Responsible innovation goes south: critique, othering, and a commitment to care

References

• Abrol, D. 1983. “American Involvement in Indian Agricultural Research.” Social Scientist, 8–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3517040
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 2019. “The Gender and Environment Debate: Lessons from India.” In Population and Environment, edited by L. Arizpe, M. P. Stone, and D.C. Major, 87–124. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andreucci, D., and C. Zografos. 2022. “Between Improvement and Sacrifice: Othering and the (Bio) Political Ecology of Climate Change.” Political Geography 92: 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, S., and H. Romijn. 2012. “The Empty Rhetoric of Poverty Reduction at the Base of the Pyramid.” Organization 19 (4): 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basalla, G. 1967. “The Spread of Western Science: A Three-Stage Model Describes the Introduction of Modern Science Into any Non-European Nation.” Science 156 (3775): 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.156.3775.611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude Vincent, B. 2014. “The Politics of Buzzwords at the Interface of Technoscience, Market and Society: The Case of ‘Public Engagement in Science’.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (3): 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513515371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A., and P. Glasner. 2009. Local Cells, Global Science: The Rise of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in India. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. 2010. “How is Technology Made?—That is the Question!.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 63-76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. M., A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. S. Guivant, K. Konrad, H. van Lente, and S. Woll. 2016. Responsibility and Emerging Technologies: Experiences, Education and Beyond. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, S. N., and E. York. 2020. “Public Engagement in Contested Political Contexts: Reflections on the Role of Recursive Reflexivity in Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1848335
   Google Scholar
• De Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, C., and L. M. Seebacher. 2019. “What About the Global South? Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach.” Ecological Economics 157: 246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denshire, S. 2014. “On Auto-Ethnography.” Current Sociology 62 (6): 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giulio, G., C. Groves, M. Monteiro, and R. Taddei. 2016. “Communicating Through Vulnerability: Knowledge Politics, Inclusion and Responsiveness in Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1166036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doezema, T., D. Ludwig, P. Macnaghten, C. Shelley-Egan, and E. M. Forsberg. 2019. “Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility Across Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2011. “Sustainability: Design for the Pluriverse.” Development 54 (2): 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.28
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, J. S., K. Hisatake, and A. Nguyen. 2020. “Decolonial Feminism as Reflexive Praxis: Lugones's” World"-Travelling as Stories of Friendship in Academia.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 41 (1): 12–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, J. L., and R. Hayes. 2004. “Catching up or Standing Still?: National Innovative Productivity among ‘Follower’countries, 1978–1999.” Research Policy 33 (9): 1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadgil, M., and R. Guha. 1994. “Ecological Conflicts and the Environmental Movement in India.” Development and Change 25 (1): 101–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 2011. “An Evolving Science-Society Contract in India: The Search for Legitimacy in Anticipatory Risk Governance.” Food Policy 36 (6): 736-741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2012. “The Pumpkin or the Tiger? Michael Polanyi, Frederick Soddy, and Anticipating Emerging Technologies.” Minerva 50 (3): 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9204-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., Fisher, E., Grunwald, A., Owen, R., Swierstra, T., and S. Van der Burg. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: Motivations for a New Journal.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2020. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Feminist Theory Reader, edited by C. McCann, S.K. Kim, and E. Ergun, 303–310. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2016. “Latin American Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge: Alliances and Tensions.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (6): 1063–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, R. J. 2015. “State Science, Risk and Agricultural Biotechnology: Bt Cotton to Bt Brinjal in India.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (1): 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.951835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda, G. 2018. Images of Savages: Ancient Roots of Modern Prejudice in Western Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. 2013. A Vision for India: Why Not Go to Mars? The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/world/asia/a-vision-for-india-why-not-go-to-mars.html.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. 2017. “Has Critique Run Out of Steam?—On Discourse Research as Critical Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 23 (1): 58-68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D. 2006. Science and the Raj: A Study of British India. 2nd ed. Delhi: Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., P. B. Mukharji, and A. Prasad. 2018. “Decolonizing Science in Asia.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 4 (1): 24–43. https://doi.org/10.5749/vergstudglobasia.4.1.0024
   Google Scholar
• Ladikas, M., J. Hahn, L. Hennen, P. Kulakov, and C. Scherz. 2019. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Germany–Between Sustainability and Autonomy.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225-248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh Star, S. 2010. “This is not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, BÅ, and C. Rikap. 2022. “China's Catching-Up in Artificial Intelligence Seen as a Co-Evolution of Corporate and National Innovation Systems.” Research Policy 51 (1): 104395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., M. B. Kearnes, and B. Wynne. 2005. “Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” Science Communication 27 (2): 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamidipudi, A. 2016. Towards a theory of innovation in handloom weaving in India. PhD thesis. NL: Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Myers, N., and A. Viseu. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience.” Social studies of science 45 (5): 625-641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamidipudi, A., and N. Frahm. 2020. “Turning Straw to Gold: Mobilising Symmetry in Responsible Research and Innovation.” Science, Technology and Society 25 (2): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820902964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamidipudi, A., Syamasundari, B, and W. Bijker. 2012. “Mobilising Discourses: Handloom as Sustainable Socio-Technology.” Economic and Political Weekly 47 (25): 41-51.
   Google Scholar
• Menzli, L. J., L. K. Smirani, J. A. Boulahia, and M. Hadjouni. 2022. “Investigation of Open Educational Resources Adoption in Higher Education Using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory.” Heliyon 8 (7): e09885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. 2015. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” In Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, edited by P. Williams and L. Chrisman, 196–220. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, U. 1995. “Colonialism and its Others: Considerations on Rights and Care Discourses.” Hypatia 10 (2): 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01375.x
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., M. Pansera, P. Macnaghten, and S. Randles. 2021a. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021b. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, P., and M. Pansera. 2020. “Bringing Laxmi and Saraswati Together: Nano-Scientists and Academic Entrepreneurship in India.” Technology in Society 63: 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, P., and A. Sharma. 2017. “NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 37 (4): 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467619861561
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P., and A. Sharma. 2021. “Knowledge Politics, Vulnerability and Recognition-Based Justice: Public Participation in Renewable Energy Transitions in India.” Energy Research & Social Science 71: 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M. 2018. “Frugal or Fair?” The Unfulfilled Promises of Frugal Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review 8 (4): 6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popov, V., and K. S. Jomo. 2018. “Are Developing Countries Catching up?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and R. A. Mashelkar. 2010. “Innovation’s Holy Grail.” Harvard Business Review 88 (7/8): 132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, G. 1999. Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, C. S. 2011. “Public Involvement in Science and Technology: The Case for A New Social Contract.” International Journal of Social and Economic Research 1 (2): 295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, A. 2014. Imperial Technoscience: Transnational Histories of MRI in the United States, Britain, and India. Massachusetts: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de La Bellacasa, M. P. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de La Bellacasa, M. P. 2012. “‘Nothing Comes Without its World’: Thinking with Care.” The Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raina, D., and S. I. Habib. 1996. “The Moral Legitimation of Modern Science: Bhadralok Reflections on Theories of Evolution.” Social Studies of Science 26 (1): 9–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, K. S. 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, K. S. 2017. Pharmocracy: Value, Politics, and Knowledge in Global Biomedicine. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, C. K. 2010. Moratorium on Bt Brinjal. Bangalore: FBAE.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, R.S. 2009. Amulya Reddy: Citizen Scientist. Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudra, S., A. Kalra, A. Kumar, and W. Joe. 2017. “Utilization of Alternative Systems of Medicine as Health Care Services in India: Evidence on AYUSH Care from NSS 2014.” PLoS One 12 (5): e0176916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 2003. Orientalism, new edition. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sarukkai, S. 1997. “The ‘Other’ in Anthropology and Philosophy.” Economic and Political Weekly 32 (24): 1406–1409.
   Google Scholar
• Sarukkai, S. 2009. “Science and the Ethics of Curiosity.” Current Science 97 (6): 756–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 2006. Science, Agriculture and the Politics of Policy: The Case of Biotechnology in India. Orient blackswan.
   Google Scholar
• Shantharam, S. 2010. “Setback to Bt Brinjal Will Have Long-Term Effect on Indian Science and Technology.” Current Science 98 (8): 996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley, M. 1818 (2001). Frankenstein [1818]. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2005. Earth Democracy: Justice, Sustainability and Peace. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simis, M. J., H. Madden, M. A. Cacciatore, and S. K. Yeo. 2016. “The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?” Public Understanding of Science 25 (4): 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 2019. Decolonizing Research: Indigenous Storywork as Methodology. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, K. R., and P. Pandey. 2019. “Indian Perspectives on Responsible Innovation and Frugal Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource, edited by R. von Schomberg and J. Henkins, 455–473. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, K. R., Kumar, A., and N. Pandey. 2018. Report from National Case Study: India. Research and information system for developing countries (RIS), & RRI-Practice, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Stenbacka, S. 2011. “Othering the Rural: About the Construction of Rural Masculinities and the Unspoken Urban Hegemonic Ideal in Swedish Media.” Journal of Rural Studies 27 (3): 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. ““Opening Up” and “Closing Down” Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, B. 2000. “Archaic Modernities: Science, Secularism, and Religion in Modern India.” Social Text 18 (3): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-3_64-67
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, B. 2019. Holy Science: The Biopolitics of Hindu Nationalism. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suldovsky, B. 2016. “In Science Communication, Why Does the Idea of the Public Deficit Always Return? Exploring key Influences.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (4): 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur, A. 2011. Dispersed Radiance: Caste, Gender, and Modern Science in India. New Delhi: Navayana.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, G. 2020. “Consensus or Contestation: Reflections on Governance of Innovation in a Context of Heterogeneous Knowledges.” Science, Technology and Society 25 (2): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820903005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67-86.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M. 2019. Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation?–Five Years Later. In Exploring the Role of Values in RRI for Energy Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Vasen, F. 2017. “Responsible Innovation in Developing Countries: An Enlarged Agenda. In L Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, and J. van den Hoven. (eds) Responsible Innovation 3 (pp. (93-109)). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64834-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Viseu, A. 2015. “Caring for Nanotechnology? Being an Integrated Social Scientist.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715598666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, S. 1985. Organizing for Science (pp. 28–38). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, S. 2002. “The Future of Science Studies.” Futures 34 (1): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00037-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, S., and C. Parmar. 2002. “A Biotechnology Story: Notes from India.” Economic and Political Weekly 37 (27): 2714–2724.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3
   Google Scholar