The RRI map: making sense of responsible research and innovation in science education

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., R. L. Bell, and N. G. Lederman. 1998. “The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural.” Science Education 82 (4): 417–436. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, B., and C. Groves. 2011. “Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 31 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1177/0270467610391237
   Google Scholar
• Amos, R., and R. Levinson. 2019. “Socio-scientific Inquiry-Based Learning: An Approach for Engaging with the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals Through School Science.” International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning 11 (1): 29–49. doi:10.18546/IJDEGL.11.1.03
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ariza, M. R., A. M. Abril, A. Quesada, and F. J. García. 2014. “Bridging Inquiry Based Learning and Science Education on Socio Scientific Issues: Contributions to the PARRISE European Project.” In INTED2014 Proceedings, edited by L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, and I. Candel Torres, 2599–2607. Valencia, Spain: IATED Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Arık, M., and M. S. Topçu. 2020. “Implementation of Engineering Design Process in the K-12 Science Classrooms: Trends and Issues.” Research in Science Education 52: 1–23. doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardone, E., M. Burget, K. Saage, and M. Taaler. 2017. “Making Sense of Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education Through Inquiry-Based Learning.” Examples from the Field. Science Education International 28 (4): 293–304.
   Google Scholar
• Bardone, E., and M. Lind. 2016. “Towards a Phronetic Space for Responsible Research (and Innovation).” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 12 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1186/s40504-016-0040-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bardone, E., A. Raudsep, and M. Eradze. 2022. “From Expectations to Generative Uncertainties in Teaching and Learning Activities. A Case Study of a High School English Teacher in the Times of Covid19.” Teaching and Teacher Education, 103723. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2015. The Beautiful Risk of Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., S. Rap, E. Zemler, and S. Rosenfeld. 2017. “Assessing Attitudes About Responsible Research and Innovation: The Development and use of a Questionnaire.” Journal of Education 5 (3): 122–156.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. 2004. On Creativity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. 1998. The Quest for Responsibility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, S., K. Millar, N. Wright, and M. Kaiser. 2015. “Responsible Techno-Innovation in Aquaculture: Employing Ethical Engagement to Explore Attitudes to GM Salmon in Northern Europe.” Aquaculture 437: 370–381. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burget, M., E. Bardone, and M. Pedaste. 2017. “Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burget, M., E. Bardone, M. Pedaste, and K. Saage. 2018. “Science Teachers’ Perceptions of the Emergence of Responsible Research and Innovation in School.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 17 (4): 590–604. doi:10.33225/jbse/18.17.590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakir, M. 2011. “Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education.” Science and Education 20 (33): 381–387. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9274-7
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, T. B. M., J. Holbrook, and M. Rannikmäe. 2020. “Socioscientific Issues Within Science Education and Their Role in Promoting the Desired Citizenry.” Science Education International 31 (2): 203–208. doi:10.33828/sei.v31.i2.10
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., O. E. Tsivitanidou, and E. Rybska. 2018. “What Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning?” In Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning, edited by E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, and C. P. Constantino, 1–23. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, T., A. Lazonder, M. Pedaste, and Z. Zacharia. 2018. “Simulations, Games, and Modeling Tools for Learning.” In International Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, and P. Reimann, 256–266. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, N., and J. Nihlén Fahlquist. 2010. “Responsibility in Engineering: Toward a new Role for Engineering Ethicists.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (3): 222–230. doi:10.1177/0270467610372112
   Google Scholar
• Egeland, C., E. M. Forsberg, and T. Maximova-Mentzoni. 2019. “RRI: Implementation as Learning.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 375–380. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1603570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and Z. R. Dagher. 2014. “Reconceptualizing Nature of Science for Science Education.” In Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education, edited by S. Erduran, and Z. R. Dagher, 1–18. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Accessed 14 June 2019. http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_public_engagement/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., and B. P. Mauriz. 2017. “Engaging Elementary School Pre-Service Teachers in Modeling a Socioscientific Issue as a way to Help Them Appreciate the Social Aspects of Science.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 5 (2): 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Flink, T., and D. Kaldewey. 2018. “The new Production of Legitimacy: Sti policy Discourses Beyond the Contract Metaphor.” Research Policy 47: 14–22. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E., G. Quaglio, H. O’Kane, T. Karapiperis, L. Van Woensel, and S. Arnaldi. 2015. “Issues and Opinions: Assessment of Science and Technologies: Advising for and with Responsibility.” Technology in Society 42: 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Carmona, A., and J. A. Acevedo-Díaz. 2018. “The Nature of Scientific Practice and Science Education.” Science & Education 27 (5-6): 435–455. doi:10.1007/s11191-018-9984-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geboers, E., F. Geijsel, W. Admiraal, and G. ten Dam. 2013. “Review of the Effects of Citizenship Education.” Educational Research Review 9: 158–173. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, C., and C. T. Gomez. 2014. Citizenship Education in Europe: The Expert’s View. London: CiCe.
   Google Scholar
• Giri, A. 2000. “Audited Accountability and the Imperative of Responsibility.” In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy, edited by M. Strathern, 173–195. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gorghiu, G., G. A. Anghel, and R. M. Ion. 2015. “Students’ Perception Related to a Responsible Research and Innovation Demarche.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 180: 600–605. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.166
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, A., and C. Groves. 2013. “What is ‘Responsible’ About Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 119–142. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjichambis, A. C., Y. Georgiou, D. Paraskeva Hadjichambi, E. A. Kyza, A. Agesilaou, and D. Mappouras. 2018. “Promoting RRI and Active Citizenship in an Inquiry-Based Controversial Socio-Scientific Issue: The Case of Cholesterol Regulation with Statins.” Journal of Biological Education 53: 1–13. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1530277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heras, M., and I. Ruiz-Mallén. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation Indicators for Science Education Assessment: How to Measure the Impact?” International Journal of Science Education 39 (18): 2482–2507. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1392643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., and M. Rannikmae. 2007. “The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (11): 1347–1362. doi:10.1080/09500690601007549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglis, F. 2000. “A Malediction Upon Management.” Journal of Education Policy 15 (4): 417–429. doi:10.1080/026809300413428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirotka, M., B. Grimpe, B. Stahl, G. Eden, and M. Hartswood. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation in the Digital Age.” Communications of the ACM 60 (5): 62–68. doi:10.1145/3064940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility; In Search of an Ethics for the Technological age. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, B. R. 1988. “The Brundtland Report: ‘Our Common Future’.” Medicine and War 4 (1): 17–25. doi:10.1080/07488008808408783
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “Influence of Explicit and Reflective Versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 39 (7): 551–578. doi:10.1002/tea.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A. 2012. “Practitioner Reflection and Judgement as Phronesis: A Continuum of Reflection and Considerations for Phronetic Judgement.” In Phronesis as Professional Knowledge, edited by E. A. Kinsella, and A. Pitman, 35–52. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. C., and F. van Dam. 2017. “PARRISE, Promoting Attainment of Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education, FP7.” Impact 2017 (5): 52–54. doi:10.21820/23987073.2017.5.52
   Google Scholar
• Laherto, A., L. Kampschulte, M. de Vocht, R. Blonder, S. Akaygun, and J. Apotheker. 2018. “Contextualizing the EU’s ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ Policy in Science Education: A Conceptual Comparison with the Nature of Science Concept and Practical Examples.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14 (6): 2287–2300. doi:10.29333/ejmste/89513
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. 1996. “Principals and Higher Principals: Accounting for Accountability in the Caring Professions.” In Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, edited by R. Munro, and J. Mouritsen, 225–244. London: International Thomson Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., and D. L. Zeidler. 1987. “Science Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Do They Really Influence Teaching Behavior?” Science Education 71 (5): 721–734. doi:10.1002/sce.3730710509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R., and PARRISE Consortium. 2017. “Socio-scientific Inquiry-Based Learning: Taking off from STEPWISE.” In Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, edited by L. Bencze, 477–502. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. R. 1996. Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström, M., J. Sjöström, and H. Hasslöf. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education: The Solution or The Emperor’s New Clothes?” Sisyphus: Journal of Education 3 (5): 11–27. doi:10.25749/sis.13087
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. 2017. Understanding how science works: The nature of science as the foundation for science teaching and learning. School Science Review 98 (365): 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Maass, K., M. Doorman, V. Jonker, and M. Wijers. 2019. “Promoting Active Citizenship in Mathematics Teaching.” ZDM 51: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Martinuzzi, A., V. Blok, A. Brem, B. Stahl, and N. Schönherr. 2018. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry—Challenges, Insights and Perspectives.” Sustainability 10 (3): 702. doi:10.3390/su10030702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, A., R. P. G. Kowalski, C. Kirner, and P. L. Torres. 2019. “Factors Influencing Teachers’ Adoption of AR Inquiry Games to Foster Skills for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Interactive Learning Environments 27 (3): 324–335. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1473257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, A., and T. Sherborne. 2018. “Equipping the Next Generation for Responsible Research and Innovation with Open Educational Resources, Open Courses, Open Communities and Open Schooling: An Impact Case Study in Brazil.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1 (18): 1–15. doi:10.5334/JIME.482
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., B. De Vries, M. Burget, E. Bardone, M. Brikker, T. Jaakkola, K. Veermans, L. Siiman, M. Mäeots, and M. Lind. 2015a. “Ark of Inquiry: Responsible Research and Innovation Through Computer- 187 Based Inquiry Learning.” In Workshop Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education ICCE 2015, edited by T. Kojiri, T. Supnithi, Y. Wang, Y.-T. Wu, H. Ogata, W. Chen, S. C. Kong, and F. Oiu, 187–192. Ishikawa: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., M. Mäeots, L. A. Siiman, T. De Jong, S. A. Van Riesen, E. T. Kamp, C. C. Manoli, Z. C. Zacharia, and E. Tsourlidaki. 2015b. “Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle.” Educational Research Review 14: 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratinen, I., A. L. Kähkönen, and A. Lindell. 2018. “Pupils’ Understanding About Responsible Research and Innovation.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 13 (2): 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. 1996. The Necessity of Experience. New York: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013. 2013. “Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11.12.2013 Establishing Horizon 2020-the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014e2020) and Repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC.” Off J Eur Union.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Ariza, M., A. M. Abril, and A. Quesada. 2017a. “Design and Evaluation of Teaching Materials for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Sisyphus-Journal of Education 5 (3): 28–43. doi:10.25749/sis.12273
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Ariza, M., A. Quesada, and A. Abril. 2017b. “Science Teachers as Key Actors in Responsible Research and Innovation: Evaluation of a Teacher Training Program.” Sisyphus-Journal of Education 5 (3): 107–121. doi:10.25749/sis.12274
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiu, D. 2019. “Models of Anticipation Within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: The two RRI Approaches and the Challenge of Human Rights.” NanoEthics 13 (1): 53–78. doi:10.1007/s11569-019-00337-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2004. “Moral Sensitivity and its Contribution to the Resolution of Socio-Scientific Issues.” Journal of Moral Education 33 (3): 339–358. doi:10.1080/0305724042000733091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2009. “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-Scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice.” Studies in Science Education 45 (1): 1–42. doi:10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., S. A. Barab, and B. Scott. 2007. “What do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry?” Research in Science Education 37 (4): 371–391. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saille, D. S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi:10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. 2005. “Understanding Students’ Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry.” Science Education 89 (4): 345–372. doi:10.1002/sce.20065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, R. M. 2014. “Philosophy of Education and Science Education: A Vital but Underdeveloped Relationship.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, edited by M. R. Matthews, 1259–1316. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., J. Ainley, J. Fraillon, B. Losito, G. Agrusti, and T. Friedman. 2016. Becoming Citizens in a Changing World: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 International Report. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., N. G. Lederman, and B. A. Crawford. 2004. “Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the gap Between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 88 (4): 610–645. doi:10.1002/sce.10128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silm, G., K. Tiitsaar, M. Pedaste, Z. C. Zacharia, and M. Papaevripidou. 2017. “Teachers’ Readiness to Use Inquiry-Based Learning: An Investigation of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Attitudes Toward Inquiry-Based Learning.” Science Education International 28 (4): 315–325.
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L. 2014. “From Promoting the Techno-Sciences to Activism – A Variety of Objectives Involved in the Teaching of SSIs.” In Activist Science and Technology Education, edited by L. Bencze, 99–111. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sincer, I., S. Severiens, and M. Volman. 2019. “Teaching Diversity in Citizenship Education: Context-Related Teacher Understandings and Practices.” Teaching and Teacher Education 78: 183–192. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Sixth Framework Programme. 2002. Accessed 13 June 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/space/research/fp6_en.
   Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., J. O. Bullard, W. Ray, C. Roberts, and A. Keiffer. 2008. “Where Might Sand Dunes be on Mars? Engaging Students Through Inquiry-Based Learning in Geography.” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 32 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1080/03098260701731520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework.” Science and Public Policy 40 (6): 708–716. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., G. Eden, M. Jirotka, and M. Coeckelbergh. 2014. “From Computer Ethics to Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT. The Transition of Reference Discourses Informing Ethics-Related Research in Information Systems.” Information and Management 51: 810–818. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrou, D., E. Michailidi, and G. Sgouros. 2018. “Development and Dissemination of a Teaching Learning Sequence on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in a Context of Communities of Learners.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19 (4): 1065–1080. doi:10.1039/C8RP00088C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, M. E., B. Taebi, C. Carson, and W. Kastenberg. 2014. “Teaching Global Perspectives: Engineering Ethics Across International and Academic Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 228–239. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922337
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, H. 2011. A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. Accessed 14 June 2019. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tassone, V. C., C. O’Mahony, E. McKenna, H. J. Eppink, and A. E. J. Wals. 2018. “(Re-)Designing Higher Education Curricula in Times of Systemic Dysfunction: A Responsible Research and Innovation Perspective.” Higher Education 76 (2): 337–352. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0211-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirre, F., L. Kampschulte, G.-B. Thoma, T. Höffler, and I. Parchmann. 2018. “Design of a Student lab Program for Nanoscience and Technology–an Intervention Study on Students’ Perceptions of the Nature of Science, the Nature of Scientists and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37: 1–26. doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1551201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meij, M. G., J. E. Broerse, and F. Kupper. 2017. “Conceptualizing Playfulness for Reflection Processes in Responsible Research and Innovation Contexts: A Narrative Literature Review.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1326258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, R. P. 2017. “The Use of Drama in Socio-Scientific Inquiry-Based Learning.” In Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research, edited by K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, and J. Lavonen, 117–126. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veugelers, W. 2007. “Creating Critical-Democratic Citizenship Education: Empowering Humanity and Democracy in Dutch Education.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 37 (1): 105–119. doi:10.1080/03057920601061893
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Accessed 14 June 2019. https://philpapers.org/archive/VONTRR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, M. Heintz, and J. Bessant, 51–74. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wiarda, M., G. van de Kaa, E. Yaghmaei, and N. Doorn. 2021. “A Comprehensive Appraisal of Responsible Research and Innovation: From Roots to Leaves.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121053. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemse, T. M., G. Ten Dam, F. Geijsel, L. Van Wessum, and M. Volman. 2015. “Fostering Teachers’ Professional Development for Citizenship Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 49: 118–127. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., and B. H. Nichols. 2009. “Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 21 (2): 49. doi:10.1007/BF03173684
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, M. L. Simmons, and E. V. Howes. 2005. “Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education.” Science Education 89 (3): 357–377. doi:10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar