Scientists need professional development to practice meaningful public engagement

References

• Ajzen, Icek. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science. . 2016. “Why Public Engagement Matters.” AAAS - The World’s Largest General Scientific Society. November 3, 2016. https://www.aaas.org/pes/what-public-engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., E. A. Ronning, R. D. Vries, and B. C. Martinson. 2010. “Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists’ Subscription to Norms of Research.” The Journal of Higher Education 81 (3): 366–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet, and Bruce V. Lewenstein. 2017. “Science Communication Training: What Are We Trying to Teach?” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7 (3): 285–300. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthel, Cèleste Frazier. 2020. “Exploring the Relationship Between Scientists’ Perspectives on Learning and Engagement in Outreach.”. Corvallis, Oregon, USA: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, John C., Anthony Dudo, and Martin Storksdieck. 2015. “Scientists’ Views About Communication Training.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (2): 199–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, Bronwyn, Angela Calabrese Barton, and Cecilia Garibay. 2020. “Broadening Perspectives on Broadening Participation: Professional Learning Tools for More Expansive and Equitable Science Communication.” Frontiers in Communication 5: 52. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.00052.
   Google Scholar
• Brenan, Megan. 2021. “Americans’ Confidence in Major U.S. Institutions Dips.” Gallup.Com, July 14, 2021, online edition, sec. Politics. https://news.gallup.com/poll/352316/americans-confidence-major-institutions-dips.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., and P. Duguid. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12 (2): 198–213. doi:10.1287/ORSC.12.2.198.10116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, Richard, Judith Petts, and James Evans. 2010. “The Importance of Context for Effective Public Engagement: Learning from the Governance of Waste.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (8): 991–1009. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.495503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield, Katherine N., and Sunshine Menezes. 2020. “The State of Inclusive Science Communication: A Landscape Study.” Metcalf Institute, University of Rhode Island. https://inclusivescicomm.org/files/State-of-Inclusive-SciComm-2020-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Canfield, Katherine N., Sunshine Menezes, Shayle B. Matsuda, Amelia Moore, Alycia N. Mosley Austin, Bryan M. Dewsbury, Mónica I. Feliú-Mójer, et al. 2020. “Science Communication Demands a Critical Approach That Centers Inclusion, Equity, and Intersectionality.” Frontiers in Communication 5. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.00002.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason. 2008. “Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (3): 421–451. doi:10.1177/01622439073075941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason. 2013. “Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology.” Science Communication 35 (3): 283–310. doi:10.1177/1075547012454598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiano, Ann, and Annie Neimand. 2017. “Stop Raising Awareness Already (SSIR).” Stanford Social Innovation Review, January 2017. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/stop_raising_awareness_already.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Steven J., Austin J. Gallagher, Natalie M. Sopinka, Vivian M. Nguyen, Rachel A. Skubel, Neil Hammerschlag, Sarah Boon, Nathan Young, and Andy J. Danylchuk. 2017. “Considerations for Effective Science Communication.” Facets 2 (1): 233–248. doi:10.1139/facets-2016-0055.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, Laura M., and Michael S. Garet. 2015. “Best Practices in Teacher’s Professional Development in the United States.”
   Google Scholar
• Diaw, Mariteuw Chimere, and Trikurnianti Kusumanto. 2010. “Scientists in Social Encounters: The Case for an Engaged Practice of Science. Mariteuw Chimère Diaw and Trikurnianti Kusumanto.” In The Equitable Forest, edited by Carol J. Pierce Colfer, 88–126. Washington, DC: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doberneck, Diane M., Burton A. Bargerstock, Miles McNall, Laurie Van Egeren, and Renee Zientek. 2017. “Community Engagement Competencies for Graduate and Professional Students: Michigan State University’s Approach to Professional Development.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 24 (1): 122–142.
   Google Scholar
• Doberneck, Diane M., R. E. Brown, and A. D. Allen. 2010. “Professional Development for Emerging Engaged Scholars.” In Handbook of Engaged Scholarship: Contemporary Landscapes, Future Directions, edited by Fitzgerald, Hiram E., Burack, Cathy, Seifer, and Sarena, 1: 391–409. Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doberneck, Diane M., Chris R. Glass, and John Schweitzer. 2010. “From Rhetoric to Reality: A Typology of Publically Engaged Scholarship.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 14 (4): 5–35.
   Google Scholar
• Dudo, Anthony, John C. Besley, and Shupei Yuan. 2021. “Science Communication Training in North America: Preparing Whom to Do What With What Effect?” Science Communication 43 (1): 33–63. doi:10.1177/1075547020960138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, Riley E., Kent D. Van Liere, Angela G. Mertig, and Robert Emmet Jones. 2000. “New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3): 425–442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, Julie A, Martha C Monroe, Bora Simmons, United States, Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and North American Association for Environmental Education. 2012. "Evaluating Your Environmental Education Programs: A Workbook for Practitioners."
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Oliver. 2011. “Public Dialogue and Deliberation: A Communication Perspective for Public Engagement Practitioners.”
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, Summer May, Sujatha Raman, Elizabeth Rasekoala, Vanessa Mignan, Emily Dawson, Liz Neeley, and Lindy A. Orthia. 2021. “From the Margins to the Mainstream: Deconstructing Science Communication as a White, Western Paradigm.” Journal of Science Communication 20 (1): C02. doi:10.22323/2.20010302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwiley, Duana. 2015. Scrambling for Africa: AIDS, Expertise, and the Rise of American Global Health Science. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, Cary, Meg Hefferon, Brian Kennedy, and Courtney Johnson. 2019. Trust and Mistrust in Americans Views of Scientific Experts. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, Cary, Alec Tyson, Brian Kennedy, and Courtney Johnson. 2020. Science and Scientists Held in High Esteem Across Global Publics. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/science-and-scientists-held-in-high-esteem-across-global-publics/.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, Michael S., Andrew C. Porter, Laura Desimone, Beatrice F. Birman, and Kwang Suk Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–945. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3202507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, John. 2011. “Power Pack: Understanding Power for Social Change | Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships.” University of Sussex. http://www.mspguide.org/resource/power-pack-understanding-power-social-change.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, Evan M., and Michael J. Hannafin. 2006. “The Collaborative Apprenticeship Model: Situated Professional Development Within School Settings.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2): 179–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, Jane. 2016. “Problem Science Society.” Science Museum Group Journal 6 (06).
   Google Scholar
• Halversen, Catherine, and Lynn Uyen Tran. 2010. “Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences: A Scientist-Educator Partnership to Prepare the Next Generation of Scientists.” New Educator 6: 265–279.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, David. 2019. . “Public Engagement at a Public University: Effectiveness, Power and Boundary-Work.” Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, Kirsten A. 2021. “A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Public Engagement Activities by Herpetologists.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida Digital Collections, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Alan, Torben Elgaard Jensen, and Kevin E. Jones. 2013. “The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice.” Social Studies of Science 43 (1): 118–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M. 2013. “Making Climate-Science Communication Evidence-Based — All the Way Down.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2216469. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2216469.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil, and Julia S. Guivant. 2020. “Narrative as a Resource for Inclusive Governance: A UK–Brazil Comparison of Public Responses to Nanotechnology.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 13–33. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1842643.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, Paul H., Anna C. Karls, Diane M. Doberneck, and Nicole C. Springer. 2015. “Portfolio and Certification Programs in Community Engagement as Professional Development for Graduate Students: Lessons Learned from Two Land-Grant Universities.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 19 (1): 157–183.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, Luis C., Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory Into Practice 31 (2): 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, Nalini M., Caitlin Q. Weber, Shelley V. Goldman, Dennis L. Schatz, Sue Allen, and Rebecca Menlove. 2019. “Beyond the Deficit Model: The Ambassador Approach to Public Engagement.” BioScience 69 (4): 305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Food and Agriculture. n.d. “Cooperative Extension System.” United States Department of Agriculture. Accessed May 23, 2022. http://www.nifa.usda.gov/about-nifa/how-we-work/extension/cooperative-extension-system.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2015. “How Scientists Engage the Public.” http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2015/02/PI_PublicEngagementbyScientists_021515.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, Emily, and Sibyl Diver. 2020. “Situating the Scientist: Creating Inclusive Science Communication Through Equity Framing and Environmental Justice.” Frontiers in Communication 5, doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.00006.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, Lee, Scott Keeter, and Andrew Perrin. 2019. Trust and Distrust in America. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Achintya. 2016. “Attitudes towards Outreach within the Particle-Physics Research Community.” In Proceedings for the 2016 Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference. doi:10.5281/zenodo.60214.
   Google Scholar
• Risien, Julie, and Martin Storksdieck. 2018. “Unveiling Impact Identities: A Path for Connecting Science and Society.” Integrative and Comparative Biology 58 (1): 58–66. doi:10.1093/icb/icy011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roue, Marie, and Douglas Nakashima. 2018. “Indigenous and Local Knowledge and Science: From Validation to Knowledge Coproduction.” The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Gene, Tom Horlick-Jones, John Walls, and Nick Pidgeon. 2005. “Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public Debate About Transgenic Crops.” Public Understanding of Science 14 (4): 331–352. doi:10.1177/0963662505056611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society. 2006. “Survey of Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers.” Final Report. London: Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rujimora, James, Kathryn A. Stofer, Danielle Sblendorio, Melissa Cuero, and William Remley. 2022. “Identifying Scientists’ Question Types in Conversational Public Engagement.” In Preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, Gabby, Kristen Kunkle, and Martha C Monroe. 2020. “Practitioner Guide to Assessing Connection to Nature. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. Wesley. 2002. “Knowledge, Information, and Household Recycling: Examining the Knowledge-Deficit Model of Behavior Change.” In New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures, edited by Thomas Dietz and Paul C. Stern, 67–82. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Alison, Steven Gray, Artina Sadler, Laura Schmitt Olabisi, Kyle Metta, Renee Wallace, Maria Claudia Lopez, Josh Introne, Maddie Gorman, and Jane Henderson. 2017. “Translating Community Narratives Into Semi-Quantitative Models to Understand the Dynamics of Socio-Environmental Crises.” Environmental Modelling & Software 97 (November): 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.010.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhi, Navjot S., Rhett Butler, and Peter H. Raven. 2011. “Bottom-up Conservation: Bottom-up Conservation.” Biotropica 43 (5): 521–523. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00793.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stofer, Kathryn A., and Teresa M. Wolfe. 2018. “Investigating Exemplary Public Engagement with Science: Case Study of Extension Faculty Reveals Preliminary Professional Development Recommendations.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 8 (2): 150–163. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1420268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stofer, Kathryn A., James Rujimora, Danielle Sblendorio, Estherland Duqueney, Meghana Tatineni, and Gabriela Gaudier. 2019. “Casual Conversations in Everyday Spaces Can Promote High Public Engagement with Science.” International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement 9 (4): 296–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylinski, Cathlyn, Martin Storksdieck, Nicolette Canzoneri, Eve Klein, and Anna Johnson. 2018. “Impacts of a Comprehensive Public Engagement Training and Support Program on Scientists’ Outreach Attitudes and Practices.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 8 (4): 340–354. doi:10.1080/21548455.2018.1506188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toman, Eric Lee, Allan Lindsay Curtis, and Bruce Shindler. 2021. “What’s Trust Got to Do With It? Lessons from Cross-Sectoral Research on Natural Resource Management in Australia and the U.S.” Frontiers in Communication 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389fcomm.2020.527945.
   Google Scholar
• Varner, Johanna. 2014. “Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science.” BioScience 64 (4): 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, Reneé V. 2020. “Designing Strategic Stakeholder Engagement through Conversations.” Poster presented at the Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success, Michigan State University, July 15. https://pewsconf.wordpress.com/posters/designing-strategic-stakeholder-engagement-through-conversations/.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Caitlin, Sue Allen, and Nalini M. Nadkarni. 2021. “Scaling Training to Support Scientists to Engage with the Public in Non-Traditional Venues.” Journal of Science Communication 20 (4): N02. doi:10.22323/2.20040802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, Jamie, Bridget M. Waller, Mathilde Chanvin, Emma K. Wallace, Anne M. Schel, Kate Peirce, Heidi Mitchell, Alaina Macri, and Katie Slocombe. 2014. “Evaluation of Public Engagement Activities to Promote Science in a Zoo Environment.” PLOS ONE 9 (11): e113395. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YESTEM Project Team. 2021. “YESTEM Insight 2: What Are Core Equitable Practices in Informal STEM Learning?” http://yestem.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2021-YESTEM-Insight-2-Core-Equitable-Practices.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, Dana L., Kimberly A. Walker, Wayne A. Ackett, and Michael L. Simmons. 2002. “Tangled up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas.” Science Education 86 (3): 343–367. doi:10.1002/sce.10025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar