Perceptions of Psychosocial and Ethical Issues and the Psychological Characteristics of Donors in the Clinical Setting of Living Kidney Donors: A Qualitative Study

References

• Arai, N., Y. Takimoto, E. Nakazawa, and A. Akabayashi. 2018. Considerations on the factors influencing living kidney donors’ autonomous decision-making: A systematic literature review. Transplantation Proceedings 50 (10):3036–44. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.06.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, N., Y. Takimoto, E. Nakazawa, T. Ishimura, N. Yokoyama, M. Hara, R. Ozeki-Hayashi, and A. Akabayashi. 2022. Psychosocial and ethical behaviors and attitudes of health care professionals in the clinical setting of living kidney donors: A qualitative study. Transplantation Proceedings 54 (7):1750–8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.04.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics (in Japanese). 5th ed. Chiba: Reitaku University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, K. K., H. Thiessen-Philbrook, C. R. Parikh, R. C. Yang, M. L. Karley, N. Boudville, G. V. Ramesh Prasad, and A. X. Garg. 2006. Psychosocial health of living kidney donors: A systematic review. American Journal of Transplantation: Official Journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 6 (12):2965–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01567.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, M. A., and C. L. Jacobs. 2012. Psychosocial and socioeconomic issues facing the living kidney donor. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease 19 (4):237–43. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giltay, E. J., F. G. Zitman, and D. Kromhout. 2006. Dispositional optimism and the risk of depressive symptoms during 15 years of follow-up: The Zutphen Elderly study. Journal of Affective Disorders 91 (1):45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Vírseda, C., Y. de Maeseneer, and C. Gastmans. 2019. Relational autonomy: What does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. J. 2012. Informed consent for living donation: A review of key empirical studies, ethical challenges and future research. American Journal of Transplantation: Official Journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 12 (9):2273–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04102.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruki, S. 2007. Essentials of psychiatric interviewing to confirm spontaneity of kidney donation in living donor candidates for renal transplantation: What can be said from clinical experience (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Transplantation 42:335–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. 2006. Family and informed consent in multicultural setting. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 6 (1):26–8. doi: 10.1080/15265160500394531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. 2008. Relational autonomy or undue pressure? family’s role in medical decision-making. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 22 (1):128–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, T. C., and C. Del Mar. 2015. Patients’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: A systematic review. JAMA Internal Medicine 175 (2):274–86. ” doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holscher, C. M., J. Leanza, A. G. Thomas, M. M. Waldram, C. E. Haugen, K. R. Jackson, D. Bae, A. B. Massie, and D. L. Segev. 2018. Anxiety, depression, and regret of donation in living kidney donors. BMC Nephrology 19 (1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1024-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoshino, K., T. Tushida, and A. Akabayashi. 1995. Dignity of death: Bioethics in Japan and the United States (in Japanese). Kyoto: Shibunkaku.
   Google Scholar
• Japanese Society for Clinical Renal Transplantation JSdCRT. 2020. Annual Progress Report from the Japanese Renal Transplant Registry: Number of Renal Transplantations in 2019 and Follow-Up Survey. Japanese Journal of Transplantation 55:225–43.
   Google Scholar
• Jowsey, S. G., C. Jacobs, C. R. Gross, B. A. Hong, E. E. Messersmith, B. W. Gillespie, T. J. Beebe, C. Kew, A. Matas, R. D. Yusen, and RELIVE Study Group, et al. 2014. Emotional well-being of living kidney donors: Findings from the RELIVE study. American Journal of Transplantation: Official Journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons 14 (11):2535–44. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, S., R. Akaho, K. Omoto, H. Shirakawa, T. Shimizu, H. Ishida, K. Tanabe, and K. Nishimura. 2019. Post-donation satisfaction in kidney transplantation: A survey of living donors in Japan. BMC Health Services Research 19 (1):755. ” doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4556-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara, R., M. L. Vázquez, A. Ogallar, and D. Godoy-Izquierdo. 2020. Optimism and social support moderate the indirect relationship between self-efficacy and happiness through mental health in the elderly. Health Psychology Open 7 (2):2055102920947905. doi: 10.1177/2055102920947905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennerling, A., A. Forsberg, K. Meyer, and G. Nyberg. 2004. Motives for becoming a living kidney donor. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 19 (6):1600–5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentine, K. L., B. L. Kasiske, A. S. Levey, P. L. Adams, J. Alberu, M. A. Bakr, L. Gallon, C. A. Garvey, S. Guleria, P. K. Li, et al. 2017. KDIGO clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors. Transplantation 101 (8S Suppl 1):S1–s109. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001769.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., and N. Stoljar. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menjivar, A., X. Torres, M. Manyalich, I. Fehrman-Ekholm, C. Papachristou, E. de Sousa-Amorim, D. Paredes, C. Hiesse, L. Yucetin, F. Oppenheimer, et al. 2020. Psychosocial risk factors for impaired health-related quality of life in living kidney donors: Results from the ELIPSY prospective study. Scientific Reports 10 (1):21343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78032-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. 2015. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research 25 (9):1212–22. doi: 10.1177/1049732315588501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muramoto, T. 2011. Series: For attending physicians; professionalism; cognitive psychology for doctor–patient relationship. how do patients understand doctor’s explanation. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 100 (6):1700–4. doi: 10.2169/naika.100.1700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitta, K., I. Masakane, N. Hanabusa, J. Hoshino, M. Taniguti, N. Tsuneki, S. Goto, M. Abe, S. Nakai, T. Hasegawa, et al. 2020. Annual dialysis data report, JSDT Renal Data Registry. Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi 53 (12):579–632. doi: 10.4009/jsdt.53.579.
   Google Scholar
• Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Policies of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. published 2021. Section/14: Living Donation. Accessed 6/28/2021. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/media/1200/optn_policies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ozçürümez, G., N. Tanriverdi, T. Colak, R. Emiroğlu, L. Zileli, and M. Haberal. 2004. The psychosocial impact of renal transplantation on living related donors and recipients: Preliminary report [preliminary report]. Transplantation Proceedings 36 (1):114–6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachristou, C., M. Walter, J. Frommer, and B. F. Klapp. 2010. Decision-making and risk-assessment in living liver donation: How informed is the informed consent of donors? a qualitative study. Psychosomatics 51 (4):312–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.51.4.312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. F., and J. R. Thistlethwaite. 2018. Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation. Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):843–50. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruck, J. M., S. E. Van Pilsum Rasmussen, M. L. Henderson, A. B. Massie, and D. L. Segev. 2018. Interviews of living kidney donors to assess donation-related concerns and information-gathering practices. BMC Nephrology 19 (1):130. ” doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0935-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroder, N. M., L. A. McDonald, G. Etringer, and M. Snyders. 2008. Consideration of psychosocial factors in the evaluation of living donors. Progress in Transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) 18 (1):41–8; quiz 49. doi: 10.1177/152692480801800109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spital, A. 2001. Ethical issues in living organ donation: Donor autonomy and beyond. American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation 38 (1):189–95. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.25213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavi, R., R. Mahdavi, and H. Toufani. 2001. the psychological effects of kidney donation on living kidney donors (related and unrelated). Transplantation Proceedings 33 (5):2636–7. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(01)02123-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takimoto, Y., and T. Nabeshima. 2022. Ethical healthcare attitudes of Japanese citizens and physicians: Patient-centered or family-centered? AJOB Empirical Bioethics. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2160511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tamura, C. 2006. The family-facilitated approach could be dangerous if there is pressure by family dynamics. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB 6 (1):16–8. ” discussion W27W18 doi: 10.1080/15265160500394606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Japan Society for Transplantation JSfCRT. 2015. Annual Progress Report from the Japanese Renal Transplant Registry: Number of Renal Transplantation in 2014 and Follow-Up Survey. Japanese Journal of Transplantation 50:38–155.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, L., S. Y. Ismail, A. E. Luchtenburg, W. C. Zuidema, J. N. M. IJzermans, J. J. V. Busschbach, W. Weimar, and E. K. Massey. 2015. Exploring knowledge about dialysis, transplantation, and living donation among patients and their living kidney donors. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 22 (5):580–9. ” doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9461-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., J. R. Chapman, G. Wong, J. Kanellis, G. McCarthy, and J. C. Craig. 2012. The motivations and experiences of living kidney donors: A thematic synthesis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 60 (1):15–26. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, A., P. Sainsbury, and J. Craig. 2007. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19 (6):349–57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umemoto, M. 2000. Organ donation and Japanese views of life and death (in Japanese). Japan Journal of Nursing Science 64:336–41.
   Google Scholar
• “United States Renal Data System 2020.” USRDS Annual Data Report. Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Accessed 9/7/2020. https://adr.usrds.org/2020.
   Google Scholar
• UNOS. “Transplant Trends”, Accessed 9/14/2016. https://www.unos.org/data/transplant-trends/#transplants_by_donor_type+organ+Kidney.
   Google Scholar
• Valapour, M., J. P. Kahn, R. F. Bailey, and A. J. Matas. 2011. Assessing elements of informed consent among living donors. Clinical Transplantation 25 (2):185–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01374.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirken, L., H. van Middendorp, C. W. Hooghof, J. S. F. Sanders, R. E. Dam, K. A. M. I. van der Pant, J. M. Wierdsma, H. Wellink, E. M. van Duijnhoven, A. J. Hoitsma, et al. 2019. Psychosocial consequences of living kidney donation: A prospective multicentre study on health-related quality of life, donor-recipient relationships and regret. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 34 (6):1045–55. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar