Anticipation and its degrees of critical-reflective radicality: opening up the affordances of engaging with futures to problematize STI

References

• Alvial-Palavicino, Carla. 2015. “The Future as Practice. A Framework to Understand Anticipation in Science and Technology.” TECNOSCIENZA. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 6 (2): 135–172.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Jenny. 2018. The Future of the World: Futurology, Futurists, and the Struggle for the Post Cold War Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaldi, Simone. 2018. “Retooling Techno-Moral Scenarios. A Revisited Technique for Exploring Alternative Regimes of Responsibility for Human Enhancement.” NanoEthics 12 (3): 283–300. doi:10.1007/s11569-018-0329-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballo, Ingrid Foss. 2015. “Imagining Energy Futures: Sociotechnical Imaginaries of the Future Smart Grid in Norway.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Third Edition, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 979–1000. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtold, Ulrike, Daniela Fuchs, and Niklas Gudowsky. 2017. “Imagining Socio-Technical Futures – Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1364617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, Jens, and Richard Bronk. 2018. Uncertain Futures: Imaginaries, Narratives, and Calculation in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Wendell. 2003. Foundations of Futures Studies: Volume 1: History, Purposes, and Knowledge. Vol. 1. London: Tylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Betten, Afke Wieke, Virgil Rerimassie, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Dirk Stemerding, and Frank Kupper. 2018. “Constructing Future Scenarios as a Tool to Foster Responsible Research and Innovation among Future Synthetic Biologists.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14 (1): 21. doi:10.1186/s40504-018-0082-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boenink, Marianne, and Olya Kudina. 2020. “Values in Responsible Research and Innovation: From Entities to Practices.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 450–470. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, Mads, Nik Brown, Kornelia Elke Konrad, and Harro Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brey, Philip A. E. 2012. “Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies.” NanoEthics 6 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brey, Philip A. E., Brandt Dainow, Yasemin J. Erden, Amal Matar, Philip Jansen, Rowena Rodrigues, Nicole Santiago, et al. 2021. “SIENNA D6.3: Methods for translating ethical analysis into instruments for the ethical development and deployment of emerging technologies”.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Harvey. 1976. “Technology Assessment in Retrospect.” Newsletter on Science, Technology & Human Values 17: 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, Rebecca, and Daniel M. Knight. 2019. The Anthropology of the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burget, Mirjam, Emanuele Bardone, and Margus Pedaste. 2017. “Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, Joseph F., John B. Mahaffie, and Andy Hines. 1994. “Technological Forecasting: 1970–1993.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(94)90037-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingridge, David. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. London: Francis Pinter Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Commission, European. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation: Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Officeof the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon N. 2020. “Who Gets to be Born? The Anticipatory Governance of pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis Technology in the United Kingdom from 1978–2001.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 507–527. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1802544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dator, Jim. 2019. “What Futures Studies Is, and Is Not.” In Jim Dator: A Noticer in Time, edited by Jim Dator, 3–5. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Charlotte Aull. 1999. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Jenny L. 2020. How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things. Cambridge, MA, London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Jouvenel, Bertrand. 1967. The art of Conjecture. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, James. 2017. “The Siren Call of Probability: Dangers Associated with Using Probability for Consideration of the Future.” Futures 88: 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha. 2023. “Prototyping Futures – Towards a Hermeneutics of Artefacts and Technologies.” In Hermeneutics, History, and Technology: The Call of the Future, edited by Armin Grunwald, Alfred Nordmann, and Martin Sand, 157–171. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dobroć, Paulina, and Andreas Lösch. 2023. “Transformation Through (re-)Politicisation of Socio-Technical Futures: How Cultural Semiotics Can Improve Transformative Vision Assessment.” European Journal of Futures Research 11 (1): 3. doi:10.1186/s40309-023-00214-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doezema, Tess, David Ludwig, Phil Macnaghten, Clare Shelley-Egan, and Ellen-Marie Forsberg. 2019. “Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility Across Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 323–331. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. “Horizon 2020 — Responsible research & innovation.” Accessed 02/04/2022. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, Samer, and Bijan Azad. 2012. “The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective.” In Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World, edited by Paul M. Leonardi, Bonnie A. Nardi, and Jannis Kallinikos, 237–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2019. “Governing with Ambivalence: The Tentative Origins of Socio-Technical Integration.” Research Policy 48 (5): 1138–1149. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, Rider W., David H. Guston, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2018. “Towards the Anticipatory Governance of Geoengineering.” In Geoengineering our Climate? Ethics, Politics, and Governance, edited by Jason J. Blackstock, and Sean Low, 223–243. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gidley, Jennifer M. 2017. The Future: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, John, and Armin Grunwald. 2000. Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Christopher. 2023. “On Profane Futures and Profane Futures Literacy.” In Hermeneutics, History, and Technology: The Call of the Future, edited by Armin Grunwald, Alfred Nordmann, and Martin Sand, 122–130. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2002. Technikfolgenabschatzung — Eine Einführung. Berlin: Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2004. “Vision Assessment as a new Element of the Technology Futures Analysis Toolbox. Paper Presented at the New Horizons and Challenges for Future-Oriented Technology Analysis.” Proceedings of the EU-US Scientific Seminar. New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods, JRC-IPTS, Seville (Spain), May 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2010. “From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology.” NanoEthics 4 (2): 91–101. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0088-5.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2014. “The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 274–291. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.968437.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2016. The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation. London and Hoboken, NJ: ISTE and Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2019a. “The Inherently Democratic Nature of Technology Assessment.” Science and Public Policy 46 (5): 702–709. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2019b. Technology Assessment in Practice and Theory. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2020. “The Objects of Technology Assessment. Hermeneutic Extension of Consequentialist Reasoning.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 96–112. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1647086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2013. ““Daddy, Can I Have a Puddle Gator?”: Creativity, Anticipation, and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John R. Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 109–118. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1-2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, Lucian. 2018. “Future-Thinking. A Historical Perspective.” In In The Psychology of Thinking About the Future, edited by Gabriele Oettingen, Timur A. Sevincer, and Peter M. Gollwitzer, 15–30. New York and London: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, Sohail. 1990. “Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Future: Predictive, Cultural and Critical Epistemologies.” Futures 22 (2): 115–141. doi:10.1016/0016-3287(90)90077-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, Sohail. 1998. “Causal Layered Analysis: Poststructuralism as Method.” Futures 30 (8): 815–829. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(98)00086-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, John, and Ben R. Martin. 1989. Research Foresight: Priority-Setting in Science. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, Erich. 1967. “Technological Forecasting in Perspective — A Framework for Technolgy Forecasting, its Techniques and Organisation.” Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3): 223–244. doi:10.1023/A:1025557512320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2016. The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2018. “Just Transitions: A Humble Approach to Global Energy Futures.” Energy Research & Social Science 35: 11–14. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2020. “Imagined Worlds: The Politics of Future-Making in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Politics and Science of Prevision: Governing and Probing the Future, edited by Andreas Wenger, Ursula Jasper, and Myriam Dunn Cavelty, 27–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karinen, Risto, and David H. Guston. 2009. “Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology.” In Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime, edited by Mario Kaiser, Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen, and Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, 217–232. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, Kornelia, and Carla Alvial Palavicino. 2017. “Evolving Patterns of Governance of, and by, Expectations: The Graphene Hype Wave.” In Embedding New Technologies Into Society: A Regulatory, Ethical and Societal Perspective, edited by Diana M. Bowman, Elen Stokes, and Arie Rip, 187–217. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, Kornelia, Harro van Lente, Christopher Groves, and Cynthia Selin. 2016. “Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Fourth Edition, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouche, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 465–493. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1992. “Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Technology / Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, and John Law, 225–258. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, Pascale, Fiona Alice Miller, and Bryn Williams-Jones. 2020. “Anticipatory Governance and Moral Imagination: Methodological Insights from a Scenario-Based Public Deliberation Study.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151: 119800. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lösch, Andreas, Knud Böhle, Christopher Coenen, Paulina Dobroc, Reinhard Heil, Armin Grunwald, Dirk Scheer, et al. 2019a. “Technology Assessment of Socio-Technical Futures—A Discussion Paper.” In Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges, edited by Andreas Lösch, Armin Grunwald, Martin Meister, and Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer, 285–305. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, Andreas, Armin Grunwald, Martin Meister, and Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. 2019b. Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil. 2021. “Towards an Anticipatory Public Engagement Methodology: Deliberative Experiments in the Assembly of Possible Worlds Using Focus Groups.” Qualitative Research 21 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1177/1468794120919096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangnus, Astrid C., Jeroen Oomen, Joost M. Vervoort, and Maarten A. Hajer. 2021. “Futures Literacy and the Diversity of the Future.” Futures 132: 102793. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Ben R., and Ron Johnston. 1999. “Technology Foresight for Wiring Up the National Innovation System: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 60 (1): 37–54. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00022-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masini, Eleonora. 2006. “Rethinking Futures Studies.” Futures 38 (10): 1158–1168. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, Ian. 1975. The Poverty of Prediction. Farnborough: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Riel, Roberto Poli, and Pierre Rossel. 2018. “The Discipline of Anticipation: Foundations for Futures Literacy.” In Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century, edited by Riel Miller, 51–65. Paris and New York: UNESCO and Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Riel, and Richard Sandford. 2019. “Futures Literacy: The Capacity to Diversify Conscious Human Anticipation.” In Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making, edited by Roberto Poli, 73–91. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mische, Ann. 2009. “Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action.” Sociological Forum 24 (3): 694–704. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mische, Ann. 2014. “Measuring Futures in Action: Projective Grammars in the Rio + 20 Debates.” Theory and Society 43 (3-4): 437–464. doi:10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Money, Eric S., Kenneth H. Reckhow, and Mark R. Wiesner. 2012. “The use of Bayesian Networks for Nanoparticle Risk Forecasting: Model Formulation and Baseline Evaluation.” Science of The Total Environment 426: 436–445. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muiderman, Karlijn, Aarti Gupta, Joost Vervoort, and Frank Biermann. 2020. “Four Approaches to Anticipatory Climate Governance: Different Conceptions of the Future and Implications for the Present.” WIRES Climate Change 11 (6): 1–20. doi:10.1002/wcc.673.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, John P., Cynthia Selin, Lauren Lambert, and David H. Guston. 2022. “Amplifying the Call for Anticipatory Governance.” The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (1): 48–50. doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.2001109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2007. “If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics.” NanoEthics 1 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0007-6.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882064.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred, and Arie Rip. 2009. “Mind the gap Revisited.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (5): 273–274. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoplansky, Ariel. 2016. “Future Perception in Plants.” In Anticipation Across Disciplines, edited by Mihai Nadin, 57–70. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oettingen, Gabriele, Timur A. Sevincer, and Peter M. Gollwitzer. 2018. The Psychology of Thinking About the Future. New York and London: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, and Weert Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Jack Stilgoe, Phil Macnaghten, Mike Gorman, Erik Fisher, and David H. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by Richard Owen, John R. Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, and Richard Owen. 2020. “Multiplicidad Interpretativa en las Prácticas de Investigación e Innovación Responsables en 12 Países: Análisis y Resultados.” Caleidoscopio – Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 24 (43), doi:10.33064/42crscsh1980.
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie. 2016. “Process, Outcomes, Virtues: The Normative Strategies of Responsible Research and Innovation and the Challenge of Moral Pluralism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 233–254. doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1258945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli, Roberto. 2015. “The Implicit Future Orientation of the Capability Approach.” Futures 71: 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli, Roberto. 2017. Introduction to Anticipation Studies. Vol. 1, Anticipation Science. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, Roberto. 2019a. Handbook of Anticipation. Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of the Future in Decision Making. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, Roberto. 2019b. Working with the Future: Ideas and Tools to Govern Uncertainty. Milano: Bocconi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, Roberto. 2021. “The Challenges of Futures Literacy.” Futures 132: 102800. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Rafael. 2008. “Foresight Methodology.” In The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice, edited by Luke Georghiou, Jennifer Cassingena Harper, Michael Keenan, Ian Miles, and Rafael Popper, 44–88. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ported, Alan L. 1995. “Technology Assessment.” Impact Assessment 13 (2): 135–151. doi:10.1080/07349165.1995.9726087.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, Rafael, and Cynthia Selin. 2014. “Plausibility and Probability in Scenario Planning.” Foresight 16 (1): 54–74. doi:10.1108/FS-08-2012-0061.
   Google Scholar
• Reijers, Wessel, David Wright, Philip Brey, Karsten Weber, Rowena Rodrigues, Declan O’Sullivan, and Bert Gordijn. 2018. “Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5): 1437–1481. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 2006. “A Co-Evolutionary Approach to Reflexive Governance – and its Ironies.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voß, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp, 82–100. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Haico te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures, edited by Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and Jameson M. Wetmore, 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, Thomas J. Misa, and Johan Schot. 1995. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas K. R. 2010. Constructive Technology Assessment of Emerging Nanotechnologies: Experiments in Interactions. Enschede: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, Hannot, Andoni Eizagirre, and Andoni Ibarra. 2019. “Dynamics of Responsible Innovation Constitution in European Union Research Policy: Tensions, Possibilities and Constraints.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by Schomberg René von, and Jonathan Hankins, 167–180. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofsen, A., J. E. W. Broerse, Tj de Cock Buning, and J. F. G. Bunders. 2008. “Exploring the future of ecological genomics: Integrating CTA with vision assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 (3): 334–355. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, René, and Hans Georg Gemunden. 2009. “Making Your R&D Future Proof: The Roles of Corporate Foresight in Innovation Management.” Paper Presented at the PICMET'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Roßmann, Maximilian. 2021. “Vision as Make-Believe: How Narratives and Models Represent Sociotechnical Futures.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (1): 70–93. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1853395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggiu, Daniele. 2019. “Models of Anticipation Within the Responsible Research and Innovation Framework: The Two RRI Approaches and the Challenge of Human Rights.” NanoEthics 13 (1): 53–78. doi:10.1007/s11569-019-00337-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samet, Robert H. 2010. “Futurists and Their Schools: A Response to Ziauddin Sardar's ‘the Namesake’.” Futures 42 (8): 895–900. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardar, Ziauddin. 2010. “The Namesake: Futures; Futures Studies; Futurology; Futuristic; Foresight—What’s in a Name?” Futures 42 (3): 177–184. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, Daniel. 2011. “Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies.” In The Growing Gap Between Emerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight: The Pacing Problem, edited by Gary E. Marchant, Braden R. Allenby, and Joseph R. Herkert, 95–105. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, Daniel R., Roger A. Pielke, and Radford Byerly. 2000. Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Christoph, and Andreas Lösch. 2019. “Visions in Assemblages: Future-Making and Governance in FabLabs.” Futures 109: 203–212. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Christoph, Maximilian Roßmann, Andreas Lösch, and Armin Grunwald. 2023. “Transformative Vision Assessment and 3-D Printing Futures: A New Approach of Technology Assessment to Address Grand Societal Challenges.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, doi:10.1109/TEM.2021.3129834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Christoph, Niko Wilke, and Andreas Lösch. 2022. “Contested Visions for Transformation—The Visions of the Green New Deal and the Politics of Technology Assessment, Responsible Research and Innovation, and Sustainability Research.” Sustainability 14 (3): 1505. doi:10.3390/su14031505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijff, Mirjam, and Anne M. Dijkstra. 2020. “Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2): 533–574. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, Martin E. P., Peter Railton, Roy F. Baumeister, and Chandra Sripada. 2016. Homo Prospectus. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2006. “Time Matters: Temporal Harmony and Dissonance in Nanotechnology Networks.” Time & Society 15 (1): 121–139. doi:10.1177/0961463X06061786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2007. “Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 (2): 196–220. doi:10.1177/0162243906296918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2011. “Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 723–737. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2014. “On not Forgetting Futures.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 103–108. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.884378.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia, Kelly Campbell Rawlings, Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone, Jathan Sadowski, Carlo Altamirano Allende, Gretchen Gano, Sarah R. Davies, and David H. Guston. 2017. “Experiments in Engagement: Designing Public Engagement with Science and Technology for Capacity Building.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (6): 634–649. doi:10.1177/0963662515620970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia, and Ângela Guimaraes Pereira. 2013. “Pursuing Plausibility.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 9 (2/3/4): 93–109. doi:10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058616.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Richard A. 1998. “Futures Studies as an Intellectual and Applied Discipline.” American Behavioral Scientist 42 (3): 372–385. doi:10.1177/0002764298042003008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike. 2020. “Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: From Critique in and of the Neurosciences to Socio-Technical Integration Research as a Practice of Critique in R(R)I.” NanoEthics 14 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11569-019-00362-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2008. ““Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swierstra, Tsjalling, Dirk Stemerding, and Marianne Boenink. 2009. “Exploring Techno-Moral Change: The Case of the ObesityPill.” In Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments, edited by Paul Sollie, and Marcus Düwell, 119–138. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tabarés, Raúl, Anne Loeber, Mika Nieminen, Michael J. Bernstein, Erich Griessler, Vincent Blok, Joshua Cohen, Helmut Hönigmayer, Ulrike Wunderle, and Elisabeth Frankus. 2022. “Challenges in the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation Across Horizon 2020.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 291–314. doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2101211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urueña, Sergio. 2021. “Responsibility Through Anticipation? The ‘Future Talk’ and the Quest for Plausibility in the Governance of Emerging Technologies.” NanoEthics 15 (3): 271–302. doi:10.1007/s11569-021-00408-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urueña, Sergio. 2022. “Anticipation and Modal Power: Opening up and Closing Down the Momentum of Sociotechnical Systems.” Social Studies of Science 52 (5): 783–805. doi:10.1177/03063127221111469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urueña, Sergio. 2023. “Enacting Anticipatory Heuristics: A Tentative Methodological Proposal for Steering Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1): 2160552. doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2160552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urueña, Sergio, Hannot Rodríguez, and Andoni Ibarra. 2021. “Foresight and Responsible Innovation: Openness and Closure in Anticipatory Heuristics.” Futures 134: 102852. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US National Resources Committee. 1937. Technological Trends and National Policy, Including the Social Implications of New Inventions. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo. 2016. “An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3): 667–686. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo, Lotte Asveld, Steven Flipse, Pim Klaassen, Victor Scholten, and Emad Yaghmaei. 2017. “Company Strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A Conceptual Model.” Sustainability 9 (11): 2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bos, Ruud. 2019. “Animal Anticipation: A Perspective.” In Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making, edited by Roberto Poli, 235–247. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Burg, Simone. 2009. “Imagining the Future of Photoacoustic Mammography.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1): 97–110. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9079-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, Harro, and Arie Rip. 1998. “The Rise of Membrane Technology: From Rhetorics to Social Reality.” Social Studies of Science 28 (2): 221–254. doi:10.1177/030631298028002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, Harro, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Pierre-Benoît Joly. 2017. “Responsible Innovation as a Critique of Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 254–261. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1326261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudheusden, Michiel, and Clare Shelley-Egan. 2021. “RRI Futures: Learning from a Diversity of Voices and Visions.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 139–147. doi:10.1080/23299460.2021.1989656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasen, Federico. 2017. “Responsible Innovation in Developing Countries: An Enlarged Agenda.” In Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda?, edited by Lotte Asveld, Rietje van Dam-Mieras, Tsjalling Swierstra, Saskia Lavrijssen, Kees Linse, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 93–109. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by Marc Dusseldorp, and Richard Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John R. Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2014. “The Quest for the ‘Right’ Impacts of Science and Technology: A Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, Neelke Doorn, Tsjalling Swierstra, Bert-Jaap Koops, and Henny Romijn, 33–50. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wei-Kang Liu, Arthur. 2023. “On the Road to Hermeneutic Technology Assessment – A Historic-Systematic Reconstruction.” In Hermeneutics, History, and Technology: The Call of the Future, edited by Armin Grunwald, Alfred Nordmann, and Martin Sand, 3–36. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesner, Mark R., and Jean-Yves Bottero. 2011. “A Risk Forecasting Process for Nanostructured Materials, and Nanomanufacturing.” Comptes Rendus Physique 12 (7): 659–668. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2011.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, Alan F. T., and Verena V. Hafner. 2019. “Anticipation in Robotics.” In Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making, edited by Roberto Poli, 1587–1615. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Withycombe Keeler, Lauren, Michael J. Bernstein, and Cynthia Selin. 2019. “Intervening Through Futures for Sustainable Presents: Scenarios, Sustainability, and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present. Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges, edited by Andreas Lösch, Armin Grunwald, Martin Meister, and Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer, 255–282. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wyborn, Carina, Federico Davila, Laura Pereira, Michelle Lim, Isis Alvarez, Gretchen Henderson, Amy Luers, et al. 2020. “Imagining Transformative Biodiversity Futures.” Nature Sustainability 3 (9): 670–672. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0587-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, Richard, and Brett Clark. 2007. “The Problem with Prediction: Contingency, Emergence, and the Reification of Projections.” The Sociological Quarterly 48 (4): 713–743. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00098.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar