562
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

He who gets slapped: how can clowning in film interrogate technoscientific culture and help enact the ideals of responsible innovation?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2233231 | Received 25 Oct 2022, Accepted 30 Jun 2023, Published online: 01 Aug 2023

References

  • Ashworth, P., J. Lacey, S. Sehic, and A.-M. Dowd. 2019. “Exploring the Value Proposition for RRI in Australia.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603571.
  • Åm, H. 2019. “Limits of Decentered Governance in Science-Society Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1605483.
  • Balmer, A. S., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, P. Schyfter, A. Mackenzie, and P. Martin. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867.
  • Berkovski, S. 2016. “A Naturalist View of Humiliation.” Phenomenology and Mind 11: 78–86. https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-20108.
  • Bliss, S. H. 1915. “The Origin of Laughter.” The American Journal of Psychology 26 (2): 236–246. https://doi.org/10.2307/1413253.
  • Bos, C., B. Walhout, A. Peine, and H. van Lente. 2014. “Steering with big Words: Articulating Ideographs in Research Programs.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922732.
  • Brown, N. 2000. “Organising/Disorganising the Breakthrough Motif. Dolly the Cloned ewe Meets Astrid the Hybrid pig.” In Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Science and Technology, edited by N. Brown, B. Rappert, and A. Webster, 87–110. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Carrier, M., and M. Gartzlaff. 2020. “Responsible Research and Innovation: Hopes and Fears in the Scientific Community in Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (2): 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1692571.
  • Chawla, D. S. 2018. “Assigning Authorship for Research Papers Can be Tricky. These Approaches Can Help. Science.” https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2018/12/assigning-authorship-research-papers-can-be-tricky-these-approaches-can-help.
  • Christen, M. 2011. Der Zirkusfilm: Exotismus, Konformität, Transgression. Marburg: Schüren.
  • Daston, L., and H. O. Sibum. 2003. “Introduction: Scientific Personae and Their Histories.” Science in Context 16 (1/2): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988970300067X.
  • Davies, S. R., M. Halpern, M. Horst, D. Kirby, and B. Lewenstein. 2019. “Science Stories as Culture: Experience, Identity, Narrative and Emotion in Public Communication of Science.” Journal of Science Communication 18: 50201. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18050201.
  • de Saille, S. 2014. “Fixed: The Science/Fiction of Human Enhancement.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882096.
  • Double, O. 2017. “Tragedy Plus Time: Transforming Life Experience Into Stand-Up Comedy.” New Theatre Quarterly 33 (2): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X17000057.
  • Eggleson, K., and S. A. Berry. 2015. “Macroethics Exploration with Impact: Technological Innovators Reconsider Profound Personal and Societal Questions After Viewing the Film FIXED: The Science/Fiction of Human Enhancement.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1038429.
  • Faulkes, Z. 2018. “Resolving Authorship Disputes by Mediation and Arbitration.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0057-z.
  • Fisher, E. 2019. “Difficulty and Doability Enacting Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1616270.
  • Florin, B. 2013. Transition and Transformation: Victor Sjöström in Hollywood 1923-1930. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Frayling, C. 2006. Mad, Bad and Dangerous? The Scientist and the Cinema. London: Reaktion Books.
  • Frodeman, R. 2019. “The Ethics of Infinite Impact.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1489172.
  • Gaycken, O. 2005. Devices of Curiosity: Early Cinema & Popular Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gilbert, C. J. 2014. “Standing Up to Combat Trauma.” Text and Performance Quarterly 34 (2): 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462937.2014.885558.
  • Glancy, H. M. 1992. “MGM Film Grosses, 1924–1948: The Eddie Mannix Ledger.” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 12 (2): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01439689200260081.
  • Goodall, J. 2020. “Engineers of Curiosity: The Barnum Era.” In Circus, Science and Technology: Dramatising Innovation, edited by A.-S. Jürgens, 15–32. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Grinbaum, A. 2020. “On the Scientist’s Moral Luck and Wholeheartedness.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup2): S12–S24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1805266.
  • Guston, D. H. 2015. “Want, Settle, Get.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1060794.
  • Guston, D. H. 2018. “ … Damned if you Don’t.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1506208.
  • Halpern, M. K., J. Sadowski, J. Eschrich, E. Finn, and D. H. Guston. 2016. “Stitching Together Creativity and Responsibility.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 36 (1): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616646637.
  • Hao, K. 2020. “A Leading AI Ethics Researcher Says She’s Been Fired from Google.” MIT Technology Review. 3 December 2020. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/12/03/1013065/google-ai-ethics-lead-timnit-gebru-fired/.
  • Haynes, R. 2007. “The Alchemist in Fiction: The Master Narrative.” In The Public Image of Chemistry, edited by J. Schummer, and B. B.-V. B. V. Tiggelen, 7–36. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
  • Hurlbut, J. B. 2015. “Reimagining Responsibility in Synthetic Biology.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1010770.
  • Jenkins, H. 1992. What Made Pistachio Nuts? Early Sound Comedy and the Vaudeville Aesthetic. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Jürgens, A.-S. 2016. “Circus as Idée Fixe and Hunger. Circomania in Fiction.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 18: 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2821.
  • Jürgens, A.-S. 2020. Circus, Science and Technology: Dramatising Innovation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jürgens, A.-S., A. Fiadotava, D. C. Tscharke, and J. N. Viaña. 2021. “Spreading Fun: Comic Zombies, Joker Viruses and Covid-19 Jokes.” Journal of Science & Popular Culture 4 (1): 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1386/jspc_00024_1.
  • Kafka, F. 1917. A Report to an Academy. Translation by Ian Johnston. Vancouver: Vancouver Island University.
  • Kaplan, M., and M. Dahlstrom. 2017. “How Narrative Functions in Entertainment to Communicate Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication, edited by K. H. Jamieson, D. M. Kahan, and D. A. Schefele, 310–319. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Källstrand, G. 2020. “Warburg’s Dogs. Nobel Laureates and Scientific Celebrity.” Celebrity Studies 13 (1): 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2020.1788402.
  • Kirby, D. A. 2011. Lab Coats in Hollywood. Science, Scientists, and Cinema. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Kuipers, G. 2006. Good Humor, Bad Taste. A Sociology of the Jokes. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Lunde, A. O. 2010. Nordic Exposures: Scandinavian Identities in Classical Hollywood Cinema. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Martin, R. A. 2007. The Psychology of Humor. An Integrative Approach. London: Elsevier.
  • Maza, S. 1996. “Stories in History: Cultural Narratives in Recent Works in European History.” The American Historical Review 101 (5): 1493–1515. https://doi.org/10.2307/2170180.
  • McGraw, A. P., C. Warren, L. Williams, and B. Leonard. 2012. “Too Close for Comfort, or Too far to Care? Finding Humor in Distant Tragedies and Close Mishaps.” Psychological Science 23: 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443831.
  • Nathanson, W. 1925. “‘He Who Gets Slapped.’ from the Culturalist Viewpoint.” The Open Court 1925 (1): 7–20.
  • Nerlich, B. 2009. “Breakthroughs and Disasters. The (Ethical) Use of Future-Oriented Metaphors in Science Communication.” In Communicating Biological Sciences: Ethical and Metaphorical Dimensions, edited by B. Nerlich, R. Elliott, and B. Larson, 201–218. London: Routledge.
  • Norris, M. 2010. “Kafka’s Hybrids. Thinking Animals and Mirrored Humans.” In Kafka’s Creatures. Animals, Hybrids, and Other Fantastic Beings, edited by M. Lucht, and D. Yarri, 17–31. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
  • Randles, S., E. Tancoigne, and P.-B. Joly. 2022. “Two Tribes or More? The Historical Emergence of Discourse Coalitions of Responsible Research and Innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 248–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2061306.
  • Reinhart, M., and C. Schendzielorz. 2020. “The Lottery in Babylon—On the Role of Chance in Scientific Success.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup2): S25–S29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1806429.
  • Shelley, M. W., J. S. Robert, E. Finn, and D. H. Guston. 2017. Frankenstein Annotated for Scientists, Engineers, and Creators of All Kinds. Boston: The MIT Press.
  • Sikes, P. 2009. “Will the Real Author Come Forward? Questions of Ethics, Plagiarism, Theft and Collusion in Academic Research Writing.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 32 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902749247.
  • Skal, David J. 1998. Screams of Reason: Mad Science and Modern Culture. New York: Norton.
  • Southwick, F. 2012. “All’s Not Fair in Science and Publishing.” The Scientist 26 (7): 24. https://www.the-scientist.com/critic-at-large/alls-not-fair-in-science-and-publishing-40801.
  • Tabarés, R., A. Loeber, M. Nieminen, M. J. Bernstein, E. Griessler, V. Blok, J. Cohen, H. Hönigmayer, U. Wunderle, and E. Frankus. 2022. “Challenges in the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation Across Horizon 2020.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2101211.
  • Theisen, B. 2002. “Kafka’s Circus Turns. ‘Auf der Galerie’ and ‘Erstes Leid’.” In  A Companion to the Works of Franz Kafka, edited by J. Rolleston, 171–186. New York: Camden House.
  • Wazeck, M. 2013. “Marginalization Processes in Science: The Controversy About the Theory of Relativity in the 1920s.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712469855.
  • Weingart, P. 2006. “Chemists and Their Craft in Fiction Film.” HYLE–International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 12 (1): 31–44.
  • White, F. H. 2016. “A Slap in the Face of American Taste: Transporting He Who Gets Slapped to American Audiences.” In Border Crossing: Russian Literature Into Film, edited by F. H. White, and A. Burry, 140–164. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • William, D. P. 2020. “Fitting the Description: Historical and Sociotechnical Elements of Facial Recognition and Anti-Black Surveillance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1831365.
  • Woolston, C. 2020. “Postdoc Survey Reveals Disenchantment with Working Life.” Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03191-7 (accessed 3 December 2020).