Futures labs: a space for pedagogies of responsible innovation

References

• Åm, Heidrun. 2019. “Limits of Decentered Governance in Science-Society Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 163–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. “Ch. 38 “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The handbook of science and technology studies, edited by Hackett, J. Edward, 979–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Michael J., Kiera Reifschneider, Ira Bennett, and Jameson M. Wetmore. 2017. “Science Outside the lab: Helping Graduate Students in Science and Engineering Understand the Complexities of Science Policy.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3): 861–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, Wiebe. 2017. “Constructing Worlds: Reflections on Science, Technology and Democracy (and a Plea for Bold Modesty).” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleecker J. 2009. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction. Near Future Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzou, Nicolas. 2016. L’innovation sauvera le monde. Paris: Plon.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannicke Barthe. 2001. Agir Dans un Monde Incertaine. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Carse, James. 1986. Finite and Infinite Games. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon N. 2011. "Engagement agents in the making: On the front lines of socio-technical integration." Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 715-721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon N., and Erik Fisher. 2019. “Developing a theoretical scaffolding for interactional competence: A conceptual and empirical investigation into competence versus expertise.” In The Third Wave in Science and Technology Studies, edited by Caudill, D., S. Conley, M. Gorman, and Martin Weine, 235–253. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Couros, George. 2015. The Innovator’s Mindset. San Diego, CA: Dave Burgess Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• De Hoop, Evelien, Auke Pols, and Henny Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saille, Stevienna, and Fabien Medvecky. 2016. “Innovation for a Steady State: A Case for Responsible Stagnation.” Economy and Society 45 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1986. “Experience and Education.” In The Educational Forum, vol. 50, no. 3, 241–252. Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Diamandis, Peter and Kotler, Steven. 2015. Bold : how to go big, achieve success, and impact the world. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2017. “The Bitter Aftertaste of Technical Sweetness.” Frankenstein: Annotated for Scientists, Engineers, and Creators of All Kinds, 247–251.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, and Carl Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream modulation of technology: governance from within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 (6): 485–496.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2007. “Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions.” NanoEthics 1(2): 155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2020. “Reinventing responsible innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2004. “Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections.” Planning Theory & Practice 5 (3): 283–306.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, Neil A. 2005. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop–from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., and Dryzek, J. S. 2006. “Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics.” Politics & Society 34 (2): 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329206288152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 2017. Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2008. “Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp.” Nature 454 (7207): 940–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2013. ““Daddy, can i have a puddle gator?”: Creativity, anticipation, and responsible innovation.” Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra G., ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Charles E. Jr, Michael S. Pritchard, Michael J. Rabins, Ray James, and Elaine Englehardt. 2018. “Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases.” Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Justin L., and Grant Fore. 2018. “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2): 551–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, Dorothy C. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2016. The Ethics of Invention. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 1994. Moral Imagination. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 2014. Morality for Humans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, Kelly Ann, Kendall Darfler, Dalton George, Jason Ludwig, and Kristene Unsworth. 2018. “Engaging STEM Ethics Education.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C., S. Cruz, N. Kellam, and B. Coley. 2019. “Making space for the women: Exploring female engineering student narratives of engagement in makerspaces.” In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaître, Denis, ed. 2018. Training Engineers for Innovation. Newark: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, David, and Phil Macnaghten. 2020. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Innovation Governance: A Framework for Responsible and Just Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, R. Bradley, and Peter McKiernan. 2018. Scenario Thinking: A Historical Evolution of Strategic Foresight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil, R. Owen, J. Stilgoe, B. Wynne, A. Azevedo, A. de Campos, J. Chilvers, et al. 2014. “Responsible Innovation Across Borders: Tensions, Paradoxes and Possibilities.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 191–199. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922249.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Riel. 2018. Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Clark A., and Ira Bennett. 2008. “Thinking longer term about technology: is there value in science fiction-inspired approaches to constructing futures?.” Science and Public Policy 35 (8): 597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, Carl. 2019. Steps Toward a Philosophy of Engineering: Historico-Philosophical and Critical Essays. Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Nieusma, Dean, and James W. Malazita. 2016. ““Making” a Bridge: Critical Making as Synthesized Engineering/Humanistic Inquiry.” In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Gerard. 1977. The High Frontier. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, Weert Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Mario Pansera, Phil Macnaghten, and Sally Randles. 2021. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, Richard Owen, Darian Meacham, and Vivienne Kuh. 2020. “Embedding Responsible Innovation Within Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation: Insights from a UK Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 384–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1980. Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1993. The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the age of the Computer. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, Jean. 1969. Psychologie et pédagogie. Paris: Denoel.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Rafael, and Angela Wilkinson. 2016. Strategic reframing: The Oxford scenario planning approach. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Jennifer, Annie E. Hale, and Leanna M. Archambault. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Education: Integrating Values and Technology in the Classroom.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 98–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, Donna. 2003. “Employing Liberative Pedagogies in Engineering Education.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 9 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Emily. 2013. “The Epistemic Value of Diversity.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (2): 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Ken. 2017. Out of Our Minds: The Power of Being Creative. New York: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. 2013. “Why Today's Inventors Need to Read More Science Fiction.” The Atlantic 20.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, Jefferey. 2015. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Peter. 1991. The Art of the Long View. New York: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Seelig, Tina. 2012. inGenius: A Crash Course on Creativity. New York: Hay House.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2011. “Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 723–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia, and Prasad Boradkar. 2010. “Prototyping Nanotechnology: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Nano Education 2 (1-2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, Marc, Martin Sand, and Ibo Van de Poel. 2021. “Virtue Ethics for Responsible Innovation.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 40 (2): 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J., and Todd I. Lubart. 1995. Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, et al. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabas, Brad. 2021. “Pourquoi et comment enseigner l'écriture créative aux ingénieurs” in eds. Ulma, Pauzet, Prouteau, Les écritures créatives en formation et dans le monde professionnel. Représentations contemporaines, nouveaux enjeux, transferts de compétences. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Tabas, Brad, Darren Paisley, and Lachell Faure. 2022. “Learning to Think Like a Factory.” In Ecopedagogies, edited by Bayer Ellen, 131–142. New York: Routledge. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin, David, and Nicole Mogul. 2020. “STS Postures: Responsible Innovation and Research in Undergraduate STEM Education.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 117–27.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2016. What is the Future? London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, Woody. 2012. Scenario Planning: A Field Guide to the Future. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Tony. 2012. Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People who Will Change the World. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Walling, Olivia. 2015. “Beyond Ethical Frameworks: Using Moral Experimentation in the Engineering Ethics Classroom.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (6): 1637–1656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickson, Fern, and Anna L. Carew. 2014. “Quality Criteria and Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation: Learning from Transdisciplinarity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 254–273.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Damien Patrick. 2020. “Fitting the Description: Historical and Sociotechnical Elements of Facial Recognition and Anti-Black Surveillance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 74–83. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1831365.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan. 1980. “Asymmetrical Freedom.” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (3): 151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, Emily. 2018. “Doing STS in STEM Spaces: Experiments in Critical Participation.” Engineering Studies 10 (1): 66–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, Emily, and Shannon Conley. 2019. “The STS Futures Lab at the Intersection of Research and Pedagogy.” In Innovating STS Digital Exhibit, curated by Aalok Khandekar and Kim Fortun. Society for Social Studies of Science. August. Accessed July 19, 2020. https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/sts-futures-lab-intersection-research-and-pedagogy.
   Google Scholar
• York, Emily, and Shannon N. Conley. 2020. “Creative Anticipatory Ethical Reasoning with Scenario Analysis and Design Fiction.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6): 2985–3016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, Emily, Shannon N. Conley, Anne D. Henriksen, Dorothy Caserta, Noah Etka, Nolan Harrington, Meghan Jennings, et al. 2019. “Co-imagining the Futures of Implementation Precision Medicine Using Scenario Analysis and Design Fiction.” Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology 23 (7): 340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar