Critiques from within. A modest proposal for reclaiming critique for responsible innovation

References

• Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebke E. Bijker and John Law, 205-224. Cambridge/Mass., London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and P. Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swiwestra, and Jeroen Van Den Hoven, 19-35. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boenink, Marianne, and Olya Kudina. 2020, September 1. “Values in Responsible Research and Innovation: From Entities to Practices.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohacek, Johannes, and Isabelle M. Mansuy. 2015, September 29. “Molecular Insights Into Transgenerational Non-Genetic Inheritance of Acquired Behaviours.” Nature Reviews Genetics 16 (11): 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun Jensen, Caspar. 2019. “Vertiginous Worlds and Emetic Anthropologies.” In The World Multiple. Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds, edited by Keiichi Omura, Grant Jun Otsuki, Shiho Satsuka, and Atsuro Morita, 37–51. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callard, Felicity, and Des Fitzgerald. 2015. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9781137407955.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Lisa S., Mary Ellen Macdonald, Franco A. Carnevale, and S. Robin Cohen. 2018. “‘I Am Only Dealing with the Acute Issues’: How Medical Ward ‘Busyness’ Constrains Care of the Dying.” Health 22 (5): 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459317708822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, Helen Stanton. 2010. No Place for Dying. Hospitals and the Ideology of Rescue. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chiapperino, Luca. 2021, March 1. “Environmental Enrichment: An Experiment in Biosocial Intervention.” BioSocieties 16 (1): 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00181-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Emma, John Cromby, Dimitris Papadopoulos, and Cristina Tufarelli. 2016, March 1. “Social Epigenetics: A Science of Social Science?” The Sociological Review Monographs 64 (1): 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/2059-7932.12019.
   Google Scholar
• Day, Jeremy J. 2014, September. “New Approaches to Manipulating the Epigenome.” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 16 (3): 345–357. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2014.16.3/jday
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussauge, Isabelle, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, and Francis Lee. 2015. Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier, ed. 2012. A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2017. ““Response- Able Practices” or “New Bureaucracies of Virtue”: The Challenges of Making RRI Work in Academic Environments.” In Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda?, edited by Lotte Asveld, Rietje van Dam-Mieras, Tsjalling Swierstra, Saskia Lavrijssen, Kees Linse, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 49–68. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_4
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2018. “Responsible Research and Innovation.” In In Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society, edited by Sarah Gibbon, Barbara Prainsack, Stephen Hilgartner, and Janette Lamoreaux, 108–116. London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315451695
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Des, and Felicity Callard. 2015, January. “Social Science and Neuroscience Beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414537319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diatrics 6 (1): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1965. Awareness of Dying. Brunswick, London: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Glerup, Cecilie, Sarah R. Davies, and Maja Horst. 2017. ““Nothing Really Responsible Goes on Here”: Scientists’ Experience and Practice of Responsibility.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (3): 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1378462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, Anthony J. 2014, February. “Environmental Enrichment and Brain Repair: Harnessing the Therapeutic Effects of Cognitive Stimulation and Physical Activity to Enhance Experience-Dependent Plasticity.” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 40 (1): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillersdal, L., A. P. Jespersen, B. Oxlund, and B. Bruun. 2020. “Affect and Effect in Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration.” Science & Technology Studies 33 (2): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.63305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerak-Zuiderent, Sonia. 2015. “Keeping Open by Re-Imagining Laughter and Fear.” The Sociological Review 63 (4): 897–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Sharon. 2005.  … and a Time to Die. How American Hospitals Shape the End of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landecker, Hannah, and Aaron Panofsky. 2013, July 30. “From Social Structure to Gene Regulation, and Back: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Epigenetics for Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 39 (1): 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. 1st edition. London: New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2009. “Collateral Realities.” December 29. http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009CollateralRealities.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Livne, Roy. 2019. Values at the End of Life. The Logic of Palliative Care. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, Margaret. 2013, July. “The Epigenome and Nature/Nurture Reunification: A Challenge for Anthropology.” Medical Anthropology 32 (4): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2012.746973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 2000. “Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society 17 (3): 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Michael. 2012. “Self-Exemplifying Revolutions? Notes on Kuhn and Latour.” Social Studies of Science 42 (3): 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712439120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, Anna. 2021. “Abandoning Questionnaires: Improving Quality of Life in Daily Nephrology Practice.” Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 9 (1): 53–63. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.3545
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Anna. Forthcoming. “To Improve Quality of Life'. Diverging Enactments of a Value in Nephrology Clinical Practices..” Health. An Interdisciplinary Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Anna, and Annemarie Mol. 2019. “Talking Pleasures, Writing Dialects: Outlining Research on Schmecka.” Ethnos 84 (5): 772–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2018.1486334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesman, Jessica. 2008. Uncertainty in Medical Innovation. Experienced Pioneers in Neonatal Care. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2006a. “Proving or Improving: On Health Care Research as a Form of Self-Reflection.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (3): 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2006b. “Koning schaak. Mannen prijzen als stijloefening.” Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies 9 (3): 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and The Problem of Patient Choice. Milton Park and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2010. “Perhaps Tears Should Not Be Counted but Wiped Away: On Quality and Improvement in Dementia Care.” In In Care in Practice: On Tinkering In Clinics, Homes and Farms, edited by Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols, 277–300. Frankfurt am Main: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, Vinogran, Olaia Martínez-Iglesias, and Ramón Cacabelos. 2022. “Chapter 20 - Targeting Epigenetics as Future Treatments of Trauma- and Stress-or-Related Disorders. Epidrugs and Epinutraceuticals.” In In Epigenetics of Stress and Stress Disorders, edited by Nagy A. Youssef, Vol. 31, 317–392. Translational Epigenetics. Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128230398000125.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Nicole. 2016, March 1. “Model Homes for Model Organisms: Intersections of Animal Welfare and Behavioral Neuroscience Around the Environment of the Laboratory Mouse.” BioSocieties 11 (1): 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewöhner, Jörg. 2015, April 3. “Epigenetics: Localizing Biology Through Co-Laboration.” New Genetics and Society 34 (2): 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2015.1036154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewöhner, Jörg. 2016. “Yhteistyöstävä Antropologia: Kuinka edistää refleksiivisyyttä [Co-laborative anthropology: Crafting reflexivities experimentally].” In Etnologinen tulkinta ja analyysi: Kohti avoimempaa tutkimusprosessia [Ethnological interpretation and analysis: Towards a transparent research process], edited by J. Jouhki and T. Steel. 81–125. Helsinki: Ethnos.
   Google Scholar
• Österreichische Gesellschaft für Nephrologie. 2016. Nierenersatztherapie 2016. Vorläufige Daten. www.nephro.at retrieved on the 8th August 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, Nelly. 2020. Resilient Cyborgs: Living and Dying with Pacemakers and Defibrillators. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, René von Schomberg, and Phil Macnaghten. 2021, May 4. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijkeren, Nienke van, Iris Wallenburg, and Roland Bal. 2021. “Triage as an Infrastructure of Care: The Intimate Work of Redistributing Medical Care in Nursing Homes.” Sociology of Health & Illness 43 (7): 1682–1699. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pols, Jeannette. 2004. “Good Care: Enacting a Complex Ideal in Long-Term Psychiatry.” PhD thesis, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, Jeannette. 2005. “Enacting Appreciation: Beyond the Patient Perspective.” Health Care Analysis 13 (3): 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-6448-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, Eugen Octav, Vincent Blok, and Renate Wesselink. 2020, January 1. “Discussion Structures as Tools for Public Deliberation.” Public Understanding of Science 29 (1): 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519880675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul, and Nikolas Rose. 2006, June. “Biopower Today.” BioSocieties 1 (2): 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855206040014.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, Sally, Philippe Larédo, Allison Marie Loconto, Bart Walhout, and Ralf Lindner. 2016. “‘Framings and Frameworks: Six Grand Narratives of de Facto RRI.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project, np. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). https://hal.science/hal-01320462.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nicolas. 1990. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandi, Carmen, and József Haller. 2015. “Stress and the Social Brain: Behavioural Effects and Neurobiological Mechanisms.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16 (5): 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomberg, Von, René, and J. Hankins, eds. 2019. The International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource. 12–32. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. 1st ed. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shanley, D. 2022. Making Responsibility Matter: The Emergence of Responsible Innovation as an Intellectual Movement, 249. Maastricht: Maastricht University. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20221208ds
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, Vicky. 2010. “Good Farming: Control or Care?” In In Care in Practice: On Tinkering In Clinics, Homes and Farms, edited by Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols, 235–257. Frankfurt am Main: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike. 2020a, April 1. “Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: From Critique in and of the Neurosciences to Socio-Technical Integration Research as a Practice of Critique in R(R)I.” NanoEthics 14 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00362-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike, Erik Fisher, and Alexandra Hausstein. 2020b, November 25. “From Affect to Action: Choices in Attending to Disconcertment in Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values. 0162243920974088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920974088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and Anselm Strauss. 1999. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 (1-2): 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008651105359
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, and David H. Guston. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Felt Ulrike, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2006. “Precaution, Foresight and Sustainability: Reflection and Reflexivity in the Governance of Science and Technology.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://china.elgaronline.com/display/9781845425821.00020.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Struhkamp, Rita M. 2005. “Patient Autonomy: A View from the Kitchen.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8 (1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-004-1134-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudnow, David. 1967. Passing On. The Social Organization of Dying. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Szyf, Moshe. 2009. “Epigenetics, DNA Methylation, and Chromatin Modifying Drugs.” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 49 (1): 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061008-103102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Stefan. 1999. Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verran, Helen. 2001. Science and an African Logic. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, René. 2011. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation’.” In Technikfolgenabschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft. Wiesbaden: VSVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, René. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, Maggy Heintz, and John R. Bessant, 51–71. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, Ayo, and Nicolas Rose. 2015. “The Governmentalization of Living: Calculating Global Health.” Economy and Society 44 (1): 60–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.983830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109 (1): 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar