Parametric optimization of 3D-printed PLA part using response surface methodology for mechanical properties

References

• Srinivasan R, Pridhar T, Ramprasath LS, et al. Prediction of tensile strength in FDM printed ABS parts using response surface methodology (RSM). Mater Today Proc. 2020 Jan;27:1827–1832. doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.03.788
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL, et al. Investigation on the tribological behavior and wear mechanism of parts processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing process. J Manuf Process. 2017 Oct;29:149–159. doi: 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2017.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kechagias JD, Zaoutsos SP. Optimising fused filament fabrication surface roughness for a dental implant. Mater Manuf Processes. 2023;38(8):954–959. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2023.2176870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deswal S, Narang R, Chhabra D. Modeling and parametric optimization of FDM 3D printing process using hybrid techniques for enhancing dimensional preciseness. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM). 2019;13:1197–1214. doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00536-z
   Google Scholar
• El Magri A, El Mabrouk K, Vaudreuil S, et al. Optimization of printing parameters for improvement of mechanical and thermal performances of 3D printed poly(ether ether ketone) parts. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020 Oct;137(37):49087. doi: 10.1002/APP.49087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kechagias J, Chaidas D. Fused filament fabrication parameter adjustments for sustainable 3D printing. Mater Manuf Processes. 2023;38(8):933–940. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2023.2176872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrios C, Kechagias JD. An investigation of PLA/W parts quality fabricated by FFF. Mater Manuf Processes. 2022;37(5):582–590. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2021.1944193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song G, Zhao HQ, Liu Q, et al. A review on biodegradable biliary stents: materials and future trends. Bioact Mater. 2022 Nov;17:488–495. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2022.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayushi UKV, Mishra S, Kanu NJ. Biomimetic 4D printed materials: a state-of-the-art review on concepts, opportunities, and challenges. Mater Today Proc. 2021 Jan;47:3313–3319. doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.07.148
   Google Scholar
• Guerra AJ, Cano P, Rabionet M, et al. 3D-Printed PCL/PLA composite stents: towards a New solution to cardiovascular problems. Materials. 2018 Sep;11(9):1679. doi: 10.3390/MA11091679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vates UK, Kanu NJ, Gupta E, et al. Optimization of FDM 3D printing process parameters on ABS based bone hammer using RSM technique. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021 Nov;1206(1):012001. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1206/1/012001
   Google Scholar
• Dou D, Wang L, Jin K, et al. 2023. Optimization of 3D printing parameters of polylactic-co-glycolic acid-based biodegradable antibacterial materials using fused deposition modeling. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
   Google Scholar
• Kafshgar AR, Rostami S, Aliha M, et al. Optimization of properties for 3d printed pla material using taguchi, anova and multi-objective methodologies. Procedia Struct Integr. 2021;34:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.011
   Google Scholar
• Fountas NA, Papantoniou, I, Kechagias, JD, et al. Modeling and optimization of flexural properties of FDM-processed PET-G specimens using RSM and GWO algorithm. Eng Fail Anal. 2022;138:106340. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari AA, Kamil M. Effect of print speed and extrusion temperature on properties of 3D printed PLA using fused deposition modeling process. Mater Today Proc. 2021 Jan;45(6):5462–5468. doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.137
   Google Scholar
• Singh J, Singh G, Pandey PM. Multi-objective optimization of solvent cast 3D printing process parameters for fabrication of biodegradable composite stents. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;115(11–12):3945–3964. doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-07423-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John J, Devjani D, Ali S, et al. Optimization of 3D printed polylactic acid structures with different infill patterns using Taguchi-grey relational analysis. Adv Ind Eng Poly Res. 2023;6(1):62–78. doi: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Pulipaka A, Gide KM, Beheshti A, et al. Effect of 3D printing process parameters on surface and mechanical properties of FFF-printed PEEK. J Manuf Processes. 2023;85:368–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamat S, Ishak MR, Sapuan SM, et al. Influence of filament fabrication parameter on tensile strength and filament size of 3D printing PLA-3D850. Mater Today Proc. 2023;74:457–461. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.145
   Google Scholar
• Zimina A, Senatov F, Choudhary R, et al. Biocompatibility and physico-chemical properties of highly porous PLA/HA scaffolds for bone reconstruction. Polymers. 2020;12(12):2938. doi: 10.3390/polym12122938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzon-Hernandez S, Garcia-Gonzalez D, Jérusalem A, et al. Design of FDM 3D printed polymers: an experimental-modelling methodology for the prediction of mechanical properties. Mater Des. 2020 Mar;188:108414. doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2019.108414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan A, Vates UK, Kanu NJ, et al. Fabrication and characterization of novel nitinol particulate reinforced aluminium alloy metal matrix composites (NiTip/AA6061 MMCs). Mater Today Proc. 2021 Jan;38:3027–3034.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov VE, Solonin AN, Urzhumtsev OD, et al. Strength of PLA components fabricated with fused deposition technology using a desktop 3D printer as a function of geometrical parameters of the process. Polymers. 2018 Mar;10(3):313. doi: 10.3390/POLYM10030313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BN, Strong R, Gold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J. 2014;20(3):192–204. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanaei HR, Khelladi S, Tcharkhtchi A. Roadmap: Numerical-experimental investigation and optimization of 3D-Printed parts using response surface methodology. Materials. 2022;15(20):7193. doi: 10.3390/ma15207193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Bhowmik JL. Mathematical modeling and FDM process parameters optimization using response surface methodology based on Q-optimal design. Appl Math Model. 2016 Dec;40(23–24):10052–10073. doi: 10.1016/J.APM.2016.06.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan K, Samykano M, Kadirgama K, et al. Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;120(3–4):1531–1570. doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asyraf Azli A, Muhammad N, Mustafa Abdullah Albakri M, et al. Printing parameter optimization of biodegradable PLA stent strut thickness by using response surface methodology (RSM). IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020 May;864(1):012154. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/864/1/012154
   Google Scholar
• Lanzotti A, Grasso M, Staiano G, et al. The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyp J. 2015 Aug;21(5):604–617. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsoufi MS, Alhazmi MW, Suker DK, et al. Experimental characterization of the influence of nozzle temperature in FDM 3D printed pure PLA and advanced PLA+. Am J Mech Eng. 2019;7(2):45–60. doi: 10.12691/ajme-7-2-1
   Google Scholar
• Radhwan H, Shayfull Z, Farizuan MR, et al. Optimization parameter effects on the quality surface finish of the three-dimensional printing (3D-printing) fused deposition modeling (FDM) using RSM. AIP Conf Proc. 2019 Jul;2129(1):020155. doi: 10.1063/1.5118163
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Chen L, Mulholland T, et al. Characterization of mechanical properties and fracture mode of PLA and copper/PLA composite part manufactured by fused deposition modeling. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1(6):616. doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-0639-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanu NJ, Gupta E, Vates UK, et al. An insight into biomimetic 4D printing. RSC Adv. 2019;9:38209–38226. doi: 10.1039/C9RA07342F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar