It takes two to tango: toward a political concept of responsible innovation

References

• Arendt, H. 1977. “Public Rights and Private Interests.” In Small Comforts for Hard Times: Humanists on Public Policy, edited by M. Mooney, and F. Stuber. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Åm, H. 2019. “Limits of Decentered Governance in Science-Society Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1605483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2014. “Look Who’s Talking: Responsible Innovation, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negotiation Processes.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.924239.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2017. “Bridging the Gap Between Individual and Corporate Responsible Behaviour: Toward a Performative Concept of Corporate Codes.” Philosophy of Management 16 (2): 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0045-7.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2018. “Towards an Ontology of Innovation: On the New, the Political-Economic Dimension and the Intrinsic Risks Involved in Innovation Processes.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Engineering, edited by D. P. Michelfelder, and N. Doorn. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2021. “What is Innovation? Laying the Ground for a Philosophy of Innovation.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 25 (1): 72–96. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2020109129.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2022. “The Ontology of Creation: Towards a Philosophical Account of the Creation of World in Innovation Processes.” Foundations of Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09848-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2023. “The Earth Means the World to me: Earth- and World-Interest in Times of Climate Change.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Climate Change, edited by G. Pellegrino, and M. Di Paola, 1–17. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16960-2_105-1.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and P. Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 19–35. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and L. Von Schomberg. 2022. “Introduction.” In Putting Responsible Research and Innovation Into Practice, edited by V. Blok. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14710-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• Böhmer, M., T. S. Saponas, and J. Teevan. 2013. “Smartphone Use does not have to be Rude: Making Phones a Collaborative Presence in Meetings.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493237.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. R., and W. W. Wilmot. 2006. Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want. Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• De Hoop, E., A. Pols, and H. Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union: A Problem Solving Approach to Fuel Innovation Led Growth. LU: Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Horizon 2020: work programme 2018-2020: Science with and for Society. Resource document. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-swfs_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2017. “Response-able Practices” or “New Bureaucracies of Virtue”: The Challenges of Making RRI Work in Academic Environments.” In Responsible Innovation 3, edited by L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, and J. van den Hoven. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A., C. Coenen, and A. Grunwald. 2012. “Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement.” NanoEthics 6 (3): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0155-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., and L. Soete. 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 2000. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2015. Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, W. R. 2012. “Open Innovation and Stakeholder Engagement.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 7 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000300001.
   Google Scholar
• GREAT. 2014. Project Deliverable 2.3. Resource Document. www.great-project.eu/deliverables_files/deliverables02.
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, A., and C. Groves. 2013. “What is “Responsible” About Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 119–142. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2010. “From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology.” NanoEthics 4 (2): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-010-0088-5.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Emerging Technological Practices.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 326–338. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00031.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., W. Pearce, and A. Taylor. 2017. “Against the Tide of Depoliticization: The Politics of Research Governance.” Policy Politics 45 (3): 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14681503832036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, Z. 2014. The Social Labs Revolution: A New Approach to Solving Our Most Complex Challenges. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1977. “The Turning.” In The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., C. Kaletka, and A. Schröder, eds. 2021. “A Research Agenda for Social Innovation: The Emergence of a Research Field.” In A Research Agenda for Social Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789909357.00007.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 1993. Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Paragon House.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., V. Blok, M. Garnier, P. Macnaghten, and A. Pols. 2022. “What’s Wrong with Global Challenges?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.2000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., and P. Macnaghten. 2019. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Innovation Governance: A Framework for Responsible and Just Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markell, P. 2011. “Arendt’s Work: On the Architecture of The Human Condition.” College Literature 38 (1): 15–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, A. D., and E. Garbee. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in a Culture of Entrepreneurship: A US Perspective.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 488–502. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00043.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, N. C., and R. S. Weiss. 1955. “The Function and Meaning of Work and the Job.” American Sociological Review 20 (2): 191–198. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancy, J.-L. 2000. Being Singular Plural. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, J. 2019. “The Goal is to Automate Us”: Welcome to the Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/20/shoshana-zuboff-age-of-surveillance-capitalism-google-facebook.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts. 1995. “Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15 (4): 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2010. “A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience.” Poiesis & Praxis 7 (1): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-010-0081-7.
   Google Scholar
• Novitzky, P., M. J. Bernstein, V. Blok, R. Braun, T. T. Chan, W. Lamers, A. Loeber, I. Meijer, R. Lindner, and E. Griessler. 2020. “Improve Alignment of Research Policy and Societal Values.” Science 369 (6499): 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and M. Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation: Process and Politics.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 35–48. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00009.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch2.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passerin, M. 2019. “Hannah Arendt.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/arendt/.
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, S. 2016. “Process, Outcomes, Virtues: The Normative Strategies of Responsible Research and Innovation and the Challenge of Moral Pluralism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1258945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penttilä, L. 2022. “Is Responsible Innovation Possible? The Problem of Depoliticization for a Normative Framework of RI.” NOvation: Critical Studies of Innovation, 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. 2021. “Imaginaries of Innovation: Turning Technology Development Into a Public Issue.” Science and Public Policy 48 (2): 257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S. M., and J. Juhl. 2017. “Innovation and the Political State: Beyond the Myth of Technologies and Markets.” In Critical Studies of Innovation, edited by B. Godin, and D. Vinck, 68–94. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, E. O., and V. Blok. 2022. “Responsible Innovation in the age of Science Conspiracism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2116804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijers, W. 2020. “Responsible Innovation Between Virtue and Governance: Revisiting Arendt’s Notion of Work as Action.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1806524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, H., A. Eizagirre, and A. Ibarra. 2019. “Dynamics of Responsible Innovation Constitution in European Union Research Policy: Tensions, Possibilities and Constraints.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 167–180. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00018.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., and V. Blok. 2023. “Stop Re-inventing the Wheel: Or How ELSA and RRI can align.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2196151.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, K. R., and P. Pandey. 2019. “Indian Perspectives on Responsible Innovation and Frugal Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 455–473. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00041.
   Google Scholar
• Stemerding, D. 2019. “From Technology Assessment to Responsible Research and Innovation in Synthetic Biology.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 339–354. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00026.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2019. “Shared Space and Slow Science in Geoengineering Research.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 259–270. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00026.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “Opening up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J., and V. Blok. 2021. “A Critical Hermeneutic Reflection on the Paradigm-Level Assumptions Underlying Responsible Innovation.” Synthese 198 (S19): 4635–4666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1839-z.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, J., V. Blok, R. Braun, R. Wesselink, and RØ Nielsen. 2020. “Social Labs as an Inclusive Methodology to Implement and Study Social Change: The Case of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, P. 2017. Innovation management and new product development. 6th ed. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I. 2013. “Translating Values Into Design Requirements.” In Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process, edited by D. P. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, and D. E. Goldberg, 253–266. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven, J. 2013. “Value Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 75–83. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch4.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Burg, S. 2014. “On the Hermeneutic Need for Future Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882556.
   Google Scholar
• Van Huijstee, M. M., M. Francken, and P. Leroy. 2007. “Partnerships for Sustainable Development: A Review of Current Literature.” Environmental Sciences 4 (2): 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430701526336.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882097.
   Google Scholar
• Van Veenstra, A. F., E. A. van Zoonen, and N. Helberger. 2021. ELSA Labs for Human Centric Innovation in AI. Resource Document. https://nlaic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ELSA-Labs-for-Human-Centric-Innovation-in-AI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2019. “Why Responsible Innovation?” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by R. von Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 12–32. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00006.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2020. “In Memory of Karl-Otto Apel: The Challenge of a Universalistic Ethics of Co-Responsibility.” In: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract = 3515173.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, L., and V. Blok. 2018. The Turbulent Age of Innovation. In: Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01950-8.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, L., and V. Blok. 2019. “Technology in the Age of Innovation: Responsible Innovation as a new Subdomain Within the Philosophy of Technology.” Philosophy & Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00386-3.
   Google Scholar
• Zwier, J., V. Blok, and P. Lemmens. 2016. “Phenomenology and the Empirical Turn: A Phenomenological Analysis of Postphenomenology.” Philosophy and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0221-7.
   Google Scholar