A model of social responsibility for start-ups: developing a cross-fertilisation of responsible innovation, the lean start-up approach, and the quadruple helix approach

References

• Asveld, L., eds. 2017. Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda? Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, R. J. 2014. “Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable Development.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21 (5): 258–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, C. A., and K. G. Shaver. 2020. “Of Horses and Jockeys: Perceptions by Academic Entrepreneurs.” Entrepreneurship Research Journal 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2019-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, S. 2013. “Why the Lean Start-Up Changes Everything.” Harvard Business Review 91 (5): 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2018. “Innovation as Ethos: Moving Beyond CSR and Practical Wisdom in Innovation Ethics.”
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2019. “16. From Participation to Interruption: Toward an Ethics of Stakeholder Engagement, Participation and Partnership in Corporate Social Responsibility and Responsible Innovation. International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource, 243
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2022. “Innovation as Ethos: Moving Beyond CSR and Practical Wisdom in Innovation Ethics.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Management, 897–910. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and T. B. Long. 2016. “The Role of Responsible Innovation in the Technology Assessment of Smart Farming Technologies in Europe.” In Food futures: ethics, science and culture, 2–10. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., L. Hoffmans, and E. F. Wubben. 2015. “Stakeholder Engagement for Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector: Critical Issues and Management Practices.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2): 147–164. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2015.x003
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., E. A. Inigo, A. Novelskaitė, R. Pučėtaitė, A. Meiji, K. Wakunuma, T. Jiya, et al. 2020. “D5.1. Recommendations for the Development of Competitive Advantage Based on RRI.” https://rring.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/D-5.1.-RECOMMENDATIONS-FOR-THE-DEVELOPMENT-OF-A-COMPETITIVE-ADVANTAGE-BASED-ON-RRI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and P. Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2, 19–35. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., V. Scholten, and T. B. Long. 2018. “Responsible Innovation in Industry and the Importance of Customer Orientation: Introduction to the Special Issue.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 21 (4): 455–462. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2018.x001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V., T. Tempels, E. Pietersma, and L. Jansen. 2017. “Exploring Ethical Decision Making in Responsible Innovation: The Case of Innovations for Healthy Food.” In Responsible Innovation 3, 209–230. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bortolini, R. F., M. N. Cortimiglia, A. D. M. F. Danilevicz, and A. Ghezzi. 2018. Lean Startup: A Comprehensive Historical Review. Management Decision.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and V. Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1987. “Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 83–103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cane, P. 2016. “Role Responsibility.” The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3): 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-016-9235-8
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E., and D. Campbell. 2009. “'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3/4): 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E., and D. Campbell. 2012. “Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems.” In Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems, 1–63. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caroll, A. 1979. “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance.” Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497–505.
   Google Scholar
• Ceicyte, J., M. Petraite, V. Blok, and E. Yaghmaei. 2021. “Responsible Innovation in Industry: The Role of Firm’s Multi-Stakeholder Network.” In Bio# Futures: Foreseeing and Exploring the Bioeconomy, 581–603. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Corvellec, H., A. F. Stowell, and N. Johansson. 2022. “Critiques of the Circular Economy.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 26 (2): 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidsson, Per. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Opportunities and the Entrepreneurship Nexus: A Re-Conceptualization.” Journal of Business Venturing 30 (5): 674–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, D. E. 2017. “Start-up Sustainability: An Insurmountable Cost or a Life-Giving Investment?” Journal of Cleaner Production 156: 838–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declich, A. 2014. “Aspettative e narrazioni: spunti per una riflessione interdisciplinare.” Quaderni di Sociologia 64: 111–138. https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.402
   Google Scholar
• Dew, Nicholas, and Saras D. Sarasvathy. 2007. “Innovations, Stakeholders & Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3): 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9234-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R., E. Ries, and S. Dillard. 2012. “Hypothesis-driven Entrepreneurship: The Lean Startup.” Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Case, 812–095.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., D. Vladimirova, M. Holgado, K. Van Fossen, M. Yang, E. A. Silva, and C. Y. Barlow. 2017. “Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models.” Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (5): 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, A., and B. Ewert. 2015. “Social innovation for social cohesion.” New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_6
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, G., and L. Malmborg. 2018. “Quadruple Helix Model Organisation and Tensions in Participatory Design Teams.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, D. L., and A. Brem. 2017. “How do Entrepreneurs Think They Create Value? A Scientific Reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup Approach.” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 13 (1): 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0411-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston.: Pitman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S.O., & R. J. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures, September.
   Google Scholar
• Garst, J., V. Blok, O. Branzei, L. Jansen, and O. S. Omta. 2019. “Toward a Value-Sensitive Absorptive Capacity Framework: Navigating Intervalue and Intravalue Conflicts to Answer the Societal Call for Health.” Business & Society 60 (6): 1349–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garst, Jilde, Vincent Blok, Léon Jansen, and Onno S. W. F. Omta. 2017. “Responsibility Versus Profit: The Motives of Food Firms for Healthy Product Innovation.” Sustainability 9 (12): 2286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gbadegeshin, S. A., and L. Heinonen. 2016. “Application of the Lean Start-up Technique in the Commercialisation of Business Ideas and Innovations.” International Journal of Business Management and Research 43 (1): 1270–1285.
   Google Scholar
• Ghezzi, A. 2019. “Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146: 945–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezzi, A., and A. Cavallo. 2020. “Agile Business Model Innovation in Digital Entrepreneurship: Lean Startup Approaches.” Journal of Business Research 110: 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianni, R. 2016. Responsibility and Freedom: The Ethical Realm of RRI. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. 1999. “Science's new Social Contract with Society.” Nature 402: C81–C84. https://doi.org/10.1038/35011576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P. A., W. Gornall, S. N. Kaplan, and I. A. Strebulaev. 2020. “How do Venture Capitalists Make Decisions?” Journal of Financial Economics 135 (1): 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, S. 2001. “Stakeholder Theory: What it Means for Corporate Governance.” Policy 17 (2): 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H .L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques, N., and M. Öberg. 2016. “CSR as a Tool for Startups to Gain External Financing: A Qualitative Study in a Swedish Context.”
   Google Scholar
• Hockerts, Kai, and Rolf Wüstenhagen. 2010. “Greening Goliaths Versus Emerging Davids — Theorizing About the Role of Incumbents and new Entrants in Sustainable Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 25 (5): 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koops, B., I. Oosterlaken, R. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, eds. 2015. Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches and Applications. New York: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., and A. P. Knight. 2005. “Innovation Implementation: Overcoming the Challenge.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (5): 243–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., H. P. Silva, R. R. Oliveira, and L. Rivard. 2020. “The Responsible Innovation in Health Tool and the Need to Reconcile Formative and Summative Ends in RRI Tools for Business.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 646–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1844974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligtvoet, A., E. Cuppen, O. Di Ruggero, K. Hemmes, U. Pesch, J. Quist, and D. Mehos. 2016. “New Future Perspectives Through Constructive Conflict: Exploring the Future of gas in the Netherlands.” Futures 78: 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T. B., and V. Blok. 2017. “When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough get Going: Towards a new–more Critical–Engagement with Responsible Research and Innovation in an age of Trump, Brexit, and Wider Populism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1): 64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T. B., and V. Blok. 2022. “Managing the Responsibilities of Doing Good and Avoiding Harm in Sustainability-Orientated Innovations: Example from Agri-Tech Start-Ups in the Netherlands.” In Putting Responsible Research and Innovation into Practice: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach, 249–272. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Long, T. B., and V. Blok. 2018. “Integrating the Management of Socio-Ethical Factors Into Industry Innovation: Towards a Concept of Open Innovation 2.0.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 21 (4): 463–486. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2017.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T. B., V. Blok, S. Dorrestijn, and P. Macnaghten. 2020. “The Design and Testing of a Tool for Developing Responsible Innovation in Start-up Enterprises.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1608785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubberink, R., V. Blok, J. Van Ophem, and O. Omta. 2017. “Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices.” Sustainability 9 (5): 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubberink, R., V. Blok, J. van Ophem, and O. Omta. 2019. “Responsible Innovation by Social Entrepreneurs: An Exploratory Study of Values Integration in Innovations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1572374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luise, V. 2019. “Le forme dell'innovazione nell'ideologia californiana: Le retoriche, i modelli e le trasformazioni nell'economia startup. EGEA spa.”
   Google Scholar
• Maccarrone, P., and A. M. Contri. 2021. “Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility Into Corporate Strategy: The Role of Formal Tools, Sustainability.” MDPI 13 (22): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mansoori, Y. 2017. “Enacting the Lean Startup Methodology: The Role of Vicarious and Experiential Learning Processes.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 23 (5): 812–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansoori, Y., and M. Lackeus. 2020. “Comparing Effectuation to Discovery-Driven Planning, Prescriptive Entrepreneurship, Business Planning, Lean Startup, and Design Thinking.” Small Business Economics 54: 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00153-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maon, F., A. Lindgreen, and V. Swaen. 2010. “Organizational Stages and Cultural Phases: A critical Review and a Consolidative Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Development.” International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1): 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschalek, I., V. Blok, M. Bernstein, R. Braun, J. Cohen, M. Hofer, and R. Kumar Thapa. 2022. “The social lab as a method for experimental engagement in participatory research.” Joursnal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 419–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinuzzi, A., V. Blok, A. Brem, B. Stahl, and N. Schönherr. 2018. Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry—Challenges, Insights and Perspectives, 702. Vol. 10. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective.” The Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1979. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by R. K. Merton, 267–278. (First publication: 1942). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., and M. Walzer. 1995. Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, S. P. D. O., and E. Carayannis. 2017. The Quadruple Innovation Helix Nexus: A Smart Growth Model, Quantitative Empirical Validation and Operationalization for OECD Countries. New York: Palgrave/Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters, How It Can Be Accelerated.
   Google Scholar
• Nazarko, Łukasz. 2019. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry: From Ethical Acceptability to Social Desirability.” In Corporate Social Responsibility in the Manufacturing and Services Sectors, edited by Paulina Golinska-Dawson, and Małgorzata Spychała, 127–138. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33851-9_7
   Google Scholar
• Novitzky, P., M. J. Bernstein, V. Blok, R. Braun, T. T. Chan, W. Lamers, E. Griessler, et al. 2020. “Improve Alignment of Research Policy and Societal Values.” Science 369 (6499): 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oertwig, N., et al. 2017. “Integration of Sustainability Into the Corporate Strategy.” In Sustainable Manufacturing. Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management, edited by R. Stark, G. Seliger, and J. Bonvoisin, 175–200. Cham.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48514-0_12
   Google Scholar
• ORBIT RI. 2022. “The Keys of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Accessed January 21, 2022 https://www.orbit-rri.org/resources/keys-of-rri/
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. H. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–51. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, E. O., V. Blok, and R. Wesselink. 2020a. “Discussion Structures as Tools for Public Deliberation.” Public Understanding of Science 29 (1): 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519880675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa, E. O., V. Blok, and R. Wesselink. 2020b. “A Processual Approach to Friction in Quadruple Helix Collaborations.” Science and Public Policy 47: 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer. 2006. “Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Harvard Bus Rev 84: 78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praszkier, R., and A. Nowak. 2011. Social Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quaranta, G., and E. Mastropietro. 2003. Le condizioni del successo. Linee guida per la creazione d’impresa destinate alla consulenza e alla formazione. Roma: CERFE, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., E. Tancoigne, and P.-B. Joly. 2022. “Two Tribes or More? The Historical Emergence of Discourse Coalitions of Responsible Research and Innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 248–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2061306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retolaza, J. L., M. Ruiz, and L. San-Jose. 2009. “CSR in Business Start-ups: An Application Method for Stakeholder Engagement.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16 (6): 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, E. 2011a. The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, E. 2011b. The Lean Startup. New Youk: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and A. Rip. 2018. “The Past and Future of RRI.” Futures of Science and Technology in Society 10 (1): 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. 1996. “Uncertainty and Technological Change.” In Technology and Growth: Conference Series No.40, edited by J. C. Fuhrer, and J. Sneddon Little. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A., and A. Tencati. 2009. “Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-Sized, and Large Firms.” Journal of Business Ethics 85: 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. K., N. Mejlgaard, and L. Degn. 2021. “Organizational Patterns of RRI: How Organizational Properties Relate to RRI Implementation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1975376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, V. E., and V. Blok. 2015. “Foreword: Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2): 101–105. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2015.x006
   Google Scholar
• Shakeel, J., A. Mardani, A. G. Chofreh, F. A. Goni, and J. J. Klemeš. 2020. “Anatomy of Sustainable Business Model Innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 261: 121201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman. 2000. “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” Acad. Manag. Rev 25 (1): 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanley, D. 2021. “Imagining the Future Through Revisiting the Past: The Value of History in Thinking About R(R)I’s Possible Future(s).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1882748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., E. Borsella, A. Porcari, and E. Mantovani. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in ICT: Challenges for Industry.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by René von Schomberg, 367–378. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., M. Obach, E. Yaghmaei, V. Ikonen, K. Chatfield, and A. Brem. 2017. “The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamm, I., A. D. Cruz, and L. Cailluet. 2019. “Entrepreneurial Groups.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 44 (170): 7–41.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm, I., and M. Gutzeit. 2021. “Group Conditions for Entrepreneurial Visions: Role Confidence, Hierarchical Congruences, and the Imagining of Future in Entrepreneurial Groups.” Small Business Economics 59 (3): 1023–1041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromberg, Per, Steven Kaplan, Berk Sensoy, and Per. Strömberg. 2009. “Should Investors Bet on the Jockey or the Horse? Evidence from the Evolution of Firms from Early Business Plans to Public Companies.” Journal of Finance 64: 75–115. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.657721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J., V. Blok, R. Braun, R. Wesselink, and RØ Nielsen. 2020. “Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: The case of responsible research and innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. 2011. “The Relation Between Forward-Looking and Backward-Looking Responsibility.” In Moral Responsibility: Beyond Free Will and Determinism, edited by N. A. Vincent, I. van de Poel, and J. van den Hoven, 37–52. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I., L. Asveld, S. Flipse, P. Klaassen, V. Scholten, and E. Yaghmaei. 2017. “Company Strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A Conceptual Model.” Sustainability 9 (11): 2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., L. Asveld, S. Flipse, P. Klaassen, Z. Kwee, M. Maia, E. Yaghmaei, et al. 2020. “Learning to do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1791506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. 2020. “RRI Measurement and Assessment: Some Pitfalls and a Proposed way Forward.” In Assessment of Responsible Innovation, 339–360. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., and M. Sand. 2018. “Varieties of Responsibility: Two Problems of Responsible Innovation.” Synthese 198: 4769–4787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01951-7.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoven, J., T. Swierstra, B. J. Koops, and J. Romijn, eds. 2014. Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues. London: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Visintin, F., and D. Pittino. 2014. “Founding Team Composition and Early Performance of University—Based Spin-off Companies.” Technovation 34 (1): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinea, C. L., M. Logger, F. Rauf, and N. Roijakkers. 2019. “Drivers for Sustainable Business Models in Start-Ups: Multiple Case Studies.” Sustainability 11 (24): 6884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddock, S., and C. Bodwell. 2017. Total Responsibility Management: The Manual. 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280402
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wiarda, M., G. van de Kaa, E. Yaghmaei, and N. Doorn. 2021. “A Comprehensive Appraisal of Responsible Research and Innovation: From Roots to Leaves.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2021. “Does Tech Need a New Narrative? In Silicon Valley, ‘Disruption’ is Giving way to ‘Building’. What Will be Built?” Letter from Silicon Valley, the New Yorker, June 18, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. 2000. Real Science. What It Is, and What it Means. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, H., L. Landeweerd, and A. Van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar