Development of hybrid multi-head, multi-material paste and ink extrusion type 3D printer for biomedical applications

References

• Tofail SAM, Koumoulos EP, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater. Today. 2018;21(1):22–37. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceramics 3D Printing Market Revenues to Top 3.6 Billion by 2028, (n.d.). [accessed February 23, 2022]. Available from: https://www.smartechanalysis.com/news/ceramics-3d-printing-market/.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Gurumurthy B, Balasubramanian A. Biomedical applications of ceramic nanomaterials: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2017;8:4950–4959. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(12).4950-59
   Google Scholar
• Goffard R, Sforza T, Clarinval A, et al. Additive manufacturing of biocompatible ceramics. Adv Prod Eng Manag. 2013;8(2):96–106. doi: 10.14743/apem2013.2.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Li Z, Li J, et al. Journal of the European ceramic society 3D printing of ceramics: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2019;39(4):661–687. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faes M, Valkenaers H, Vogeler F, et al. Extrusion-based 3D printing of ceramic components. Procedia CIRP. 2015;28:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.04.028
   Google Scholar
• Abilgaziyev A, Kulzhan T, Raissov N, et al. Design and development of multi-nozzle extrusion System for 3D printer. 2015. doi: 10.1109/ICIEV.2015.7333982.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Martin AJ, Kroehler B, et al., Fabricating functionally graded materials by ceramic on-demand extrusion with dynamic mixing. Solid free. Fabr. 2018. Proc. 29th Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. - An Addit. Manuf. Conf. SFF 2018. Austin, TX; 2018. p. 1087–1099. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3576&context=matsci_eng_facwork.
   Google Scholar
• Lode A, Meissner K, Luo Y, et al. Fabrication of porous scaffolds by three-dimensional plotting of a pasty calcium phosphate bone cement under mild conditions. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012;8(9):682–693. doi: 10.1002/term
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S, et al. An introduction to 3D bioprinting: possibilities, challenges and future aspects. Materials. 2018;11(11):2199. doi: 10.3390/ma11112199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daramwar V, Kadam S. Design and developemet of multi-material extrusion in FDM 3D printers. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2020;7:3634–3641.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Pham QL, Abatemarco P, et al. Review of low-cost 3D bioprinters: state of the market and observed future trends. SLAS Technol. 2021;26(4):333–366. doi: 10.1177/24726303211020297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndsen JC, Forcellini F, Barbosa SB, et al. Design for Service (DFS) in the product development process (PDP). Braz. J. Dev. 2021;7(1):2627–2645. doi: 10.34117/bjdv7n1-179
   Google Scholar
• Rafiee M, Farahani RD, Therriault D. Multi-material 3D and 4D printing: a survey. Adv Sci. 2020;7(12):1902307–26. doi: 10.1002/advs.201902307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Zhang M, Bhandari B. A comparative study between syringe-based and screw-based 3D food printers by computational simulation. Comput Electron Agric. 2019;162:397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoel J, Netto J, Idogava HT, et al. Screw-assisted 3D printing with granulated materials: a systematic review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;115(9–10):2711–2727. doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-07365-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drotman DTJ. Design of a screw extruder for additive manufacturing. Master’s thesis. University of California, San Diego. 2015. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5142579v.
   Google Scholar
• 3D Potterbot 10XL Ceramic 3D Clay Printer — Real Clay 3D Ceramic Printer - 3D Potter, (n.d.). [accessed March 1, 2022]. Available from: https://3dpotter.com/printers/potterbot-10-xl.
   Google Scholar
• Best Ceramic 3D Printers of 2022 | All3DP Pro, (n.d.). [accessed March 1, 2022]. Available from: https://all3dp.com/2/ceramic-3d-printer-ceramic-3d-printing/.
   Google Scholar
• Ceramic 3D printer 2022 - Guide and hardware selection, (n.d.). [accessed March 1, 2022]. Available from: https://www.aniwaa.com/buyers-guide/3d-printers/ceramic-3d-printer/.
   Google Scholar
• BRUTUM® Concept Large 3D Clay Printer. VormVrij. 2020. https://vormvrij.nl/download/datasheets/datasheet-BRUTUM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xiurong Ke LZ, Qiu J, Wang X, et al. Modification of pore-wall in direct ink writing wollastonite scaffolds favorable for tuning biodegradation and mechanical stability and enhancing osteogenic capability. FASEB J. 2020;34(4):5673–5687. doi: 10.1096/fj.201903044R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao H, Yang X, He Y, et al. Bioactive glass-reinforced bioceramic ink writing scaffolds: sintering, microstructure and mechanical behavior. Biofabrication. 2015;7(3):35010. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao F, Qin L, Liu J, et al. Assessment of calcium sulfate hemihydrate–tricalcium silicate composite for bone healing in a rabbit femoral condyle model, mater. Sci Eng C. 2018;88:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shie MY, Ding SJ, Chang HC. The role of silicon in osteoblast-like cell proliferation and apoptosis. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2604–2614. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD, Yang MC. Product design and development. Seventh ed. New York (USA): McGraw-Hill Education; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ponche R, Mognol P, Kerbrat O, et al. A new global approach to design for additive manufacturing to cite this version: a new global approach to design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2012;7(2):93–105. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2012.679499
   Google Scholar
• Molloy O, Warman EA, Tilley S. Design for manufacturing and assembly: concepts, architectures, and implementation, First Edition. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. p. 220. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5785-2
   Google Scholar
• Koraishy BM, Wood KL, Tilstra A. Des Manuf Assembly. 2011. doi: 10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0253
   Google Scholar
• Albar A, Chougan M, Kheetan M-J-A, et al. Results Eng effective extrusion-based 3D printing system design for cementitious-based materials. Results In Eng. 2020;6:100135. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100135
   Google Scholar
• Bortolamasi M, Fottner J. Design and sizing of screw feeders. In: Proceedings of the Int. Congr. Part. Technol. Nuremberg, Germany. 2001;69:27–29. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1188322/document.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Golafshan N, Vorndran E, Zaharievski S, et al. Tough magnesium phosphate-based 3D-printed implants induce bone regeneration in an equine defect model. Biomaterials. 2020;261:120302. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panaksri A, Tanadchangsaeng N. Evaluation of 3D-printing scaffold fabrication on biosynthetic medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoate terpolyester as biomaterial-ink. Polymers. 2021;13(14):2222. doi: 10.3390/polym13142222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oghbaei M, Mirzaee O. Microwave versus conventional sintering: a review of fundamentals, advantages and applications. J Alloys Compd. 2010;494:175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.01.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar