Adapting to changing values: a framework for responsible decision-making in smart city development

References

• Baykurt, B., and C. Raetzsch. 2020. “What Smartness Does in the Smart City: From Visions to Policy.” Convergence 26 (4): 775–789. doi:10.1177/1354856520913405.
   Google Scholar
• Boenink, M., and O. Kudina. 2020. “Values in Responsible Research and Innovation: From Entities to Practices.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 450–470. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2019. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ smart Cities in Europe.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (5): 813–830. doi:10.1177/0263774X18806508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correljé, A. F., E. Cuppen, M. Dignum, U. Pesch, and B. Taebi. 2015. “Responsible Innovation in Energy Projects: Values in the Design of Technologies, Institutions and Stakeholder Interactions.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 2, 183–200. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Correljé, A. F., U. Pesch, and E. Cuppen. 2022. “Understanding Value Change in the Energy Transition: Exploring the Perspective of Original Institutional Economics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (6): 55. doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00403-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. 2017. “Surveillance-democracy.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14 (2): 182–188. doi:10.1080/19331681.2017.1309310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E., S. Brunsting, U. Pesch, and Y. Feenstra. 2015. “How Stakeholder Interactions Can Reduce Space for Moral Considerations in Decision Making: A Contested CCS Project in the Netherlands.” Environment and Planning A 47 (9): 1963–1978. doi:10.1177/0308518X15597408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E., O. Ejderyan, U. Pesch, S. Spruit, E. van de Grift, A. Correljé, and B. Taebi. 2020. “When Controversies Cascade: Analysing the Dynamics of Public Engagement and Conflict in the Netherlands and Switzerland Through “Controversy Spillover”.” Energy Research & Social Science 68: 101593. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E., E. van de Grift, and U. Pesch. 2019. “Reviewing Responsible Research Innovation: Lessons for a Sustainable Innovation Research Agenda.” In Handbook on Sustainable Innovation, edited by F. Boons, and A. McMeekin, 142–164. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and its Problems. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Engelbert, J., L. van Zoonen, and F. Hirzalla. 2019. “Excluding Citizens from the European Smart City: The Discourse Practices of Pursuing and Granting Smartness.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142: 347–353. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F., A. Wentland, and S. M. Pfotenhauer. 2019. “Testing Future Societies? Developing a Framework for Test Beds and Living Labs as Instruments of Innovation Governance.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103826. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Anez, V., J. M. Fernández-Güell, and R. Giffinger. 2018. “Smart City Implementation and Discourses: An Integrated Conceptual Model. The Case of Vienna.” Cities 78: 4–16. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foth, M., M. Brynskov, and T. Ojala. 2015. Citizen’s Right to the Digital City. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galdon-Clavell, G. 2013. “(Not so) Smart Cities? The Drivers, Impact and Risks of Surveillance-Enabled Smart Environments.” Science and Public Policy 40 (6): 717–723. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and M. A. Rappa. 1994. “A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants.” Organization Science 5 (3): 344–362. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635135. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.3.344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C., K. Henwood, F. Shirani, C. Butler, K. Parkhill, and N. Pidgeon. 2016. “The Grit in the Oyster: Using Energy Biographies to Question Socio-Technical Imaginaries of ‘Smartness’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 4–25. doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1178897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2014. “Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation edited by J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.K. Koops, and H. Romijn, 1, 15–31. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1999. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Borugeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatuka, T., and H. Zur. 2020. “From Smart Cities to Smart Social Urbanism: A Framework for Shaping the Socio-Technological Ecosystems in Cities.” Telematics and Informatics 55: 101430. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2015. “Critical Interventions Into the Corporate Smart City.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keymolen, E., and A. Voorwinden. 2020. “Can we Negotiate? Trust and the Rule of law in the Smart City Paradigm.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 34 (3): 233–253. doi:10.1080/13600869.2019.1588844.
   Google Scholar
• Kool, L., J. Timmer, and R. Van Est. 2017. Opwaarderen: borgen van publieke waarden in de digitale samenleving.
   Google Scholar
• Ligtvoet, A., E. Cuppen, O. Di Ruggero, K. Hemmes, U. Pesch, J. Quist, and D. Mehos. 2016. “New Future Perspectives Through Constructive Conflict: Exploring the Future of Gas in the Netherlands.” Futures 78: 19–33. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., and S. Marvin. 2019. “Developing a Critical Understanding of Smart Urbanism.” In Handbook of Urban Geography edited by T. Schwanen and R. van Kempen, 210–224. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R. 2020. “Imaginaries of Sustainability: The Techno-Politics of Smart Cities.” Science as Culture 29 (3): 365–387. doi:10.1080/09505431.2019.1705273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagenborg, M. 2018. “Urban Robotics and Responsible Urban Innovation.” Ethics and Information Technology 22 (6): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9446-8.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2007. “If and Then: A Critique of Speculative Nanoethics.” Nanoethics 1 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A., and A. Rip. 2009. “Mind the gap Revisited.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (5): 273–274. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2014. “Engineers and Active Responsibility.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21: 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9571-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2019. “Elusive Publics in Energy Projects: The Politics of Localness and Energy Democracy.” Energy Research & Social Science 56: 101225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2021. “From Liberalism to Experimentation: Reconstructing the Dimensions of Public Space.” In Technology and the City: Towards a Philosophy of Urban Technologies, edited by M. Nagenborg, T. Stone, M. González Woge, and P. E. Vermaas, 291–317. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2022. “Values as Hypotheses and Messy Institutions: What Ethicists Can Learn from the COVID-19 Crisis.” In Values for a Post-Pandemic Future, edited by M. J. Dennis, G. Ishmaev, S. Umbrello, and J. van den Hoven, 129–144. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch, U., A. Correljé, E. Cuppen, and B. Taebi. 2017. “Energy Justice and Controversies: Formal and Informal Assessment in Energy Projects.” Energy Policy. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, U., and G. Ishmaev. 2019. “Fictions and Frictions: Promises, Transaction Costs and the Innovation of Network Technologies.” Social Studies of Science 49 (2): 264–277. doi:10.1177/0306312719838339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., and M. Roser. 2018. Urbanization. Our World in Data.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., and R. Bendor. 2019. “Selling Smartness: Corporate Narratives and the Smart City as a Sociotechnical Imaginary.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (3): 540–563. doi:10.1177/0162243918806061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, T. 2021. “Design for Values and the City.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (3): 1–18. doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1909813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taebi, B., A. F. Correljé, E. Cuppen, M. Dignum, and U. Pesch. 2014. “Responsible Innovation as an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 118–124. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882072.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2002. “Modern Social Imaginaries.” Public Culture 14 (1): 91–124. doi:10.1215/08992363-14-1-91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M. 2013. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York and London: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Trindade, E. P., M. P. F. Hinnig, E. Moreira da Costa, J. S. Marques, R. C. Bastos, and T. Yigitcanlar. 2017. “Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3 (3): 11. doi:10.1186/s40852-017-0063-2.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I. 2018. “Design for Value Change.” Ethics and Information Technology. doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9461-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van den Hoven, J. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: A New Look at Technology and Ethics.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.K. Koops, and H. Romijn, 1, 3–13. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Sloot, B., and M. Lanzing. 2021. “The Continued Transformation of the Public Sphere: On the Road to Smart Cities, Living Labs and a New Understanding of Society.” In Technology and the City, edited by M. Nagenborg, T. Stone, M. González Woge, and P.E. Vermaas, 319–345. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen, L. 2016. “Privacy Concerns in Smart Cities.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (3): 472–480. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veeneman, W., W. Dicke, and M. De Bruijne. 2009. “From Clouds to Hailstorms: A Policy and Administrative Science Perspective on Safeguarding Public Values in Networked Infrastructures.” International Journal of Public Policy 4 (5): 414–434. doi:10.1504/IJPP.2009.025080.
   Google Scholar
• Vieveen, F. 2018. Inventarisatie Smart City Initiatieven. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar