Putting visions in their place: responsible research and innovation for energy system decarbonization

References

• Bakke, G. 2016. The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future. New York: Bloomsbury USA.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. 2015. “The Problem of Expertise.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy VII (1): Article 1. doi:10.4000/ejpap.346.
   Google Scholar
• Blue, S., E. Shove, and P. Forman. 2020. “Conceptualising Flexibility: Challenging Representations of Time and Society in the Energy Sector*.” Time & Society, 0961463X20905479. doi:10.1177/0961463X20905479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., and W. Menz. 2009. “The Theory-Generating Expert Interview: Epistemological Interest, Forms of Knowledge, Interaction.” In Interviewing Experts, edited by A. Bogner, B. Littig, and W. Menz, 43–80. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230244276_3
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C., C. Demski, K. Parkhill, N. Pidgeon, and A. Spence. 2015. “Public Values for Energy Futures: Framing, Indeterminacy and Policy Making.” Energy Policy 87: 665–672. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa. 2008. “The Growing Engagement of Emergent Concerned Groups in Political and Economic Life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 230–261. doi:10.1177/0162243907311264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes. 2015. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id = 3bDMCgAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., H. Pallett, and T. Hargreaves. 2018. “Ecologies of Participation in Socio-Technical Change: The Case of Energy System Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 42: 199–210. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., J. Stilgoe, and C. Cavoli. 2018. “Reframing the Governance of Automotive Automation: Insights from UK Stakeholder Workshops.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 257–279. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., and S. Owens. 2006. “Governing Space: Planning Reform and the Politics of Sustainability.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24: 403–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E. 2018. “The Value of Social Conflicts. Critiquing Invited Participation in Energy Projects.” Energy Research & Social Science 38: 28–32. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and P. Macnaghten. 2010. “Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology.” NanoEthics 4 (2): 141–151. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. J., N. S. Lewis, M. Shaner, S. Aggarwal, D. Arent, I. L. Azevedo, S. M. Benson, … K. Caldeira. 2018. “Net-zero Emissions Energy Systems.” Science 360 (6396): eaas9793. doi:10.1126/science.aas9793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers-Payette, O., P. Lehoux, and G. Daudelin. 2016. “Responsible Research and Innovation: A Productive Model for the Future of Medical Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 188–208. doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1256659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, D. I. F. W. 2005. “The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860–1930).” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4): 445–476. doi:10.1080/09537320500357319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. 1998. “Review Article: Communities of Enlightenment.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (3): 531–558. doi:10.1017/S0007123498000234.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, C. 2013. “Four Scenarios for Nanotechnologies in the UK, 2011-2020.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.785510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C., K. Henwood, C. Butler, K. A. Parkhill, F. Shirani, and N. Pidgeon. 2016a. “Energy Biographies: Narrative Genres, Lifecourse Transitions and Practice Change.” Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (3): 483–508. doi:10.1177/0162243915609116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C., K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, C. Cherry, E. Roberts, F. Shirani, and G. Thomas. 2021. “The Future is Flexible? Exploring Expert Visions of Energy System Decarbonisation.” Futures 130: 102753. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C., K. Henwood, F. Shirani, C. Butler, K. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon. 2016b. “The Grit in the Oyster: Questioning Socio-Technical Imaginaries Through Biographical Narratives of Engagement with Energy.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1178897.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2014. “Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 1, edited by J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.-J. Koops, and H. Romijn, 15–31. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1057/9780230244276_3
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2020. “The Objects of Technology Assessment. Hermeneutic Extension of Consequentialist Reasoning.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 96–112. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1647086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, W. 2021, August 19. “Target for no-one in Wales to use a Gas Boiler after 2030, Climate Change Minister Says.” WalesOnline. https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/climate-change-wales-gas-boilers-21344951.
   Google Scholar
• Heaslip, E., and F. Fahy. 2018. “Developing Transdisciplinary Approaches to Community Energy Transitions: An Island Case Study.” Energy Research & Social Science 45: 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. L., and N. F. Pidgeon. 1992. “Qualitative Research and Psychological Theorizing.” British Journal of Psychology 83 (1): 97. buh.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., and N. Pidgeon. 2003. “Grounded Theory in Psychological Research.” In Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design, edited by P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, and L. Yardley, 131–155. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10595-008
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, K., N. Pidgeon, K. A. Parkhill, and P. Simmons. 2011. “Researching Risk: Narrative, Biography.” Subjectivity. Historical Social Research 36 (4): 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2019. “Climate Emergency Politics Is Dangerous.” Issues in Science and Technology 36 (1): 23–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320. doi:10.1177/0306312706053350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., P. Simmons, and G. Walker. 1999. “Faulty Environments and Risk Reasoning: The Local Understanding of Industrial Hazards.” Environment and Planning A 31: 1311–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity, edited by S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, 1–33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koirala, B. P., E. van Oost, and H. van der Windt. 2018. “Community Energy Storage: A Responsible Innovation Towards a Sustainable Energy System?” Applied Energy 231: 570–585. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why has Critique run out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Enquiry 30 (2): 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowes, R., and B. Woodman. 2020. “Disruptive and Uncertain: Policy Makers’ Perceptions on UK Heat Decarbonisation.” Energy Policy 142: 111494. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2003. “Embodying the Environment in Everyday Life Practices.” The Sociological Review 51 (1): 63–84. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2017. “Focus Groups as Anticipatory Methodology: A Contribution from Science and Technology Studies Towards Socially Resilient Governance.” In A New Era in Focus Group Research: Challenges, Innovation and Practice, edited by R. L. Barbour and D. L. Morgan, 343–364. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, P. 1996. The Politics of Uncertainty: Attachment in Private and Public Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2015. “Engaging the Mundane: Complexity and Speculation in Everyday Technoscience.” In Remaking Participation, edited by J. Chilvers, M. Kearnes, J. Chilvers, and M. Kearnes, 81–98. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Middlemiss, L., and R. Gillard. 2015. “Fuel Poverty from the Bottom-up: Characterising Household Energy Vulnerability Through the Lived Experience of the Fuel Poor.” Energy Research & Social Science 6 (Supplement C): 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Moini, G. 2011. “How Participation has Become a Hegemonic Discursive Resource: Towards an Interpretivist Research Agenda.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 149–168. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576524.
   Google Scholar
• National Grid. 2017. Future Energy Scenarios. Warwick: National Grid.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P. 2005. “Race, Class and the Global Politics of Environmental Inequality.” Global Environmental Politics 5 (3): 70–94. doi:10.1162/1526380054794835.
   Google Scholar
• Nulli, M., B. Stahl, C. T. Holter, and M. de Heaver. 2018. “Responsible Research in IT.” ITNOW 60 (2): 14–15. doi:10.1093/itnow/bwy036.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe, A., and C. Haggett. 2012. “An Investigation into the Potential Barriers Facing the Development of Offshore Wind Energy in Scotland: Case Study – Firth of Forth offshore Wind Farm.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (6), 3711–3721. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K. A., F. Shirani, C. Butler, K. L. Henwood, C. Groves, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2015. “‘We are a Community [but] That Takes a Certain Amount of Energy’: Exploring Shared Visions, Social Action, and Resilience in Place-Based Community-led Energy Initiatives.” Environmental Science & Policy 53 (Part A): 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. 2021. “Engaging Publics About Environmental and Technology Risks: Frames, Values and Deliberation.” Journal of Risk Research 24 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1749118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., C. C. Demski, C. Butler, K. A. Parkhill, and A. Spence. 2014. “Creating a National Citizen Engagement Process for Energy Policy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 111 (Sup 4): 13606–13613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., and T. Rodgers-Hayden. 2007. “Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?” Health, Risk and Society 9 (2): 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Campillo, X., V. Castán Broto, and L. Westman. 2021. “Motivations and Intended Outcomes in Local Governments’ Declarations of Climate Emergency.” Politics and Governance 9 (2): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield, T. 2001. “In Search of Value Literacy: Suggestions for the Elicitation of Environmental Values.” Environmental Values 10: 331–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafran, A., M. N. Smith, and S. Hall. 2020. The Spatial Contract: A new Politics of Provision for an Urbanized Planet. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. W. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. 2012. The art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York: Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Shirani, F., K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, K. A. Parkhill, C. Butler, and C. Groves. 2015. “Asking About the Future: Insights from Energy Biographies.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 19 (4): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjølsvold, T. M., and L. Coenen. 2021. “Are Rapid and Inclusive Energy and Climate Transitions Oxymorons? Towards Principles of Responsible Acceleration.” Energy Research & Social Science 79: 102164. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., J. Osborn, M. Martiskainen, A. Anaam, and M. Lipson. 2020. “Humanizing Heat as a Service: Cost, Creature Comforts and the Diversity of Smart Heating Practices in the United Kingdom.” Energy and Climate Change 1: 100012. doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100012.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., C. Demski, and N. Pidgeon. 2019. “Deliberating the Social Acceptability of Energy Storage in the UK.” Energy Policy 133: 110908. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., C. Cherry, C. Groves, K. Henwood, E. Roberts, and N. Pidgeon. 2022. “‘It's not a very Certain Future’: Emotion and Infrastructure Change in an Industrial Town.” Geoforum 132, 81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2021. Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener. Norwich: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Vervoort, J. M., R. Bendor, A. Kelliher, O. Strik, and A. E. R. Helfgott. 2015. “Scenarios and the art of Worldmaking.” Futures 74: 62–70. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., P. Devine-Wright, J. Barnett, K. Burningham, N. Cass, H. Devine-Wright, G. Speller, J. Barton, B. Evans, and Y. Heath. 2011. “Symmetries, Expectations, Dynamics and Contexts: A Framework for Understanding Public Engagement with Renewable Energy Projects.” In Renewable Energy and the Public. From NIMBY to Participation, edited by P. Devine-Wright, 1–14. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Withycombe Keeler, L., M. J. Bernstein, C. L. Selin, A. Grunwald, A. Loesch, M. Meister, and I. Schulz-Schaeffer. 2019. “Intervening Through Futures for Sustainable Presents: Scenarios, Sustainability, and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Socio-technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges in Social Studies of Science and Technology and Technology Assessment, 255–284. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar