Responsible innovation ecosystem governance: socio-technical integration research for systems-level capacity building

References

• Aarikka-Stenroos, Leena, and Paavo Ritala. 2017. “Network Management in the era of Ecosystems: Systematic Review and Management Framework.” Industrial Marketing Management 67: 23–36. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, Ron. 2006. “Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem.” Harvard Business Review 84 (4): 98–107. Accessed 27 December 2022. https://hbr.org/2006/04/match-your-innovation-strategy-to-your-innovation-ecosystem.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adner, Ron. 2017. “Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy.” Journal of Management 43 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1177/0149206316678451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aicardi, Christine, Michael Reinsborough, and Nikolas Rose. 2017. “The Integrated Ethics and Society Programme of the Human Brain Project: Reflecting on an Ongoing Experience.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (1): 13–37. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1331101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albury, Kath, Jean Burgess, Ben Light, Kane Race, and Rowan Wilken. 2017. “Data cultures of mobile dating and hook-up apps: Emerging issues for critical social science research.” Big Data & Society 4: 2. doi:10.1186/s40537-016-0061-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aris, Anna, and Willemine Willems. 2023. “Co-creating Consortia? Tackling Challenges in the Systemic Turn of Public Engagement.” Paper presented at the ethics and politics of emerging science and technology (EPET) network meeting, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, January 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, Erkko, and Llewellyn D. W. Thomas. 2014. “Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management?” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, edited by Mark Dodgson, David M. Gann, and Nelson Phillips, 341–346. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, Andrew S., Kate Bulpin, and Susan Molyneux-Hodgson. 2016a. Synthetic Biology. A Sociology of Changing Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, et al. 2016b. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight Engagement, and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 979–1000. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, Pieter J., and Barbara Van Mierlo. 2017. “Reflexivity and Learning in System Innovation Processes.” Sociologia Ruralis 57 (3): 415–436. doi:10.1111/soru.12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, Linda Hoffmans, and Emiel F. M. Wubben. 2015. “Stakeholder Engagement for Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector: Critical Issues and Management Practices.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2): 147–164. doi:10.3920/JCNS2015.x003.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, and Pieter Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation: Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2. Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Jeroen Van Den Hoven, 19–35. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bogers, Marcel. 2011. “The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations.” European Journal of Innovation Management 14 (1): 93–117. doi:10.1108/14601061111104715.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Teunis, and Vincent Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Kathrin, and Sabine Könninger. 2018. “From Experiments to Ecosystems? Reviewing Public Participation, Scientific Governance and the Systemic Turn.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (6): 674–689. doi:10.1177/0963662517717375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundage, Miles, and David H. Guston. 2019. “Understanding the Movement(s) for Responsible Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource, edited by René Von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins, 102–121. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cantner, Uwe, James A. Cunningham, Erik E. Lehmann, and Matthias Menter. 2020. “Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: A Dynamic Lifecycle Model.” Small Business Economics 57: 407–423. doi:10.1007/s11187-020-00316-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capurro, Gabriela, Holly Longstaff, Patricia Hanney, and David M. Secko. 2015. “Responsible Innovation: An Approach for Extracting Public Values Concerning Advanced Biofuels.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (3): 246–265. doi:10.1080/23299460.2015.1091252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, Elias G., and David F. J. Campbell. 2009. “'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3–4): 201–234. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, Elias G., Evangelos Grigoroudis, Dimitra Stamati, and Theodora Valvi. 2021. “Social Business Model Innovation: A Quadruple/Quintuple Helix-Based Social Innovation Ecosystem.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 68 (1): 235–248. doi:10.1109/TEM.2019.2914408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caswill, Chris, and Elizabeth Shove. 2000. “Introducing Interactive Social Science.” Science and Public Policy 27 (3): 154–157. doi:10.3152/147154300781781968.
   Google Scholar
• Ceicyte, Jolita, and Monika Petraite. 2017. “Self-Organisation Perspective to Responsible Innovation in Industry.” Management of Organizations: Systematic Research 78 (1): 21–32. doi:10.1515/mosr-2017-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Ceicyte, Jolita, and Monika Petraite. 2018. “Networked Responsibility Approach for Responsible Innovation: Perspective of the Firm.” Sustainability 10: 1720. doi:10.3390/su10061720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, Don, Rebekah E. McWhirter, Dianne Nicol, Tess Whitton, Margaret Otlowski, Michael M. Burgess, Simon J. Foote, Christine Critchley, and Joanne L. Dickinson. 2014. “New Avenues Within Community Engagement: Addressing the Ingenuity gap in our Approach to Health Research and Future Provision of Health Care.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 321–328. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.963002.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, Henry William. 2003. Open Innovation: The new Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheyre, Cristobal, Jon Kowalski, and Francisco M. Veloso. 2015. “Spinoffs and the Ascension of Silicon Valley.” Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (4): 837–858. doi:10.1093/icc/dtv025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Noel Longhurst. 2016. “Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5): 585–607. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, Helen Pallett, and Tom Hargreaves. 2018. “Ecologies of Participation in Socio-Technical Change: The Case of Energy System Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 42: 199–210. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys, Gregory. 2000. “The ‘Survival of the Fittest’ and the Origins of Social Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 61 (2): 223–240. doi:10.1353/jhi.2000.0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Tom, Jack Stilgoe, and Clemence Cavoli. 2018. “Reframing the Governance of Automotive Automation: Insights from UK Stakeholder Workshops.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 257–279. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon. 2014. “Negotiating Socio-Technical Contracts. Anticipatory Governance and Reproductive Technologies.” PhD Diss. Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon N., and Erik Fisher. 2019. “Developing a Theoretical Scaffolding for Interactional Competence: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation Into Competence Versus Expertise.” In The Third Wave in Science and Technology Studies, edited by David S. Caudill, Shannon N. Conley, Michael E. Gorman, and Martin Weinel, 235–253. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, Michael M., and William B. Dabars. 2020. The Fifth Wave: The Evolution of American Higher Education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dabars, William B., and Kevin T. Dwyer. 2022. “Toward Institutionalization of Responsible Innovation in the Contemporary Research University: Insights from Case Studies of Arizona State University.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (1): 114–123. doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2042983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Cheng, Zixue Tai, and Shan Ni. 2021. “Smartphone Use and Psychological Well-Being Among College Students in China: A Qualitative Assessment.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 708970. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattée, Brice, Oliver Alexy, and Erkko Autio. 2017. “Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game When Uncertainty is High.” Academy of Management Journal 61 (2): 466–498. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saille, Stevienna, Fabien Medvecky, Michiel Van Oudheusden, Kevin Albertson, Effie Amanatidou, Timothy Birabi, and Mario Pansera. 2020. Responsibility Beyond Growth: A Case for Responsible Stagnation. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Michael, Nora Weinberger, Bettina-Johanna Krings, and Johannes Hirsch. 2017. “Imagined Technology Futures in Demand-Oriented Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 177–196. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1360720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, Ana, and Heidrun Åm. 2018. “Experiments in Interdisciplinarity: Responsible Research and Innovation and the Public Good.” PLOS Biology 16 (3): e2003921. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvenne, Pierre, and Céline Parotte. 2019. “Breaking the Myth of Neutrality: Technology Assessment has Politics, Technology Assessment as Politics.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139: 64–72. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj, Charles, and Arvind Parkhe. 2006. “Orchestrating Innovation Networks.” Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 659–669. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, Diego Alex Gazaro, Aurora Zen, and Bruno Anicet Bittencourt. 2021. “From Governance to Choreography: Coordination of Innovation Ecosystems.” Innovation & Management Review 19 (1): 26–38. doi:10.1108/INMR-08-2020-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, Gary Lee, and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak. 2021. Making & Doing. Activating STS Through Knowledge Expression and Travel. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, Boelie, Frank W. Geels, and Ken Green. 2005. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, Jerome S. 2015. “Global Clusters of Innovation: Lessons from Silicon Valley.” California Management Review 57 (2): 36–65. doi:10.1525/cmr.2015.57.2.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Research Policy 29 (2): 109–123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Maximilian Fochler, and Lisa Sigl. 2018. “IMAGINE RRI. A Card-Based Method for Reflecting on Responsibility in Life Science Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2): 201–224. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1457402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Brian Wynne, Michel Callon, Maria Eduarda Gonçalves, Sheila Jasanoff, Maria Jepsen, Pierre-Benoît Joly, et al. 2007. “Taking European Knowledge Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate.” Brussels: Directorate-General for Research, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro, Giovanna, and Antonio Iovanella. 2015. “Organizing Collaboration in Inter-Organizational Innovation Networks, from Orchestration to Choreography.” International Journal of Engineering Business Management 7 (24): 24–14. doi:10.5772/61802.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2007. “Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions.” Nanoethics 1 (2): 155–165. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0016-5.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2018. “Sociotechnical Integration Research (STIR) Manual.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2019. “Engaging the Micro-Foundations of Responsible Innovation: Integration of Social Sciences and Humanities with Research and Innovation Practices.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource, edited by René Von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins, 194–210. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Roop L. Mahajan. 2010. “Embedding the Humanities in Engineering: Art, Dialogue, and a Laboratory.” In Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, edited by Michael E. Gorman, 209–230. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, and Carl Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 (6): 485–496. doi:10.1177/0270467606295402.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Genevieve Maricle. 2014. “Higher-level Responsiveness? Socio-Technical Integration Within US and UK Nanotechnology Research Priority Setting.” Science and Public Policy 42: 72–85. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Michael O’Rourke, Robert Evans, Eric B. Kennedy, Michael E. Gorman, and Thomas P. Seager. 2015. “Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-Technical Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 39–61. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Cynthia Pickering, Lyric Peate, and Mareike Smolka. 2022. “Socio-Technical Integration Research 2022 Seminar Series.” Accessed 25 February 2023. https://stir-sessions.carrd.co/.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Daan Schuurbiers. 2013. “Socio-technical Integration Research: Collaborative Inquiry at the Midstream of Research and Development.” In Early Engagement and new Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by Neelke Doorn, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo Van De Poel, and Michael E. Gorman, 97–110. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flipse, Steven M., and Chris J. Van De Loo. 2018. “Responsible Innovation During Front-end Development: Increasing Intervention Capacities for Enhancing Project Management Reflections on Complexity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2): 225–240. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1465168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipse, Steven M., Maarten C. A. Van Der Sanden, and Patricia Osseweijer. 2013. “Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19: 1141–1164. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frahm, Nina, Tess Doezema, and Sebastian Pfotenhauer. 2021. “Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (1): 174–216. doi:10.1177/0162243921999100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garst, Jilde, Vincent Blok, Oana Branzei, Léon Jansen, and Onno S. W. F. Omta. 2021. “Toward a Value-Sensitive Absorptive Capacity Framework: Navigating Intervalue and Intravalue Conflicts to Answer the Societal Call for Health.” Business & Society 60 (6): 1349–1386. doi:10.1177/0007650319876108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garst, Jilde, Vincent Blok, Léon Jansen, and Onno S. W. F. Omta. 2017. “Responsibility Versus Profit: The Motives of Food Firms for Healthy Product Innovation.” Sustainability 9: 2286. doi:10.3390/su9122286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garst, Jilde, Vincent Blok, Léon Jansen, and Onno S. W. F. Omta. 2022. “From Value Sensitive Design to Values Absorption – Building an Instrument to Analyze Organizational Capabilities for Value-Sensitive Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2069994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjefsen, Mads Dahl, and Erik Fisher. 2014. “From Ethnography to Engagement: The Lab as a Site of Intervention.” Science as Culture 23 (3): 419–431. doi:10.1080/09505431.2014.926147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glerup, Cecilie. 2015. “Organizing Science in Society. The Conduct and Justification of Responsible Research.” PhD Diss. Copenhagen Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Glerup, Cecilie, Sarah R. Davies, and Maja Horst. 2017. “‘Nothing Really Responsible Goes on Here’: Scientists’ Experience and Practice of Responsibility.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (3): 319–336. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1378462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobble, MaryAnne M. 2014. “Charting the Innovation Ecosystem.” Research Technology Management 57 (4): 55–59. doi:10.5437/08956308X5704005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 2009. “National Innovation System.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 34 (4): 476–501. doi:10.1177/0162243908329187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, Leonado Augusto De Vasconcelos, Ana Lucia Figueiredo Facin, Mario Sergio Salerno, and Rodrigo Kazu Ikenami. 2018. “Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 136: 30–48. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, Leonardo F., Jerusa G. Garay, Felipe De M, Kadigia Faccin Zarpelon, and Alsones Balestrin. 2020. “Creating and Maintaining Innovation Ecosystems in Cities: Institutional Work Approach.” Paper Presented at the ISPIM Innovation Conference of 2020, online event, June 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Mary L., and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Grimpe, Barbara, Bernd Carsten Stahl, Carolyn Ten Holter, Philip Inglesant, Grace Eden, Menisha Patel, and Marina Jirotka. 2020. “From Collaborative to Institutional Reflexivity: Calibrating Responsibility in the Funding Process.” Science and Public Policy 47 (5): 720–732. doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, Christopher, Meenakshisundaram Sankar, and P. John Thomas. 2018. “Second-generation Biofuels: Exploring Imaginaries via Deliberative Workshops with Farmers.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1422926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, David H., and Dan Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1–2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1.
   Google Scholar
• Günel, Gökçe, Saiba Varma, and Chika Watanabe. 2020. “A Manifesto for Patchwork Ethnography.” Fieldsights, June 9. Accessed 29 December 2022. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/a-manifesto-for-patchwork-ethnography.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat, Constance E., Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margaret Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David Teece, and Sidney G. Winter. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heyen, Dirk Arne, and Bettina Brohmann. 2017. “Konzepte Grundlegenden Gesellschaftlichen Wandels und Seiner Gestaltung Richtung Nachhaltigkeit – ein Überblick über die Aktuelle Transformationsliteratur.” In Governance für Eine Gesellschaftstransformation, edited by Jana Rückert-John, and Martina Schäder, 69–86. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2016. The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, Peter, Alberto Cambrosio, and Michael Mackenzie. 1992. “The Tools of the Discipline: Standards, Models, and Measures in Affinity/Avidity Controversy in Immunology.” In The Right Tools for the Job, edited by Adele E. Clarke, and Joan H. Fujimura, 312–354. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ketzer, Daniel, Nora Weinberger, Christine Rösch, and Stefanie B. Seitz. 2020. “Land use Conflicts Between Biomass and Power Production – Citizens’ Participation in the Technology Development of Agrophotovoltaics.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (2): 193–216. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1647085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaassen, Pim, Lisa Verwoerd, Frank Kupper, and Barbara Regeer. 2020. “Reflexive Monitoring in Action as a Methodology for Learning and Enacting Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Assessment of Responsible Innovation. Methods and Practices, edited by Emad Yaghmaei, and Ibo Van De Poel, 222–243. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klimas, Patrycja, and Wojciech Czakon. 2021. “Species in the Wild: A Typology of Innovation Ecosystems.” Review of Managerial Science 16: 249–282. doi:10.1007/s11846-020-00439-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokshagina, Olga. 2021. “Managing Shifts to Value-Based Healthcare and Value Digitalization as a Multi-Level Dynamic Capability Development Process.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121072. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, Kornelia. 2021. “Constructive Technology Assessment – TA als Konstruktives Element im Innovationsprozess.” In Technikfolgenabschätzung. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis, edited by Stefan Böschen, Armin Grunwald, Bettina-Johanna Krings, and Christine Rösch, 209–219. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, Kai U. 2008. “Boundary Brokering as a Promoting Factor in Competence Sharing in a Project Work Context.” International Journal of Project Organisation and Management 1 (1): 119–132. doi:10.1504/IJPOM.2008.020032.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Jonathan, Frank W. Geels, Florian Kern, Jochen Markard, Elsie Onsongo, Anna J. Wieczorek, Floortje Alkemade, et al. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabbenborg, Lotte. 2013. “Dramatic Rehearsal on the Societal Embedding of the Lithium Chip.” In Ethics on the Laboratory Floor, edited by Simone Van Der Burg, and Tsjalling Swierstra, 168–190. New York: Plagrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kroesen, J. Otto, Rudi Darson, and David J. Ndegwah. 2015. “Capacities, Development and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2. Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Jeroen Van Den Hoven, 201–222. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Signe Sophus, and Sofie Flensburg. 2020. “A Proxy for Privacy Uncovering the Surveillance Ecology of Mobile Apps.” Big Data & Society, doi:10.1177/2053951720942543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laser, Stefan. 2020. Hightech am Ende. Über das Globale Recycling von Elektroschrott und die Entstehung Neuer Werte. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1988. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, Brice. 2019. “Innovation for Whom? City Experiments and the Redefinition of Urban Democracy.” In Innovation Beyond Technology, edited by Sébastien Lechevalier, 265–283. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, Pascale, Hudson P. Silva, Robson R. Oliveira, and Lysanne Rivard. 2020. “The Responsible Innovation in Health Tool and the Need to Reconcile Formative and Summative Ends in RRI Tools for Business.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 646–671. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1844974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenda, Anthony. 2022. “Why can’t engineers think about this sort of thing? The importance of reaching out to affected users.” Paper presented at the STIR Seminar Series 2022, online event, July 29. Accessed 29 December 2022. https://stir-sessions.carrd.co/#recordings.
   Google Scholar
• Lipmanowicz, Henri, and Keith McCandless. 2013. The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures. Simple Rules to Unleash a Culture of Innovation. Liberating Structures Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Thomas B., Vincent Blok, Steven Dorrestijn, and Phil Macnaghten. 2020. “The Design and Testing of a Tool for Developing Responsible Innovation in Start-up Enterprises.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 45–75. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1608785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubberink, Rob, Vincent Blok, Johan Van Ophem, and Onno Omta. 2017. “Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices.” Sustainability 9: 721. doi:10.3390/su9050721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukovics, Miklós, and Erik Fisher. 2017. “Socio-technical Integration Research in an Eastern European Setting: Distinct Features, Challenges and Opportunities.” Society and Economy 39: 501–528. doi:10.1556/204.2017.004.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117. Accessed 29 December 2022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2155931. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, Wolfgang, Julian Brückner, and Hans Jürgen Wagener. 2016. “System.” In Handbuch Transformationsforschung, edited by Raj Kollmorgen, Merkel Wolfgang, and Hans-Jürgen Wagener, 31–46. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, Donna M. 2009. Transformative Research and Evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhailov, Andrei, Carlos Oliveira, Antonio Domingos, and Fernanda Maciel Reichert. 2021. “Californian Innovation Ecosystem: Emergence of Agtechs and the new Wave of Agriculture.” Innovation & Management Review 18 (3): 292–307. doi:10.1108/INMR-12-2018-0098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, James F. 1993. “Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition.” Harvard Business Review May/June, 75–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, Mika, and Veikko Ikonen. 2020. “A Future-Oriented Evaluation and Development Model for Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Assessment of Responsible Innovation. Methods and Practices, edited by Emad Yaghmaei, and Ibo Van De Poel, 248–271. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, Petra A., Xavier Ferras-Hernandez, and Alexander Braun. 2019. “Strategies for Activating Innovation Ecosystems: Introduction of a Taxonomy.” IEEE Engineering Management Review 47 (4): 60–66. doi:10.1109/EMR.2019.2931696.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Deog-Seong, Fred Phillips, Sehee Park, and Eunghyun Lee. 2016. “Innovation Ecosystems: A Critical Examination.” Technovation 54: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms, Ward, Claudia Werker, Marjolein C. J. Caniëls, and Herman Van Den Bosch. 2015. “Research Orientation and Agglomeration: Can Every Region Become a Silicon Valley.” Technovation 45–46: 78–92. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, Richard Owen, Darian Meacham, and Vivienne Kuh. 2020. “Embedding Responsible Innovation Within Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation: Insights from a UK Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 384–409. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1785678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parandian, Alireza. 2012. “Constructive TA of Newly Emerging Technologies. Stimulating learning by anticipation through bridging events.” PhD diss., Technical University Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Peltoniemi, Mirva. 2006. “Preliminary Theoretical Framework for the Study of Business Ecosystems.” Emergence: Complexity and Organization 8 (1): 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, Sebastian, and Sheila Jasanoff. 2017. “Travelling Imaginaries: The ‘Practice Turn’ in Innovation Policy and the Global Circulation of Innovation Models.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science, edited by David Tyfield, Rebecca Lave, Samuel Randalls, and Charles Thrope, 416–428. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, Sebastian, Joakim Juhl, and Erik Aarden. 2019. “Challenging the “Deficit Model” of Innovation: Framing Policy Issues Under the Innovation Imperative.” Research Policy 48: 895–904. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, Cynthia, Erik Fisher, and Paul Ross. 2022. “Socio-Technical Learning: Contextualizing Undergraduate Externships to Bridge the Digital Divide.” IADIS International Journal on Computer Science and Information Systems. Accessed 14 February 2023. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10318369.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, Roger A. 2007. The Honest Broker. Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piqué, Josep, M. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, and Henry Etzkowitz. 2018. “Triple Helix and the Evolution of Ecosystems of Innovation: The Case of Silicon Valley.” Triple Helix 5 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s40604-018-0060-x.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, Chistian, Stephan Rist, Anne Zimmermann, Patricia Fry, Ghana S. Gurung, Flurina Schneider, Chinwe Ifejika Speranza, et al. 2010. “Researchers’ Roles in Knowledge co-Production: Experience from Sustainability Research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal.” Science and Public Policy 37 (4): 267–281. doi:10.3152/030234210X496628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo-Juárez, Laura, Totti Könnölä, Ian Miles, Ozcan Saritas, Doris Schartinger, Effie Amantidou, and Susanne Giesecke. 2017. “Wiring up Multiple Layers of Innovation Ecosystems: Contemplations from Personal Health Systems Foresight.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115: 278–288. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, Eugen Octav, Vincent Blok, and Renate Wesselink. 2020. “A Processual Approach to Friction in Quadruple Helix Collaborations.” Science and Public Policy 47 (6): 876–889. doi:10.1093/scipol/scaa054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, Keith G., and Patrick Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabelo, Ricardo J., and Peter Bernus. 2015. “A Holistic Model of Building Innovation Ecosystems.” Paper presented at the IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing, Ottawa, Canada, May 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Radatz, Alecia, Michael Reinsborough, Erik Fisher, Elizabeth Corley, and David Guston. 2019. “An Assessment of Engaged Social Science Research in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Communities.” Science and Public Policy 46 (6): 853–865. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijers, Wessel, David Wright, Philip Brey, Karsten Weber, Rowena Rodrigues, Declan O’Sullivan, and Bert Gordijn. 2018. “Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24: 1437–1481. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Elisabeth B., and Yilmaz Uygun. 2018. “Strengthening Advanced Manufacturing Innovation Ecosystems: The Case of Massachusetts.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136: 178–191. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, Jennifer A., Abraham S. D. Tidwell, Erik Fisher, and Thaddeus R. Miller. 2017. “STIRring the Grid: Engaging Energy Systems Design and Planning in the Context of Urban Sociotechnical Imaginaries.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (3): 365–384. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1237281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 2006. “A Co-Evolutionary Approach to Reflexive Governance – and its Ironies.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voß, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp, 82–102. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Haico Te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology and Society, Vol. 1: Presenting Futures, edited by Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and Jameson M. Wetmore, 49–70. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Douglas K. R. Robinson. 2013. “Constructive Technology Assessment and the Methodology of Insertion.” In Early Engagement and new Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by Neelke Doorn, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo Van De Poel, and Michael E. Gorman, 37–53. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Harro Van Lente. 2013. “Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and ELSA: The TA Program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed.” Nanoethics 7: 7–16. doi:10.1007/s11569-013-0171-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, Paavo, and Argyro Almpanopoulou. 2017. “In Defense of ‘Eco’ in Innovation Ecosystem.” Technovation 60–61: 39–42. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roßmann, Maximilian. 2021. “Vision as Make-Believe: How Narratives and Models Represent Sociotechnical Futures.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (1): 70–93. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1853395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, Carlo, and Roberto Vassolo. 2018. “The Sources of Dynamism in Dynamic Capabilities.” Strategic Management Journal 39: 1728–1752. doi:10.1002/smj.2703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, Johan, and Arie Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54: 251–268. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijff, Mirjam, and Anne M. Dijkstra. 2020. “Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26: 533–574. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo, and Martin Meister. 2017. “Laboratory Settings as Built Anticipations – Prototype Scenarios as Negotiation Arenas Between the Present and Imagined Futures.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 197–216. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1326260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, Daan. 2011. “What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 769–788. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanley, Danielle. 2021. “Imagining the Future Through Revisiting the Past: The Value of History in Thinking About R(R)I’s Possible Future(s).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 234–253. doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1882748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanley, Danielle. 2022. “Making Responsibility Matter: The Emergence of Responsible Innovation as an Intellectual Movement.” PhD Diss. Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Shilton, Katie. 2012. “Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (3): 374–397. Accessed 29 December 2022. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23474474. doi:10.1177/0162243912436985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2008. “Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 13–32. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adrian, and Andy Stirling. 2007. “Moving Outside or Inside? Objectification and Reflexivity in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3–4): 351–373. doi:10.1080/15239080701622873.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike. 2020. “Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: From Critique in and of the Neurosciences to Socio-Technical Integration Research as a Practice of Critique in R(R)I.” Nanoethics 14: 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11569-019-00362-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike, and Erik Fisher. 2022. “Testing Reflexive Practitioner Dialogues in Contemplative Science.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike, Erik Fisher, and Alexandra Hausstein. 2021. “From Affect to Action: Choices in Attending to Disconcertment in Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (5): 1076–1103. doi:10.1177/0162243920974088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Pickering, and Lyric Peate. 2022. “Traveling Through the Past and Into the Future of Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR): Midpoint Report on the 2022 STIR Seminar Series.” EASST Review 41 (2), Accessed 25 February 2023. https://www.easst.net/article/traveling-through-the-past-and-into-the-future-of-socio-technical-integration-research-stir-midpoint-report-on-the-2022-stir-seminar-series/.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike, Lennart Stoepel, Jasmin Quill, Thorsten Wahlbrink, Julia Floehr, Stefan Böschen, Peter Letmathe, and Max Lemme. forthcoming. “NeuroSys Cluster4Future: Shaping the Innovation Ecosystem of Neuromorphic Computing Hardware for Artificial Intelligence Applications.” In Mensch – Technik – Transformation: Sammelband, edited by Peter Letmathe, Maren Paegert, and Christine Roll. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd Carsten. 2021. Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future. An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd Carsten. 2022. “Responsible Innovation Ecosystems: Ethical Implications of the Application of the Ecosystem Concept to Artificial Intelligence.” International Journal of Information Management 62: 102441. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Sunny Li, Yanli Zhang, Yuhua Cao, Jielin Dong, and John Cantwell. 2019. “Enriching Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Government in a University Science Park.” Global Transitions 1: 104–119. doi:10.1016/j.glt.2019.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kulve, Haico, and Arie Rip. 2011. “Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-Engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 699–714. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9304-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, David J. 2009. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Job, Emad Yaghmaei, Bernd Carsten Stahl, and Alexander Brem. 2017. “Research and Innovation Processes Revisited – Networked Responsibility in Industry.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 8 (3): 307–334. doi:10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2015-0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, Anna. 2004. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto, Masaharu, Yuya Kajikawa, Junichi Tomita, and Yoichi Matsumoto. 2018. “A Review of the Ecosystem Concept — Towards Coherent Ecosystem Design.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 136: 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, Esther, Marian Stuiver, Judith Klostermann, Bette Harms, and Cees Leeuwis. 2013. “New Roles of Science in Society: Different Repertoires of Knowledge Brokering.” Science and Public Policy 40: 354–365. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, Lachlan D., and Peter J. Craigon. 2021. “The Moral-IT Deck: A Tool for Ethics by Design.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (1): 94–126. doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1880112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkokari, Katri. 2015. “Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive Within Them.” Technology Innovation Management Review 5 (8): 17–24. doi:10.22215/timreview/919.
   Google Scholar
• Van Agtmael, Antoine, and Fred Bakker. 2016. The Smartest Places on Earth: Why Rustbelts Are the Emerging Hotspots of Global Innovation. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Poel, Ibo, Lotte Asveld, Steven Flipse, Pim Klaassen, Zenlin Kwee, Maria Maia, Elvio Mantovani, Christopher Nathan, Andrea Porcari, and Emad Yaghmaei. 2020. “Learning to do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1791506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Hoven, Jeroen, Seumas Miller, and Thomas Pogge. 2017. Designing in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Burg, Simone, and Tsjalling Swierstra. 2013. Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merkerk, Rutger. 2007. “Intervening in Emerging Nanotechnologies. A CTA of Lab-on-a-Chip Technology.” PhD Diss. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo, Barbara, Barbara Regeer, Mariëtte Van Amstel, Marlèn Arkesteijn, Volkert Beekman, Joske Bunders, Tjard De Cock Buning, Boelie Elzen, Anne-Charlotte Hoes, and Cees Leeuwis. 2010. Reflexive Monitoring in Action. A guide for monitoring system innovation projects. Wageningen: Communication and Innovation Studies, WUR. Accessed 12 February 2023. https://www.wur.nl/en/Publication-details.htm?publicationId=publication-way-333935373332.
   Google Scholar
• Vinsel, Lee, and Andrew L. Russell. 2020. The Innovation Delusion. How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most. New York: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, René, and Jonathan Hankins. 2019. International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, and Nina Amelung. 2016. “Innovating Public Participation Methods: Technoscientization and Reflexive Engagement.” Social Studies of Science 46 (5): 749–772. doi:10.1177/0306312716641350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp. 2006. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, and Basil Bornemann. 2011. “The Politics of Reflexive Governance: Challenges for Designing Adaptive Management and Transition Management.” Ecology and Society 16 (1): art 9. Accessed 30 December 2022. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art9/.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, and René Kemp. 2006. “Sustainability and Reflexive Governance: Introduction.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voß, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp, 3–28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, Adrian Smith, and John Grin. 2009a. “Designing Long-Term Policy: Rethinking Transition Management.” Policy Sciences 42: 275–302. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9103-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, Bernhard Truffer, and Kornelia Konrad. 2009b. “Sustainability Foresight: Reflexive Governance in the Transformation of Utility Systems.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voß, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp, 162–188. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Rosina, Hugh N. Wilson, Palie Smart, and Emma K. Macdonald. 2017. “Harnessing Difference: A Capability-Based Framework for Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 35: 254–279. doi:10.1111/jpim.12394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. Matthias. 2009. “Foresight and Adaptive Planning as Complementary Elements in Anticipatory Policy-Making: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voß, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp, 189–221. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, Fern, Roger Strand, and Kamilla Lein Kjølberg. 2015. “The Walkshop Approach to Science and Technology Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21: 241–264. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9526-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, Julia M., and Niko Schäpke. 2014. “Action, Research and Participation: Roles of Researchers in Sustainability Transitions.” Sustainability Science 9: 483–496. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZRR. 2021. “Wirtschafts- und Strukturprogramm 1.1 für das Rheinische Revier.” Zukunftsagentur Rheinisches Revier. Accessed 27 December 2022. https://www.rheinisches-revier.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/wsp_1.1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun, and Casper Bruun Jensen. 2007. “Editorial Introduction: Unpacking ‘Intervention’ in Science and Technology Studies.” Science as Culture 16 (3): 227–235. doi:10.1080/09505430701568552.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, Laurens Landeweerd, and Arjan Van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (11): 1–19. doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zygiaris, Sotiris. 2013. “Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 4: 217–231. doi:10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4.
   Google Scholar