The conceptual evolution of responsible research and innovation in China: a systematic literature review

References

• Bronson, K. 2019. “Looking Through a Responsible Innovation Lens at Uneven Engagements with Digital Farming.” NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 90–91:100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S., and A. Vaccaro. 2017. “Ethics, Technology and Organizational Innovation.” Journal of Business Ethics 143 (2): 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3061-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denyer, DT,D. 2009. “Producing a Systematic Review.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, edited by D. Buchanan and A. Bryman, 671–689. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Science with and for Society (HORIZON 2020 – Work Programme 2016–2017). Brussels: European Commission. E. Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., M. Liao, and Y. Zhao. 2019. “Exploring Complexity, Variety and the Necessity of RRI in a Developing Country: The Case of China.” Null 6:368–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603572.
   Google Scholar
• Gremmen, B., V. Blok, and B. Bovenkerk. 2019. “Responsible Innovation for Life: Five Challenges Agriculture Offers for Responsible Innovation in Agriculture and Food, and the Necessity of an Ethics of Innovation.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5-6): 673–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09808-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2011. “Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research..” Enterprise and work innovation studies 31: 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, H. 2017. “Keeping a lid on Open Science.” Nature 545 (7655): S62–S64. https://doi.org/10.1038/545S62a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Nouwens M. 2022. Strategic Settings for 6G: Pathways for China and the US. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. Report. https://alkhanadeq.com/static/media/uploads/files/Strategic%20Settings%20for%206G%20Pathways%20for%20China%20and%20the%20US.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Q. Ji, and D. Zhang. 2020. “Technological Catching up and Innovation Policies in China: What is Behind This Largely Successful Story?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153:119918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., R. Owen, J. Stilgoe, B. Wynne, A. Azevedo, A. de Campos, J. Chilvers, et al. 2014. “Responsible Innovation Across Borders: Tensions, Paradoxes and Possibilities.” Null 1:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922249.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, L., H. Rodríguez, and J. Chen. 2020. “Responsible Innovation in the Contexts of the European Union and China: Differences, Challenges and Opportunities.” Global Transitions 2:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellé, S., and B. Reber. 2015. “Responsible Innovation in the Light of Moral Responsibility.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2): 107–117. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2014.x017.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, A. J. K., P. A. Macnaghten, and D. Ludwig. 2019. RRI Practice Internal RRI Review. Project Deliverable 16.3, Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice (RRI-Practice), August.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Galindo, L., M. Monteiro, and P. Macnaghten. 2019. “‘Opening up’ Science Policy: Engaging with RRI in Brazil.” Null 6:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603568.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiu, D. 2015. “Anchoring European Governance: Two Versions of Responsible Research and Innovation and EU Fundamental Rights as ‘Normative Anchor Points’.” NanoEthics 9 (3): 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-015-0240-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomberg, R. v. 2013. A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 51–74. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan, A. D. 2020. “The Influence of National Culture on Responsible Innovation: A Case of CO2 Utilisation in Indonesia.” Technology in Society 62:101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeth, M., and J. D. Raffo. 2013. “What Makes Companies Pursue an Open Science Strategy?” Research Policy 42 (9): 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., M. Obach, E. Yaghmaei, V. Ikonen, K. Chatfield, and A. Brem. 2017. “The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaughten. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J. 2017. “Mapping the RRI Landscape: An Overview of Organisations, Projects, Persons, Areas and Topics.” In Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda?, edited by L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, and T. Swierstra, 21–47. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J., and V. Blok. A critical hermeneutic reflection on the paradigm-level assumptions underlying responsible innovation. Synthese 198 (Suppl 19), 4635–4666 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1839-z.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2010. “Organising Collective Responsibility: On Precaution, Codes of Conduct and Understanding Public Debate.” In Understanding Nanotechnology, edited by U. Fiedeler, 61–70. Heidelberg: AKA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R., and J. Hankins. 2019. International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wakunuma, K., F. de Castro, T. Jiya, E. A. Inigo, V. Blok, and V. Bryce. 2021. “Reconceptualising Responsible Research and Innovation from a Global South Perspective.” Null, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1944736.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P.-H. 2016. “. Responsible Innovation for Decent Nonliberal Peoples: A Dilemma?” Null 3:154–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, P., and C. Mitcham. 2021. “The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy in China: Field Philosophical Questioning.” Social Epistemology 35 (4): 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2020.1752842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, P., and W. Ravesteijn. 2019. “Chinese Road to Responsible Innovation: Constructing a Green Port in Dalian.” WIT Transactions on The Built Environment 187:109–119. https://doi.org/10.2495/MT190111.
   Google Scholar
• Yandong, Z., and M. Liao. 2019. “Chinese Perspectives on Responsible Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource, edited by Rene von Schomberg and Jonathan Hankins, 426–440. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar