931
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Renewable energy Living Labs through the lenses of responsible innovation: building an inclusive, reflexive, and sustainable energy transition

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2213145 | Received 09 Aug 2021, Accepted 09 May 2023, Published online: 31 May 2023

References

  • Adam, B., and C. Groves. 2011. “Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 31 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1177/0270467610391237.
  • Allen, E., H. Lyons, and J. C. Stephens. 2019. “Women’s Leadership in Renewable Transformation, Energy Justice and Energy Democracy: Redistributing Power.” Energy Research & Social Science 57: 101233. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101233.
  • Andoni, M., V. Robu, D. Flynn, S. Abram, D. Geach, D. Jenkins, P. McCallum, and A. Peacock. 2019. “Blockchain Technology in the Energy Sector: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 100: 143–174. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014.
  • Avelino, F., and J. M. Wittmayer. 2016. “Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-Actor Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5): 628–649. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
  • Baccarne, B., S. Logghe, D. Schuurman, and L. De Marez. 2016. “Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship.” Technology Innovation Management Review 6 (3): 22–30. doi:10.22215/timreview/972.
  • Ballon, P., and D. Schuurman. 2015. “Living Labs: Concepts, Tools and Cases.” Info 17 (4): info–04–2015–0024. doi:10.1108/info-04-2015-0024.
  • Baran, G., and A. Berkowicz. 2020. “Sustainability Living Labs as a Methodological Approach to Research on the Cultural Drivers of Sustainable Development.” Sustainability 12 (12): 4835. doi:10.3390/su12124835.
  • Bäckstrand, K. 2006. “Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness.” European Environment 16 (5): 290–306. doi:10.1002/eet.425.
  • Bifulco, L. 2013. “Citizen Participation, Agency and Voice.” European Journal of Social Theory 16 (2): 174–187. doi:10.1177/1368431012459695.
  • Brand, T., and V. Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13620-004
  • Brons, A., K. van der Gaast, H. Awuh, J. E. Jansma, C. Segreto, and S. Wertheim-Heck. 2022. “A Tale of Two Labs: Rethinking Urban Living Labs for Advancing Citizen Engagement in Food System Transformations.” Cities 123: 103552. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103552.
  • Brown, D., S. Hall, and M. E. Davis. 2019. “Prosumers in the Post Subsidy era: An Exploration of New Prosumer Business Models in the UK.” Energy Policy 135: 110984. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110984.
  • Burget, M., E. Bardone, and M. Pedaste. 2017. “Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1.
  • Burke, M. J., and J. C. Stephens. 2018. “Political Power and Renewable Energy Futures: A Critical Review.” Energy Research & Social Science 35: 78–93. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018.
  • Calvert, K. 2016. “From ‘Energy Geography’ to ‘Energy Geographies’.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (1): 105–125. doi:10.1177/0309132514566343.
  • Campos, I., and E. Marín-González. 2020. “People in Transitions: Energy Citizenship, Prosumerism and Social Movements in Europe.” Energy Research & Social Science 69: 101718. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101718.
  • Campos, I., E. Marín-González, G. Luz, J. Barroso, and N. Oliveira. 2019. “Renewable Energy Prosumers in Mediterranean Viticulture Social–Ecological Systems.” Sustainability 11 (23): 6781. doi:10.3390/su11236781.
  • Campos, I., G. Pontes Luz, E. Marín-González, S. Gährs, S. Hall, and L. Holstenkamp. 2020. “Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities for Collective Renewable Energy Prosumers in the EU.” Energy Policy 138: 111212. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111212.
  • Carayannis, E. G., T. D. Barth, and D. F. Campbell. 2012. “The Quintuple Helix Innovation Model: Global Warming as a Challenge and Driver for Innovation.” Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 1 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.
  • Chilvers, J. 2013. “Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology.” Science Communication 35 (3): 283–310. doi:10.1177/1075547012454598.
  • Engels, A., and K. Walz. 2018. “Dealing with Multi-Perspectivity in Real-World Laboratories: Experiences from the Transdisciplinary Research Project Urban Transformation Laboratories.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (1): 39–45. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.10.
  • Engels, F., A. Wentland, and S. M. Pfotenhauer. 2019. “Testing Future Societies? Developing a Framework for Test Beds and Living Labs as Instruments of Innovation Governance.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103826. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826.
  • Evans, J., and A. Karvonen. 2014. “‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Lower Your Carbon Footprint!’ – Urban Laboratories and the Governance of Low-Carbon Futures.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 413–430. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12077.
  • Fast, S. 2013. “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy: Trends, Concepts, and Geographies.” Geography Compass 7 (12): 853–866. doi:10.1111/gec3.12086.
  • Franz, Y. 2015. “Designing Social Living Labs in Urban Research.” Info 17 (4): 53–66. doi:10.1108/info-01-2015-0008.
  • Franz, Y., K. Tausz, and S.-K. Thiel. 2015. “Contextuality and Co-Creation Matter: A Qualitative Case Study Comparison of Living Lab Concepts in Urban Research.” Technology Innovation Management Review 5 (12): 48–55. doi:10.22215/timreview/952.
  • Gjorgievski, V. Z., S. Cundeva, and G. E. Georghiou. 2021. “Social Arrangements, Technical Designs and Impacts of Energy Communities: A Review.” Renewable Energy 169: 1138–1156. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.078.
  • Gremmen, B., V. Blok, and B. Bovenkerk. 2019. “Responsible Innovation for Life: Five Challenges Agriculture Offers for Responsible Innovation in Agriculture and Food, and the Necessity of an Ethics of Innovation.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5–6): 673–679. doi:10.1007/s10806-019-09808-w.
  • Hartley, S., C. McLeod, M. Clifford, S. Jewitt, and C. Ray. 2019. “A Retrospective Analysis of Responsible Innovation for low-Technology Innovation in the Global South.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 143–162. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1575682.
  • Hassan, Z. 2014. “What Are Social Laboratories?” Design Management Review 25 (2): 56–59. doi:10.1111/drev.10285.
  • Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2009. “Cities Mediating Technological Transitions: Understanding Visions, Intermediation and Consequences.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 21 (4): 515–534. doi:10.1080/09537320902819213.
  • Horstink, L., J. M. Wittmayer, K. Ng, G. P. Luz, E. Marín-González, S. Gährs, I. Campos, L. Holstenkamp, S. Oxenaar, and D. Brown. 2020. “Collective Renewable Energy Prosumers and the Promises of the Energy Union: Taking Stock.” Energies 13 (2): 421. doi:10.3390/en13020421.
  • Jenkins, K. E. H., J. C. Stephens, T. G. Reames, and D. Hernández. 2020. “Towards Impactful Energy Justice Research: Transforming the Power of Academic Engagement.” Energy Research & Social Science 67: 101510. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101510.
  • Kuzma, J., and P. Roberts. 2018. “Cataloguing the Barriers Facing RRI in Innovation Pathways: A Response to the Dilemma of Societal Alignment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 338–346. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1511329.
  • Lang, D. J., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, and C. J. Thomas. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
  • Lennon, M. 2017. “Decolonizing Energy: Black Lives Matter and Technoscientific Expertise Amid Solar Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 30: 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.002.
  • Lennon, B., N. Dunphy, C. Gaffney, A. Revez, G. Mullally, and P. O’Connor. 2020. “Citizen or Consumer? Reconsidering Energy Citizenship.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22 (2): 184–197. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1680277.
  • Lewis, J. M. 2021. “The Limits of Policy Labs: Characteristics, Opportunities and Constraints.” Policy Design and Practice 4 (2): 242–251. doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077.
  • Martin, C. J., J. Evans, and A. Karvonen. 2018. “Smart and Sustainable? Five Tensions in the Visions and Practices of the Smart-Sustainable City in Europe and North America.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 133: 269–278. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005.
  • McCauley, D., and R. Heffron. 2018. “Just Transition: Integrating Climate, Energy and Environmental Justice.” Energy Policy 119: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014.
  • McChesney, K., and J. Aldridge. 2019. “Weaving an Interpretivist Stance Throughout Mixed Methods Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 42 (3): 225–238. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2019.1590811.
  • Mormina, M. 2019. “Science, Technology and Innovation as Social Goods for Development: Rethinking Research Capacity Building from Sen’s Capabilities Approach.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (3): 671–692. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0037-1.
  • Mukama, M., J. K. Musango, S. Smit, F. Ceschin, and A. Petrulaityte. 2022. “Development of Living Labs to Support Gendered Energy Technology Innovation in Poor Urban Environments.” Technology in Society 68: 101850. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101850.
  • Nevens, F., N. Frantzeskaki, L. Gorissen, and D. Loorbach. 2013. “Urban Transition Labs: Co-Creating Transformative Action for Sustainable Cities.” Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001.
  • Nelson, A., and F. Edwards. 2020. Food for Degrowth: Perspectives and Practices. Routledge.
  • Nelson, J. P., C. L. Selin, and C. T. Scott. 2021. “Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (3): 382–420. doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1957579.
  • Niitamo, V.-P., S. Kulkki, M. Eriksson, and K. A. Hribernik. 2006. “State-of-the-art and Good Practice in the Field of Living Labs.” 2006 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE), 1–8. doi:10.1109/ICE.2006.7477081.
  • Olejniczak, K., S. Borkowska-Waszak, A. Domaradzka-Widła, and Y. Park. 2020. “Policy Labs: The Next Frontier of Policy Design and Evaluation?” Policy & Politics 48 (1): 89–110. doi:10.1332/030557319X15579230420108.
  • Pallot, M., K. Pawar, and R. Santoro. 2013. “A User Experience Framework and Model Within Experiential Living Labs for Internet of Things.” 2013 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) & IEEE International Technology Management Conference, 1–15. doi:10.1109/ITMC.2013.7352688.
  • Pontes Luz, G., and R. Amaro e Silva. 2021. “Modeling Energy Communities with Collective Photovoltaic Self-Consumption: Synergies Between a Small City and a Winery in Portugal.” Energies 14 (2): 323. doi:10.3390/en14020323.
  • Renn, O. 2018. “Real-World Laboratories - the Road to Transdisciplinary Research?” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (1): 1–1. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.1.
  • Ribeiro, B., L. Bengtsson, P. Benneworth, S. Bührer, E. Castro-Martínez, M. Hansen, K. Jarmai, et al. 2018. “Introducing the Dilemma of Societal Alignment for Inclusive and Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 316–331. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033.
  • Ryghaug, M., T. M. Skjølsvold, and S. Heidenreich. 2018. “Creating Energy Citizenship Through Material Participation.” Social Studies of Science 48 (2): 283–303. doi:10.1177/0306312718770286.
  • Schäpke, N., F. Stelzer, G. Caniglia, M. Bergmann, M. Wanner, M. Singer-Brodowski, D. Loorbach, P. Olsson, C. Baedeker, and D. J. Lang. 2018. “Jointly Experimenting for Transformation? Shaping Real-World Laboratories by Comparing Them.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (1): 85–96. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16.
  • Schneidewind, U., K. Augenstein, F. Stelzer, and M. Wanner. 2018. “Structure Matters: Real-World Laboratories as a New Type of Large-Scale Research Infrastructure: A Framework Inspired by Giddens’ Structuration Theory.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (1): 12–17. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.5.
  • Schuurman, D. 2015. Bridging the gap Between Open and User Innovation?. Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation [PhD Dissertation, Ghent University]. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/5931264/file/5931265.pdf.
  • Setälä, M. 2017. “Connecting Deliberative Mini-Publics to Representative Decision Making.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (4): 846–863. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12207.
  • Silva, L. M. da, C. C. Bitencourt, K. Faccin, and T. Iakovleva. 2019. “The Role of Stakeholders in the Context of Responsible Innovation: A Meta-Synthesis.” Sustainability 11 (6): 1766. doi:10.3390/su11061766.
  • Sovacool, B. K., and P. L. Blyth. 2015. “Energy and Environmental Attitudes in the Green State of Denmark: Implications for Energy Democracy, Low Carbon Transitions, and Energy Literacy.” Environmental Science & Policy 54: 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.011.
  • Sovacool, B. K., D. J. Hess, and R. Cantoni. 2021. “Energy Transitions from the Cradle to the Grave: A Meta-Theoretical Framework Integrating Responsible Innovation, Social Practices, and Energy Justice.” Energy Research & Social Science 75: 102027. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102027.
  • Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
  • Timmermans, J., V. Blok, R. Braun, R. Wesselink, and RØ Nielsen. 2020. “Social Labs as an Inclusive Methodology to Implement and Study Social Change: The Case of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 410–426. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751.
  • Voytenko, Y., K. McCormick, J. Evans, and G. Schliwa. 2016. “Urban Living Labs for Sustainability and Low Carbon Cities in Europe: Towards a Research Agenda.” Journal of Cleaner Production 123: 45–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053.
  • Wittmayer, J. M., F. Avelino, B. Pel, and I. Campos. 2021. “Contributing to Sustainable and Just Energy Systems? The Mainstreaming of Renewable Energy Prosumerism Within and Across Institutional Logics.” Energy Policy 149), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112053.