DaPeCa-9 – cohabitation and socio-economic conditions predict penile cancer-specific survival in a national clinical study from Denmark

References

• Jakobsen JK, Öztürk B, Søgaard M. The Danish National Penile Cancer Quality database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:589–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Maldonado JL, Pow-Sang J, et al. Incidence trends in primary malignant penile cancer. Urol Oncol. 2007;25(5):361–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya M, Li R, Pegler K, et al. Long-term trends in incidence, survival and mortality of primary penile cancer in England. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(12):2169–2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, et al. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(4):606–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez ME, Unkart JT, Tao L, et al. Prognostic significance of marital status in breast cancer survival: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0175515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Dai W, Li Y, et al. The effect of marital status by age on patients with colorectal cancer over the past decades: a SEER-based analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(8):1001–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles JL, Joseph SA, Konety BR. The impact of marriage on bladder cancer mortality. Urol Oncol. 2009;27(3):263–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao W, Zhang Z, Huang X, et al. Marital status and survival in patients with penile cancer. J Cancer. 2019;10(12):2661–2669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuret R, Sun M, Budaus L, et al. A population-based analysis of the effect of marital status on overall and cancer-specific mortality in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(1):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulff-Møller CJ, Simonsen J, Frisch M. Marriage, cohabitation and incidence trends of invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma in Denmark 1978–2010. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(5):1173–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen JK, Kortsen D, Jensen JB. DaPeCa5 – obesity at the time of diagnosis does not predict poor cancer-specific survival in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma – a Danish National study. Scand J Urol. 2020; Aug 10:1–6. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32772767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danmarks Statistik & Socialforskningsinstituttet. Living conditions in Denmark Compendium of Statistics; 1976. Available from: http://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/Udgivelser/.
   Google Scholar
• Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP, et al. Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(31):3869–3876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth-Gomer K, Johnson JV. Social network interaction and mortality. A six year follow-up study of a random sample of the Swedish population. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(10):949–957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Recklitis CJ, Syrjala KL. Provision of integrated psychosocial services for cancer survivors post-treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e39–e50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becofsky KM, Shook RP, Sui X, et al. Influence of the source of social support and size of social network on all-cause mortality. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(7):895–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Smith M, Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK. Sood AK impact of stress on cancer metastasis. Future Oncol. 2010;6(12):1863–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchino BN. Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med. 2006;29(4):377–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy GJ, Stamatakis E, Randall G, et al. Marital status, gender and cardiovascular mortality: behavioural, psychological distress and metabolic explanations. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(2):223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar LS, Anisman H. Stress and coping factors influence tumor growth. Science. 1979;205(4405):513–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attalla K, Paulucci DJ, Blum K, et al. Demographic and socioeconomic predictors of treatment delays, pathologic stage, and survival among patients with penile cancer: a report from the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(1):14.e17–14.e24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar