The dynamic changes of customer requirements for sustainable design over time in quality function deployment

References

• Akao, Y. (1972). New product development and quality assurance: System of QFD, standardization and quality control. Japan Standards Association, 25(4), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bhamra, T., Evans, S., McAloone, T., Simon, M., Poole, S., & Sweatman, A. (1999). Integrating environmental decisions into the product development process: Part 1. The early stages. Proceedings of the IEEE. international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing. Tokyo. p. 329–333.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvoisin, J., Lelah, A., Mathieux, F., & Brissaud, D. (2014). An integrated method for environmental assessment and ecodesign of ICT-based optimization services. J. Clean. Prod, 68 , 144–154. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (1996). Environmental policy in the hotel sector: ‘‘green’’ strategy or stratagem? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 8(3), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596119610115961
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R.G., and Meyer, R.F. 1961. The fundamental theorem of exponential smoothing. Operations Research, 9(5), 673–685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.5.673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckow, K., Quade, M., Rienhoff, O., & Nussbeck, S. Y. (2016). Changing requirements and resulting needs for IT-infrastructure for longitudinal research in the neurosciences. Neuroscience Research, 102, 22–28. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, E., Kloeber, M., & Deckro, F, J. (2002). Using and abusing QFD scores. Quality Engineering, 15(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120006707
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., & Yeh, C. (2001). Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making. Omega, 29(5), 405e415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00032-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2013). Towards green loyalty: Driving from green perceived value, green satisfaction, and green trust. Sustain. Dev, 21(5), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Management Science and Engineering, 4(2), 27–39 . doi:10.3968/J.MSE.1913035X20100402.002.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofari, M., Deshmukh, A., & Wang, B. (1996). Green quality function deployment. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on environmentally conscious design and manufacturing July 23-25, Cleveland, Ohio. doi:10.12691/ajme-4-2-4.
   Google Scholar
• Firman, M., Hassan, C., Sulaiman, C., Mahmud, N., Mokhtar, S., & Khairulzan, Y. (2012). Eco-costs per value ratio assessment of construction waste: A study in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 7(1), 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Griese, H., Stobbe, L., Reichl, H., & Stevels, A. (2005, March). Eco-design and beyond-key requirements for a global sustainable development. In Proceedings of 2005 international conference on asian green electronics, 2005. AGEC. (pp. 37–41). Shanghai, China: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C., Chang, A., & Kuo, H. (2012). Data mining QFD for the dynamic forecasting of life cycle under green supply chain. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 11(1), 2224–2872.
   Google Scholar
• Janes, A., Remencius, T., Sillitti, A., & Succi, G. (2013). Managing changes in requirements: An empirical investigation. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 25(12), 1273–1283. doi:10.1002/smr.1602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Ji, P., & Gu, R. (2016). Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 49, 61–73. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaebernick, H., Kara, S., & Sun, M. (2003). Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(6), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00056-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, T. C., Wu, H. H., & Shieh, J. I. (2009). Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7148–7156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, C., & Bai, H. (2003). Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions, 35(2), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170304355
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2009). Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910940456
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Tang, J., Luo, X., & Xu, J. (2009). An integrated method of rough set, Kano’s model and AHP for rating customer requirements’ final importance. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7045–7053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., Amy, H., & Kang, H. (2013). An integrated new product development framework – an application on green and low-carbon products. International Journal of Systems Science May, 46(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2013.798447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui, K., Sakao, T., Kobayashi, M., & Inaba, A. (2003). Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710310453836
   Google Scholar
• Osman, M. A., Talib, A. Z., Sanusi, Z. A., Shiang-Yen, T., & Alwi, A. S. (2012). A study of the trend of smartphone and its usage behavior in Malaysia. International Journal on New Computer Architectures and Their Applications, 2(1), 274–285.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. H., Ham, S., & Lee, M. A. (2012). How to improve the promotion of Korean beef barbecue, bulgogi, for international customers. An Application of Quality Function Deployment. Appetite, 59(2), 324–332. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.008.
   Google Scholar
• Paulrajan, R., & Rajkumar, H. (2011). Service quality and customers preference of cellular mobile service providers. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000100004
   Google Scholar
• Pezzoli, K. (1997). Sustainable development: A, trans disciplinary overview of the literature. J Environ Plan Manage, 40(5), 549–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569711949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusporini, P., Abhary, K., & Luong, L. (2013). Integrating environmental requirements into quality function deployment for designing eco-friendly product, International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, 1(1). doi:10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.17.
   Google Scholar
• Raharjo, H., Xie, M., & Brombacher, A. C. (2009). On modeling dynamic priorities in the analytic hierarchy process using compositional data analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 834–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raharjo, H., Xie, M., & Brombacher, A. C. (2011). A systematic methodology to deal with the dynamics of customer needs in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3653–3662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romli, A., Prickett, P., Setchi, R., & Soe, S. (2015). Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.958593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakao, T. (2007). A QFD-centred design methodology for environmentally conscious product design. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4143–4162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701450179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh, G., Arnoscht, J., & Völker, M. (2012). Product design leverage on the changeability of production systems. CIRP conference on manufacturing systems. procedia CIRP, 3, Aachen, Germany, 305–310. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.053.
   Google Scholar
• Schuh, G., Schiffer, M., & Arnoscht, J. (2012, July). Scenario based development of robust product architectures. In 2012 Proceedings of PICMET’12: technology management for emerging technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (pp. 2542–2549). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Singhaputtangkul, N, Low, S. Pheng, Teo, A. Lin, and Hwang, B. (2013). Knowledge-based Decision Support System Quality Function Deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes. Automation in Construction, 35, 314–328. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Calker, K., Berentsen, P., Romero, C., Giesen, G. W., & Huirne, R. (2006). Development and application of a multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems. Ecological Economics, 57(4), 640–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (1999). Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. International Journal Production Research, 37(4), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075499191599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, G. (1993). On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions, 25(3), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179308964291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younesi, M., & Roghanian, E. (2015). A framework for sustainable product design: A hybrid fuzzy approach based on quality function deployment for environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108 , 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Zhang, C. (1999). Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices. International Journal of Production Research, 37(5), 1075–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075499191418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar