Appreciating the responsibilities of researchers and governments in “evidence-informed policy”: Commentary on “Helping distressed people with intellectual disabilities to manage their chaotic emotions” (Clegg & Lansdall-Welfare, 2022)

References

• Bellew, B., Bauman, A., & Brown, W. (2010). Evidence-based policy and practice of physical activity in Australia: Awareness and attitudes of attendees at a national physical activity conference (the PAPPA study). Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 21(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1071/he10222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2020). Dedifferentiation and people with intellectual disabilities in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme: Bringing research, politics and policy together. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 45(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2020.1776852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, A., Head, B., Boreham, P., Povey, J., & Ferguson, M. (2013). Research utilization in the social sciences: A comparison of five academic disciplines in Australia. Science Communication, 35(6), 780–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013491398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, A., Head, B., Povey, J., Ferguson, M., & Boreham, P. (2015). Use of academic social research by public officials: Exploring preferences and constraints that impact on research use. Evidence & Policy, 11(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X14138926450067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, M., Newberry, S., & Potter, B. N. (2019). Enabling global accounting change: Epistemic communities and the creation of a ‘more business-like’ public sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 58, 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. A., & Lansdall-Welfare, R. (2022). Helping distressed people with intellectual disability to manage their chaotic emotions. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2022.2106146
   Google Scholar
• Department of Social Services. (2021). Australia’s disability strategy 2021–2031. https://www.disabilitygateway.gov.au/document/3106
   Google Scholar
• European Academies Science Advisory Council. (2012). Good practice in the dialogue between science academies and policy communities. https://easac.eu/science-policy-dialogue/
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, A. (2017). Science meets parliament 2017 opening address. https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/sites/default/files/Chief-Scientist-Science-meets-Parliament.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, G., & Sibthorpe, J. (2018). Facing the challenges together: A collaborative approach to understanding contemporary government library and information services. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 67(3), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1500435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, B. A. (2022). Positive behaviour support (PBS) in Australian disability services: Social network perspectives on policy and people [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Melbourne. http://hdl.handle.net/11343/311268
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, B. A., McKay-Brown, L., & Poed, S. (2022). Geographical networks in the divergence of Australian positive behavior support policy. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 19(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, B. A., McKay-Brown, L., Poed, S., & McVilly, K. (2022). Identifying important persons in the promotion of positive behaviour support (PBS) in disability services: A social network analysis. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 47(4), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1984084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2010). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society, 29(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more “evidence-informed” policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B., Ferguson, M., Cherney, A., & Boreham, P. (2014). Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy and Society, 33(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, J., Barham, L., & Brady, S. (2008). Understanding and practice of information literacy in Australian government libraries. The Australian Library Journal, 57(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2008.10722478
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2018). Influence seekers: The production of grey literature for policy and practice. Information Services & Use, 37(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170857
   Google Scholar
• NDIS Act. (2013). (Cmwth). https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2022C00206
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Re-examining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Cherney, A., & Head, B. W. (2017). Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service. Public Management Review, 19(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1148191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirion, R. (2017, October 11). 10 Tips for making researchers’ voices heard by politicians. https://www.universityaffairs.ca/career-advice/career-advice-article/ten-tips-making-researchers-voices-heard-politicians/
   Google Scholar
• Universities Australia. (2019, February 27). Public brains trust: Uni researchers Australia’s most trusted source of facts and evidence in public debates [Press release]. https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/media-item/public-brains-trust-uni-researchers-australias-most-trusted-source-of-facts-and-evidence-in-public-debates/
   Google Scholar
• van der Arend, J. (2014). Bridging the research/policy gap: Policy officials’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to effective links between academic and policy worlds. Policy Studies, 35(6), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2014.971731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar