHO13 deletion-induced transcriptional activation prevents sedoheptulose accumulation during xylose metabolism in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2016a. 2016;34:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang P, Ko JK, Gong G, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a refactored xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for lignocellulosic biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11(1):268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1269-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xia PF, et al. Recycling carbon dioxide during xylose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2016. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Schmitz O, Alper HS. Enabling glucose/xylose co-transport in yeast through the directed evolution of a sugar transporter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(23):10215–10223. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7879-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledesma-Amaro R, Nicaud JM. Metabolic engineering for expanding the substrate range of yarrowia lipolytica. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34(10):798–809. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yook SD, Kim J, Gong G, et al. High-yield lipid production from lignocellulosic biomass using engineered xylose-utilizing yarrowia lipolytica. GCB Bioenergy. 2020;12(9):670–679. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12699
   Google Scholar
• Qiao K, Wasylenko T, Zhou K, et al. Lipid production in Yarrowia lipolytica is maximized by engineering cytosolic redox metabolism. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(2):173–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu P, Qiao K, Ahn WS, et al. Engineering yarrowia lipolytica as a platform for synthesis of drop-in transportation fuels and oleochemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA. 2016b;113(39):10848–10853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607295113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Qiao Y, Li F, et al. Subcellular engineering of lipase dependent pathways directed towards lipid related organelles for highly effectively compartmentalized biosynthesis of triacylglycerol derived products in Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2019;55:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Ryu J, Huh IY, et al. Ethanol production from galactose by a newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae KL17. Bioproc biosyst eng. 2014;37(9):1871–1878. doi: 10.1007/s00449-014-1161-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanimura A, Nakamura T, Watanabe I, et al. Isolation of a novel strain of Candida shehatae for ethanol production at elevated temperature. Springerplus. 2012;1(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-1-27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• da Silva Filho EA, de Melo HF, Antunes DF, et al. Isolation by genetic and physiological characteristics of a fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with potential for genetic manipulation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;32(10):481–486. doi: 10.1007/s10295-005-0027-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Bao XLY, Jiao C, et al. Cloning and characterization of heterologous transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of important amino acids for xylose utilization. Metab Eng. 2015;30:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko JK, Jung JH, Altpeter F, et al. Largely enhanced bioethanol production through the combined use of lignin-modified sugarcane and xylose fermenting yeast strain. Biores Technol. 2018;256:312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko JK, Lee SM. Advances in cellulosic conversion to fuels: engineering yeasts for cellulosic bioethanol and biodiesel production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;50:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran HN, Ko P, Gong JK, et al. Improved simultaneous co-fermentation of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulosic biorefinery. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1641-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar