Can maneuverability in the robot assisted laparoscopic stapler during ileoileal anastomosis compensate for shorter stapler length? – A randomized experimental porcine study

References

• Novara G, Catto JW, Wilson T, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):376–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura S, Iwata T, Foerster B, et al. Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Urol. 2019;26(8):760–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, et al. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J. 1980;281(6237):411–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen C. The art of bowel anastomosis. Scand J Surg. 2012;101(4):238–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandakumar G, Stein SL, Michelassi F. Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(12):709–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Chen Z, Huang J, et al. Stapled side-to-side anastomosis might be better than handsewn end-to-end anastomosis in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a Meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(7):1544–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7(9):Cd004320.
   Google Scholar
• Tzortzis V, Dimitropoulos K, Gravas S, et al. The impact of stapling devices use on patients with increased body mass index treated with radical cystectomy. Can J Urol. 2014;21(1):7114–7119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sozutek A, Colak T, Dag A, et al. Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(9):1035–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion JK, Williams MD. Prospective randomized comparison of linear staplers during laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2003;13(6):855–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda T, Kawano H, Hisamatsu Y, et al. Progression from laparoscopic-assisted to totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: comparison of circular stapler (i-DST) and linear stapler (BBT) for intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korolija D. The current evidence on stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in the digestive tract. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(3):151–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazargani ST, Djaladat H, Ahmadi H, et al. Gastrointestinal complications following radical cystectomy using enhanced recovery protocol. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(6):889–894.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, et al. Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1231–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SS, Smith JA, Cookson MS.Decreasing blood loss in patients treated with radical cystectomy: A prospective randomizes trial using a new stapling device. J Urol. 2003;169(3):951–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanaat M, Winer AG, Sjoberg DD, et al. Comparison of postradical cystectomy ileus rates using GIA-80 versus GIA-60 intestinal stapler device. Urology. 2018; Dec122:121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa S, Nakayama S, Hida K, et al. Effect of Tri-Staple (TM) technology and slow firing on secure stapling using an endoscopic linear stapler. Dig Surg. 2015;32(5):353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljabery F, Jancke G, Skoglund P, et al. Stapled versus robot-sewn ileo-ileal anastomosis during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a review of outcomes in urinary bladder cancer patients. Scand J Urol. 2020;10:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Holzmacher JL, Luka S, Aziz M, et al. The use of robotic and laparoscopic surgical stapling devices during minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery: a comparison. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(2):151–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander HF, Fändriks L. Surface area of the digestive tract - revisited. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(6):681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kararli TT. Comparison of the gastrointestinal anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of humans and commonly used laboratory animals. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995;16(5):351–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar