Online data sharing with virtual social interactions favor scientific and educational successes in a biodiversity citizen science project

References

• Bedessem, Baptiste, and Stéphanie Ruphy. 2020. “Citizen Science and Scientific Objectivity: Mapping Out Epistemic Risks and Benefits.” Perspectives on Science 28 (5): 630–654. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00353.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Tomas J., Amanda E. Bates, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Nicole A. Hill, Russell J. Thomson, Graham J. Edgar, Rick D. Stuart-Smith, et al. 2014. “Statistical Solutions for Error and Bias in Global Citizen Science Datasets.” Biological Conservation 173 (May): 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037.
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, Rick, Caren B. Cooper, Janis Dickinson, Steve Kelling, Tina Phillips, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, and Jennifer Shirk. 2009. “Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy.” BioScience 59 (11): 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Emily. 2006. “Aesthetics in Practice: Valuing the Natural World.” Environmental Values 15 (3): 277–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossard, Dominique, Bruce Lewenstein, and Rick Bonney. 2005. “Scientific Knowledge and Attitude Change: The Impact of a Citizen Science Project.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (9): 1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Caren B., Janis Dickinson, Tina Phillips, and Rick Bonney. 2007. “Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems.” Ecology and Society 12 (2), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02197-120211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosquer, Alix, Richard Raymond, and Anne-Caroline Prevot-Julliard. 2012. “Observations of Everyday Biodiversity: A New Perspective for Conservation?” Ecology and Society 17 (4): art2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04955-170402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crall, Alycia W., Rebecca Jordan, Kirstin Holfelder, Gregory J. Newman, Jim Graham, and Donald M. Waller. 2013. “The Impacts of an Invasive Species Citizen Science Training Program on Participant Attitudes, Behavior, and Science Literacy.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (6): 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511434894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsen, Finn, Per M. Jensen, Neil D. Burgess, Ronald Altamirano, Philip A. Alviola, Herizo Andrianandrasana, Justin S. Brashares, et al. 2014. “A Multicountry Assessment of Tropical Resource Monitoring by Local Communities.” BioScience 64 (3): 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deguines, Nicolas, Mathieu de Flores, Grégoire Loïs, Romain Julliard, and Colin Fontaine. 2018. “Fostering Close Encounters of the Entomological Kind.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16 (4): 202–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deguines, Nicolas, Romain Julliard, Mathieu de Flores, and Colin Fontaine. 2012. ““The Whereabouts of Flower Visitors: Contrasting Land-Use Preferences Revealed by a Country-Wide Survey Based on Citizen Science.” Edited by Jeff Ollerton.” PLoS ONE 7 (9): e45822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deguines, Nicolas, Romain Julliard, Mathieu de Flores, and Colin Fontaine. 2016. “Functional Homogenization of Flower Visitor Communities with Urbanization.” Ecology and Evolution 6 (7): 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deguines, Nicolas, Karine Princé, Anne-Caroline Prévot, and Benoît Fontaine. 2020. “Assessing the Emergence of Pro-Biodiversity Practices in Citizen Scientists of a Backyard Butterfly Survey.” Science of The Total Environment 716 (May): 136842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136842.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desaegher, James, Sophie Nadot, Colin Fontaine, and Bruno Colas. 2018. “Floral Morphology as the Main Driver of Flower-Feeding Insect Occurrences in the Paris Region.” Urban Ecosystems 21 (4): 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0759-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devictor, Vincent, Robert J. Whittaker, and Coralie Beltrame. 2010. “Beyond Scarcity: Citizen Science Programmes as Useful Tools for Conservation Biogeography: Citizen Science and Conservation Biogeography.” Diversity and Distributions 16 (3): 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00615.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, Janis L, Jennifer Shirk, David Bonter, Rick Bonney, Rhiannon L Crain, Jason Martin, Tina Phillips, and Karen Purcell. 2012. “The Current State of Citizen Science as a Tool for Ecological Research and Public Engagement.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitzel, Melissa, Jessica Cappadonna, Chris Santos-Lang, Ruth Duerr, Sarah Elizabeth West, Arika Virapongse, Christopher Kyba, Anne Bowser, Caren Cooper, and Andrea Sforzi. 2017. “Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Celia, Eleanor Abrams, Robert Reitsma, Karin Roux, Laura Salmonsen, and Peter P. Marra. 2005. “The Neighborhood Nestwatch Program: Participant Outcomes of a Citizen-Science Ecological Research Project.” Conservation Biology 19 (3): 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, Jacqueline, Florian G. Kaiser, and Mark Wilson. 2004. “Environmental Knowledge and Conservation Behavior: Exploring Prevalence and Structure in a Representative Sample.” Personality and Individual Differences 37 (8): 1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabillet, Marine, Isabelle Arpin, and Anne-Caroline Prévot. 2020. “Between Hope and Boredom: Attending to Long-Term Related Emotions in Participatory Environmental Monitoring Programmes.” Biological Conservation 246 (June): 108594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108594.
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, Benjamin K., Julia K. Parrish, and Jane Dolliver. 2016. “Place-Based and Data-Rich Citizen Science as a Precursor for Conservation Action: Citizen Science and Conservation Action.” Conservation Biology 30 (3): 476–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES. 2019. “Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3553579.
   Google Scholar
• Jennett, Charlene, Laure Kloetzer, Daniel Schneider, Ioanna Iacovides, Anna Cox, Margaret Gold, Brian Fuchs, et al. 2016. “Motivations, Learning and Creativity in Online Citizen Science.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (03): A05. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15030205.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, McKenzie F., Corrie Hannah, Leslie Acton, Ruxandra Popovici, Krithi K. Karanth, and Erika Weinthal. 2014. “Network Environmentalism: Citizen Scientists as Agents for Environmental Advocacy.” Global Environmental Change 29 (November): 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Rebecca C, Heidi L Ballard, and Tina B Phillips. 2012. “Key Issues and New Approaches for Evaluating Citizen-Science Learning Outcomes.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10 (6): 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1890/110280.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Rebecca C., Steven A. Gray, David V. Howe, Wesley R. Brooks, and Joan G. Ehrenfeld. 2011. “Knowledge Gain and Behavioral Change in Citizen-Science Programs: Citizen-Scientist Knowledge Gain.” Conservation Biology 25 (6): 1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperowski, Dick, and Thomas Hillman. 2018. “The Epistemic Culture in an Online Citizen Science Project: Programs, Antiprograms and Epistemic Subjects.” Social Studies of Science 48 (4): 564–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718778806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kountoupes, Dina L, and Karen Oberhauser. 2008. “Citizen Science and Youth Audiences: Educational Outcomes of the Monarch Larva Monitoring Project.” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarchip 1 (1): 12.
   Google Scholar
• Le Féon, Violette, Matthieu Aubert, David Genoud, Valérie Andrieu-Ponel, Paul Westrich, and Benoît Geslin. 2018. “Range Expansion of the Asian Native Giant Resin Bee Megachile Sculpturalis (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Megachilidae) in France.” Ecology and Evolution 8 (3): 1534–1542. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levé, Marine, Emmanuelle Baudry, and Carmen Bessa-Gomes. 2019. “Domestic Gardens as Favorable Pollinator Habitats in Impervious Landscapes.” Science of The Total Environment 647 (January): 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levrel, Harold, Benoît Fontaine, Pierre-Yves Henry, Frédéric Jiguet, Romain Julliard, Christian Kerbiriou, and Denis Couvet. 2010. “Balancing State and Volunteer Investment in Biodiversity Monitoring for the Implementation of CBD Indicators: A French Example.” Ecological Economics 69 (7): 1580–1586. “Special Section: Ecosystem Services Valuation in China.” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luczak-Rösch, Markus, Ramine Tinati, Elena Simperl, Max Van Kleek, Nigel Shadbolt, and Robert Simpson. 2014. “Why Won’t Aliens Talk to Us? Content and Community Dynamics in Online Citizen Science.” In. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/363523/.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, Duncan C., Abe J. Miller-Rushing, Heidi L. Ballard, Rick Bonney, Hutch Brown, Susan C. Cook-Patton, Daniel M. Evans, et al. 2017. “Citizen Science Can Improve Conservation Science, Natural Resource Management, and Environmental Protection.” Biological Conservation 208 (April): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, Maria, Tim Diekötter, and Kerstin Kremer. 2019a. “Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability 11 (10): 2780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, Maria, Tim Diekötter, and Kerstin Kremer. 2019b. “Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review.” Sustainability 11 (10): 2780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Tina, Norman Porticella, Mark Constas, and Rick Bonney. 2018. “A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 3 (2): 3. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.126.
   Google Scholar
• Pier-Luigi, Barrotta. 2018. Scientists, Democracy and Society: A Community of Inquirers, Springer. Berlin-New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Prévot, Anne-Caroline, Hélène Cheval, Richard Raymond, and Alix Cosquer. 2018. “Routine Experiences of Nature in Cities Can Increase Personal Commitment Toward Biodiversity Conservation.” Biological Conservation 226 (October): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.008.
   Google Scholar
• Price, C. Aaron, and Hee-Sun Lee. 2013. “Changes in Participants’ Scientific Attitudes and Epistemological Beliefs During an Astronomical Citizen Science Project.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (7): 773–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, Erin, Eren Turak, and Patrick Tegart. 2019. “Adopting Citizen Science as a Tool to Enhance Monitoring for an Environment Agency.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4 (1): 35. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.231.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Serret, Hortense, Nicolas Deguines, Yikweon Jang, Grégoire Lois, and Romain Julliard. 2019. “Data Quality and Participant Engagement in Citizen Science: Comparing Two Approaches for Monitoring Pollinators in France and South Korea.” Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.200.
   Google Scholar
• Silvertown, Jonathan, Martin Harvey, Richard Greenwood, Mike Dodd, Jon Rosewell, Tony Rebelo, Janice Ansine, and Kevin McConway. 2015. “Crowdsourcing the Identification of Organisms: A Case-Study of ISpot.” ZooKeys 480 (February): 125–146. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.480.8803.
   Google Scholar
• Spipoll - Vigie-Nature. 2010 - 2018. Base de données du Suivi photographique des insectes pollinisateurs / Photomonitoring of pollinating insects database for France. Paris: Office pour les Insectes et leur Environnement – Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, Bruno J., Jérôme Baudry, Dana Mahr, Gabriela Sanchez, and Elise Tancoigne. 2019. “‘Citizen Science’? Rethinking Science and Public Participation.” Science & Technology Studies May: 52–76. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, Kim-Pong. 2013. “Concepts and Measures Related to Connection to Nature: Similarities and Differences.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 34 (June): 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbull, D. J., R. Bonney, D. Bascom, and A. Cabral. 2000. “Thinking Scientifically During Participation in a Citizen-Science Project.” Science Education 84 (2): 265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrini, Tabea, Daniel Dörler, Anett Richter, Florian Heigl, and Aletta Bonn. 2018. “The Threefold Potential of Environmental Citizen Science – Generating Knowledge, Creating Learning Opportunities and Enabling Civic Participation.” Biological Conservation 225 (September): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024.
   Google Scholar
• Vallabh, Priya, Heila Lotz-Sisitka, Rob O’Donoghue, and Ingrid Schudel. 2016. “Mapping Epistemic Cultures and Learning Potential of Participants in Citizen Science Projects: Citizen Science and Learning Potential.” Conservation Biology 30 (3): 540–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar