Challenge-driven innovation and responsible innovation: dynamics and disconnects explored through the UK’s industrial biotechnology sector

References

• Adams, V., M. Murphy, and A. Clarke. 2009. “Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality.” Subjectivity 28 (1): 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.18
   Google Scholar
• Alvial-Palavicino, C. 2016. “The future as practice. A framework to understand anticipation in science and technology.” TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 6 (2): 135–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A., K. Bulpin, and S. Molyneux-Hodgson. 2016. Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and M. Michael. 2003. “A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI. 2020. “PAS 440:2020 Responsible Innovation – Fast Track Standard.” https://shop.bsigroup.com/products/responsible-innovation-guide/standard.
   Google Scholar
• BSI. 2021. “Industrial Biotechnology Strategic Roadmap for Standards and Regulation.” Accessed August 31, 2023. https://www.bsigroup.com/globalassets/localfiles/en-gb/standards-services/consulting/BSI-industrial-biotechnology-strategic-roadmap-for-standards-and-regulations-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chataway, J., T. Ciarli, S. Arora, I. Steenmans, J. Assa, V. Arza, J. Ouma-Mugabe, V. R. Sulaiman, N. Mittal, and H. Confrafria. 2022. “Chapter 13: Areas for Policy Action.” In Changing Directions: Steering Science, Technology and Innovation Towards the Sustainable Development Goals, edited by T. Ciarli. STRINGS, SPRU, University of Sussex. https://strings.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/STRINGS_Changing_Directions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L., and R. Kitney. 2020. “Developing synthetic biology for industrial biotechnology application.” Biochemical Society Transactions 48 (1): 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daimer, S., A. Havas, K. Cuhls, M. Yorulmaz, and P. Vrgovic. 2021. “Multiple futures for society, research, and innovation in the European Union: jumping to 2038.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 148–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1978692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deserti, A., F. Rizzo, and M. Smallman. 2020. “Experimenting with co-design in STI policy making.” Policy Design and Practice 3 (2): 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1764692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, H. 2022. “Britain is Paving the Way for Gene-Edited Food – Will the Public Stomach It?.” The Guardian, Accessed July 30, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/may/27/gene-edited-food-britain-gm-public-mood.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B., J. Nelson, and P. Winters. 2012. “Perspective on Opportunities in Industrial Biotechnology in Renewable Chemicals.” Biotechnology Journal 7 (2): 176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. EU Missions in Horizon Europe. Brussels: UCL. https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe_en.
   Google Scholar
• Flyverbom, M., and C. Garsten. 2021. “Anticipation and Organization: Seeing, knowing and governing futures.” Organization Theory, https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211020325.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, N. K., G. Heath, E. Cameron, S. Rashid, and S. Redwood. 2013. “Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 13 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., E. M. Forsberg, C. Shelley-Egan, R. Arias, S. Daimer, G. Dalton, and N. Steinhaus. 2020. “Joint declaration on mainstreaming RRI across Horizon Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 708–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1764837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2014. “Understanding Anticipatory Governance.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, C. R., V. Nakić, A. Bergek, and H. Hellsmark. 2022. “Transformative innovation policy.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 43: 14–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBLF. 2018. “A National Industrial Biotechnology Strategy to 2030.” Accessed August 31, 2023. https://www.bioindustry.org/uploads/assets/uploaded/d390c237-04b3-4f2d-be5e776124b3640e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kastenhofer, K., and S. Molyneux-Hodgson. 2021. “Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences.” In Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook V. 31. London.: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., H. Van Lente, C. Groves, and C. Selin. 2016. “Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 4th edn., 465–493. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., and S. Carr. 2009. GM food on trial: Testing European democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., V. Blok, M. Garnier, P. Macnaghten, and A. Pols. 2022. “What’s wrong with global challenges?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.2000130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., E. Shah, and D. Ludwig. 2021. “Making dialogue work: Responsible innovation and gene editing.” In The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation, edited by D. Ludwig, B. Boogaard, P. Macnaghten, and C. Leeuwis, 243–255. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, C. 2015. “The construction of imaginaries of the public as a threat to synthetic biology.” Science as Culture 24 (1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.986320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. “Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mission Innovation. 2021. “What is Mission Innovation 2.0.” Accessed October 20, 2022. http://mission-innovation.net/about-mi/overview.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux-Hodgson, S., and M. Meyer. 2009. “Tales of emergence—synthetic biology as a scientific community in the making.” BioSocieties 4 (2-3): 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855209990019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. Von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021. “An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, C., J. Schot, and J. Molas-Gallart. 2021. “Transformative” Mission-Oriented Policies: A Case Study of Vinnova and New Design and Implementation Framework. Accessed July 30, 2023. https://www.euspri2021.no/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Session-18.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., B. Laurent, K. Papageorgiou, and J. Stilgoe. 2022. “The politics of scaling.” Social Studies of Science 52 (1): 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, J. C. 2018. “Realising the Circular Bioeconomy.” OECD Policy paper No. 60: 1–75.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, J., R. Ritchie, and J. Allan. 2013. “Biobased chemicals: the convergence of green chemistry with industrial biotechnology.” Trends in Biotechnology 31 (4): 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porritt, J. 2013. “Sustainable Returns: Industrial Biotechnology Done Well.” Accessed August 31, 2023. http://www.jonathonporritt.com/sites/default/files/users/FINALreport%20IB%20DONE%20WELL%20%28Jan%202013%29%20PDF_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., E. Tancoigne, and P. B. Joly. 2022. “Two tribes or more? The historical emergence of discourse coalitions of responsible research and innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 248–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., L. Bengtsson, P. Benneworth, S. Bührer, E. Castro-Martínez, M. Hansen, and P. Shapira. 2018. “Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., and P. Shapira. 2019. “Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: Insights from biosynthetic menthol.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139: 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. K., A. Simone, and M. Mazzonetto. 2021. “RRI legacies: co-creation for responsible, equitable and fair innovation in Horizon Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1842633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roessler, P. 2013. “Comparative content analysis.” In The handbook of comparative communication research, edited by F. Esser, and T. Hanitzsch, 459–468. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a framework for responsible innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A., and S. Arora. 2022. “Chapter 10: Diversity and Plurality – Strategies to address complexities in aligning STI and the SDGs.” In Changing Directions: Steering Science, Technology and Innovation Towards the Sustainable Development Goals, edited by T. Ciarli. STRINGS, SPRU, University of Sussex. https://strings.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/STRINGS_Changing_Directions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckerman, L., J. Nelles, K. Walsh, and T. Vorley. 2023. “Sustainable Innovation Policy: Examining the Discourse of UK Innovation Policy.” Environmental Science & Policy 145: 286–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2017. “Industrial Strategy: The Grand Challenges.” Accessed August 31, 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/industrial-strategy-the-grand-challenges.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2021. “UK Innovation Strategy – Leading the Future by Creating It.” Accessed August 31, 2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009577/uk-innovation-strategy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2023. “Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023: Government Bill.” Accessed 30 July, 2023. https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3167.
   Google Scholar
• UKRI. 2022. “UKRI Strategy 2022-2027: Transforming Tomorrow Together.” Accessed August 31, 2023. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UKRI-210422-Strategy2022To2027TransformingTomorrowTogether.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ulnicane, I., T. Mahfoud, and A. Salles. 2022. “Experimentation, learning, and dialogue: an RRI-inspired approach to dual-use of concern.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2094071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegtlin, C., A. G. Scherer, G. K. Stahl, and O. Hawn. 2022. “Grand societal challenges and responsible innovation.” Journal of Management Studies 59 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schomberg, R. 2019. “Why Responsible Innovation.” In The International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A Global Resource, edited by R. Van Schomberg, and J. Hankins, 12–32. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar